Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (31)
- Preprint (5)
- Conference Proceeding (2)
Has Fulltext
- yes (38)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (38)
Keywords
- SARS-CoV-2 (6)
- COVID-19 (5)
- PCR (3)
- antiviral therapy (3)
- PRNT (2)
- antiviral drugs (2)
- Acute HIV infection (1)
- Ag-RDT (1)
- Anti-CMV IgG (1)
- Atherosklerose (1)
Institute
- Medizin (38)
- Georg-Speyer-Haus (1)
Die Einteilung der Pneumonien richtet sich neben klinischen und pathologischen vor allem nach ätiologischen Gesichtspunkten. Es werden diesbezüglich die respirato- bzw. pneumotropen Viren vorgestellt, daneben differentialdiagnostisch wichtige andere Infektionserreger der "Viruspneumonie" (M. pneumoniae, Chlamydia psittaci, Coxiella burnetii) beschrieben und ihre klinischen Aspekte, labordiagnostischen Möglichkeiten sowie die Aussagekraft der verschiedenen Nachweisverfahren diskutiert. Die Letalität der primär virusbedingten Pneumonien ist zwar niedrig, der respiratotrope Virusbefall kann aber Schrittmacher für schwerebakterielle Superinfektionen sein.
Es wurde die Seroprävalenz von Erregern mit und ohne Tropismus zu Gefäßendothelzellen, wie Chlamydia (C.) pneumoniae, C. trachomatis, C. psittaci, verschiedene Herpesviren (Cytomegalie-Virus (CMV), Epstein-Barr-Virus (EBV), Herpes simplex Typ l und 2-Virus, Varizella Zoster-Virus (VZV)) sowie Masern- und Mumpsviren, bei Patienten mit koronarer Herzerkrankung (KHK) (n=167) und zwei Kontrollkollektiven ohne Herzerkrankung (n=400, n=108) ermittelt. Die IgG-Antikörperprävalenzen betrugen im KHK-Kollektiv für C. pneumoniae 79,6% bzw. in den Kontrollkollektiven 72,5% und 66,7%, für C. trachomatis 4,8% bzw. 6,8% und 2,8%, für C. psittaci 3% bzw. 3,5% und 6,5%, für CMV 72,9% bzw. 74,3% und 79,2%, für EBV 95,1% bzw. 93.1% und 94%, für Herpes simplex 1/2 91,8% bzw. 87,4% und 91,3%, für Masern 99,2% bzw. 100% und für Mumps 93,4% bzw. 86,5% und 84,8%. Die Prävalenzen der VZV-IgA waren 60,3% bzw. 57,3% und 54%. Bei dieser Untersuchung zeigten sich somit keine signifikanten Unterschiede in den Antikörperprävalenzen zwischen den einzelnen Kollektiven. Wurden kranke, stationäre Patienten aus dem Kontrollkollektiv ausgeschlossen, so fand sich in diesem zweiten Kontrollkollektiv mittels Chi2-Test eine signifikant niedrigere Prävalenz (66,7%) der C. pneumoniae-IgG-Antikörper im Vergleich zu Patienten mit KHK (79,6%), (p=0,02). Die Untersuchung der geschlechtsspezifischen Prävalenzen zeigte für Männer (82,6% bzw. 78,5% und 73,2%) eine höhere Durchseuchung als für Frauen (55,6% bzw. 63% und 59,6%). Beim Vergleich gleichgeschlechtlicher Gruppen fanden sich keine signifikanten Unterschiede. Eine Assoziation von C. pneumoniae oder CMV mit der atherosklerotischen, koronaren Herzerkrankung konnte somit durch unsere* Untersuchung nicht bestätigt werden. Die Wahl der Kontroll-Gruppen kann möglicherweise die Ergebnisse der Metaanalyse früherer Assoziationsstudien beeinflußt haben.
Purpose: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) replicates predominantly in the upper respiratory tract and is primarily transmitted by droplets and aerosols. Taking the medical history for typical COVID-19 symptoms and PCR-based SARS-CoV-2 testing have become established as screening procedures. The aim of this work was to describe the clinical appearance of SARS-CoV-2-PCR positive patients and to determine the SARS-CoV-2 contact risk for health care workers (HCW).
Methods: The retrospective study included n = 2283 SARS-CoV-2 PCR tests from n = 1725 patients with otorhinolaryngological (ORL) diseases performed from March to November 2020 prior to inpatient treatment. In addition, demographic data and medical history were assessed.
Results: n = 13 PCR tests (0.6%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. The positive rate showed a significant increase during the observation period (p < 0.01). None of the patients had clinical symptoms that led to a suspected diagnosis of COVID-19 before PCR testing. The patients were either asymptomatic (n = 4) or had symptoms that were interpreted as symptoms typical of the ORL disease or secondary diagnoses (n = 9).
Conclusion: The identification of SARS-CoV-2-positive patients is a considerable challenge in clinical practice. Our findings illustrate that taking a medical history alone is of limited value and cannot replace molecular SARS-CoV-2 testing, especially for patients with ORL diseases. Our data also demonstrate that there is a high probability of contact with SARS-CoV-2-positive patients in everyday clinical practice, so that the use of personal protective equipment, even in apparently “routine cases”, is highly recommended.
The demand to develop convergent technology platforms, such as bio-functionalized medical devices, is rapidly increasing. However, the loss of biological function of the effector molecules during sterilization represents a significant and general problem. Therefore, we have developed and characterized a nano-coating (NC) formulation capable of maintaining the functionality of proteins on biological-device combination products. As a proof of concept, the NC preserved the structural and functional integrity of an otherwise highly fragile antibody immobilized on polyurethane during deleterious sterilizing irradiation (≥ 25 kGy). The NC procedure enables straight-forward terminal sterilization of bio-functionalized materials while preserving optimal conditioning of the bioactive surface.
Objectives: Regarding reactogenicity and immunogenicity, heterologous COVID-19 vaccination regimens are considered as an alternative to conventional immunization schemes.
Methods: Individuals receiving either heterologous (ChAdOx1-S [AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK]/BNT162b2 [Pfizer-BioNTech, Mainz, Germany]; n = 306) or homologous (messenger RNA [mRNA]-1273 [Moderna, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA]; n = 139) vaccination were asked to participate when receiving their second dose. Reactogenicity was assessed after 1 month, immunogenicity after 1, 3, and/or 6 months, including a third dose, through SARS-CoV-2 antispike immunoglobulin G, surrogate virus neutralization test, and a plaque reduction neutralization test against the Delta (B.1.167.2) and Omicron (B.1.1.529; BA.1) variants of concern.
Results: The overall reactogenicity was lower after heterologous vaccination. In both cohorts, SARS-CoV-2 antispike immunoglobulin G concentrations waned over time with the heterologous vaccination demonstrating higher neutralizing activity than homologous mRNA vaccination after 3 months to low neutralizing levels in the Delta plaque reduction neutralization test after 6 months. At this point, 3.2% of the heterologous and 11.4% of the homologous cohort yielded low neutralizing activity against Omicron. After a third dose of an mRNA vaccine, ≥99% of vaccinees demonstrated positive neutralizing activity against Delta. Depending on the vaccination scheme and against Omicron, 60% to 87.5% of vaccinees demonstrated positive neutralizing activity.
Conclusion: ChAdOx1-S/BNT162b2 vaccination demonstrated an acceptable reactogenicity and immunogenicity profile. A third dose of an mRNA vaccine is necessary to maintain neutralizing activity against SARS-CoV-2. However, variants of concern-adapted versions of the vaccines would be desirable.
Nosocomial infectious diseases (e.g. influenza, pertussis) are a threat particularly for immunocompromised and vulnerable patients. Although vaccination of healthcare workers (HCWs) constitutes the most convenient and effective means to prevent nosocomial transmissions, vaccine uptake among HCWs remains unacceptably low. Worldwide, numerous studies have demonstrated that nurses have lower vaccination rates than physicians and that there is a relationship between receipt of vaccination by HCWs and knowledge. Measures to improve vaccination rates need to be profession-sensitive as well as specific in their approach in order to achieve sustained success.
With respect to nosocomial influenza infections, the welfare of patients is best served by high rates of staff immunity against influenza. However, data from the Centers of Disease Control (CDC) in the USA and the Robert Koch-Institute (RKI) in Germany indicate that most of health care workers (HCWs) choose not to be vaccinated. Under voluntary influenza immunization standards, institutional influenza outbreaks occur every flu season. The question about the legality of implementation mandatory flu vaccination for HCWs is an ongoing debate, which covers several different positions.
To characterize the attitudes of German HCWs toward mandatory influenza immunization, an anonymous questionnaire was offered to HCWs of the University Hospital in Frankfurt/Main / Germany. Our study showed that almost 70% of the respondents would accept mandatory influenza vaccination.
In our opinion an annual influenza vaccination should be required for HCWs who care for immunocompromised patients and residents in long-term care if there will be a failure of voluntary vaccination programs. An informed declination should be obtained from employees who decline vaccination and these HCWs ought to work in uncritical areas of patient care.
The thrombopoietin receptor agonist eltrombopag was successfully used against human cytomegalovirus (HCMV)-associated thrombocytopenia refractory to immunomodulatory and antiviral drugs. These effects were ascribed to effects of eltrombopag on megakaryocytes. Here, we tested whether eltrombopag may also exert direct antiviral effects. Therapeutic eltrombopag concentrations inhibited HCMV replication in human fibroblasts and adult mesenchymal stem cells infected with six different virus strains and drug-resistant clinical isolates. Eltrombopag also synergistically increased the anti-HCMV activity of the mainstay drug ganciclovir. Time-of-addition experiments suggested that eltrombopag interferes with HCMV replication after virus entry. Eltrombopag was effective in thrombopoietin receptor-negative cells, and addition of Fe3+ prevented the anti-HCMV effects, indicating that it inhibits HCMV replication via iron chelation. This may be of particular interest for the treatment of cytopenias after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation, as HCMV reactivation is a major reason for transplantation failure. Since therapeutic eltrombopag concentrations are effective against drug-resistant viruses and synergistically increase the effects of ganciclovir, eltrombopag is also a drug repurposing candidate for the treatment of therapy-refractory HCMV disease.
Oral swabs, sputum and blood samples from 18 patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection were examined using real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing. Whereas oral swabs or sputum from the lower respiratory tract were tested RT-PCR positive in all patients, RNAemia was neither detected in 3 patients without symptoms nor in 14 patients with flu-like symptoms, fever or pneumonia. The only patient with RNAemia suffered from acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and was artificially ventilated in an intensive care unit. Risk for SARS-CoV-2 transmission through blood components in asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals therefore seems negligible but further studies are needed.
As the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic continues, serological assays are urgently needed for rapid diagnosis, contact tracing and for epidemiological studies. So far, there is little data on how commercially available tests perform with real patient samples and if detected IgG antibodies provide protective immunity. Focusing on IgG antibodies, we demonstrate the performance of two ELISA assays (Euroimmun SARS-CoV-2 IgG & Vircell COVID-19 ELISA IgG) in comparison to one lateral flow assay ((LFA) FaStep COVID-19 IgG/IgM Rapid Test Device) and two in-house developed assays (immunofluorescence assay (IFA) and plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT)). We tested follow up serum/plasma samples of individuals PCR-diagnosed with COVID-19. Most of the SARS-CoV-2 samples were from individuals with moderate to severe clinical course, who required an in-patient hospital stay.
For all examined assays, the sensitivity ranged from 58.8 to 76.5% for the early phase of infection (days 5-9) and from 93.8 to 100% for the later period (days 10-18) after PCR-diagnosed with COVID-19. With exception of one sample, all positive tested samples in the analysed cohort, using the commercially available assays examined (including the in-house developed IFA), demonstrated neutralizing (protective) properties in the PRNT, indicating a potential protective immunity to SARS-CoV-2. Regarding specificity, there was evidence that samples of endemic coronavirus (HCoV-OC43, HCoV-229E) and Epstein Barr virus (EBV) infected individuals cross-reacted in the ELISA assays and IFA, in one case generating a false positive result (may giving a false sense of security). This need to be further investigated.