ZENAF Arbeits- und Forschungsberichte : (ZAF)
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Working Paper (13)
- Part of a Book (2)
- Article (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (16)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (16)
Keywords
- USA (8)
- Institutionalisierung (2)
- Multikulturelle Gesellschaft (2)
- Aufsatzsammlung (1)
- Bush, George W. (1)
- Demokratie (1)
- Einkommensumverteilung (1)
- Evangelikale Bewegung (1)
- Geschichte (1)
- Geschichte 1942-1990 (1)
Institute
2009,1
The paper aims at presenting research about Neo-Conservatism, in particular about the origin(s), history of development, ideas, and foreign policy goals. The core argument of the paper is that the discipline of International Relations (IR), in particular the North American Research and the Peace and Conflict Research, should take the Neoconservatives seriously. Three arguments can be made for this: First of all, Neoconservatives such as Robert Kagan, Charles Krauthammer, and Normen Podhoretz are participating in the debates about US foreign policy, and they introduce their ideas (e.g. "democracy promotion", "unipolar moment", and "benevolent empire") into the discourse. The foreign policy of the Reagan administration as well as the foreign policy of George W. Bush was highly influenced by neoconservative ideas. To sum up, Neo-Conservatism is the fourth influential school of US foreign policy beside Isolationism, Liberal Internationalism, and Realism. Secondly, Neoconservatives are proponents of a war-prone-US foreign policy, and advocates of the "war on terror" and the Iraq War. And finally, Neoconservatives are characterized by ideas, in particular the idea of democracy promotion, as the purpose of American politics and historic mission. Along with this, a neoconservative misunderstanding of IR theories becomes apparent. The "Democrat Realist" Krauthammer and the "Wilsonianist" Podhoretz both refer to "Realism", "Liberalism" and Wilson’s doctrine "to make the world safe for democracy" in a way which is not only misleading, but deceptive. Neoconservatives suggest that Realism is a sole power politics-theory without normative bias, and that the scholars of the liberal peace theory as well as Wilson and his successors claim for a policy of democracy promotion by using force and waging war. Against this background, a critical examination with Neoconservatism is presented in the paper. To reveal the neoconservative misunderstanding of IR discipline and its two important school of thoughts, the few similarities but numerous differences between Neo-Conservatism on the one hand and realist and liberal approaches in IR on the other hand are worked out.
2009,2
The privatization of Old Age and Survivors Insurance and Disability Insurance was a top priority on president Bush’s domestic political agenda. Although Bush’s reform initiative has failed and president Obama has declared not to privatize social security, the system of public old age security in the United States is still in crisis, mainly because of demographic factors and the ensuing financial problems but also because of the recent and deep economic recession in the United States. This article reviews the initiative of the Bush-Administration to partially privatize social security and analyzes the main objectives behind Bush policy as well as the main arguments against and obstacles to it. By placing Bush politics of privatizing social security in a broader context of comparative welfare state reform, this article discusses the consequences of privatizing social security systems on equality and poverty, as well as on the legitimacy of the political system in general.
2007,1
After he had only tightly lost the election in July 2006, Andrés Manuel López Obrador and his Coalición claimed fraud and asserted that unfair conditions during the campaign had diminished his chances to win the presidency. The paper investigates this latter allegation centering on a perceived campaign of hate, unequal access to campaign resources and malicious treatment by the mass media. It further analyzes the mass media’s performance during the conflictual post electoral period until the final decision of the Federal Electoral Tribunal on September 5th, 2006. While the media’s performance during the campaign tells us about their compliance with fair media coverage mechanisms that have been implemented by electoral reforms in the 1990s, the mass media is uncontained by such measures after the election. Thus, their mode of coverage of the postelectoral conflicts allows us to “test” the mass media’s transformation to a more unbiased, social responsible “fourth estate”. Finally the paper scrutinizes whether the claims of fraud and the protests by the leftist movement resulted in lower levels of institutional trust and democratic support. The analysis of the media performance is based on data provided by the Federal Electoral Institute (IFE). Its Media Monitor encompassed more than 150 TV stations, 240 radio stations and 200 press publications. However, there is no comparable data available for the postelectoral period. Interviews with Mexican media experts, which the author has conducted during the postelectoral period, serve as empirical basis for the second part. Data on the public opinions and attitudes of Mexican citizens are taken from the 2007 Latinobarometro, the 2006 Encuesta Nacional and several polls conducted by Grupo Reforma. The results do not support López Obradors notions. Even though a strong party bias is characteristic of the Mexican media system, all findings hint at a continuity of balanced campaign coverage and fair access to mass media publicity. Coverage during the postelectoral period was more polarized, yet both sides remained at least partially open for oppositional views. The claims of fraud, mass protest mobilization and anti-institutional discourse by Lopez Obrador’s leftist movement seem not to have caused significant loss in institutional trust, support of and satisfaction with democracy, even though these levels remain quite low.
2006,1
Although many observers consider the Bush administration’s “faith-based initiative” a unique breach in the wall of separation between church and state, close ties between the federal government and religious agencies are no novelty in the history of American public policy. Since the end of the Second World War, billions of dollars of public funds have been made available to religiously-affiliated hospitals, nursing homes, educational institutions, and social services - institutions which were regarded as vital to Cold War preparedness. By the same token, government use of religious foreign aid agencies, the donation of surplus land and military facilities to religious charities, and the funding of the chaplaincy in the armed forces have undergirded Cold War foreign policy goals. Based on the principle of subsidiarity, post-war public policy thus integrated religious groups into the framework of the welfare and national security state in ways which underwrote both the expansion of the federal government and the growth of religious agencies. Crucially, public funding relations involved not only mainline Protestant, Jewish and Catholic organizations, but also white evangelicals, who had traditionally been the most outspoken opponents of closer ties between church and state. Cold War Anti-Communism, the fear of Catholic or secularist control of public funds, and pragmatic considerations, however, ushered in the gradual revision of their separatist views. Ironically, the programs of Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society, so vilified by the Christian Right, pioneered many of the funding streams most beneficial to evangelical providers. Considering that since 1945 the sprawling and loosely organized evangelical movement has become the largest single religious faction in the US, and that conservative Protestants now form the most strongly Republican group in the religious spectrum, these findings are of particular importance. They suggest that Cold War state-building and the resurgence of Evangelicalism mutually reinforced each other in ways which have been largely ignored by scholarship on conservatism and its focus on the “backlash” against the political and cultural upheaval of the 1960s. Based on newly accessible archival materials and a comprehensive review of secondary literature, this paper suggests that the institutional and ideological ties between evangelicals and the state, which developed in the aftermath of the Second World War, are as important in understanding the political mobilization of conservative Protestants as the more recent “culture war” sentiments.
2005,1
In der vorliegenden Studie werden die sozialpolitischen Reformen in den USA und Kanada während der 1990er Jahren in einer vergleichenden Perspektive analysiert. Dabei wird insbesondere die Rolle steuerpolitischer Instrumentarien in den Reformen thematisiert und der Frage nachgegangen, ob sich hier ein neuer Typ von Wohlfahrtsstaat herausbildet. Im ersten Teil des Papiers wird das in der vergleichenden Wohlfahrtsstaatsforschung etablierte Modell des liberalen Wohlfahrtsstaats skizziert, um vor diesem Hintergrund die Reformen in den USA und Kanada zu untersuchen und zu vergleichen. Anschließend wird in einer breiteren vergleichenden Perspektive die out-put-Leistung der beiden Wohlfahrtsstaaten analysiert. Al normative Kriterien hierbei gilt in erster Linie die Umverteilungsfunktion sozialpolitischer Instrumentarien, hier in erster Linie verstanden als Einkommensumverteilung.
2004,1
Am Beginn des 21. Jahrhunderts wird der Zustand der US-Demokratie kontrovers diskutiert. Während manche Beobachter eine zu hohe Responsivität des politischen Systems gegenüber den Ansprüchen seiner Bürger entdeckt haben wollen und deshalb von demosclerosis und einer Hyperdemokratie sprechen, in welcher der Volkswille in einen unantastbaren, göttlichen Rang erhoben worden sei, kommen andere zu dem Schluss, dass die Gründerväter im Hinblick auf ihre handlungsanleitende Furcht vor einer »Tyrannei der Mehrheit« ganze Arbeit geleistet und ein nahezu unüberwindbares System von Vetopositionen geschaffen hätten, das Partikularinteressen strukturell bevorzuge und deshalb nur in Ausnahmesituationen die Mehrheitspräferenzen der Bürger in Politik umsetze. Kurzum: Die Furcht der Federalists vor einer »Mehrheitstyrannei« habe einer »Minderheitstyrannei« Tür und Tor geöffnet. Der Artikel versucht die Vereinigten Staaten in diesem Spannungsbogen zu verorten. Ziel ist es, die Qualität der amerikanischen Demokratie am Beginn des 21. Jahrhunderts zu problematisieren. Dabei werden auch die Entwicklungen nach dem 11. September berücksichtigt.
2003,2 Teil 1
Proceeding chronologically in terms of the events covered, Raimund Schieß in his paper „Too close to call: CNN’s politics of captions in the coverage of the Florida Recount“ focusses on Nov. 11, 2000, when the Bush campaign applied to Miami Federal Court to stop the manual recount of ballots which had been started in some counties. The paper studies the discursive practices employed by the CNN journalists to construct a particular version of the events, focussing on captions, i.e. the lines of text inserted at the bottom of the tv screen, and on the way in which they interact with the other verbal and visual components of the television text. Raimund Schieß concludes that captions, far beyond providing mere details of a speech event (who is talking to whom about what, where and when), are used to select, to highlight and hide, and thus to invite a preferred interpretation of the event. He is also able to show that captions are often employed to exploit a story’s potential for drama and sensation. His detailed micro-analysis of the verbal and visual dimensions of the television text is supported by careful documentation of the data, either through screen shots or via transcriptions of the stretches of broadcast discussed.
2003,1
This paper studies one of the earliest forms of modern consumer culture—the road book—in relation to one of the early utopias of modern consumption—California. Criticism has traditionally treated the road book as an extension of a loosely defined transcendentalist project, where drivers take to the open road to “discover” themselves in nature. The determinate context, however, is corporate rather than literary-historical. The earliest road books were advertisements. Their itineraries linked up with other spatial technologies (e.g. the conveyor belts in automobile plants and modern highways), transforming space into a vast production and distribution network. Production and distribution intersected in California, the state with the most automobiles per capita and the destination of most early road trips.
The first section of the paper considers the journey to California from the perspective of Emily Post, who would later become a famous writer on etiquette. Post’s book is the narrative equivalent to the standardized roadside architecture, converting local difference into a tourist attraction, and local (especially ethnic) identity into a commodity. The next section considers the effects of commercial homogenization on gender, focusing on the moment when some women, taking the steering wheel, assumed agency as consumers. The primary texts here are some of the early novels of Sinclair Lewis, along with examples of sociology and advertising copy from the 1920s and 1930s. The final section analyzes the WPA Guidebook to California as a federal attempt to re-map corporate space—the space of tourist attractions and consumers—according to a progressive ideal. All three sections treat the tour form as a spatial and literary structure—a privileged topos, at once geographical and symbolic, where complex relations between identity and place are negotiated in the form of a journey.
1999,1
Auf dem Hintergrund der Analyse der kanadischen Entwicklung und der sie begleitenden Diskussion um die Integration in den nordamerikanischen Wirtschaftsraum und die Problematik des Quebecer Minderheitennationalismus lassen sich folgende Schlussfolgerungen ziehen: Zum ersten kann im Falle Kanadas tatsächlich nur von einer internationalen Wirtschaftsintegration im Sinne einer regionalen Integration gesprochen werden und nicht von einer Globalisierung der ökonomischen Beziehungen. Die Ergebnisse und Daten haben gezeigt, dass sich der Handel zunehmend auf den nordamerikanischen Kontinent konzentriert. Diese Ergebnisse lassen sich auch durch andere Untersuchungen zum europäischen Binnenmarkt und auch zum asiatischen Markt bestätigen. Die regionale Integration innerhalb der drei Wirtschaftsblöcke kann eher definiert werden als eine Gegenreaktion gegen eine globale ökonomische Liberalisierung denn als ein erster Schritt in Richtung eines globalen Marktes. Ähnlich vorsichtig und differenziert argumentieren auch Hirst und Thompson, wenn sie in den Nationalstaaten weiterhin die grundlegenden Einheiten der internationalen Wirtschaft sehen. Eine relative Trennung von nationalen und internationalen Bezugssystemen werde nach Hirst und Thompson nicht aufgehoben, der Einfluß von internationalen Ereignissen auf die Binnenökonomie werde noch immer gefiltert von nationalen Maßnahmen und Prozessen. Diese Schlussfolgerungen konnten auch durch die Analyse der Verhandlungen zur Implementierung des Free trade agreements mit den USA und den sich anschließenden Verhandlungen zur NAFTA bestätigt werden. Es sind staatliche Akteure und Institutionen, die die Regeln der Integration festschreiben und auch noch weite rhin Einflussmöglichkeiten im Rahmen dieser Kooperationsgebilde besitzen. Natürlich ergeben sich hieraus andere Akteurskonstellationen und Handlungsspielräume für die staatlichen Akteure, aber von einem generellen Bedeutungsverlust kann keinesfalls gesprochen werden. Genau hier fehlt es in der Globalisierungsdi skussion noch an empirischen Untersuchungen, die den veränderten Charakter, die unterschiedlichenHandlungsebenen und die veränderte Funktion nationaler Wirtschaftspolitik genauer beleuchtet. Dem Staat kommen nach Hirst und Thompson auch weiterhin zentrale Aufgaben im Wirtschaftsbereich zu. Dazu gehören die Herstellung eines V erteilungskompromisses zur Beeinflussung der Wirtschaft, die Herbeiführung eines sozialen Konsenses und eine adäquate Aufteilung der Steuereinnahmen und -ko mpetenzen auf den verschiedenen Regierungsebenen. Es kann also keinesfalls von einem völligen Verlust der nationalen Souveränität durch die Globalisierung gesprochen werden, wobei hier gefragt werden muss, inwieweit das Konzept staatlicher Souveränität in seiner juristischen und rechtswissenschaftlichen Zuspitz ung je zutraf. Die Forschung müsste sich stärker konzentrieren auf das neue Konkurrenzverhältnisvon internationalen Wirtschaftsbeziehungen und Handelsströmen einerseits und den Machtbefugnissen des Staates anderer seits. Verschiedene Akteure treten neb en dem Nationalstaat auf verschiedenenEbenen mit unterschiedlichen Interessen auf. Diese neuen Interaktionsformen und die Handlungsspielräume, in denen sie stattfinden, bedürfen noch einer genauen empirischen Analyse, um Prognosen über die Zukunft des Nationalstaates zu machen. Der Nationalstaat wird aber weiterhin eine bedeutende Rolle in der Vermittlung zwischen den sozialen, politischen und ökonomischen Dimensionen der Realität spielen.
