Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Preprint (579)
- Article (370)
- Working Paper (3)
- Conference Proceeding (2)
- Contribution to a Periodical (2)
- Part of a Book (1)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
- Report (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (959)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (959)
Keywords
- Heavy Ion Experiments (18)
- Hadron-Hadron scattering (experiments) (11)
- Heavy-ion collision (6)
- LHC (6)
- Kollisionen schwerer Ionen (5)
- Hadron-Hadron Scattering (4)
- Quark-Gluon Plasma (4)
- heavy ion collisions (4)
- ALICE experiment (3)
- Heavy Ions (3)
Institute
- Physik (909)
- Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies (FIAS) (811)
- Informatik (775)
- Medizin (33)
- Biowissenschaften (3)
- Center for Financial Studies (CFS) (3)
- ELEMENTS (3)
- Hochschulrechenzentrum (3)
- Informatik und Mathematik (3)
- Wirtschaftswissenschaften (3)
- E-Finance Lab e.V. (2)
- Georg-Speyer-Haus (2)
- Geowissenschaften / Geographie (2)
- Gesellschaftswissenschaften (2)
- Helmholtz International Center for FAIR (2)
- House of Finance (HoF) (2)
- Pharmazie (2)
- Präsidium (2)
- Sustainable Architecture for Finance in Europe (SAFE) (2)
- Biochemie und Chemie (1)
- Biochemie, Chemie und Pharmazie (1)
- Deutsches Institut für Internationale Pädagogische Forschung (DIPF) (1)
- Frankfurt MathFinance Institute (FMFI) (1)
- Institut für Ökologie, Evolution und Diversität (1)
- Psychologie (1)
- Sportwissenschaften (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek (1)
An experiment addressing electron capture (EC) decay of hydrogen-like 142Pm60+ions has been conducted at the experimental storage ring (ESR) at GSI. The decay appears to be purely exponential and no modulations were observed. Decay times for about 9000 individual EC decays have been measured by applying the single-ion decay spectroscopy method. Both visually and automatically analysed data can be described by a single exponential decay with decay constants of 0.0126(7)s−1 for automatic analysis and 0.0141(7)s−1 for manual analysis. If a modulation superimposed on the exponential decay curve is assumed, the best fit gives a modulation amplitude of merely 0.019(15), which is compatible with zero and by 4.9 standard deviations smaller than in the original observation which had an amplitude of 0.23(4).