Refine
Year of publication
- 2008 (3)
Document Type
- Article (3)
Language
- English (3)
Has Fulltext
- yes (3)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (3)
Keywords
- Bestäuberanlockung (1)
- Blütenduftsoff (1)
- Blütensignale (1)
- Bombus vestalis (1)
- E. helleborine (1)
- Echium (1)
- GLV (1)
- Mimikry (1)
- Ophrys (1)
- Osmia adunca (1)
Sexual deception of male bees is one of the most remarkable mechanisms of pollination (Ackermann 1986, Proctor & al. 1996). Flowers of the orchid genus Ophrys mimic females of their pollinator species, usually bees and wasps, to attract males, which try to copulate with the flowers. During this so-called “pseudocopulation” the male removes the pollinia and transfers them to another flower to ensure pollination. Apart from visual and tactile cues, floral scent was shown to be most important for eliciting mating behaviour in males (Kullenberg 1961, Schiestl & al. 1999, Ayasse & al. 2003). Pollination in Ophrys is highly specific and usually each Ophrys species attracts only one pollinator species (Paulus & Gack 1990). The high degree of specialization provides the means of reproductive isolation between the intercrossable Ophrys-species (Ehrendorfer 1980). The complex odour-bouquets released by the flowers are species-specific and often consist of more than 100 different chemical compounds (Borg-Karlson & al. 1985, Ayasse 2006). Speciation in Ophrys-orchids may be brought about by changes in the pollinator attracting floral scent. The attraction of a new pollinator may act as a pre-zygotic isolation barrier (Stebbins 1970, Paulus & Gack 1990, Soliva & al. 2001). We investigated three sympatrically occuring Ophrys-species on Sardinia. O. chestermanii and O. normanii are endemic and are both pollinated by males of the bumblebee B. vestalis. O. tenthredinifera is pollinated by Eucera nigrilabris. There are different opinions concerning the taxonomic status of O. normanii. It has been described as an actual hybrid between O. chestermanii and O. tenthredinifera (Wood 1983). Paulus & Gack (1995) suggested that it is an own species, that either has developed from a hybrid between O. chestermanii and O. normanii or that has evolved by radiation from O. tenthredinifera. By conducting behavioural-tests with B. vestalis males, performing gas chromatographic analyses and electrophysiological studies we wanted to identify pollinator attracting scent and to clarify the taxonomic status of O. normanii.
Solitary bees are important pollinators of flowers. Besides nectar they collect pollen at flowers mainly to provide their larvae with food. Many bee species collect pollen only on a few closely related plant species (oligolecty) (Müller & al. 1997). Little is known about the visual and olfactorial signals they use for host-plant finding (Wcislo & Cane 1996). However, bees can olfactorily distinguish between different pollen species (von Frisch 1923), and a species-specific chemistry of pollen odour is known for some plant species (Bergström & al. 1995, Dobson & al. 1999). Further, it was shown that naïve oligolectic bees recognize their host-plant on the basis pollen volatiles (Dobson & Bergström 2000) and that flower-experienced bees could use pollen odours to assess pollen availability (Dobson & al. 1999). Besides scent, also visual cues are of relevance for host-plant finding, and bees orientate especially spectral contrasts. Biotests with dummy flowers revealed that colour contrast and not intensity and dominant wavelengths are influencing innate behavioural responses (Lunau 1990). Further it was shown that naïve bumblebees were most motivated to land on a flower when visual stimuli from the antheres are combined with olfactorial stimuli from the pollen (1992). We choose Osmia adunca P., which is highly specialized on Echium L., as a model to investigate the importance of floral cues for an oligolectic bee. Because bees learn to associate odours with reward more rapidly than visual cues (Menzel 1985), we hypothesize that scent plays a major role in attraction flower-experienced O. adunca females. We used gas chromatography to compare the scent of three Echium species with the scent of a closely related Anchusa species, and a spectrometer to compare the colour of the three Echium species. Additionally we conducted a biotest to determine the importance of visual and olfactorial signals of Echium for host-plant finding of experienced O. adunca females.
The orchid genus Epipactis is represented by 25 species in Europe (Richards 1982). Epipactis helleborine (L.) Crantz is the most common and widely distributed species of the genus (Wiefelspütz 1970), and is a prime example for wasp-flowers, because it is mainly pollinated by social wasps (Hymenoptera: Vespidae), like Vespula vulgaris and V. germanica (Müller 1873). Darwin (1888) already noticed that E. helleborine is almost exclusively ignored by bees and bumblebees, an observation that was confirmed in recent investigations (Keppert 2001). The flowers of E. helleborine show morphological, physiological and phenological adaptations to the visit and the pollination by Vespidae (Keppert 2001). They possess a reddish-brown or dirty purple coloration of the inflorescence (Keppert 2001), have relatively small, mostly bulbous blossoms with a broad entrance and bulbous widened, nectar-rich juice holders (Müller 1873, 1881; Schremmer 1962). Although there is much reported about wasp-pollinated flowers there is little known about the signals that are responsible for the attraction of wasps. Wiefelspütz (1970) proclaimed the statement that only the visual stimulus is responsible for the wasp attraction. Recently studies, however, assumed that odour is involved in the wasp attraction (Keppert 2001). Hölzler (2003) showed that the main attraction of the wasp-flower Epipactis for pollinators is its olfactory stimulus. It remains an unanswered question why E. helleborine flowers almost exclusively attracts social wasps, as opposed to bees and bumblebees. In this study we analysed the role of floral volatiles which are responsible for the specific attraction of social wasps. We supposed a mimicry-system in E. helleborine for the specific attraction of pollinators for the following reasons. So-called “green leaf volatiles” (GLVs) are emitted by plants while herbivorous insects, for example caterpillars, feed on them. GLVs thereby attract predators or parasitoids of the herbivorous insects (Dicke & Sabelis 1988; Turlings & al. 1990, 1995; Dicke & Vet 1999). Among the GLVs so far identified in former studies there are aldehydes, compounds that were also found in flower extracts of E. helleborine (Hölzler 2003). Therefore, we postulated that E. helleborine flowers produce GLVs in order to attract prey hunting social wasps for pollination. We performed bioassays and analysed flower odour gained to headspace-sampling using gas chromatography (GC), mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and gas chromatography coupled with electrophysiological analysis (GC-EAD) to investigate the hypothesis that E. helleborine flowers mimic “green leaf volatiles” (GLVs) to attract their pollinators.