Open Access

G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) constitute the largest family of cell-surface receptors in mammals and are key players in signal transduction. By responding to a plethora of extracellular stimuli ranging from photons to amines to fatty acids to peptides and proteins, these receptors trigger intracellular signalling cascades and regulate a variety of cellular responses. Approximately 800 genes in humans encode GPCRs which are classified according to sequence conservation into rhodopsin-like, glutamate, adhesion, frizzled/taste2 and secretin receptors. GPCRs share a seven transmembrane domain fold undergoing a conformational change upon ligand binding which is translated to the intracellular surface of the receptor thereby allowing a heterotrimeric G protein to couple. Heterotrimeric G proteins consist of a Ga, Gb and Gg subunit and dissociate into their Ga and Gbg entities upon activation by a GPCR. Subsequently, distinct signalling cascades are triggered by each G protein protomer. Membrane proteins and GPCRs in particular, are highly important targets in drug design and development as currently approximately 60% of all marketed drugs target membrane proteins. Although these classes of proteins are of high therapeutic interest, our understanding of their mechanism of action and structure remains limited. The first structure of a human GPCR was determined in 2007 and required the development of protein engineering and innovative crystallisation techniques. Since then, approximately 130 GPCR structures of less than 40 individual receptors have been determined providing insights into the structural arrangement of the transmembrane helices, ligand binding pockets and G protein interactions. Combined with spectroscopic methods, these studies allowed a more detailed understanding of the molecular aspects of GPCR activation and signalling. Despite the tremendous advances in GPCR structural biology, certain aspects of GPCR function still remain poorly understood. Due to their size and inherent flexibility, the interaction of protein and peptide ligands with their receptors remains a challenging aspect in the structural characterisation of GPCRs. Moreover, structural information on subtype selectivity of peptide ligands continues to be scarce. To contribute functional and structural information on the molecular mechanisms of peptide interactions with GPCRs, this thesis focused on characterising receptors from the chemoattractant cluster using radioligand binding assays as well as NMR spectroscopy. The chemoattractant cluster mainly groups the kinin, angiotensin, anaphylatoxin chemotactic complement and apelin receptors according to conserved residues in their ligand binding cavities. All receptors in this cluster bind to peptide ligands deriving from high molecular weight protein precursors upon proteolytic processing. Comparable to the conserved binding pocket of the chemoattractant receptors, the peptide ligands display a certain sequence conservation although they differ strongly in size. The largest ligands used in this thesis are the anaphylatoxins complement 3a and 5a, comprising 77 or 74 residues, respectively. Due to their size and complex fold involving three intramolecular disulphide bonds, solid phase synthesis is impossible, which prompted us to develop a modified cell-free expression system to produce these ligands in tritiated form for subsequent functional characterisation of the complement receptors. To demonstrate the versatility of the developed system, it was applied to another disulphidebond containing peptide ligand, the 21 amino acid endothelin-1. We describe a reliable and multifaceted tool to generate custom labelled peptide ligands for the structural and functional characterisation of GPCRs. The system allows the production of custom radioligands, peptides labelled for NMR studies or with fluorescent amino acids. Apart from the modulation of GPCR activity by orthosteric ligands, GPCR signalling has long been described to be regulated by allosteric ligands including peptides, small molecules and ions. In this thesis, the influence of sodium ions on the activity state of the chemoattractant cluster receptors and in particular on the apelin, bradykinin 2 and angiotensin II type 1 receptors was examined. In recent high resolution crystal structures an allosteric sodium ion pocket beneath the orthosteric ligand binding cavity was identified and residues contributing to the coordination of sodium ions are conserved throughout the chemoattractant cluster receptors. This allosteric sodium ion coordinated within the transmembrane domain bundle has been described to negatively influence the affinity of agonists but not of antagonists. It was found that sodium ions have distinct influences on the affinity state as well as the available number of binding sites of the chemoattractant receptors. In case of the apelin and bradykinin 2 receptors, sodium ions drastically reduced the number of available binding sites whereas the affinity of peptide ligands to the bradykinin 2 receptors remained constant and the ligand binding affinities to the apelin receptor were completely abolished. In contrast, the angiotensin II type 1 receptor affinity state towards the endogenous peptide ligand angiotensin II is highly dependent on the presence of sodium ions, whereas binding of the synthetic peptide antagonist Sar1-Ile8-angiotensin II remained unaffected by the sodium ion concentration. As differential effects irrespective of the efficacy class but dependent on the amino acid composition of the applied ligands are observed, it can be concluded that electrostatic interactions between charged residues of the peptide ligands and amino acids on the extracellular surface of the receptors are influenced by sodium ions thereby adding another layer of complexity on GPCR signalling. To elucidate the structure-function relationship of ligand selectivity between the kinin receptors, the structure of desArg10-kallidin (DAK) bound to the bradykinin 1 receptor was determined using solid state NMR (SSNMR) in the course of this thesis. The kinin peptides DAK and bradykinin bind with high affinity and high selectivity to either the bradykinin 1 or bradykinin 2 receptor, respectively. The binding pockets of the receptors are highly conserved and the two peptide ligands only differ in one amino acid at their N- and C-termini whereas the remaining eight amino acids are fully conserved. DAK adopts a U-shaped structure when bound to the bradykinin 1 receptor which resembles a horse shoe-like conformation. Using 2D TEDOR spectroscopy it could furthermore be demonstrated that positively charged residues at the N-terminal part of the peptide engage in ionic interactions with negatively charged amino acids on the extracellular surface of the bradykinin 1 receptor. In contrast, bradykinin displays a distinct b-turn at the C-terminus and an S-shaped conformation of the N-terminal segment when bound to the bradykinin 2 receptor. By using SSNMR to study the binding mode of DAK on the bradykinin 1 receptor we could determine that subtype selectivity between the kinin receptors is conferred by distinct conformational restraints within the peptide ligands and by the formation of specific ionic interaction between charged residues on the peptide and receptor, respectively. In brief, this thesis contributes structural and functional data on the binding mechanisms and binding mode of different peptide-ligand GPCRs helping to understand subtype selectivity and allosteric modulation of the chemoattractant cluster receptors. In addition, a versatile cell-free expression system was developed that allows the custom synthesis of isotopically labelled peptides containing disulphide bonds for the functional characterisation of GPCRs.

The present work wishes to contribute with information on two members of the primary active transporter group, which differ both in structure and function: Wilson Disease Protein which uses the energy released by ATP hydrolysis to transport copper across cell membranes, and Proteorhodopsin, which uses the energy of light to build up a proton gradient across the bacterial cell membrane, both heterologously expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes. The surface detection experiments using HA-tagged WNDP confirm the proposed topology of WNDP. The HA-tag per se does not interfere with the function of WNDP, as shown for WNDP HA56 by ATP-dependent phosphorylation after expression in Sf9 cells. Sequence modifications within the WNDP HA56 template-construct reveal some interesting features: i) the N-terminal domain, which contains the 6 metal binding sites, is not necessary for plasma membrane targeting; ii) elevated surface expression of WNDP was observed when the carboxy terminus containing the tri-Leu motif is missing, which suggests that this motif might be involved in the retrieval of the protein from the plasma membrane; iii) the mutations TGE>AAA (proposed to lock the protein in the E1 conformation and lead to constitutive plasma membrane localisation) and D1027A (phosphorylation deficient) did not interfere with the surface localisation of the protein; iv) the mutations CPC>SPS (copper transport deficient) and H1069Q (phosphorylation deficient, most common mutation in Wilson Disease) reduced plasma membrane expression to less then 50%. Western blot analysis shows that the overall expression level of all constructs is similar to that of the reference construct WNDP HA56. These findings suggest that motifs involved in copper binding and catalytic activity do not interfere with plasma membrane targeting of WNDP in Xenopus oocytes. However, the H1069Q mutation could interfere with the distribution of WNDP protein within the cells. In the case of Proteorhodopsin, data presented in this work support earlier observations according to which proteorhodopsin can operate as an outwardly and inwardly directed light-driven ion pump. The residues proposed to play the roles of proton donor (E108) and acceptor (D97) are important for proton translocation. In the absence of an anionic residue at position 97 no outward pumping takes place, but inward charge translocation may occurs under appropriate conditions. An M-like state similar to that known from BR detectably accumulates under neutral pH conditions or under conditions where reprotonation of the Schiff base from the cytoplasmic side is slowed down, as in case of the mutants at position 108. Under acidic conditions PR pumps inwardly under the concerted action of pH and transmembrane potential. The experiments performed in parallel with PR and BR wild-types brought not only interesting information about similarities and differences between the two retinylidene ion pumps, but also led to the observation that the life-time of the M state in BR wild-type can be extended in addition to hyperpolarising transmembrane potentials also by extracellular acidic pH, when the proton gradient through the cell membrane is directed opposite to the ion transport (i.e. when the electrochemical gradient opposing the direction of proton transport increases). Direct photocurrent measurements of HA-tagged PR and BR have shown that the inserted tag may interfere with the functionality of the protein. Next to E108 and D97 in PR other residues in the vicinity of the retinal binding pocket contribute to the translocation of protons, as exemplified by the mutant L105Q: additionally to changing the absorption maximum of the protein, this mutant is a less effective proton pump than the wild type. The example of PR suggests that transduction of light energy by – and reaction mechanisms of retinylidene ion pumps have not been entirely deciphered by the extensive studies of bacteriorhodopsin.

LmrA is a member of the ATP Binding Cassette (ABC) transporter family of membrane proteins and a structural and functional homologue of P-glycoprotein1, 2. ABC-transporters share a common architecture of two transmembrane domains and two nucleotide binding domains. The NBDs are highly conserved in this transporter family whereas the TMDs are highly diverse3. The TMDs recognize the substrate and the NBDs bind and hydrolyze ATP and thus contribute the energy for substrate translocation. ABC transporters as a protein family transport a high number of substrates including peptides, nutrients, ions, bile acids, lipids and other lipophilic compounds. LmrA is a multidrug transporter that recognizes a number of hydrophobic substrates including fluorescent dyes and antibiotics1, 4-6. LmrA is a native protein of the gram-positive bacterium Lactococcus lactis. In this thesis, L. lactis was used as a homologous expression host for the preparation of LmrA for a variety of experiments. Wildtype LmrA as well as a number of cysteine mutants were successfully expressed in L. lactis, purified and subsequently characterized by a variety of biochemical assays (Chapter 4). LmrA can be expressed to very high amounts in L. lactis. The purification and reconstitution were optimized for the requirements of solid-state NMR experiments in this thesis. For the first time, an ABC transporter has been reconstituted in synthetic lipids to a ratio of up to 1:150 (mol/mol). LmrA was shown to be active under magic angle spinning conditions with these reconstitution ratios. By taking advantage of the slower ATP hydrolysis by LmrA ΔK388 (lysine deletion in the Walker A motif), a real-time 31P solid-state NMR ATPase assay was established (Chapter 5). This assay allowed, for the first time, the investigation of all phosphor nuclei during the ATP hydrolysis cycle of a membrane protein simultaneously and in real time7. This assay has been successfully adapted to investigate both ATP hydrolysis and substrate phosphorylation of diacylglycerol kinase (together with S. Wollschlag) and ATP hydrolysis at high temperatures of the thermophilic ABC transporter ABC1 from Thermos thermophilus (together with A. Zutz). In the course of this thesis, the gene for LmrA has been cloned into expression vectors suitable for Escherichia coli and the heterologous expression of LmrA was established (Chapter 4). The functionality of the heterologously expressed protein has been investigated and compared to L. lactis LmrA. In these experiments, LmrA was shown to yield a distinct multidrug resistance phenotype in its E. coli host and to show secondary active multidrug transport in the absence of ATP and presence of a proton gradient [Hellmich et al, in prep] (Chapter 4). Previously, it had been shown that LmrA acts as a seconadary active transporter when the NBDs are truncated8. The overexpression in minimal and defined medium and the purification of LmrA from E. coli have been optimized. Isotope labeling for ssNMR has been established and the first multinuclear ssNMR experiments have been carried out on a functional ABC transporter (Chapter 8). ABC transporters couple two cycles: upon ATP binding, the NBDs dimerize, hydrolyze the ATP, subsequently release Pi and ADP and finally dissociate. During this cycle, conformational changes are relayed to the TMDs which utilize the energy from ATP binding and/or hydrolysis to translocate the respective substrate. The prehydrolysis state can be trapped by beryllium fluoride, whereas the post-hydrolysis state of this cycle can be trapped by vanadate9-12. Trapping protocols for these reagents were successfully established for LmrA in this thesis (Chapter 4). This allowed for the investigation of different catalytic states by both ssNMR and EPR. A general 19F labeling protocol for membrane proteins has been established in the course of this thesis and successfully applied to proteorhodopsin (together with N. Pfleger)13 and LmrA (chapter 6). Single cysteine mutants of LmrA that line out the dimer interface have been labeled with a fluorine label for ssNMR. In the apo state, the 19F labeling indicates highly flexible transmembrane domains, a finding that is supported by 13C ssNMR and EPR measurements. The addition of drugs has a different effect on different positions within the LmrA dimer, therefore indicating that different drugs are recognized at a different position within the protein. For P-glycoprotein and LmrA it has been previously shown by biochemical methods that different drug binding sites co-exist. For a 19F label attached at position 314 (LmrA E314C), the spectra showed two distinct peaks with similar populations. This could hint towards a structural asymmetry within the LmrA dimer that might also be reflected in the alternating ATP hydrolysis at the NBDs. E314 has been specifically implicated with drug transport. Thus, structural asymmetry at this position might be functionally relevant for guiding a substrate through the transporter. Structural asymmetry within a homodimeric ABC transporter has also been shown for BtuCD, the E. coli vitamin B12 importer14. In addition, the conserved glutamates in EmrE, a small multidrug resistance protein, were shown to be asymmetric in the drug bound state15. Both, uniformly 13C/15N labeled as well as selectively amino acid type labeled LmrA has been investigated in different conformational states. Interestingly, significant dynamic changes in the b-sheet regions of LmrA (confined to the NBDs) were observed in the pre-hydrolysis (beryllium fluoride) and transition state (vanadate trapped) state. These were interpreted as the transition from a domain in fast conformational exchange in the apo state to one of intermediate exchange in the nucleotide bound state. A significant change in NBD mobility upon nucleotide binding was previously also shown with 2H ssNMR on LmrA16. By EPR it was shown that LmrA in both the vanadate and BeFx trapped states displays a significantly higher rigidity and therefore defined distances, whereas the apo state resembled a “floppy” protein with no preferred distance distribution. This concurs with data obtained from 19F ssNMR with fluorine labeled single-cysteine mutants. Here, in agreement with the EPR data, a higher label (and possibly) protein mobility was observed in the apo state displaying rather broad line widths. Upon trapping with vanadate, the line widths of the majority of fluorine-labeled mutants decreased due to an enhanced protein rigidity and a more homogenous environment of the fluorine labels. A similar observation was made when increasing the temperature that can be explained due to higher protein flexibility at increased temperatures. Solution NMR was employed to investigate the isolated soluble NBD of LmrA (Chapter 9). First 2D and 3D spectra were successfully obtained and could be utilized for a preliminary assignment of a significant fraction of residues. Additionally, binding of ATP and ADP in absence and presence of magnesium was investigated. Finally, the effects of peptides emulating the coupling helices of the full-length transporter on the soluble NBD were investigated. Strikingly, binding of one of these peptides only occurred in the presence of nucleotides (whereas the other showed no binding at all) hinting towards a tightly coupled regulation of the NBD and TMD during the substrate translocation/ATP hydrolysis cycle based on nucleotide binding.

Eine wichtige Klasse von Membranproteinen ist die der aktiven sekundären Transporter. Diese Proteine werden in allen Spezies gefunden und verwenden einen Gradienten von löslichen Substanzen, um den Transport von Substraten voran zu treiben. Dieser Transportprozess ist essentiell, um die chemische Zusammensetzung des Zytoplasmas, wie Kalium- oder Natriumkonzentration von der des umgebenden Milieus unterschiedlich zu halten. Die Konzentration von K+ und Na+ in der Zelle sind wichtig für ein konstantes Zellvolumen, für die pH-Homöostase, für die Erregbarkeit von Nervenzellen und füür die Akkumulierung von Zuckern und Aminosöuren über Kotransportsysteme. In Bakterien wie Escherichia coli wird mit der Oxidation von Substraten durch die Elektronentransportkette ein Protonengradient und gleichzeitig eine Potentialdifferenz erzeugt. Ein Beispiel für einen sekundären Transporter, der diese Potentialdifferenz ausnutzt ist der Na+/H+-Antiporter NhaA, einer der am besten untersuchten Antiporter aus E. coli (Hunte, Screpanti et al. 2005). Dieser Antiporter ist essentiell für die Fähigkeit von Bakterien im alkalischen pH-Bereich zu überleben. Auch bei Säugetieren, sind die Isoformen der humanen Natrium/Protonen-Antiporter SLC9A1-SLC9A8 (NHE1-8) unentbehrlich für eine Reihe physiologischer Prozesse. So wird über die Antiporter-Aktivität nicht nur der Säure-Base-Haushalt und das Verhältnis des Zellvolumens zur Menge an Elektrolyten reguliert, Antiporter spielen ebenso eine wichtige Rolle bei der Adhäsion, Migration und Proliferation der Zelle (Orlowski and Grinstein 2004). Anomalien in diesem Bereich sind charakteristisch für maligne Zellen. Die Rolle von NHE1 in der Entwicklung von Tumoren ist daher ein wichtiger Ansatzpunkt für die Entwicklung von Krebsmedikamenten. Im Herz ist NHE1 die dominierende Isoform und wird damit zu einem pharmakologisch wertvollen Zielprotein (Malo and Fliegel 2006). Struktur und Mechanismus der meisten Antiporter ist bis dato jedoch noch nicht bekannt. Neben den klassischen Methoden der Pharmaentwicklung wird die strukturbasierende Wirkstoffentwicklung immer wichtiger um effiziente Medikamente ohne Nebenwirkung zu herzustellen. Hierfür werden jedoch 3D-Strukturen von Proteinen, sowie genaue Kenntnisse von deren Mechanismus benötigt. Zieht man in Betracht, dass 70% aller bis jetzt entwickelten Medikamente als Ziel ein Membranprotein haben, wird die Notwendigkeit klar, eine möglichst große Anzahl von Membranproteinstrukturen verfgbar zu haben. Wie bereits erwähnt ist die Klasse der monovalenten Kation/Proton-Antiporter aufgrund ihrer vielfältigen Aufgaben, eine äußerst wichtige Zielgruppe für die strukturbasierende Wirkstoffentwicklung. Die große Anzahl an entschlüsselten Genomen eröffnet hier ein breites Forschungsfeld füür die Strukturbiologie. In dieser Arbeit wurden daher Techniken und Methoden aus Hochdurchsatz-orientierten Strukturgenomikprojekten übernommen, um eine große Anzahl von Zielproteinen in ausreichender Menge für die funktionelle Charakterisierung und für die Kristallisation zu produzieren. Als Zielorganismen wurden Salmonella typhimurium LT2, Helicobacter pylori 26695, Aquifex aeolicus VF5 und Pyrococcus furiosus ausgewählt. Die Grundlage dieser Entscheidung hierfür waren die humanpathogenen Eigenschaften der beiden zuerst genannten Organismen und die Hyperthermophilie der beiden letzteren. Dadurch konnten sowohl klinische Anwendungsmöglichkeiten, als auch die potentiell höhere Stabilität der hyperthermophilen Proteine genutzt werden. Als Proteinzielgruppe wurden die monovalenten Kation/Proton-Antiporter aus allen 4 Organismen ausgewählt. Des Weiteren wurden Antiporter zweier eukaryotischer Systeme, Saccharomyces cerevisiae und Homo sapiens in die Zielproteingruppe aufgenommen. In dieser Arbeit wurden 24 verschiedene monovalente Kation/Proton-Antiporter untersucht. Von diesen 24 Zielproteinen konnten 12 in Expressionsvektoren kloniert und produziert werden. Von diesen 12 Antiportern konnten die Zielproteine STM0039 (STNhaA), HP1552 (HPNhaA), STM1556 (NhaC) und PF2032 (NhaC) in einer für die Kristallisation ausreichenden Homogenität und Ausbeute gereinigt werden. Mit der Ausnahme von HP1552 ist bis heute in keiner Veröffentlichung über diese Zielproteine berichtet worden. Durch Komplementationsexperimente mit dem E. coli-Deletionsstamm EP432 konnten eine Reihe von Zielproteine (STM0039, HP1552, PF2032, Aq_2030, STM1806, STM1556) bezüglich ihrer Fähigkeiten zum Na+/H+-Antiport untersucht werden. Die Ziel-proteine STM0039, STM1556 und HP1552 konnten zum ersten Mal kloniert, produziert, gereinigt und anschlieáen in Liposomen rekonstitutiert werden.Weiterhin konnte durch SSM-Messung die pH-Regulation der Zielproteine STM0039 und HP1552 gezeigt werden. Im Gegensatz zu bisherigen Literaturangaben ist HP1552 im pH-Bereich von pH 6 bis 8,5 nicht konstitutiv aktiv, sondern erfährt eine ähnliche Aktivierung wie STM0039 oder ECNhaA. STM0039 lässt sich zudem durch 2-Aminoperimidin inhibieren. Für STM0039 konnten die ersten Proteinkristalle der inaktiven Konformation bei pH 4 erzeugt werden. Weiterhin wurde in dieser Arbeit ein gegen das Zielprotein STM0039 gerichtetes scFV-Antikörperfragment (F6scFv) eingehend charakterisiert. Durch die Ko-Kristallisation des Antikörperfragments F6scFv mit STM0039 konnten die ersten 3 dimensionalen Kristalle in einer aktiven Proteinkonformation bei pH 7,5 erzeugt werden. Neben den bereits verfeinerten Kristallisationsbedingungen für das Zielprotein STM0039 wurden erfolgreich erste Kristallisationsbedingungen für STM0086 und PF2032 gefunden. Es wurde eine Vielzahl von Produktions- und Reinigungsprotokollen füür die Zielproteine etabliert. Dadurch ist der Grundstein füür weitergehende Charakterisierungs- und Kristalli-sationsexperimente gelegt. Die in dieser Arbeit etablierte Kombination von Hochdurch-satzmethoden mit klassischen Vorgehensweisen zur Proteincharakterisierung lassen sich leicht auf anderen Membranproteinklassen bertragen und die Geschwindigkeit der ver-schiedenen Schritte bis zur Strukturlösung stark beschleunigen.

The increasing resistance of almost all pathogenic bacteria to antibiotics (multidrug resistance) causes a severe threat to public health. The mechanisms underlying multidrug resistance include the induced over expression of multidrug transporters which extrude a variety of lipophilic and toxic substrates in an energy dependent fashion through the membrane out of the cell. These proteins are found in all transporter families. The work described in this thesis is dedicated to drug-proton antiporters from the small multidrug resistance (SMR) family. These efflux pumps with just four transmembrane helices per monomer are so far the smallest transporters discovered. Their oligomeric state, topology, three dimensional structure, catalytic cycle and transport mechanism are still rather controversial. Therefore, the aim of this thesis was to directly address these questions for the small multidrug resistance proteins Halobacterium salinarium Hsmr and Escherichia coli (E. coli) EmrE using a number of biophysical methods such as NMR, transport assays, mass spectrometry and analytical ultracentrifugation. Especially the work on Hsmr has been challenging due to the halophilic nature of this protein. In Chapter 1, key questions and the most important biophysical techniques are introduced followed by Material and Methods in Chapter 2. Depending on experimental requirements, cell free or ‘classical’ in vivo expression has been used for this thesis. Cell free expression as an option for the production of small multidrug transporters has been explored in Chapter 3. It has been possible to produce the SMR family members Hsmr, EmrE, TBsmr and YdgF in vitro. The expression of Hsmr was investigated in more detail under different experimental conditions. Hsmr was either refolded from precipitate or maintained in a soluble form during expression in the presence of detergents and liposomes. Furthermore, amino acids for which no auxotrophic strains were available could be labelled successfully. This expression system has been also used for preparing labelled samples of EmrE as described in Chapter 9. In vivo in E. coli expression of Hsmr, as described in Chapter 4, provided large amounts of proteins if fermenter production was used. Uniform labelling and selective unlabelling with stable isotopes (13C, 15N) for NMR spectroscopy was achieved in vivo in a more efficient and cost effective manner than using the cell free approach for this protein. Hsmr could be purified successfully from both in vitro and in vivo expression media. Hsmr is expressed in vivo and in vitro with N-terminal formylation. The Nterminal formylation is unstable and Hsmr in the presence of low salt concentrations was amenable to N-terminal degradation. It was found that Hsmr shows longest stability in Fos-ß-choline® 12 and sodium dodecyl sulphate, but best reconstitution conditions were found, when dodecyl maltoside is used and exchanged with Escherichia coli lipids. A molar protein lipid ratio of 1 to 100, amenable to solid state nuclear magnetic resonance, has been achieved. Sample homogeneity was shown by freeze fracture electron microscopy. The oligomeric state of Hsmr in detergent has been assessed by SDS PAGE, blue native PAGE, size exclusion chromatography, analytical ultracentrifugation and laser induced liquid bead ion desorption mass spectrometry (LILBID) as described in Chapter 5. A concentration and detergent dependent monomer-oligomer equilibrium has been found by all methods. The activity of Hsmr under the sample preparation conditions used here was shown using radioactive and fluorescence binding as well as fluorescence and electrochemical transport assays (Chapter 6). For transport studies, a stable pH gradient was generated by co-reconstitution of Hsmr with bacteriorhodopsin and subsequent sample illumination. Based on the observed long term stability of Hsmr in Fos-ß-choline® 12 and sodium dodecyl sulphate, liquid state NMR experiments were attempted in order to assess the correct folding of Hsmr in detergent micelles (Chapter 7). 1D proton and 2D HSQC spectra of U-15N Hsmr revealed a poor spectral dispersion, low resolution and only a small number of peaks. These are at least partly due to long rotational correlation times of the large protein detergent complex. This problem has been overcome by applying solid-state NMR to Hsmr reconstituted into E. coli lipids (Chapter 8). Uniform 13C labelled samples were prepared and two dimensional proton-driven spin diffusion and double quantum-single quantum correlation spectra were acquired successfully. Unfortunately, the spectral resolution was not yet sufficient for further structural studies. Reasons for the observed linebroadening could be structural heterogeneity or molecular motions which interfere with the NMR timescale. Therefore, the protein mobility has been probed using static 2H solid state NMR on Ala-d3-Hsmr. It could be shown, that parts of Hsmr are remarkably mobile in the membrane and that this mobility can be limited by the addition of the substrate ethidium bromide. Ethidium bromide as well as tetraphenylphosphonium (TPP+) is typical multidrug transporter substrates. The membrane interaction of TPP+ in DMPC membranes has been resolved by 1H MAS NMR. It was found that it penetrates into the interface region of the lipid bilayers and therefore behaves like many other transporter substrates adding to the hypothesis that the membrane could act as a pre-sorting filter. Finally, Chapter 9 is dedicated to the characterisation of the essential and highly conserved residue Glu-14 in EmrE by solid-state NMR. In order to avoid spectral overlap, the single Glu EmrE E25A mutant was chosen instead of the wildtype. The protein has been produced in vitro to take advantage of reduced isotope scrambling in the cell free expression system as verified by analytical NMR spectroscopy. Correct labelling of EmrE was tested by MALDI-TOF and solid-state NMR. The dimeric state of DDM solubilised EmrE has been probed by LILBID. The labelled protein was reconstituted into E. coli lipids to ensure a native membrane environment. Activity was determined by measuring ethidium bromide transport. Freeze fracture EM revealed very homogeneous protein incorporation even after many days of MAS NMR experiments. 2D 13C double quantum filtered experiments were used to obtain chemical shift and lineshape information of Glu-14 in EmrE. Two distinct populations were found with backbone chemical shift differences of 4 - 6 ppm which change upon substrate binding. These findings indicate a structural asymmetry at the assumed dimerisation interface and are discussed in the context of a model for shared substrate/proton binding. These studies represent the first successful use of cell free expression to prepare labelled membrane proteins for solid-state NMR and allow for the first time an NMR insight into the binding pocket of a multidrug efflux pump.