Refine
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (6)
Language
- English (6)
Has Fulltext
- yes (6)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (6)
The impacts of human activities, notably the conversion of tropical forests into farmland habitat, has profound impacts on biological diversity and ecosystem functions (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment 2005). It is widely debated to what extent human modified landscapes can maintain tropical biodiversity and their ecosystem functionality (e.g. Waltert et al. 2004, Sekercioglu et al. 2007). In this thesis, I have used a huge and temporarily replicated dataset to assess the value of different habitat types differing in land-use intensities for bird communities in tropical East Africa. I investigated bird abundance and species richness along a forest-farmland habitat gradient and assessed spatial and temporal fluctuations of bird assemblages and their food resources.
I could show that forest and farmland habitats harbor distinct bird communities. Moreover, the protection of natural forests merits the highest priority for conserving the high diversity of forest-dependent bird species. My study, however, also shows that farmland habitats in the proximity of natural forest can support a high bird diversity. High bird diversity in tropical farmlands depends on a high structural complexity, such as in small-scale subsistence farmlands. From my findings, I conclude that the conversion of forest to farmland leads to substantial losses in bird diversity, in particular in specialized feeding guilds such as insectivores, while the conversion of structurally heterogeneous subsistence farmlands to sugarcane plantation causes erosion of bird diversity in agricultural ecosystems. Both findings are important for conservation planning in times when tropical forests and agroecosystems are under constantly high pressure due to increasing human population numbers and global demands for biofuel crops (Gibbs et al. 2008). From an ecosystem function perspective, my study demonstrates the potential of agroecosystems in supporting important ecosystem functions, such as seed dispersal by frugivorous birds and pest control by insectivorous birds. I could show that bird abundances in both frugivorous and insectivorous guilds were strongly predicted by their respective food resources, implying that seasonal shifts in fruit and invertebrate abundance at Kakamega forest and surrounding farmlands affect community dynamics and appear to influence local movement patterns of birds. The most interesting finding of this study was that feeding guilds responded idiosyncratically to resource fluctuations. Frugivore richness fluctuated asynchronously in forest and farmland habitats, suggesting foraging movements and fruit tracking across habitat borders. In contrast, I found that insectivores fluctuated synchronously in the two habitat types, suggesting a lack of inter-habitat movements. I therefore predict that insectivorous bird communities in this forest-farmland landscape may be more susceptible to the combined effects of land-use and climate change, due to their narrow habitat niche and limited capacity to track their resources.
The fact that a number of bird species regularly moved across the landscape mosaic in my study system implies that birds are able to provide long-distance seed dispersal across habitat borders. Thus, birds may enhance forest regeneration in human-modified landscapes, such as those in most parts of tropical Africa, given that forest remnants are protected within an agricultural habitat matrix. In order to effectively conserve tropical biodiversity within forest-farmland mosaics, this study advocates for conservation strategies that go beyond forest protection and explicitly integrate farmlands into forest management plans and policies. This should emphasize the retention of keystone habitat elements within tropical farmland landscapes, such as indigenous trees, forest galleries and hedgerows, whose presence enhance species diversity. Such grassroot-level approaches can be operationalized for instance through providing incentives to farmers to maintain their traditional subsistence land-use practices and through community-based livelihood projects aiming at enhancing local habitat heterogeneity and inter-habitat connectivity.
Menschliche Aktivitäten beeinflussen beinahe alle Bereiche des Lebens auf der Erde (MEA 2005a; UNEP 2007). Die Zerstörung und Veränderung natürlicher Lebensräume sind als Hauptursache für den weltweiten Biodiversitätsverlust identifiziert (Harrison and Bruna 1999; Dale et al. 2000; Foley et al. 2005; MEA 2005a). Zusammen mit dem Klimawandel wird die Landnutzungsveränderung daher als einflussreichster Aspekt anthropogen verursachten globalen Wandels betrachtet (MEA 2005a). Landnutzungsveränderung schließt sowohl die Umwandlung natürlicher Habitate in Agrarland oder Siedlungen als auch die Landnutzungsintensivierung in bereits kultivierten Landschaften mit ein. Diese Veränderungen haben weitreichende Konsequenzen für die Artenvielfalt und resultieren häufig in dem Verlust von Arten mit zunehmender Intensität der Landnutzung (Scholes and Biggs 2005).
Biodiversität und Ökosysteme stellen viele verschiedene Funktionen zur Verfügung, wie z. B. die Sauerstoffproduktion, die Reinigung von Wasser und die Bestäubung von Nutzpflanzen.
Einige dieser Funktionen sind hilfreich, andere wichtig und wieder andere notwendig für das menschliche Wohlergehen (MEA 2005b; UNEP 2007). Mittlerweile sind Ökosystemfunktionen und die vielen Nutzen, die sie erbringen, zu einem zentralen Thema der interdisziplinären Forschung von Sozialwissenschaften und Naturwissenschaften geworden (Barkmann et al. 2008 und darin enthaltene Referenzen). Dadurch bedingt ist es zu einiger Verwirrung bezüglich der verwendeten Begriffe der "Ökosystemfunktion" (engl. "ecosystem function") und dem der "Ökosystemdienstleistung" (engl. "ecosystem service") gekommen (deGroot et al. 2002). Da der Fokus meiner Arbeit auf grundlegenden Funktionen von Ökosystemen liegt, verwende ich im Folgenden den Begriff der Ökosystemfunktion.
Für viele Ökosystemfunktionen ist noch sehr unzureichend bekannt, wie diese von externen Störungen beeinflusst werden (Kremen and Ostfeld 2005; Balvanera et al. 2006). Ökosystemfunktionen werden selten von nur einer einzigen Art aufrechterhalten, sondern meist von einer ganzen Reihe unterschiedlicher taxonomischer Gruppen – alle mit ihren ganz eigenen Ansprüchen. Diese Arten, wie auch deren intra- und interspezifischen Interaktionen, können durchaus nterschiedlich auf die gleiche Störungsquelle oder Störungsintensität reagieren. Dies kann Vorhersagen zum Verhalten von Ökosystemfunktionen extrem erschweren. ...
Das geographische Verbreitungsgebiet von Arten ist ein fundamentales Struktur gebendes Merkmal der biologischen Welt. Warum Arten so verteilt sind, wie sie sind ist seit langem eine der zentralen Fragen in Ökologie, Biogeographie und Evolution. Gegenwärtig verändern sich, im Wesentlichen als unbeabsichtigtes Nebenprodukt menschlicher ökonomischen Aktivitäten und Populationsdynamik, die geographischen Verbreitungsgebiete von Arten mit entscheidender Bedeutung für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, als Krankheitsvektoren oder als Teil der biologischen Systeme, die Ökosystemfunktionen bereitstellen. Daher ist es dringend notwendig, dass wir unser Verständnis über die Dynamiken, aus denen die geographische Verbreitung von Arten erwachsen, verbessern. Mit dieser Doktorarbeit versuche ich, in drei Untersuchungen zur Dynamik der Verbreitungsgebiete von Singvögeln einen Beitrag zu unserem in Entwicklung begriffenen Verständnis der multiplen Faktoren die Artverbreitungsgebiete beeinflussen, zu leisten.
1) Zu einem mechanistischeren Verständnis von Artmerkmalen und Verbreitungsgebietsgrößen: Ein wichtiger, ungelöster Fragenkomplex in der Makroökologie ist, die immense interspezifische Variation in der Größe geographischer Verbreitungsgebiete zu verstehen. Während man davon ausgeht, dass Artmerkmale wie Fekundität und Körpergröße einen Effekt auf Verbreitungsgebietsgrößen haben, fehlt ein allgemeines Verständnis davon, wie Verbreitungsgebietsgrößen von mehreren Merkmalen gemeinsam beeinflusst werden. Hier beurteilen wir den Effekt von Lebensgeschichtsmerkmalen (Fekundität, Ausbreitungsfähigkeit), ökologischen Merkmalen (Habitatnische, Nahrungsnische, Zugverhalten, Flexibilität im Zugverhalten) und morphologischen Merkmalen (Körpergröße) auf die globale Verbreitungsgebietsgröße von 165 europäischen Singvögeln. Wir identifizieren Hypothesen zur Beziehung von Artmerkmalen und Verbreitungsgebietsgrößen aus der Literatur und verwenden die Methodik der Pfadanalyse, um sie zu testen. Die Größe der globalen geographischen Verbreitungsgebiete europäischer Singvögel wurde von Lebensgeschichtsmerkmalen (Fekundidtät und Ausbreitungsfähigkeit), ökologischen Merkmalen (Habitatnischenbreite, Nahrungsnischenposition und Zugverhalten) und von Körpergröße beeinflusst. Artmerkmale beeinflussten Verbreitungsgebietsgrößen auf direktem und indirektem Weg. Insbesondere der Einfluss von Körpergröße war komplex mit positiven und negativen Effekten über verschiedene Pfade. Die Größe von Verbreitungsgebieten ist sehr wahrscheinlich auch von anderen Faktoren als von Artmerkmalen abhängig. Wir zeigen, dass es notwendig ist, den direkten und indirekten Einfluss einer Vielzahl von Merkmalen zu entwirren, um die Mechanismen, die makroökologische Beziehungen generieren, aufzuklären.
2) Konkurrenz und Ausbreitungsfähigkeit interagieren bei der Bestimmung der geographischen Verbreitung von Vögeln: Es ist weiterhin eine Herausforderung für Ökologie und Evolutionsbiologie, die Faktoren zu verstehen , die die geographische Verbreitung von Arten beeinflussen. Wir untersuchen wie Konkurrenz, Ausbreitungsfähigkeit, das Alter eines Taxons und Habitatverschiebungen seit dem letzten glazialen Maximum das Ausmaß beeinflussen, in dem Arten der Vogelgattung Sylvia in allen Gegenden mit geeigneten Umweltbedingungen vorkommen (d.h. range filling).
Wir haben range filling in der Vogelgattung Sylvia (Grasmücken) unter Verwendung von Boosted Regression Trees und Ridge-Regression quantifiziert. Mittels multipler Regression haben wir für die Effekte von intragenerischer Konkurrenz, Ausbreitungfähigkeit, Alter des Taxons und Habitatverschiebung seit dem letzten glazialen Maximum auf range filling getestet.
Grasmücken mit hoher Ausbreitungsfähigkeit zeigten höheres range filling, aber nur wenn Konkurrenz in Gebieten mit weniger geeignetem Habitat innerhalb ihres potentiellen Verbreitungsgebietes niedrig war. Das Alter eines Taxon und Habitatverschiebung seit dem letzten glazialen Maximum hatten keinen konsistenten Effekt. Wir zeigen, dass die Verbreitungsgebiete von Grasmücken mit hoher Wahrscheinlichkeit durch den simultanen, interaktiven Effekt von Konkurrenz und Ausbreitungsfähigkeit geformt werden. Wenn biotische Interaktionen wie Konkurrenz generell die Fähigkeit von Arten beeinflussen auf der kontinentalen Skala neue Gebiete zu kolonisieren, wird es eine Herausforderung sein, den Effekt von Klimawandel auf Biodiversität vorherzusagen.
3) Nischenverfügbarkeit in Zeit und Raum: Vogelzug der Grasmücken: Im Kontext neuer Fortschritte in der ökologischen Nischenmodellierung sind sowohl die Umwelt als auch die ökologische Nische einer Art als statische Entitäten behandelt und quantifiziert worden. In der Realität sind aber die Umwelt und die Nischenanforderungen einer Art auf einer Vielzahl von Skalen dynamisch. Wir schlagen ein konzeptionelles System vor das berücksichtigt, wie die realisierte Nische und geographische Verbreitung von Arten durch die entkoppelte raumzeitliche Verfügbarkeit unterschiedlicher Umweltbedingungen und durch Veränderungen der Nischenanforderungen über die Lebenszeit eines Organismus geformt werden. Das Testen von aus dem konzeptionellen System abgeleiteten Vorhersagen am Beispiel des Vogelzugs der Grasmücken ergab neue Erkenntnisse: Das Verfolgen der Klimanische im geographischen Raum war höchstwahrscheinlich nicht die treibende Kraft für Migration in der Gattung und steht potentiell im Konflikt mit dem Verfolgen der Landnutzungsnische. Die Nischen der Grasmücken waren während der Brutsaison schmaler, was zeigt, dass Nischenanforderungen zeitlich dynamisch sein können. Wir legen nahe, dass die Berücksichtigung dynamischer Umwelten und Nischenanforderungen zu einer entscheidenden Verbessserung unseres Verständnisses der treibenden Faktoren hinter der Bewegung von Organismen im Raum und der Dynamik ihrer Nischen und Verbreitungsgebiete führt.
Nature and its constituents are known to affect human well-being in positive and negative ways. Nature can be beneficial for humans by providing, for instance, food, recreation or inspiration. Natural disasters or transmitted diseases are, on the other hand, examples of nature’s detrimental or harmful contributions to human well-being. Such positive as well as negative effects have been termed Nature’s Contributions to People (NCP) by the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) and can be categorized into three different types of contributions: regulating, material and non-material NCP. While regulating and material NCP have been studied extensively, research on the non-material NCP is less common in comparison, especially regarding non-material NCP of biodiversity and wildlife. This dissertation therefore aims at shedding light on the non-material links between biodiversity, wildlife and human well-being. The thesis presents the results of three individual research studies in three separate chapters (CH1, 2 & 3).
In the first chapter (CH1) I conduct a systematic literature review on the non-material contributions of wildlife. Several previous reviews have published overviews on the non-material contributions of wildlife. However, only a few of these reviews examine both the positive and negative effects of wildlife in combination. These reviews usually cover few aspects of human well-being (e.g. recreation, health, psychological well-being) or just focus on a specific group of wildlife species (e.g. carnivores, scavengers). In addition, the pathways determining how wildlife affects human well-being are yet little understood. The aim of this review is therefore to create a holistic overview of the current knowledge on non-material contributions of wildlife (WCP), by summarising research on positive and negative effects and disentangling potential channels of human-wildlife experiences.
My results show that most studies in scientific literature report negative WCP. However, over the last decade the number of publications on positive WCP has increased, mainly in the Global North. This change in research focus, at the turn of the century, may be related to the newly emerging ideas and perspectives on nature during that time (e.g. Ecosystem Services and NCP). The results may also indicate different research interests across global regions and a focus on positive WCP (especially in the Global North). Surprisingly, the review identifies a lack of joint systematic assessments of positive and negative WCP across taxa, human well-being dimensions and ways (channels) of wildlife experiences. Studies show taxon-specific differences, with predominantly positive WCP reported for birds and predominantly negative WCP published for mammals and reptiles. Physical health was the most examined human well-being dimension, while many others, such as subjective well-being, social well-being, learning, identity or sense of place were rarely studied in comparison. The two channels of wildlife experiences that have been mainly studied or reported are Interaction and Knowing. While Interaction describes multisensory experiences in which people physically interact with wildlife. Knowing describes the metaphysical connection between humans and wildlife that arises through thinking or remembering experiences from wildlife encounters (including knowledge about wildlife).
To date, only few published studies examine the relationship between biodiversity and human well-being across larger spatial scales. For instance, little is known about how biodiversity is related to human well-being on the national or continental level. The second and third chapter (CH2 & 3) are thus comprised of two empirical case studies which examine the relationship between biodiversity and human well-being across Germany and Europe, respectively. As indicator for biodiversity, I use different species diversity measures including species richness and abundance. In the second chapter (CH2) I analyse the association between species richness and human health across Germany. The results demonstrate a significant positive relationship between plant and bird species richness and mental health while controlling for a multitude of socio-economic and demographic factors as well as other nature characteristics. In the third chapter (CH3) I conduct the first study on the relationship between species diversity and subjective well-being on the continental level. The results show that bird species richness (unlike mammal, megafauna and tree richness) is positively associated with life-satisfaction, a measure for subjective well-being across Europe. These results are robust while accounting for socio-economic and macro-economic factors. The results of both empirical studies are in correspondence with previous research, conducted on the local and national level.
Overall, my dissertation shows that wildlife and biodiversity greatly affect human well-being and provide substantial non-material NCP.
...
Understanding global biodiversity patterns is one of the main objectives of ecology. Spatial variation in species richness can be explained by several environmental factors. The relationships between species richness and environmental factors have been associated with latitudinal, longitudinal and elevational gradients. The number of species is determined by birth, death and migration rates of species in a given area. These rates are affected by abiotic and biotic factors acting at local and regional scales. Climatic seasonal variation may also influence biodiversity, directly through physiological limitations and indirectly through biotic interactions, vegetation structure and food availability. Climate and land use change are the main factors for landscape simplification and biotic homogenization. Thus, the study of community patterns across environmental gradients may help to predict the effect of projected environmental change.
I investigated how abiotic and biotic factors influence different facets of bird diversity across an elevational gradient. My study was conducted along an elevational gradient spanning 2000 m within and around Podocarpus National Park and San Francisco reserve on the southeastern slope of the Andes in Ecuador. The climate is humid tropical montane with a bimodal rain regime. The region is characterized by evergreen premontane forest at low elevations, evergreen lower montane forest at mid elevations and upper montane forest at high elevations. The elevational gradient has natural continuous forests within the protected reserves and fragmented forests surrounding the reserves in a matrix of cattle pastures. To monitor bird diversity, I placed nine 20-m radius point counts within 18 one-hectare plots, in continuous and fragmented forest at 1000, 2000 and 3000 m a.s.l. I recorded and identified all birds for 10 minutes within each point count. Bird communities were sampled eight times per plot, in the most humid season and in the least humid season of 2014 and 2015. To estimate flower and fruit availability, I recorded all plants with open flowers and ripe fruits within each point count. To obtain the relative invertebrate availability, I assessed understory invertebrate fresh biomass using a standardized sweep-netting design along 100-metre borders of each plot. Vertical vegetation heterogeneity was estimated at eight layers above the ground within each point count. Temperature for each plot was obtained using an air temperature regionalization tool and precipitation through remote sensing techniques and meteorological data.
In the first chapter of this thesis, I explored the effects of elevation, climate and vegetation structure on overall bird communities as well as on frugivorous and insectivorous birds. I found that elevation was mostly indirectly associated with bird diversity, jointly mediated via temperature, precipitation and vegetation structure. Additionally, elevation was directly and positively associated with both the overall bird community and with insectivores, but not with frugivores. My findings indicate a reduction of bird diversity due to climatic factors and vegetation structure with increasing elevation. However, the direct, positive effect of elevation suggests that bird diversity was higher than expected towards high elevations, probably due to spatial, biotic and evolutionary settings.
In the second chapter, I analysed the influence of climate and resource availability on temporal variation of bird communities. I found a higher bird diversity in the least humid season than in the most humid season. The seasonality of the bird communities was mainly driven by temperature and precipitation. While temperature had a significant positive effect at high elevations, precipitation had a significant negative effect at low elevations. Resource availability had no significant effect. My findings suggest that the temporal fluctuations in bird communities likely occur due to climate
constraints rather than due to resource limitations.
In the third chapter, I studied the effect of forest fragmentation on taxonomic and functional bird diversity. I found that taxonomic diversity was higher in fragmented compared to continuous forests, while functional diversity was negatively affected by fragmentation, but only at low elevations. The increase of taxonomic diversity in disturbed habitats suggests an increase of habitat generalists, which may compensate the loss of forest specialists. My findings suggest that taxonomic diversity can be uncoupled from functional diversity in diverse communities at low elevations.
My results show the effects of environmental factors on the spatio-temporal patterns of bird communities and the potentially uncoupled responses of taxonomic and functional diversity to forest fragmentation. My findings highlight that bird communities respond differently to abiotic and biotic factors across elevational gradients. Overall, my study helps to better understand the mechanisms that drive species communities in response to complex environmental conditions, which could be an essential contribution for the conservation of bird communities in the tropical Andes.
Long-distance seed dispersal is a crucial process allowing the dispersal of fleshy-fruited tree species among forest fragments. In particular, large frugivorous bird species have a high potential to provide inter-patch and long-distance seed transport, both important for maintaining fundamental genetic and demographic processes of plant populations in isolated forest fragments. In the face of increasing worldwide forest fragmentation, the investigation of long-distance seed dispersal and the factors influencing seed dispersal processes has recently become a central issue in ecology. In my thesis, I studied the movement behaviour and the seed dispersal patterns of the trumpeter hornbill (Bycanistes bucinator), a large obligate frugivorous bird, in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. I investigated (i) the potential of trumpeter hornbills to provide long-distance seed dispersal within different landscape structures, (ii) seasonal variations in ranging behaviour of this species, and (iii) the potential of this species to enhance the functional connectivity of a fragmented landscape. I used highresolution GPS-data loggers to record temporally and spatially fine-scaled movement data of trumpeter hornbills within both continuous forests and fragmented agricultural landscapes during the breeding- and the non-breeding season. First, combining these data with data on seed-retention times, I calculated seed dispersal kernels, able to distinguish between seed dispersal kernels from the continuous forests and those from the fragmented agricultural landscapes. The seed dispersal distributions showed a generally high ability of trumpeter hornbills to generate seed transport over a distance of more than 100 m and for potential dispersal distances of up to 14.5 km. Seed dispersal distributions were considerably different between the two landscape types, with a bimodal distribution showing larger dispersal distances for fragmented agricultural landscapes and a unimodal one for continuous forests. My results showed that the landscape structure strongly influenced the movement behaviour of trumpeter hornbills, and this variation in behaviour is likely reflected in the shape of the seed dispersal distributions. Second, for each individual bird I calculated daily ranges and investigated differences in daily ranging behaviour and in the process of range expansion comparatively between the breeding- and the non-breeding season. I considered differences in habitat use and possible consequences resulting for seed dispersal function during different seasons. I found that within the breeding season multi-day ranges were built from strongly overlapping and nearly stationary daily ranges which were almost completely restricted to continuous forest. In the non-breeding season, however, birds assembled multi-day ranges by shifting their range site to a generally different area, frequently utilizing the fragmented agricultural landscape. Thereby, several small daily ranges and few large daily ranges composed larger multi-day ranges within the non-breeding season. Seasonal differences in ranging behaviour and range assembly processes resulted in important consequences for seed dispersal function, with short distances and less spatial variation during the breeding season and more inter-patch dispersal across the fragmented landscape during the non-breeding season. Last, I used a projection of simulated seed dispersal events on a high-resolution habitat map to assess the extent to which trumpeter hornbills potentially facilitate functional connectivity between plant populations of isolated forest fragments. About 7% of dispersal events resulted in potential between-patch dispersal and trumpeter hornbills connected a network of about 100 forest patches with an overall extent of about 50 km. Trumpeter hornbills increased the potential of functional connectivity of the landscape more than twofold and seed dispersal pathways revealed certain forest patches as important stepping-stones for seed dispersal among forest fragments. Overall, my study highlights the overriding role that large frugivorous bird species, like trumpeter hornbills, play in seed dispersal in fragmented landscapes. In addition, it shows the importance of fine-scaled movement data combined with high-resolution habitat data and consideration of different landscape structures and seasonality for a comprehensive understanding of seed dispersal function.