Open Access

Neben Brille und Kontaktlinse stehen heute operative Maßnahmen zur Verfügung, um Sehfehler dauerhaft zu korrigieren. Dazu zählen Verfahren, bei denen die Hornhaut moduliert wird, sowie Methoden, bei denen der Sehfehler mit Hilfe eines Kunstimplantats behoben wird. Vor allem Kurzsichtigkeit, Weitsichtigkeit und Astigmatismus (Hornhautverkrümmung) können so effektiv und dauerhaft korrigiert werden. Das vorherrschende Verfahren für niedrige bis mittlere Refraktions(Brechungs)fehler ist die Hornhautkorrektur mit Hilfe eines Argon-Fluorid-Excimer-Lasers. Schon 24 Stunden nach der Operation können die Betroffenen wieder »normal« sehen, das heißt ohne Brille oder Kontaktlinsen. Höhere Refraktionsfehler werden heute vor allem mit implantierbaren Kunstlinsen behandelt. Die größte Herausforderung für die moderne Forschung auf dem Gebiet der Refraktionschirurgie in den nächsten Jahren bis Jahrzehnten wird die sichere Korrektur der Altersweitsichtigkeit bleiben.

Hintergrund: Die Unterschidung von Augen mit frühem Keratokonus (KC) von normalen Augen bereitet nach wie vor Schwierigkeiten. Die vorliegende Untersuchung vergleicht konventionelle keratometrie-basierte mit wellenfront-basierten Maßzahlen hinsichtlich ihrer Eignung, normale Augen von Augen mit sehr frühem Keratokonus zu unterscheiden. Methoden: Es wurden 17 Augen von 17 Patienten mit frühem KC eingeschlossen. Bei diesen 17 Augen handelt es sich um klinisch unauffällige Partneraugen des stärker betroffenen Auges. 123 Normalaugen von 69 Patienten dienten als Negativkontrolle. Von den axialen Kurvaturdaten wurden folgende Maßzahlen berechnet: zentrale Keratometrie (cK), Astigmatismus (AST), inferior-superiore Brechwertdifferenz (I-S), Verkippung der radialen Achsen (SRAX), KISA% index (eine Maßzahl, die auf cK, AST, I-S und SRAX basiert) und corneale Zernike-Koeffizienten (1.–7. Ordnung, Pupillendurchmesser: 6 mm). Aus Zernike-Koeffizienten wurden Diskriminanzfunktionen konstruiert. Receiver-Operatiing-Charakteristik (ROC)-Kurven wurden erstellt, um die diagnostische Trennschärfe dieser Werte zur Unterscheidung von klinisch unauffälligen Partneraugen von Augen mit frühem Keratokonus und normalen Kontrollen zu evaluieren. Ergebnisse: Der I-S-Wert (Korrektheit 92,1%, kritischer Wert 0,59 D) und die vertikale Coma (C3-1; 96,7%, –0,2 µm) waren die beiden Einzelwerte mit höchster Trennschärfe. Mit den ursprünglich publizierten kritischen Werten lag der Rabinowitz-McDonnell test (cK und I-S) bei 83,3% (Sensitivität 0%, Spezifität 100%) und der KISA% bei 70,8% (81,3%, 60,3%). In Verbindung mit Diskriminanzanalyse errichten Zernike-Koeffizienten eine Korrektheit von 96,7% (100%, 93,4%). Schlussfolgerungen: Auf cornealen Zernike-Koeffizienten basierende Maßzahlen erreichte die höchste Trennschärfe bei der Unterscheidung von Augen mit subklinischem KC von Normalaugen. Dennoch konnten konventionelle KC-indices eine ähnlich hohe Trenschärfe wie die Zernike-Methode erreichen, wenn die kritischen Werte entsprechend angepasst werden.

Purpose: To investigate the efficacy and safety of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for corneal decompensation following primary Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). Methods: This was a retrospective case series of 15 patients that underwent DMEK surgery for corneal decompensation after failed DSAEK. Main outcome parameter was corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) after DMEK and DSAEK. Secondary outcome measures included central corneal thickness (CCT), endothelial cell density (ECD), rebubbling rate, and primary graft failure after DMEK. Explanted DSAEK grafts were evaluated by light microscopy. Results: The mean (±SD) time period between DSAEK and DMEK surgery was 15±8 months (range, 6–31 months). Preoperative CDVA was 1.72±0.62 (logMAR). After DMEK, CDVA improved significantly to 0.78±0.48 at 1 month and to 0.23±0.24 after 12 months (P=0.022). Visual acuity data after DMEK were significantly better compared to preoperative values. The average CCT after DMEK decreased significantly from 869±210 µm (preoperative) to 505±45 µm (1 month postoperative) (P<0.001) and remained stable over 12 months. The ECD decreased from 2,589±209/mm2 (preoperative) to 1,691±589/mm2 (12 months postoperative). Rebubbling DMEK was required in three patients (=20%). Conclusion: DMEK represents a feasible and safe procedure in achieving better functional results compared to DSAEK. Visual acuity and optical quality can be effectively reestablished after unsuccessful primary DSAEK surgery even in patients with long-standing corneal decompensation. Further investigations are required to validate the preliminary clinical findings.

Purpose: Amblyopia with eccentric fixation, especially when not diagnosed early, is a therapeutic challenge, as visual outcome is known to be poorer than in amblyopia with central fixation. Consequently, treatment after late diagnosis is often denied. Electronic monitoring of occlusion provides us the chance to gain first focussed insight into age-dependent dose response and treatment efficiency, as well as the shift of fixation in this rare group of paediatric patients. Methods: In our prospective pilot study, we examined amblyopes with eccentric fixation during 12 months of occlusion treatment. We evaluated their visual acuity, recorded patching duration using a TheraMon®-microsensor, and determined their fixation with a direct ophthalmoscope. Dose-response relationship and treatment efficiency were calculated. Results: The study included 12 participants with strabismic and combined amblyopia aged 2.9–12.4 years (mean 6.5). Median prescription of occlusion was 7.7 h/day (range 6.6–9.9) and median daily received occlusion was 5.2 h/day (range 0.7–9.7). At study end, median acuity gain was 0.6 log units (range 0–1.6) and residual interocular visual acuity difference (IOVAD) 0.3 log units (range 0–1.8). There was neither significant acuity gain nor reduction in IOVAD after the 6th month of treatment. Children younger than 4 years showed best response with lowest residual IOVAD at study end. Efficiency calculation showed an acuity gain of approximately one line from 100 h of patching in the first 2 months and half a line after 6 months. There was a significant decline of treatment efficiency with age (p = 0.01). Foveolar fixation was achieved after median 3 months (range 1–6). Three patients (> 6 years) did not gain central fixation. Conclusion: Eccentric fixation is a challenge to therapy success. Based on electronic monitoring, our study quantified for the first time the reduction of treatment efficiency with increasing age in amblyopes with eccentric fixation. Despite some improvement in patients up to 8 years, older patients showed significantly lower treatment efficiency. In younger patients with good adherence, despite poor initial acuity, central fixation and low residual IOVAD could be attained after median 3 months. Hence, the necessity of early diagnosis and intensive occlusion should be emphasized.

Purpose: Amblyopia with eccentric fixation, especially when not diagnosed early, is a therapeutic challenge, as visual outcome is known to be poorer than in amblyopia with central fixation. Consequently, treatment after late diagnosis is often denied. Electronic monitoring of occlusion provides us the chance to gain first focussed insight into age-dependent dose response and treatment efficiency, as well as the shift of fixation in this rare group of paediatric patients. Methods: In our prospective pilot study, we examined amblyopes with eccentric fixation during 12 months of occlusion treatment. We evaluated their visual acuity, recorded patching duration using a TheraMon®-microsensor, and determined their fixation with a direct ophthalmoscope. Dose-response relationship and treatment efficiency were calculated. Results: The study included 12 participants with strabismic and combined amblyopia aged 2.9–12.4 years (mean 6.5). Median prescription of occlusion was 7.7 h/day (range 6.6–9.9) and median daily received occlusion was 5.2 h/day (range 0.7–9.7). At study end, median acuity gain was 0.6 log units (range 0–1.6) and residual interocular visual acuity difference (IOVAD) 0.3 log units (range 0–1.8). There was neither significant acuity gain nor reduction in IOVAD after the 6th month of treatment. Children younger than 4 years showed best response with lowest residual IOVAD at study end. Efficiency calculation showed an acuity gain of approximately one line from 100 h of patching in the first 2 months and half a line after 6 months. There was a significant decline of treatment efficiency with age (p = 0.01). Foveolar fixation was achieved after median 3 months (range 1–6). Three patients (> 6 years) did not gain central fixation. Conclusion: Eccentric fixation is a challenge to therapy success. Based on electronic monitoring, our study quantified for the first time the reduction of treatment efficiency with increasing age in amblyopes with eccentric fixation. Despite some improvement in patients up to 8 years, older patients showed significantly lower treatment efficiency. In younger patients with good adherence, despite poor initial acuity, central fixation and low residual IOVAD could be attained after median 3 months. Hence, the necessity of early diagnosis and intensive occlusion should be emphasized.