Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (13)
- Doctoral Thesis (3)
- Working Paper (2)
- Conference Proceeding (1)
Language
- German (11)
- English (7)
- Multiple languages (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (19)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (19)
Keywords
- Lebensqualität (19) (remove)
Institute
- Sportwissenschaften (10)
- Medizin (4)
- Erziehungswissenschaften (1)
- Geographie (1)
- Psychologie und Sportwissenschaften (1)
- Wirtschaftswissenschaften (1)
Zusammenfassung und Schlussfolgerungen Die verschiedenen Alternativrechnungen zur Bemessung des Eckregelsatzes auf Basis der Daten der EVS 2003 und der normativen Setzungen der derzeit gültigen Regelsatzverordnung (RSV) haben zu Beträgen leicht über (Variante 1b) bis mäßig unter (Variante 4b) dem gegenwärtigen Satz von 345 Euro geführt. Da sich aus einer kritischen Betrachtung der grundlegenden Vorentscheidungen, auf denen die RSV aufbaut, einige fragwürdige bzw. nicht konsistente Einzelregelungen ergeben haben, erscheint das seit 2005 gültige Niveau des gesetzlich anerkannten Existenzminimums als tendenziell zu gering, zumal der Eckregelsatz auch für den Leistungsanspruch von Familien mit Kindern maßgeblich ist. Darüber hinaus ist zu bedenken, dass die Herausnahme der Sozialhilfebezieher aus der Referenzgruppe gemäß RSV unter theoretischen Gesichtspunkten nicht hinreichend ist, um Zirkelschlüsse - vom Ausgabeverhalten der Hilfebedürftigen auf deren Existenzminimum - zu vermeiden. Denn nur etwa die Hälfte bis drei Fünftel der Bedürftigen nehmen ihre HLu-Ansprüche wahr, die weiteren Anspruchsberechtigten leben in verdeckter Armut. Die Referenzgruppe zur Ermittlung des sozio-kulturellen Existenzminimums müsste also auch um die so genannte Dunkelziffer der Armut (Personen in verdeckter Armut) bereinigt werden, was vermutlich zu einem leicht erhöhten (regelsatzrelevanten) Ausgabenniveau führen und Forderungen nach einer moderaten Anhebung des Eckregelsatzes unterstreichen würde. Abschließend soll der letztlich normative Charakter jeglicher Definition des Existenzmi-nimums nochmals verdeutlicht werden, aus dem die Notwendigkeit einer gesellschaftspoliti-schen Diskussion dessen, was ein menschenwürdiges Dasein und Chancengerechtigkeit - nicht nur im formalen, sondern im materiellen Sinne - ermöglicht, folgt. Dass mit dem so genannten Statistik-Modell der Regelsatzbemessung keineswegs Objektivität bzw. Wertur-teilsfreiheit, eher nur Überprüfbarkeit oder Nachvollziehbarkeit erreicht wird, haben die An-merkungen zu den regelsatzrelevanten Anteilssätzen einzelner Ausgabenpositionen in Kapitel 3.2 gezeigt. Wie stark der Einfluss normativer Vorentscheidungen auf das Niveau des sozio-kulturellen Existenzminimums ist, zeigt sich aber bereits in der Auswahl der Alleinstehenden als Referenzgruppe. Damit wird bei der Analyse des regelsatzrelevanten Ausgabeverhaltens auf eine Gruppe Bezug genommen, die überdurchschnittlich von relativer Einkommensarmut betroffen ist.13 Alternativ könnten auch die Paarhaushalte ohne Kinder mit ihrem vergleichs-weise geringen Armutsrisiko als Referenzgruppe definiert werden. Nach einer ersten Abschätzung ergibt sich für das unterste Quintil von Paaren ohne Kind ein regelsatzrelevanter Konsum in Höhe von gut 700 Euro; bei gegebenen Regelsatzproportionen folgt daraus ein Existenzminimum (ohne Kosten für Unterkunft und Heizung) von gut 390 Euro gegenüber derzeit 345 Euro bei Alleinstehenden und von etwa 1.130 Euro gegenüber 828 Euro bei Paa-ren mit einem Kind. Mit diesem Beispiel ist nicht die Empfehlung einer entsprechend starken Leistungsanhebung verbunden, sondern lediglich ein Hinweis darauf, dass das derzeitige Ver-fahren der Regelsatzbemessung restriktiv angelegt ist und mit aktuellen Daten eher eine Er-höhung als eine Absenkung des Niveaus des Existenzminimums begründet werden kann.
The central portion of chronic wounds is often hypoxic and relatively hypothermic, representing a deficient energy supply of the tissue, which impedes wound healing or even makes it impossible. Water-filtered infrared-A (wIRA) is a special form of heat radiation with a high tissue penetration and a low thermal load to the skin surface. wIRA produces a therapeutically usable field of heat and increases temperature, oxygen partial pressure and perfusion of the tissue. These three factors are decisive for a sufficient tissue supply with energy and oxygen and consequently as well for wound healing, especially in chronic wounds, and infection defense. wIRA acts both by thermal and thermic as well as by non-thermal and non-thermic effects. wIRA can advance wound healing or improve an impaired wound healing process and can especially enable wound healing in non-healing chronic wounds. wIRA can considerably alleviate the pain and diminish wound exudation and inflammation and can show positive immunomodulatory effects.
In a prospective, randomized, controlled study of 40 patients with chronic venous stasis ulcers of the lower legs irradiation with wIRA and visible light (VIS) accelerated the wound healing process (on average 18 vs. 42 days until complete wound closure, residual ulcer area after 42 days 0.4 cm² vs. 2.8 cm²) and led to a reduction of the required dose of pain medication in comparison to the control group of patients treated with the same standard care (wound cleansing, wound dressing with antibacterial gauze, and compression garment therapy) without the concomitant irradiation.
Another prospective study of 10 patients with non-healing chronic venous stasis ulcers of the lower legs included extensive thermographic investigation. Therapy with wIRA(+VIS) resulted in a complete or almost complete wound healing in 7 patients and a marked reduction of the ulcer size in another 2 of the 10 patients, a clear reduction of pain and required dose of pain medication, and a normalization of the thermographic image.
In a current prospective, randomized, controlled, blinded study patients with non-healing chronic venous stasis ulcers of the lower legs are treated with compression garment therapy, wound cleansing, wound dressings and 30 minutes irradiation five times per week over 9 weeks. A preliminary analysis of the first 23 patients of this study has shown in the group with wIRA(+VIS) compared to a control group with VIS an advanced wound healing, an improved granulation and in the later phase of treatment a decrease of the bacterial burden.
Some case reports have demonstrated that wIRA can also be used for mixed arterial-venous ulcers or arterial ulcers, if irradiation intensity is chosen appropriately low and if irradiation is monitored carefully. wIRA can be used concerning decubital ulcers both in a preventive and in a therapeutic indication. wIRA can improve the resorption of topically applied substances also on wounds.
An irradiation with VIS and wIRA presumably acts with endogenous protoporphyrin IX (or protoporphyrin IX of bacteria) virtually similar as a mild photodynamic therapy (endogenous PDT-like effect). This could lead to improved cell regeneration and wound healing and to antibacterial effects.
In conclusion, these results indicate that wIRA generally should be considered for the treatment of chronic wounds.
Water-filtered infrared-A (wIRA) as a special form of heat radiation with a high tissue penetration and with a low thermal load to the skin surface acts both by thermal and thermic as well as by non-thermal and non-thermic effects. wIRA produces a therapeutically usable field of heat in the tissue and increases tissue temperature, tissue oxygen partial pressure, and tissue perfusion. These three factors are decisive for a sufficient tissue supply with energy and oxygen and consequently as well for wound healing and infection defense.
wIRA can considerably alleviate the pain (with remarkably less need for analgesics) and diminish an elevated wound exudation and inflammation and can show positive immunomodulatory effects. wIRA can advance wound healing or improve an impaired wound healing both in acute and in chronic wounds including infected wounds. Even the normal wound healing process can be improved.
A prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind study with 111 patients after major abdominal surgery at the University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany, showed with 20 minutes irradiation twice a day (starting on the second postoperative day) in the group with wIRA and visible light VIS (wIRA(+VIS), approximately 75% wIRA, 25% VIS) compared to a control group with only VIS a significant and relevant pain reduction combined with a markedly decreased required dose of analgesics: during 230 single irradiations with wIRA(+VIS) the pain decreased without any exception (median of decrease of pain on postoperative days 2-6 was 13.4 on a 100 mm visual analog scale VAS 0-100), while pain remained unchanged in the control group (p<0.001). The required dose of analgesics was 57-70% lower in the subgroups with wIRA(+VIS) compared to the control subgroups with only VIS (median 598 versus 1398 ml ropivacaine, p<0.001, for peridural catheter analgesia; 31 versus 102 mg piritramide, p=0.001, for patient-controlled analgesia; 3.4 versus 10.2 g metamizole, p=0.005, for intravenous and oral analgesia). During irradiation with wIRA(+VIS) the subcutaneous oxygen partial pressure rose markedly by approximately 30% and the subcutaneous temperature by approximately 2.7°C (both in a tissue depth of 2 cm), whereas both remained unchanged in the control group: after irradiation the median of the subcutaneous oxygen partial pressure was 41.6 (with wIRA) versus 30.2 mm Hg in the control group (p<0.001), the median of the subcutaneous temperature was 38.9 versus 36.4°C (p<0.001). The overall evaluation of the effect of irradiation, including wound healing, pain and cosmesis, assessed on a VAS (0-100 with 50 as indifferent point of no effect) by the surgeon (median 79.0 versus 46.8, p<0.001) or the patient (79.0 versus 50.2, p<0.001) was markedly better in the group with wIRA compared to the control group. This was also true for single aspects: Wound healing assessed on a VAS by the surgeon (median 88.6 versus 78.5, p<0.001) or the patient (median 85.8 versus 81.0, p=0.040, trend) and cosmetic result assessed on a VAS by the surgeon (median 84.5 versus 76.5, p<0.001) or the patient (median 86.7 versus 73.6, p=0.001). In addition there was a trend in favor of the wIRA group to a lower rate of total wound infections (3 of 46, approximately 7%, versus 7 of 48, approximately 15%, p=0.208) including late infections after discharge, caused by the different rate of late infections after discharge: 0 of 46 in the wIRA group and 4 of 48 in the control group. And there was a trend towards a shorter postoperative hospital stay: 9 days in the wIRA group versus 11 days in the control group (p=0.037). The principal finding of this study was that postoperative irradiation with wIRA can improve even a normal wound healing process.
A prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind study with 45 severely burned children at the Children’s Hospital Park Schönfeld, Kassel, Germany, showed with 30 minutes irradiation once a day (starting on the first day, day of burn as day 1) in the group with wIRA and visible light VIS (wIRA(+VIS), approximately 75% wIRA, 25% VIS) compared to a control group with only VIS a markedly faster reduction of wound size. On the fifth day (after 4 days with irradiation) decision was taken, whether surgical debridement of necrotic tissue was necessary because of deeper (second degree, type b) burns (11 of 21 in the group with wIRA, 14 of 24 in the control group) or non-surgical treatment was possible (second degree, type a, burns). The patients treated conservatively were kept within the study and irradiated till complete reepithelialization. The patients in the group with wIRA showed a markedly faster reduction of wound area: a median reduction of wound size of 50% was reached already after 7 days compared to 9 days in the control group, a median reduction of wound size of 90% was already achieved after 9 days compared to 13 days in the control group. In addition the group with wIRA showed superior results till 3 months after the burn in terms of the overall surgical assessment of the wound, cosmesis, and assessment of effects of irradiation compared to the control group.
In a prospective, randomized, controlled study with 12 volunteers at the University Medical Center Charité, Berlin, Germany, within each volunteer 4 experimental superficial wounds (5 mm diameter) as an acute wound model were generated by suction cup technique, removing the roof of the blister with a scalpel and a sterile forceps (day 1). 4 different treatments were used and investigated during 10 days: no therapy, only wIRA(+VIS) (approximately 75% wIRA, 25% VIS; 30 minutes irradiation once a day), only dexpanthenol (= D-panthenol) cream once a day, wIRA(+VIS) and dexpanthenol cream once a day. Healing of the small experimental wounds was from a clinical point of view excellent with all 4 treatments. Therefore there were only small differences between the treatments with slight advantages of the combination wIRA(+VIS) and dexpanthenol cream and of dexpanthenol cream alone concerning relative change of wound size and assessment of feeling of the wound area. However laser scanning microscopy with a scoring system revealed differences between the 4 treatments concerning the formation of the stratum corneum (from first layer of corneocytes to full formation) especially on the days 5-7: fastest formation of the stratum corneum was seen in wounds treated with wIRA(+VIS) and dexpanthenol cream, second was wIRA(+VIS) alone, third dexpanthenol cream alone and last were untreated wounds. Bacterial counts of the wounds (taken every 2 days) showed, that wIRA(+VIS) and the combination of wIRA(+VIS) with dexpanthenol cream were able to inhibit the colonisation with physiological skin flora up to day 5 when compared with the two other groups (untreated group and group with dexpanthenol cream alone). At any investigated time, the amount of colonisation under therapy with wIRA(+VIS) alone was lower (interpreted as more suppressed) compared with the group with wIRA(+VIS) and dexpanthenol cream.
During rehabilitation after hip and knee endoprosthetic operations the resorption of wound seromas and wound hematomas was both clinically and sonographically faster and pain was reduced by irradiation with wIRA(+VIS).
wIRA can be used successfully for persistent postoperative pain e.g. after thoracotomy.
As perspectives for wIRA it seems clinically prudent to use wIRA both pre- and postoperatively, e.g. in abdominal and thoracic operations. wIRA can be used preoperatively (e.g. during 1-2 weeks) to precondition donor and recipient sites of skin flaps, transplants or partial-thickness skin grafts, and postoperatively to improve wound healing and to decrease pain, inflammation and infections at all mentioned sites. wIRA can be used to support routine pre- or intraoperative antibiotic administration or it might even be discussed to replace this under certain conditions by wIRA.
Water-filtered infrared-A (wIRA) as a special form of heat radiation with a high tissue penetration and with a low thermal load to the skin surface acts both by thermal and thermic as well as by non-thermal and non-thermic effects. wIRA produces a therapeutically usable field of heat in the tissue and increases tissue temperature, tissue oxygen partial pressure, and tissue perfusion. These three factors are decisive for a sufficient tissue supply with energy and oxygen and consequently as well for wound healing and infection defense.
wIRA can considerably alleviate the pain (with remarkably less need for analgesics) and diminish an elevated wound exudation and inflammation and can show positive immunomodulatory effects. wIRA can advance wound healing or improve an impaired wound healing both in acute and in chronic wounds including infected wounds. Even the normal wound healing process can be improved.
A prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind study with 111 patients after major abdominal surgery at the University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany, showed with 20 minutes irradiation twice a day (starting on the second postoperative day) in the group with wIRA and visible light VIS (wIRA(+VIS), approximately 75% wIRA, 25% VIS) compared to a control group with only VIS a significant and relevant pain reduction combined with a markedly decreased required dose of analgesics: during 230 single irradiations with wIRA(+VIS) the pain decreased without any exception (median of decrease of pain on postoperative days 2-6 was 13.4 on a 100 mm visual analog scale VAS 0-100), while pain remained unchanged in the control group (p<0.001). The required dose of analgesics was 57-70% lower in the subgroups with wIRA(+VIS) compared to the control subgroups with only VIS (median 598 versus 1398 ml ropivacaine, p<0.001, for peridural catheter analgesia; 31 versus 102 mg piritramide, p=0.001, for patient-controlled analgesia; 3.4 versus 10.2 g metamizole, p=0.005, for intravenous and oral analgesia). During irradiation with wIRA(+VIS) the subcutaneous oxygen partial pressure rose markedly by approximately 30% and the subcutaneous temperature by approximately 2.7°C (both in a tissue depth of 2 cm), whereas both remained unchanged in the control group: after irradiation the median of the subcutaneous oxygen partial pressure was 41.6 (with wIRA) versus 30.2 mm Hg in the control group (p<0.001), the median of the subcutaneous temperature was 38.9 versus 36.4°C (p<0.001). The overall evaluation of the effect of irradiation, including wound healing, pain and cosmesis, assessed on a VAS (0-100 with 50 as indifferent point of no effect) by the surgeon (median 79.0 versus 46.8, p<0.001) or the patient (79.0 versus 50.2, p<0.001) was markedly better in the group with wIRA compared to the control group. This was also true for single aspects: Wound healing assessed on a VAS by the surgeon (median 88.6 versus 78.5, p<0.001) or the patient (median 85.8 versus 81.0, p=0.040, trend) and cosmetic result assessed on a VAS by the surgeon (median 84.5 versus 76.5, p<0.001) or the patient (median 86.7 versus 73.6, p=0.001). In addition there was a trend in favor of the wIRA group to a lower rate of total wound infections (3 of 46, approximately 7%, versus 7 of 48, approximately 15%, p=0.208) including late infections after discharge, caused by the different rate of late infections after discharge: 0 of 46 in the wIRA group and 4 of 48 in the control group. And there was a trend towards a shorter postoperative hospital stay: 9 days in the wIRA group versus 11 days in the control group (p=0.037). The principal finding of this study was that postoperative irradiation with wIRA can improve even a normal wound healing process.
A prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind study with 45 severely burned children at the Children’s Hospital Park Schönfeld, Kassel, Germany, showed with 30 minutes irradiation once a day (starting on the first day, day of burn as day 1) in the group with wIRA and visible light VIS (wIRA(+VIS), approximately 75% wIRA, 25% VIS) compared to a control group with only VIS a markedly faster reduction of wound size. On the fifth day (after 4 days with irradiation) decision was taken, whether surgical debridement of necrotic tissue was necessary because of deeper (second degree, type b) burns (11 of 21 in the group with wIRA, 14 of 24 in the control group) or non-surgical treatment was possible (second degree, type a, burns). The patients treated conservatively were kept within the study and irradiated till complete reepithelialization. The patients in the group with wIRA showed a markedly faster reduction of wound area: a median reduction of wound size of 50% was reached already after 7 days compared to 9 days in the control group, a median reduction of wound size of 90% was already achieved after 9 days compared to 13 days in the control group. In addition the group with wIRA showed superior results till 3 months after the burn in terms of the overall surgical assessment of the wound, cosmesis, and assessment of effects of irradiation compared to the control group.
In a prospective, randomized, controlled study with 12 volunteers at the University Medical Center Charité, Berlin, Germany, within each volunteer 4 experimental superficial wounds (5 mm diameter) as an acute wound model were generated by suction cup technique, removing the roof of the blister with a scalpel and a sterile forceps (day 1). 4 different treatments were used and investigated during 10 days: no therapy, only wIRA(+VIS) (approximately 75% wIRA, 25% VIS; 30 minutes irradiation once a day), only dexpanthenol (= D-panthenol) cream once a day, wIRA(+VIS) and dexpanthenol cream once a day. Healing of the small experimental wounds was from a clinical point of view excellent with all 4 treatments. Therefore there were only small differences between the treatments with slight advantages of the combination wIRA(+VIS) and dexpanthenol cream and of dexpanthenol cream alone concerning relative change of wound size and assessment of feeling of the wound area. However laser scanning microscopy with a scoring system revealed differences between the 4 treatments concerning the formation of the stratum corneum (from first layer of corneocytes to full formation) especially on the days 5-7: fastest formation of the stratum corneum was seen in wounds treated with wIRA(+VIS) and dexpanthenol cream, second was wIRA(+VIS) alone, third dexpanthenol cream alone and last were untreated wounds. Bacterial counts of the wounds (taken every 2 days) showed, that wIRA(+VIS) and the combination of wIRA(+VIS) with dexpanthenol cream were able to inhibit the colonisation with physiological skin flora up to day 5 when compared with the two other groups (untreated group and group with dexpanthenol cream alone). At any investigated time, the amount of colonisation under therapy with wIRA(+VIS) alone was lower (interpreted as more suppressed) compared with the group with wIRA(+VIS) and dexpanthenol cream.
During rehabilitation after hip and knee endoprosthetic operations the resorption of wound seromas and wound hematomas was both clinically and sonographically faster and pain was reduced by irradiation with wIRA(+VIS).
wIRA can be used successfully for persistent postoperative pain e.g. after thoracotomy.
As perspectives for wIRA it seems clinically prudent to use wIRA both pre- and postoperatively, e.g. in abdominal and thoracic operations. wIRA can be used preoperatively (e.g. during 1-2 weeks) to precondition donor and recipient sites of skin flaps, transplants or partial-thickness skin grafts, and postoperatively to improve wound healing and to decrease pain, inflammation and infections at all mentioned sites. wIRA can be used to support routine pre- or intraoperative antibiotic administration or it might even be discussed to replace this under certain conditions by wIRA.
Ziel der Studie war es, das Auftreten von Fatigue, Depression und Einschränkungen der Lebensqualität zu untersuchen bei einem an nichtmuskelinvasivem Blasenkrebs erkrankten Patienten unter BCG-Therapie. Die Hypothese war, dass es keinen Unterschied zu dem Validierungskollektiv der genutzten Fragebögen gibt. Zum Ende der Auswertung wurden die Ergebnisse mit dem Patientenkollektiv der mit Mitomycin behandelten Patienten (Dissertation Fr. Elena Walther) und BPH-bzw. Prostatakarzinom-Patienten (Dissertation Fr. Dr Daniela Drescher) verglichen. Ausgegeben wurden 400 Fragebögen an Patienten betreut in urologischen Praxen deutschlandweit. Zuvor war die Studie von der Ethikkommission der Landesärztekammer Hessen bewilligt worden. Der Fragebogen wurde vollständig anonymisiert, ein Rückschluss auf die Identität der Teilnehmer ist nicht möglich. Die Testinstrumente setzten sich zusammen aus dem sozioökonomischen Status, dem Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI), dem EORTC-QLQ-C30, dem Beck Depression Inventar und dem EORTC-Blasenmodul QLQ-NMIBC24. Ausgewertet wurden 67 Fragebögen. Das Geschlecht der teilnehmenden Patienten war überwiegend männlich, 58, versus 9, weiblich. Das Mindestalter lag bei 45, das Höchstalter bei 91 Jahren. Die Mehrheit der Patienten (46) waren verheiratet, zusammenlebend. 50 % der Probanden verfügten über einen Hauptschulabschluss, 22 bzw. 15 % über einen Hochschul- bzw. Realschulabschluss. Die Mehrzahl der Patienten nahm keine Psychopharmaka ein (85 %). Es konnte gezeigt werden, dass die Lebensqualität der Patienten gut ist, gemessen der der Krebsdiagnose und der begleitenden belastenden intravesikalen Therapie. 73 Entscheidende Faktoren für die guten Ergebnisse schienen in diesem Patientenkollektiv die Lebensumstände zu sein, da herausgearbeitet werden konnte, dass Patienten, zusammenlebend mit Partner beim QLQ-C30- Fragebogen beim emotionalen Teil der Fragen bessere Ergebnisse zeigten. Bei den kognitiven Einschränkungen war das Alter ein negativer Einflussfaktor. Die körperlichen Einschränkungen waren trotz des hohen Durchschnittsalters der Teilnehmer eher gering. Der Anteil an Patienten mit schwerer Fatigue war mit 6 von 67 Teilnehmern sehr gering. Der Vergleich mit anderen Patientengruppen, wie Prostatakarzinom- und BPHPatienten und mit Mitomycin behandelten Patienten ergab keine signifikanten Unterschiede. Der größte limitierende Faktor dieser Arbeit war die geringe Patientenzahl. Dies ist umso bedeutsamer, da alle den Themenbereich untersuchenden Studien so geringe Patientenzahlen aufweisen. In der täglichen Praxis scheint es schwierig, noch zusätzliche Befragungen durchzuführen, die über das normale Maß hinausgehen. Die im Fragebogen abgefragten Punkte sind allerdings sehr wichtig für den Therapieerfolg, da Patienten mit einer schlechten Lebensqualität oder einer Depression, die sich unter Therapie entwickelt eher dazu geneigt sein werden, die Behandlung abzubrechen. Wünschenswert wäre weitere Studien mit größerer Patientenzahl, um den Einfluss des Alters und der Lebensumstände noch besser untersuchen zu können. Auch Unterschiede zwischen Männern und Frauen könnten so besser aufgearbeitet werden. Es wäre sehr wichtig, diese Studien durchzuführen, um Standards in der Versorgung der Patienten zu erarbeiten, beispielsweise Messinstrumente, die gut in den Alltag zu integrieren sind, um Krankheiten oder Begleitsymptome aufzudecken, die den Krankheitsverlauf negativ beeinflussen.
Ziel der Studie war es, das Auftreten von Fatigue, Depression und Einschränkungen der Lebensqualität zu untersuchen bei einem an nichtmuskelinvasivem Blasenkrebs erkrankten Patienten unter BCG-Therapie. Die Hypothese war, dass es keinen Unterschied zu dem Validierungskollektiv der genutzten Fragebögen gibt. Zum Ende der Auswertung wurden die Ergebnisse mit dem Patientenkollektiv der mit Mitomycin behandelten Patienten (Dissertation Fr. Elena Walther) und BPH-bzw. Prostatakarzinom-Patienten (Dissertation Fr. Dr Daniela Drescher) verglichen. Ausgegeben wurden 400 Fragebögen an Patienten betreut in urologischen Praxen deutschlandweit. Zuvor war die Studie von der Ethikkommission der Landesärztekammer Hessen bewilligt worden. Der Fragebogen wurde vollständig anonymisiert, ein Rückschluss auf die Identität der Teilnehmer ist nicht möglich. Die Testinstrumente setzten sich zusammen aus dem sozioökonomischen Status, dem Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI), dem EORTC-QLQ-C30, dem Beck Depression Inventar und dem EORTC Blasenmodul QLQ-NMIBC24. Ausgewertet wurden 67 Fragebögen. Das Geschlecht der teilnehmenden Patienten war überwiegend männlich, 58, versus 9, weiblich. Das Mindestalter lag bei 45, das Höchstalter bei 91 Jahren. Die Mehrheit der Patienten (46) waren verheiratet, zusammenlebend. 50 % der Probanden verfügten über einen Hauptschulabschluss, 22 bzw. 15 % über einen Hochschul- bzw. Realschulabschluss. Die Mehrzahl der Patienten nahm keine Psychopharmaka ein (85 %). Es konnte gezeigt werden, dass die Lebensqualität der Patienten gut ist, gemessen der der Krebsdiagnose und der begleitenden belastenden intravesikalen Therapie. Entscheidende Faktoren für die guten Ergebnisse schienen in diesem Patien tenkollektiv die Lebensumstände zu sein, da herausgearbeitet werden konnte, dass Patienten, zusammenlebend mit Partner beim QLQ-C30-Fragebogen beim emotionalen Teil der Fragen bessere Ergebnisse zeigten. Bei den kognitiven Einschränkungen war das Alter ein negativer Einflussfaktor. Die körperlichen Einschränkungen waren trotz des hohen Durchschnittsalters der Teilnehmer eher gering. Der Anteil an Patienten mit schwerer Fatigue war mit 6 von 67 Teilnehmern sehr gering.
Der Vergleich mit anderen Patientengruppen, wie Prostatakarzinom- und BPH-Patienten und mit Mitomycin behandelten Patienten ergab keine signifikanten Unterschiede. Der größte limitierende Faktor dieser Arbeit war die geringe Patientenzahl. Dies ist umso bedeutsamer, da alle den Themenbereich untersuchenden Studien so geringe Patientenzahlen aufweisen. In der täglichen Praxis scheint es schwierig, noch zusätzliche Befragungen durchzuführen, die über das normale Maß hinausgehen. Die im Fragebogen abgefragten Punkte sind allerdings sehr wichtig für den Therapieerfolg, da Patienten mit einer schlechten Lebensqualität oder einer Depression, die sich unter Therapie entwickelt eher dazu geneigt sein werden, die Behandlung abzubrechen. Wünschenswert wäre weitere Studien mit größerer Patientenzahl, um den Einfluss des Alters und der Lebensumstände noch besser untersuchen zu können. Auch Unterschiede zwischen Männern und Frauen könnten so besser aufgearbeitet werden. Es wäre sehr wichtig, diese Studien durchzuführen, um Standards in der Versorgung der Patienten zu erarbeiten, beispielsweise Messinstrumente, die gut in den Alltag zu integrieren sind, um Krankheiten oder Begleitsymptome aufzudecken, die den Krankheitsverlauf negativ beeinflussen.
Principles and working mechanisms of water-filtered infrared-A (wIRA) in relation to wound healing
(2007)
The experience of the pleasant heat of the sun in moderate climatic zones arises from the filtering of the heat radiation of the sun by water vapor in the atmosphere of the earth. The filter effect of water decreases those parts of infrared radiation (most parts of infrared-B and -C and the absorption bands of water within infrared-A), which would cause – by reacting with water molecules in the skin – only an undesired thermal load to the surface of the skin. Technically water-filtered infrared-A (wIRA) is produced in special radiators, whose full spectrum of radiation of a halogen bulb is passed through a cuvette, containing water, which absorbs or decreases the described undesired wavelengths of the infrared radiation. Within infrared the remaining wIRA (within 780-1400 nm) mainly consists of radiation with good penetration properties into tissue and therefore allows – compared to unfiltered heat radiation – a multiple energy transfer into tissue without irritating the skin, similar to the sun’s heat radiation in moderate climatic zones. Typical wIRA radiators emit no ultraviolet (UV) radiation and nearly no infrared-B and -C radiation and the amount of infrared-A radiation in relation to the amount of visible light (380-780 nm) is emphasized.
Water-filtered infrared-A as a special form of heat radiation with a high tissue penetration and with a low thermal load to the skin surface acts both by thermal (related to heat energy transfer) and thermic (temperature depending, with a relevant change of temperature) as well as by non-thermal (without a relevant transfer of heat energy) and non-thermic (not depending on temperature, without a relevant change of temperature) effects. wIRA produces a therapeutically usable field of heat in the tissue and increases tissue temperature, tissue oxygen partial pressure, and tissue perfusion. These three factors are vital for a sufficient tissue supply with energy and oxygen. As wound healing and infection defense (e.g. granulocyte function including their antibacterial oxygen radical formation) depend decisively on a sufficient supply with energy and oxygen, one explanation for the good clinical effect of wIRA on wounds and wound infections can be the improvement of both the energy supply per time (increase of metabolic rate) and the oxygen supply. In addition wIRA has non-thermal and non-thermic effects, which are based on putting direct stimuli on cells and cellular structures.
wIRA can considerably alleviate the pain (with remarkably less need for analgesics) and diminish an elevated wound exudation and inflammation and can show positive immunomodulatory effects. wIRA can advance wound healing or improve an impaired wound healing both in acute and in chronic wounds including infected wounds. Even the normal wound healing process can be improved.
Keywords: water-filtered infrared-A (wIRA), infrared-A radiation, wound healing, thermal and non-thermal effects, thermic and non-thermic effects, energy supply, oxygen supply, tissue oxygen partial pressure, tissue temperature, tissue blood flow, reduction of pain, wound exudation, inflammation, immunomodulatory effects, acute wounds, chronic venous stasis ulcers of the lower legs, problem wounds, wound infections, infection defense, contact-free method, absent expenditure of material, quality of life, prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind studies
Wassergefiltertes Infrarot A (wIRA) als spezielle Form der Wärmestrahlung mit hohem Penetrationsvermögen in das Gewebe bei geringer thermischer Oberflächenbelastung vermag über thermische und nicht-thermische Effekte wesentliche, auch energetisch bedeutsame Faktoren der Wundheilung - messtechnisch belegt - zu verbessern.
wIRA kann sowohl bei akuten Wunden (prospektive, randomisierte, kontrollierte, doppeltblinde Studien der chirurgischen Universitätsklinik Heidelberg bei frischen abdominellen Op-Wunden, n=94, und der Kinderchirurgie Kassel bei schwerbrandverletzten Kindern, n=45) als auch bei chronischen Wunden und Problemwunden (prospektive, randomisierte, kontrollierte Studie in Basel, n=40, sowie prospektive Studie der Universität Tromsø/Norwegen in Hillerød/Dänemark mit u. a. auch aufwendiger thermographischer Verlaufskontrolle, n=10, in beiden Studien chronische venöse Unterschenkel-Ulzera) einschließlich infizierter Wunden Schmerzen deutlich mindern und die Wundheilung beschleunigen oder bei stagnierender Wundheilung verbessern sowie eine erhöhte Wundsekretion und Entzündung mindern. Insbesondere ist auch ohne Wundheilungsstörung eine positive Beeinflussung der Wundheilung möglich. Bei chronischen Wunden werden vollständige Abheilungen erreicht, die zuvor nicht erreicht wurden.
wIRA ist ein kontaktfreies, verbrauchsmaterialfreies, leicht anzuwendendes, als angenehm empfundenes Verfahren mit guter Tiefenwirkung, das der Sonnenwärmestrahlung auf der Erdoberfläche in gemäßigten Klimazonen nachempfunden ist. Die Bestrahlung der unbedeckten Wunde erfolgt typischerweise aus ca. 25 cm Abstand mit einem wIRA-Strahler.
Wundheilung und Infektionsabwehr (z.B. Granulozytenfunktion einschließlich antibakterieller Sauerstoffradikalbildung der Granulozyten) hängen ganz entscheidend von einer ausreichenden Energieversorgung (und von ausreichend Sauerstoff) ab.
Die klinisch gute Wirkung von wIRA auf Wunden und auch auf Problemwunden und Wundinfektionen lässt sich u. a. über die Verbesserung sowohl der Energiebereitstellung pro Zeit (Steigerung der Stoffwechselleistung) als auch der Sauerstoffversorgung (z.B. für die Granulozytenfunktion) erklären. wIRA bewirkt als thermischen Effekt eine Verbesserung aller drei entscheidender Faktoren Sauerstoffpartialdruck im Gewebe, Gewebetemperatur und Gewebedurchblutung. Daneben wurden auch nicht-thermische Effekte von Infrarot A im Sinne einer Reizsetzung auf Zellen und zelluläre Strukturen mit Reaktionen der Zellen beschrieben.
Principles and working mechanisms of water-filtered infrared-A (wIRA) in relation to wound healing
(2007)
The experience of the pleasant heat of the sun in moderate climatic zones arises from the filtering of the heat radiation of the sun by water vapor in the atmosphere of the earth. The filter effect of water decreases those parts of infrared radiation (most parts of infrared-B and -C and the absorption bands of water within infrared-A), which would cause – by reacting with water molecules in the skin – only an undesired thermal load to the surface of the skin. Technically water-filtered infrared-A (wIRA) is produced in special radiators, whose full spectrum of radiation of a halogen bulb is passed through a cuvette, containing water, which absorbs or decreases the described undesired wavelengths of the infrared radiation. Within infrared the remaining wIRA (within 780-1400 nm) mainly consists of radiation with good penetration properties into tissue and therefore allows – compared to unfiltered heat radiation – a multiple energy transfer into tissue without irritating the skin, similar to the sun’s heat radiation in moderate climatic zones. Typical wIRA radiators emit no ultraviolet (UV) radiation and nearly no infrared-B and -C radiation and the amount of infrared-A radiation in relation to the amount of visible light (380-780 nm) is emphasized. Water-filtered infrared-A as a special form of heat radiation with a high tissue penetration and with a low thermal load to the skin surface acts both by thermal (related to heat energy transfer) and thermic (temperature depending, with a relevant change of temperature) as well as by non-thermal (without a relevant transfer of heat energy) and non-thermic (not depending on temperature, without a relevant change of temperature) effects. wIRA produces a therapeutically usable field of heat in the tissue and increases tissue temperature, tissue oxygen partial pressure, and tissue perfusion. These three factors are vital for a sufficient tissue supply with energy and oxygen. As wound healing and infection defense (e.g. granulocyte function including their antibacterial oxygen radical formation) depend decisively on a sufficient supply with energy and oxygen, one explanation for the good clinical effect of wIRA on wounds and wound infections can be the improvement of both the energy supply per time (increase of metabolic rate) and the oxygen supply. In addition wIRA has non-thermal and non-thermic effects, which are based on putting direct stimuli on cells and cellular structures. wIRA can considerably alleviate the pain (with remarkably less need for analgesics) and diminish an elevated wound exudation and inflammation and can show positive immunomodulatory effects. wIRA can advance wound healing or improve an impaired wound healing both in acute and in chronic wounds including infected wounds. Even the normal wound healing process can be improved. wIRA is contact-free, easily applied, without discomfort to the patient, with absent consumption of material and with a good effect in the depth. The irradiation of the typically uncovered wound is carried out with a wIRA radiator.
Case description: A patient with a Barrett oesophageal carcinoma and a resection of the oesophagus with gastric pull-up developed swallowing disorders 6 years and 2 months after the operation. Within 1 year and 7 months two recurrences of the tumor at the anastomosis were found and treated with combined chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy respectively. 7 years and 9 months after the operation local tumor masses and destruction were present with no ability to orally drink or eat (full feeding by jejunal PEG tube): quality of life was poor, as saliva and mucus were very viscous (pulling filaments) and could not be swallowed and had to be spat out throughout the day and night resulting in short periods of sleep (awaking from the necessity to spit out). In total the situation was interpreted more as a problem related to a feeling of choking (with food or fluid) in the sense of a functional dysphagia rather than as a swallowing disorder from a structural stenosis.
At that time acetylcysteine (2 times 200 mg per day, given via the PEG tube) and irradiation with water-filtered infrared-A (wIRA), a special form of heat radiation, of the ventral part of the neck and the thorax were added to the therapy. Within 1 day with acetylcysteine saliva and mucus became less viscous. Within 2 days with wIRA (one day with 4 to 5 hours with irradiation with wIRA at home) salivation decreased markedly and quality of life clearly improved: For the first time the patient slept without interruption and without the need for sleep-inducing medication. After 5 days with wIRA the patient could eat his first soft dumpling although drinking of fluids was still not possible. After 2½ weeks with wIRA the patient could eat his first minced schnitzel (escalope).
Following the commencement of wIRA (with typically approximately 90–150 minutes irradiation with wIRA per day) the patient had 8 months with good quality of life with only small amounts of liquid saliva and mucus and without the necessity to spit out. During this period the patient was able to sleep during the night.
Discussion: The main physiological effects of water-filtered infrared-A (wIRA) are: wIRA increases tissue temperature, tissue oxygen partial pressure and tissue perfusion markedly.
The five main clinical effects of wIRA are: wIRA decreases pain, inflammation and exudation/hypersecretion, and promotes infection defense and regeneration, all in a cross-indication manner. Therefore there is a wide range of indications for wIRA.
The effects of wIRA are based on both its thermal effects (relying on transfer of heat energy) and thermic effects (temperature-dependent effects, occurring together with temperature changes) as well as on non-thermal and temperature-independent effects like direct effects on cells, cell structures or cell substances.
Conclusion: Besides in a variety of other indications for wIRA, in cases of swallowing disorders (functional dysphagia) and hypersalivation or hypersecretion of mucus the use of wIRA should be considered as part of the treatment regime for improving a patient’s quality of life.