• Deutsch
Login

Open Access

  • Home
  • Search
  • Browse
  • Publish
  • FAQ

Refine

Author

  • Christoffersen, Peter F. (3)
  • Diebold, Francis X. (3)
  • Andersen, Torben G. (2)
  • Bollerslev, Tim (2)

Year of publication

  • 2005 (2)
  • 2004 (1)

Document Type

  • Working Paper (3)

Language

  • English (3)

Has Fulltext

  • yes (3)

Is part of the Bibliography

  • no (3)

Keywords

  • Volatilität (2)
  • ARCH-Modell (1)
  • Europäische Union (1)
  • Kapitalertrag (1)
  • Konjunkturzyklus (1)
  • Portfolio-Management (1)
  • Prognose (1)
  • Prognoseverfahren (1)
  • Risikomanagement (1)
  • Schätzung (1)
+ more

Institute

  • Center for Financial Studies (CFS) (3)

3 search hits

  • 1 to 3
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100

Sort by

  • Year
  • Year
  • Title
  • Title
  • Author
  • Author
Volatility forecasting (2005)
Andersen, Torben G. ; Bollerslev, Tim ; Christoffersen, Peter F. ; Diebold, Francis X.
Volatility has been one of the most active and successful areas of research in time series econometrics and economic forecasting in recent decades. This chapter provides a selective survey of the most important theoretical developments and empirical insights to emerge from this burgeoning literature, with a distinct focus on forecasting applications. Volatility is inherently latent, and Section 1 begins with a brief intuitive account of various key volatility concepts. Section 2 then discusses a series of different economic situations in which volatility plays a crucial role, ranging from the use of volatility forecasts in portfolio allocation to density forecasting in risk management. Sections 3, 4 and 5 present a variety of alternative procedures for univariate volatility modeling and forecasting based on the GARCH, stochastic volatility and realized volatility paradigms, respectively. Section 6 extends the discussion to the multivariate problem of forecasting conditional covariances and correlations, and Section 7 discusses volatility forecast evaluation methods in both univariate and multivariate cases. Section 8 concludes briefly. JEL Klassifikation: C10, C53, G1.
Financial asset returns, direction-of-change forecasting, and volatility dynamics (2004)
Christoffersen, Peter F. ; Diebold, Francis X.
We consider three sets of phenomena that feature prominently - and separately - in the financial economics literature: conditional mean dependence (or lack thereof) in asset returns, dependence (and hence forecastability) in asset return signs, and dependence (and hence forecastability) in asset return volatilities. We show that they are very much interrelated, and we explore the relationships in detail. Among other things, we show that: (a) Volatility dependence produces sign dependence, so long as expected returns are nonzero, so that one should expect sign dependence, given the overwhelming evidence of volatility dependence; (b) The standard finding of little or no conditional mean dependence is entirely consistent with a significant degree of sign dependence and volatility dependence; (c) Sign dependence is not likely to be found via analysis of sign autocorrelations, runs tests, or traditional market timing tests, because of the special nonlinear nature of sign dependence; (d) Sign dependence is not likely to be found in very high-frequency (e.g., daily) or very low-frequency (e.g., annual) returns; instead, it is more likely to be found at intermediate return horizons; (e) Sign dependence is very much present in actual U.S. equity returns, and its properties match closely our theoretical predictions; (f) The link between volatility forecastability and sign forecastability remains intact in conditionally non-Gaussian environments, as for example with time-varying conditional skewness and/or kurtosis.
Practical volatility and correlation modeling for financial market risk management (2005)
Andersen, Torben G. ; Bollerslev, Tim ; Christoffersen, Peter F. ; Diebold, Francis X.
What do academics have to offer market risk management practitioners in financial institutions? Current industry practice largely follows one of two extremely restrictive approaches: historical simulation or RiskMetrics. In contrast, we favor flexible methods based on recent developments in financial econometrics, which are likely to produce more accurate assessments of market risk. Clearly, the demands of real-world risk management in financial institutions - in particular, real-time risk tracking in very high-dimensional situations - impose strict limits on model complexity. Hence we stress parsimonious models that are easily estimated, and we discuss a variety of practical approaches for high-dimensional covariance matrix modeling, along with what we see as some of the pitfalls and problems in current practice. In so doing we hope to encourage further dialog between the academic and practitioner communities, hopefully stimulating the development of improved market risk management technologies that draw on the best of both worlds.
  • 1 to 3

OPUS4 Logo

  • Contact
  • Imprint
  • Sitelinks