Refine
Year of publication
- 2014 (34) (remove)
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (34) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (34)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (34) (remove)
Keywords
- Kongress (7)
- Germanistik (6)
- Türkei (6)
- Architekturforschung (1)
- Cross-cutting topics (1)
- Diversität (1)
- Europe (1)
- German-Jewish history (1)
- Grammatical Aspect (1)
- Hamburg <2014> (1)
Institute
- Physik (7)
- Biochemie und Chemie (3)
- Geschichtswissenschaften (3)
- Medizin (3)
- Erziehungswissenschaften (2)
- Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies (FIAS) (2)
- Psychologie (2)
- Universitätsbibliothek (2)
- Cornelia Goethe Centrum für Frauenstudien und die Erforschung der Geschlechterverhältnisse (CGC) (1)
- Extern (1)
D2.1. provides further elaboration of the original research design and informs about ideas for the final Volume II of bEUcitizen. It is closely connected to task 1 of work package 2: specifying various concrete tasks for the different work packages and formulating overarching questions suitable to provide substantive cohesion and integration of the overall project. The elaboration of 10 crosscutting topics (to become chapters in the “horizontal” book, D2.3.) is a first step towards this goal. Discussing these cross-cutting topics is supposed to feed, infuse and inspire the work done in the different work packages and to build cross-cutting connections between them. Themes 1-10 merge into a valuable overview of the multi-faceted research on (EU) citizenship. They access the main issues of EU-citizenship and citizenship in general from different angles and different disciplines. Taken together these contributions help to identify barriers towards EU citizenship and ways to overcome them. Each Theme formulates questions how it might feed and be fed by further information and findings in the other work packages.
D2.1. is mainly meant for internal use. Its functions are firstly to inform about preliminary ideas, eventual contributions to planned final results and secondly to make out some more of less specific guiding questions that connect the work done by the single researchers in every different work package to the project as a whole. This task implies a normative yardstick, a clear picture of what would be a "good" EU citizenship practice. Elaborating on such a normative yardstick is a meta-topic that cuts across the range of cross-cutting topics presented in this working paper.