Refine
Year of publication
- 2009 (3) (remove)
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (3)
Language
- English (3)
Has Fulltext
- yes (3)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (3)
Keywords
- Biochemie (1)
- Biochemistry (1)
- Chlorophyll (1)
- Crystallography (1)
- Kristallographie (1)
- Licht-Sammel-Komplex (1)
- Light-Harvesting Complex (1)
- Photosynthese (1)
- Photosynthesis (1)
Institute
TeaABC from the halophilic bacterium Halomonas elongata belongs to the family of tripartite ATP-independent periplasmic (TRAP) transporters. It facilitates the uptake of the compatible solutes ectoine and hydroxyectoine which protect the cell from dehydration by accumulating in the cytoplasm during hyperosmotic stress. It is the only known TRAP transporter activated by osmotic stress. Ectoine and hydroxyectoine accumulation in H. elongata is regulated by the cytoplasmic universal stress protein TeaD. The gene encoding TeaD is located in the same operon as the TeaABC gene. TeaD regulates the cellular homeostasis of ectoine possibly by interacting directly or indirectly with TeaABC. All subunits of TeaABC and TeaD were expressed in E. coli and purified. With TeaD and the solute binding protein (SBP) TeaA high levels of expression suitable for crystallization could be obtained and their 3D structures solved. The small transmembrane protein TeaB and the transporter TeaC showed only moderate and low levels of expression respectively. Functional analysis on TeaA was performed using Isothermal Titration Calorimetry. The measurements demonstrate that TeaA is a high affinity ectoine-binding protein (Kd = 0.19 _M) that also has a significant affinity for hydroxyectoine (Kd = 3.8 _M). The structure of TeaA was solved using ab initio phase determination by MAD (multiple anomalous dispersion). TeaA structures were determined in three conformations: TeaA alone, TeaA in complex with ectoine and TeaA in complex with hydroxyectoine. The resolutions of the structures were 2.2, 1.55 and 1.80 Å, respectively. These represent the first structures of an osmolyte SBP associated to a TRAP transporter. The structures reveal similar ligand binding compared to osmolyte SBPs of ABC transporter pointing to coevolution of the ligand binding modes. Moreover, unique features such as the solvent-mediated specific binding of the ligands ectoine and hydroxyectoine could be observed for TeaA. The structure of TeaD in complex with its cofactor ATP was solved by molecular replacement at a resolution of 1.9 Å. Comparison with other structures of universal stress proteins shows striking oligomerization and ATP binding in TeaD. In conclusion, this work presents the first detailed analysis of the molecular mechanisms underlying ligand recognition of an osmoregulated transporter from the TRAP-transporter family.
The light-harvesting complex of photosystem II (LHC-II) is the major antenna complex in plant photosynthesis. It accounts for roughly 30% of the total protein in plant chloroplasts, which makes it arguably the most abundant membrane protein on Earth, and binds about half of plant chlorophyll (Chl). The complex assembles as a trimer in the thylakoid membrane and binds a total of 54 pigment molecules, including 24 Chl a, 18 Chl b, 6 lutein (Lut), 3 neoxanthin (Neo) and 3 violaxanthin (Vio). LHC-II has five key roles in plant photosynthesis. It: (1) harvests sunlight and transmits excitation energy to the reaction centres of photosystems II and I, (2) regulates the amount of excitation energy reaching each of the two photosystems, (3) has a structural role in the architecture of the photosynthetic supercomplexes, (4) contributes to the tight appression of thylakoid membranes in chloroplast grana, and (5) protects the photosynthetic apparatus from photo damage by non photochemical quenching (NPQ). A major fraction of NPQ is accounted for its energy-dependent component qE. Despite being critical for plant survival and having been studied for decades, the exact details of how excess absorbed light energy is dissipated under qE conditions remain enigmatic. Today it is accepted that qE is regulated by the magnitude of the pH gradient (ΔpH) across the thylakoid membrane. It is also well documented that the drop in pH in the thylakoid lumen during high-light conditions activates the enzyme violaxanthin de-epoxidase (VDE), which converts the carotenoid Vio into zeaxanthin (Zea) as part of the xanthophyll cycle. Additionally, studies with Arabidopsis mutants revealed that the photosystem II subunit PsbS is necessary for qE. How these physiological responses switch LHC-II from the active, energy transmitting to the quenched, energy-dissipating state, in which the solar energy is not transmitted to the photosystems but instead dissipated as heat, remains unclear and is the subject of this thesis. From the results obtained during this doctoral work, five main conclusions can be drawn concerning the mechanism of qE: 1. Substitution of Vio by Zea in LHC-II is not sufficient for efficient dissipation of excess excitation energy. 2. Aggregation quenching of LHC-II does not require Vio, Neo nor a specific Chl pair. 3. With one exception, the pigment structure in LHC-II is rigid. 4. The two X-ray structures of LHC-II show the same energy transmitting state of the complex. 5. Crystalline LHC-II resembles the complex in the thylakoid membrane. Models of the aggregation quenching mechanism in vitro and the qE mechanism in vivo are presented as a corollary of this doctoral work. LHC-II aggregation quenching in vitro is attributed to the formation of energy sinks on the periphery of LHC-II through random interaction with other trimers, free pigments or impurities. A similar but unrelated process is proposed to occur in the thylakoid membrane, by which excess excitation energy is dissipated upon specific interaction between LHC-II and a PsbS monomer carrying Zea. At the end of this thesis, an innovative experimental model for the analysis of all key aspects of qE is proposed in order to finally solve the qE enigma, one of the last unresolved problems in photosynthesis research.
This thesis presents a 5.9 Å map of yeast FAS obtained by cryo-electron microscopy using single particle analysis (SPA). The EM-map has been analyzed both by quantitative and qualitative analysis to aid in understanding of the structure and dynamics of yeast FAS. This study approaches the factors limiting the resolution in EM (>20 Å) and further discusses the possibilities of achieving higher-resolutions (<10 Å) in cryo-EM by single particle analysis. Here, SPA is highlighted as a powerful tool for understanding the structure and dynamics of macro-molecular complexes at near native conditions. Though SPA has been used over the last four decades, the low-resolution range (20-30 Å) of the method has limited its use in structural biology. Over the last decade, sub nanometer resolution (<10 Å) structures solved by SPA have been reported --both in studies involving symmetric particles, such as GroEL (D7) and asymmetric particles, such as ribosomes (C1). Recently, near-atomic resolution in the range of 3.8-4.2 Å has been achieved in cases of highly symmetric icosahedral viral capsid structures as well. The yeast FAS structure (D3) presented here is one of two low symmetry structures submitted to the EM-database in a resolution range of 5-6 Å; the other being GroEL (D7). Fatty acid synthase (FAS) is the key enzyme for the biosynthesis of fatty acids in living organisms. There are two types of FAS, namely the type II FAS system in prokaryotes, consisting of a set of individual enzymes, and type I FAS found in eukaryotes as a multienzyme complex. Yeast fatty acid synthase (FAS) is a 2.6 MDa barrel-shaped multienzyme complex, which carries out cyclic synthesis of fatty acids. By electron cryomicroscopy of single particles we obtained a 3D map of yeast FAS at 5.9 Å resolution. Compared to the crystal structures of fungal FAS, the EM map reveals major differences and new features that indicate a considerably different arrangement of the complex in solution, as well as a high degree of variance inside the barrel. Distinct density regions in the reaction chambers next to each of the catalytic domains fit well with the substratebinding acyl carrier protein (ACP) domain. In each case, this resulted in the expected distance of ~18 Å from the ACP substrate binding site to the active site of the catalytic domains. The multiple, partially occupied positions of the ACP within the reaction chamber provide direct insight into the proposed substrate-shuttling mechanism of fatty acid synthesis in this large cellular machine.