Refine
Year of publication
- 2023 (2)
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (2)
Language
- English (2)
Has Fulltext
- yes (2)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (2)
Institute
In our rapidly changing world, land use has been recognized as having one of the strongest impacts on species and genetic diversity. The present state of temperate forests in Europe is a product of decisions made by former and current management and policy actions, rather than natural factors. Alterations of crown projection areas, structural complexity of the forest stand caused by thinning and cuttings, and changes in tree species composition caused by regeneration or plantings not only affect forest interior buffering against warming, but also the understorey light environment and nutrient availability. Ultimately, current silvicultural management practices have deep impact on the forest ecosystems, microenvironmental changes and forest floor understorey herbs. In response to environmental changes, plants rely on genetically heritable phenotypic variation, an important level of variation in the population, as it is prerequisite for adaptation. However, until now most studies on plant adaptation to land use focus on grassland management. Yet, studies on the adaptation of forest understorey herbs to forest management have been absent so far. This is important because understanding adaptation of understorey herbs is crucial for biodiversity conservation, forest restoration, and climate change mitigation. Studying current adaptation of understorey herbs to forest management yields insights into the evolutionary consequences of management practices, which could be employed to improve sustainable use of forest habitat.
In sum, my conducted experiments complement each other well and managed to fill in research gaps on the topic of genetically heritable phenotypic variation in understorey herbs and how it is affected by forest management and related microenvironmental variables. I showed that forest management has direct evolutionary consequences on the genetic basis of understorey herbs, but also indirectly through the microenvironment. Furthermore, I revealed that local adaptation and phenotypic plasticity of understorey herbs to forest structural attributes act along continuous gradients. And lastly, I highlighted the important role of intra-individual variation by revealing plastic responses to drought and shading, urging researchers to not ignore this important level of trait variation. Ultimately, understorey herbs in temperate forests employ phenotypic plasticity as a flexible strategy to adapt to varying environmental conditions. By adjusting their leaf characteristics, reproductive investment, and phenology, they can optimize their fitness and survival in response to changes in light availability, resource availability, and seasonal cues. The anthropogenic impact on temperate forests and understorey herbs will continue and likely increase in the future. This should urge foresters to adapt their silvicultural management decisions towards the long-term preservation of genetic diversity and, through this, the evolvability and adaptability of forest understorey herbs and associated organisms. Based on the results shown in my dissertation, variation in forest management regimes and types could be beneficial for promoting genetic diversity within several species of forest understorey herbs. Lastly, in the face of future climatic changes, the mechanisms by which plants can cope with increasing stressful environmental conditions might very well rely heavily on intra-individual variation, providing the necessary rapid plastic adjustment to changing microclimatic conditions within populations and thus increase climate change resilience.
Anthropogenic activities have a major impact on our planet and rapidly drive biodiversity loss in ecosystems at a global scale. Particularly over the last century, rising CO2 emissions significantly raised global temperatures and increased the intensity and frequency of droughts and heatwaves. Additionally, agricultural land use and fossil fuel combustion contribute to the continuous release of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) into ecosystems worldwide through extensive fertilization and deposition from the atmosphere. It is important to understand how these rapid changes affect the evolution of plant populations and their adaptive potential. Adaptation by natural selection (i.e., adaptive evolution) within a few generations is an essential process as a response to rapid environmental changes. Rapid evolution of plant populations can be detected by using the so-called resurrection approach. Here, diaspores (i.e., seeds) from a population are collected before (ancestors) and after (descendants) a potential selection pressure (e.g., consecutive years of drought or changes in nutrient supply). Comparing phenotypes of ancestors and descendants in a common environment such as an outside garden, greenhouse, or climate chamber, may then reveal evolutionary changes. Ideally, plants are first grown in a common environment for an intermediate refresher generation to reduce parental and storage effects.
The aim of this thesis was to investigate the occurrence of adaptive evolution in natural plant populations in response to rapidly changing environments over the past three decades. I conducted three experiments using the resurrection approach to generate comprehensive data on the adaptive processes that acted on three plant populations from three different species over the last three decades. Furthermore, I filled knowledge gaps in plant evolutionary ecology and conceptually developed the resurrection approach further.
In Chapter I, I performed a novel approach by testing for adaptive evolution in natural plant populations using the resurrection approach in combination with in-situ transplantations. I cultivated seedlings from ancestors (23 – 26 years old) and contemporary descendants of three perennial species (Melica ciliata, Leontodon hispidus and Clinopodium vulgare) from calcareous grasslands in the greenhouse and In Chapter III, I assessed the reproducibility of phenotypic differences between genotypes among three different growth facilities (climate chamber, greenhouse, and outdoor garden). I also evaluated differences in phenotypic expression between plants grown after one vs. two intermediate generations (i.e., refresher generations). I performed this experiment within the framework of the resurrection approach and compared ancestors and descendants of the same population of Leontodon hispidus.
I observed very strong differences among plants growing in the different growth facilities. I found a significant interaction between the growth facility and the temporal origin (ancestors vs. descendants): descendants had significantly larger rosettes than ancestors only in the greenhouse and they flowered significantly later than ancestors exclusively in the climate chamber. I did not find significant differences between intermediate generations within the growth facilities. Overall, Chapter III shows that the use of a particular experimental system can dictate the presence and magnitude of phenotypic differences. This implies that absence of evidence is not evidence of absence when it comes to investigating genetically based trait differentiation among plant origins (in space or time). Experimental systems should be carefully designed to provide meaningful conditions, ideally mimicking the environmental conditions of the population’s origins. Finally, growing a second intermediate generation did not impact the genetic differences of ancestors and descendants within the environments, supporting the idea that only one intermediate generation may be sufficient to reduce detectable parental and storage effects.
The resurrection approach allows a better understanding of rapid plant adaptation, but some limitations deserve to be highlighted. I only studied one population per species, and Chapters II and III only focus on one population of L. hispidus, which is also hampering generalizations, as adaptive potential can vary greatly among populations of the same species. I only compared the ancestral genotypes to one descendant sample with a long time span in between (26 – 28 years), which makes it hard to pinpoint the selection agents that caused the genetic differentiation among the sampling years. Hence, closely monitoring biotic and abiotic factors of the studied populations between the ancestral and descendant sampling in future studies, would make identifying the responsible selection pressures more precise. I also recommend sampling multiple populations over consecutive years to improve the robustness of results and make generalizations more approachable.Furthermore, combining the resurrection approach with other methods such as in-situ transplantations will be valuable to offset the limitation that adaptations cannot be proven under artificial conditions (e.g., in the greenhouse).