• Deutsch
Login

Open Access

  • Home
  • Search
  • Browse
  • Publish
  • FAQ

Refine

Author

  • Agarwal, Sumit (2)
  • Liu, Chunlin (2)
  • Chomsisengphet, Souphala (1)
  • Souleles, Nicholas (1)
  • Souleles, Nicholas S. (1)

Year of publication

  • 2005 (1)
  • 2008 (1)

Document Type

  • Working Paper (2)

Language

  • English (2)

Has Fulltext

  • yes (2)

Is part of the Bibliography

  • no (2)

Keywords

  • Konsumentenkredit (2)
  • Banking (1)
  • Borrowing (1)
  • Consumer Credit (1)
  • Consumer Finance (1)
  • Consumption (1)
  • Consumption-Saving (1)
  • Credit Cards (1)
  • Fiscal Policy (1)
  • Kreditkarte (1)
+ more

Institute

  • Center for Financial Studies (CFS) (2)

2 search hits

  • 1 to 2
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100

Sort by

  • Year
  • Year
  • Title
  • Title
  • Author
  • Author
The reaction of consumer spending and debt to tax rebates – evidence from consumer credit data (2008)
Agarwal, Sumit ; Liu, Chunlin ; Souleles, Nicholas
We use a new panel dataset of credit card accounts to analyze how consumer responded to the 2001 Federal income tax rebates. We estimate the monthly response of credit card payments, spending, and debt, exploiting the unique, randomized timing of the rebate disbursement. We find that, on average, consumers initially saved some of the rebate, by increasing their credit card payments and thereby paying down debt. But soon afterwards their spending increased, counter to the canonical Permanent-Income model. Spending rose most for consumers who were initially most likely to be liquidity constrained, whereas debt declined most (so saving rose most) for unconstrained consumers. More generally, the results suggest that there can be important dynamics in consumers’ response to “lumpy” increases in income like tax rebates, working in part through balance sheet (liquidity) mechanisms.
Do consumers choose the right credit contracts? (2005)
Agarwal, Sumit ; Chomsisengphet, Souphala ; Liu, Chunlin ; Souleles, Nicholas S.
We find that on average consumers chose the contract that ex post minimized their net costs. A substantial fraction of consumers (about 40%) still chose the ex post sub-optimal contract, with some incurring hundreds of dollars of avoidable interest costs. Nonetheless, the probability of choosing the sub-optimal contract declines with the dollar magnitude of the potential error, and consumers with larger errors were more likely to subsequently switch to the optimal contract. Thus most of the errors appear not to have been very costly, with the exception that a small minority of consumers persists in holding substantially sub-optimal contracts without switching. Klassifikation: G11, G21, E21, E51
  • 1 to 2

OPUS4 Logo

  • Contact
  • Imprint
  • Sitelinks