Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (22)
- Conference Proceeding (15)
- Part of a Book (14)
- Report (6)
- Preprint (4)
- Book (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (62)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (62)
Keywords
- Englisch (8)
- Syntax (8)
- Generative Transformationsgrammatik (6)
- Semantik (5)
- Deutsch (4)
- Pronomen (4)
- Formale Semantik (3)
- Pragmatik (3)
- Bindungstheorie <Linguistik> (2)
- Distribution <Linguistik> (2)
The status of quantifier raising in German and other languages where scope is fairly rigid is debated. The first part of this paper argues that quantifiers in German can undergo covert extraction out of coordinations, and therefore that quantifier raising is available in German. The second part argues that quantifier raising in German is constrained to never move one DP across another. This result might provide part of an explanation of scope rigidity in German.
A new semantics for number
(2003)
The lemmings theory of case
(1995)
Alexopoulou (2008) argues that Greek provides new evidence for the concept of binding illusions that was hypothesized by Fox and Sauerland (1996). Of special interest from my perspective is Alexopoulou’s argument that binding illusions arise not only with existential and universal quantifiers, but also with negative and interrogative quantifiers. The purpose of this note is to speculate on how to account for these kinds of binding illusions semantically building on Alexopoulou’s argument. In the following I refer to Alexopoulou’s (2008) paper as BIRG (Binding Illusions and Resumption in Greek) and to Clitic Left-Dislocation as CLLD. BIRG’s argument is based on the generalization concerning CLLD in Greek. Generally, a left-dislocated noun phrase cannot bind a pronoun in its clause in Greek.
Beyond unpluggability
(2007)
"A team", definitely
(2004)
