Refine
Year of publication
- 2008 (2)
Document Type
- Article (2)
Language
- English (2)
Has Fulltext
- yes (2)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (2)
Keywords
- Bestäuberanlockung (1)
- Blütenduftsoff (1)
- Bombus vestalis (1)
- E. helleborine (1)
- GLV (1)
- Mimikry (1)
- Ophrys (1)
- floral scent (1)
- mimicry (1)
- pollination by sexual deception (1)
Sexual deception of male bees is one of the most remarkable mechanisms of pollination (Ackermann 1986, Proctor & al. 1996). Flowers of the orchid genus Ophrys mimic females of their pollinator species, usually bees and wasps, to attract males, which try to copulate with the flowers. During this so-called “pseudocopulation” the male removes the pollinia and transfers them to another flower to ensure pollination. Apart from visual and tactile cues, floral scent was shown to be most important for eliciting mating behaviour in males (Kullenberg 1961, Schiestl & al. 1999, Ayasse & al. 2003). Pollination in Ophrys is highly specific and usually each Ophrys species attracts only one pollinator species (Paulus & Gack 1990). The high degree of specialization provides the means of reproductive isolation between the intercrossable Ophrys-species (Ehrendorfer 1980). The complex odour-bouquets released by the flowers are species-specific and often consist of more than 100 different chemical compounds (Borg-Karlson & al. 1985, Ayasse 2006). Speciation in Ophrys-orchids may be brought about by changes in the pollinator attracting floral scent. The attraction of a new pollinator may act as a pre-zygotic isolation barrier (Stebbins 1970, Paulus & Gack 1990, Soliva & al. 2001). We investigated three sympatrically occuring Ophrys-species on Sardinia. O. chestermanii and O. normanii are endemic and are both pollinated by males of the bumblebee B. vestalis. O. tenthredinifera is pollinated by Eucera nigrilabris. There are different opinions concerning the taxonomic status of O. normanii. It has been described as an actual hybrid between O. chestermanii and O. tenthredinifera (Wood 1983). Paulus & Gack (1995) suggested that it is an own species, that either has developed from a hybrid between O. chestermanii and O. normanii or that has evolved by radiation from O. tenthredinifera. By conducting behavioural-tests with B. vestalis males, performing gas chromatographic analyses and electrophysiological studies we wanted to identify pollinator attracting scent and to clarify the taxonomic status of O. normanii.
The orchid genus Epipactis is represented by 25 species in Europe (Richards 1982). Epipactis helleborine (L.) Crantz is the most common and widely distributed species of the genus (Wiefelspütz 1970), and is a prime example for wasp-flowers, because it is mainly pollinated by social wasps (Hymenoptera: Vespidae), like Vespula vulgaris and V. germanica (Müller 1873). Darwin (1888) already noticed that E. helleborine is almost exclusively ignored by bees and bumblebees, an observation that was confirmed in recent investigations (Keppert 2001). The flowers of E. helleborine show morphological, physiological and phenological adaptations to the visit and the pollination by Vespidae (Keppert 2001). They possess a reddish-brown or dirty purple coloration of the inflorescence (Keppert 2001), have relatively small, mostly bulbous blossoms with a broad entrance and bulbous widened, nectar-rich juice holders (Müller 1873, 1881; Schremmer 1962). Although there is much reported about wasp-pollinated flowers there is little known about the signals that are responsible for the attraction of wasps. Wiefelspütz (1970) proclaimed the statement that only the visual stimulus is responsible for the wasp attraction. Recently studies, however, assumed that odour is involved in the wasp attraction (Keppert 2001). Hölzler (2003) showed that the main attraction of the wasp-flower Epipactis for pollinators is its olfactory stimulus. It remains an unanswered question why E. helleborine flowers almost exclusively attracts social wasps, as opposed to bees and bumblebees. In this study we analysed the role of floral volatiles which are responsible for the specific attraction of social wasps. We supposed a mimicry-system in E. helleborine for the specific attraction of pollinators for the following reasons. So-called “green leaf volatiles” (GLVs) are emitted by plants while herbivorous insects, for example caterpillars, feed on them. GLVs thereby attract predators or parasitoids of the herbivorous insects (Dicke & Sabelis 1988; Turlings & al. 1990, 1995; Dicke & Vet 1999). Among the GLVs so far identified in former studies there are aldehydes, compounds that were also found in flower extracts of E. helleborine (Hölzler 2003). Therefore, we postulated that E. helleborine flowers produce GLVs in order to attract prey hunting social wasps for pollination. We performed bioassays and analysed flower odour gained to headspace-sampling using gas chromatography (GC), mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and gas chromatography coupled with electrophysiological analysis (GC-EAD) to investigate the hypothesis that E. helleborine flowers mimic “green leaf volatiles” (GLVs) to attract their pollinators.
