Refine
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (2)
Language
- English (2)
Has Fulltext
- yes (2)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (2)
Keywords
- Daphnia (1)
- Evolution (1)
- food quality (1)
- subgenera (1)
Institute
The rate of species extinctions due to anthropogenic activities has dramatically increased within the past few centuries (Dirzo & Raven, 2003; Novacek & Cleland, 2001). Although the mechanisms and ultimate causes leading to the extinction of species remain largely unclear (Frankham et al., 2002), five threats to global biodiversity have frequently been referred to as the most important: habitat destruction and fragmentation, global climate change, hunting and overuse of food resources, biological invasions and environmental pollution (Dudgeon et al., 2006; Lewis, 2006; Novacek & Cleland, 2001). Different research fields, as conservation biology, ecology and ecotoxicology, investigate the effects of these factors on organisms and found strong evidence for their negative impact on regional and global biodiversity.
In most cases, natural populations will be impacted not only by one threat, but rather a combination of them (Buckley & Roughgarden, 2004; Kappelle et al., 1999). Multiple environmental stress factors can have cumulative negative effects on the survival of populations (Sih et al., 2004). To understand, how natural populations respond to combinations of different stress factors is thus of crucial importance in order to understand our present and future impact on all scales of biodiversity (Warren et al., 2001).
The effects of anthropogenically introduced chemicals on organisms and ecosystems are investigated in the field of ecotoxicology. Research in this area has led to a large body of information concerning the impact of chemical stress on the fitness of model species in the laboratory. In contrast to this, there is an obvious lack of knowledge on the effects of contaminants on natural populations and communities (Bickham et al., 2000; Bourdeau et al., 1990). For instance, ecotoxicologists have just started to investigate the impact of environmental pollution on the genetic variability of natural populations (Bickham et al., 2000; Whitehead et al., 2003). Genetic variation provides the raw material for populations in order to adapt to changing environmental conditions and is thus the substrate for evolution and long-term survival of populations and species (Frankham, 2005). The amount of genetic variation in populations is positively correlated with the effective population size (Frankham, 1996). Habitat destruction and fragmentation has divided the ranges of many species into small and isolated refuges. Without migration from adjacent habitats, isolated populations will decrease in their level of genetic diversity through random loss of alleles (Hedrick, 2000). Frankham (1995) for instance, showed that 32 of the 37 endangered species (which occur in small populations per definition) of different animals and plant taxa display reduced levels of heterozygosity compared to closely related and more frequent species.
In strongly human impacted landscapes, both factors, environmental pollution and habitat destruction, can be expected to occur frequently together. It is thus of crucial importance to investigate the impact of reduced genetic diversity and inbreeding on the response to chemical stress. In addition, chemical exposure has frequently been discussed to have an impact on the extent of genetic variability in exposed populations (Guttman, 1994; Staton et al., 2001; van Straalen & Timmermans, 2002). However, evidence for this 'genetic erosion hypothesis' remained scarce to date, most likely because of the difficulty to single out the impact of pollution stress from a background of multiple factors which influence patterns of genetic variability in natural populations (Belfiore, 2001; Staton et al., 2001; van Straalen & Timmermans, 2002).