940 Geschichte Europas
Refine
Document Type
- Working Paper (5) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (5)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (5)
Keywords
- Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) (1)
- Anti-Judaism (1)
- Antijudaismus (1)
- Bibel / Altes Testament (1)
- Bible / Old Testament (1)
- Church Courts (1)
- Common Law (1)
- Confessionalization (1)
- Early Modern Times (1)
- Early modern political thought (1)
Permanent conflict resolution at the high courts was one of the Holy Roman Empire’s main characteristics. This applies even to conflicts between rural communities and their lords, who could be dealt with, at least under certain circumstances, at the Imperial Chamber Court or the Aulic Council. These trials, however, were embedded in complicated processes of establishing and legitimizing claims on a local level as well as attempts to achieve a solution by violence or by arbitration. Researchers have stated that conflict resolution underwent, in the long run, a process of “juridification” (“Verrechtlichung”). This working paper proposes a method, based on Niklas Luhmann’s theory of procedural legitimation (“Legitimation durch Verfahren”), which possibly allows to detect elements of juridification and conflict resolution in the actions of parties and courts.
Der Beitrag erwägt aus bibelhermeneutischer Perspektive, wie es zu unterschiedlichen Idealisierungen des alttestamentlichen Gemeinwesens im politischen Denken der Frühen Neuzeit kam. Dabei werden zunächst allgemeine Faktoren berücksichtigt, die eine biblische Orientierung im politischen Denken ausgehend von der Reformationszeit im 16. Jahrhundert erklärbar machen. Ein Überblick über betreffende Quellentitel des 16. und 17. Jahrhunderts zeigt, dass hierbei in allen größeren Konfessionen, wenn auch in unterschiedlicher Dichte, das Ideal des alttestamentlich-jüdischen Gemeinwesens eine Rolle spielte. Entlang zweier Fallbeispiele (François Ragueau, Petrus Cunaeus) werden dann konfessionelle und transkonfessionelle Aspekte unterschieden, um neue Perspektiven auf das Konfessionalisierungsparadigma und andere Modernisierungstheorien zu eröffnen.
Das Arbeitspapier zeigt Perspektiven eines Promotionsprojektes auf, das sich mit der Reform der englischen Common Law- und Equity-Gerichtsbarkeit im Viktorianischen Zeitalter befasst. Nach einem Einblick in relevante Quellen und Literatur wird inhaltlich auf Mitglieder und Aufgaben der im Jahr 1867 eingesetzten Judicature Commission eingegangen. Anschließend werden Neuerungen aufgezeigt, die für das englische Gerichtswesen aus den in den 1870er Jahren verabschiedeten Judicature Acts folgten.
This paper examines a practice that is nearly imperceptible to historians because the bulk of evidence for it is to be found in the interstices of the beaten paths of legal and social history and because it mixes economic and religious matters in a strikingly unfamiliar manner. From the thirteenth to the sixteenth century, excommunication for debt offered ordinary people an economical, efficacious enforcement mechanism for small-scale, daily, unwritten credit. At the same time, the practice offered holders of ecclesiastical jurisdiction an important opportunity to round out their incomes, particularly in the difficult fifteenth century. This transitional practice reveals a level of credit below that of the letters of change, annuities secured on real property, or written obligations beloved of economic historians and historians of banking. Studying the practice casts light on the transition from the face-to-face, local economies of the high Middle Ages to the regional economies of the early modern period, on how the Reformation shaped early modern regimes of credit, and on how the disappearance of ecclesiastical civil justice facilitated the emergence of early modern juridically sovereign territories.
Between the 12th and 16th centuries the Hanseatic merchants obtained extremely important privileges from the rulers of the countries with whom they traded. These secured their commercial and legal status and the autonomy of their staples in Flanders, England, Norway, Denmark and Russia. Within these privileges no other subject receives so extensive a treatment as court procedure. Here, the single most important concern of the Hanseatic merchants was their position in front of alien courts. The article analyses the great attention given to court procedure in the twenty main Hanseatic privileges: What did the merchants require? Which procedural rules were necessary to encourage them to submit their disputes to alien public court instead of taking the matter into their own hands and turning to extra-judicial methods to resolve matters, e.g. cancellation of business relations, boycotts or even trade wars? This analysis suggests that the two most important concerns reflected in the procedural rules were to avoid delay to the next trading trip and to ensure a rational law of proof. The former was addressed by pressing for short-term scheduling and swift judgment and by the dispensation from appearing before the court in person. The latter included avoidance of duels and other ordeals and the attempt to obtain parity by appointing half of the jurors from Hanseatic cities.