Institut für Sozialforschung (IFS)
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (345)
- Part of Periodical (24)
- Review (22)
- Contribution to a Periodical (8)
- Book (2)
- Periodical (1)
- Report (1)
- Working Paper (1)
Language
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (404)
Keywords
- Adorno (50)
- Critical Theory (27)
- Reconhecimento (26)
- Recognition (24)
- Axel Honneth (22)
- Teoria Crítica (20)
- Theodor W. Adorno (18)
- Critical theory (17)
- Frankfurt School (14)
- Teoria crítica (14)
Institute
Wo und warum es verdeckten Widerstand in demokratischen Gesellschaften gibt, erkundet ein neuer Sammelband des Instituts für Sozialforschung. Ein Gespräch mit den Herausgeber:innen Ferdinand Sutterlüty und Almut Poppinga über die Verbindung von Widerstand, Würde und das gemeinsame Pflanzen von Bäumen.
Dr. Felix Trautmann, Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter am Institut für Sozialforschung (IfS) und gemeinsam mit Dr. Sidonia Blättler, Prof. Dr. Axel Honneth und Almut Poppinga Organisator der Konferenz, über einen wichtigen und vielseitigen Denker, der lange nicht als prominenter Vertreter der Frankfurter Schule rezipiert wurde. Doch seitdem auch eine Gesamtausgabe vorliegt, hat die interdisziplinäre Auseinandersetzung mit Kracauer deutlich zugenommen.
Este texto é uma resposta ao texto de Fernando de Moraes Barros, intitulado “Ontologia coercitiva da obra de arte: Adorno contra Heidegger”. Em linhas gerais, trata-se de um exame do funcionamento interno do texto “A origem da obra de arte”, de Heidegger. Assume-se a coexistência de dois eixos no texto de Heidegger, um crítico, compatível com o pensamento de Adorno, e outro ontológico, incompatível com a reflexão de Adorno sobre a arte.
This essay presents contributions by Jürgen Habermas and Paulo Freire for the constitution of critical-reflexive subjects and the implications in the teaching-research-extension processes in the field of Organizational Studies. We show that intersubjectivity and dialogicity are conditions for the understanding between subjects and it is precisely through these conditions that the subjects are constituted, in a process that is dialogical, pedagogical and political. Freire and Habermas offer elements to deconstruct dominant instrumental logic and provide the basis for the reconstruction of unprecedented-viable possibilities of ways of organizing and managing. Therefore, this article highlights the importance of Organizational Studies to broaden the focus of teaching-research-extension possibilities and directs them to a communicative and dialogic engagement, beyond the borders of universities. This reconstruction indicates that researchers participate in different public arenas, debate and build public problems, processes of resistance, visibility, and dramatization of problematic issues. Observing the contributions of Freire and Habermas, Organizational Studies as a field cannot be limited to developing a critique, from a distant point of view: it is necessary to co-participate, co-act, co-operate and co-construct with its public.
