Forum Interdisziplinäre Begriffsgeschichte. 12. Jahrgang [Heft] 1
Refine
Year of publication
- 2023 (10)
Has Fulltext
- yes (10)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (10)
Keywords
- Begriff (5)
- Sowjetunion (4)
- Osteuropa (2)
- Russland (2)
- Terminologie (2)
- Vernadskij, Vladimir Ivanovič (2)
- Ökologie (2)
- Biogeochemie (1)
- Biogeocoenosis (1)
- Biologie (1)
Märzgefallene : Anmerkungen zum publizistischen Gebrauch einer politischen Bezeichnung 1848–1898
(2023)
Das Wort 'Märzgefallene' ist eine Bezeichnung, die in der wissenschaftlichen wie populären Literatur vor allem über die Geschichte der Berliner Märzrevolution von 1848 auftaucht. Die vorliegende Analyse untersucht die Verwendung der Bezeichnung in der Tagespresse in den 50 Jahren nach der Revolution von 1848/49 bis zum 50. Jubiläum im Jahr 1898. [...] Die Analyse erfolgt in temporaler, quantitativer und qualitativer Hinsicht. Untersucht werden das erste Auftreten, die Häufigkeiten im Wandel der Jahrzehnte, Synonyme des Wortes sowie seine metaphorische Verwendung. Dadurch werden implizit auch eine Geschichte der Rezeption der Revolution von 1848/49 skizziert und die unterschiedlichen semantischen Varianten uneigentlichen Sprechens der Bezeichnung 'Märzgefallene' aufgezeigt.
The essay will focus on three of the "many faces of irreversibility", sketching a history of irreversibility in 20th-century Russian thought: The abstract irreversibility of time in physics, the 'embodied' irreversibility of biological evolution and, finally, the irreversibility of cultural processes. The first part will trace the history of irreversibility in 19th-century physics and biology. The second part will discuss Vladimir Vernadsky's theory of biological time as an attempt to synthesize physical and biological irreversible processes ('neobratimye protsessy') as phenomena of asymmetry in space-time. The third part will look at the migration of scientific ideas of irreversibility into the theory of culture, i.e., Juri Lotman's semiotic theory of irreversibility as unpredictable and unrepeatable processes of culture. In this three-step sketch, the history of irreversibility will be outlined as one of spatialization (from an abstract law to the image of 'time's arrow') and of specialization (from the law of entropy to the case of the generation of meaning).
This article follows the conceptual history of regulation in the Russian and Soviet context from the late 19th to mid-20th century and emphasizes its ecological dimension. Considering that regulation is a fundamentally interdisciplinary concept applied in biology, economics, law, or political science, such a history cannot strictly limit itself to the conceptual use of regulation in ecological theory. Here, ecology is rather generally understood as a scientific knowledge of nature that is being formed in various sciences throughout the 19th and 20th century by reintegrating knowledge generated in such different disciplines as natural history, biology, medicine, physics, or physiology. This paper exemplarily traces the constitutional process of ecology as a science with regard to the concept of regulation by acknowledging the transdisciplinary and sometimes metaphorical use of the concept and its oscillation between the organic and the social, the natural and the artificial, the mechanic and the dynamic, the intrinsic and the extrinsic.
Metabolism has long served as a broad organizing concept in Russian and Soviet culture for the exchange of material and energy between organisms and their environment. The Russian term 'obmen veshchestv', literally meaning "exchange of substances", semantically ranges beyond the Latinate 'metabolizm' (metabolism) and provides a framework for reflecting on bodies and material objects as open systems engaged in a constant process of transformation. 'Obmen veshchestv' appears in public discourse in mid-19th century Russia as a calque from the German term 'Stoffwechsel' (or 'Wechsel der Materie'). Its usage in Russia reflects the enduring influence of German science. In this entry, I will explore the development and expansion of this concept of material and energy exchange between organisms and their environment in Russia and the Soviet Union. In the course of a century, metabolism migrated from discussions of plant nutrition into physiology, thermodynamics, and ultimately into the Soviet practice of state economic planning. This entry will therefore pay particular attention to the early Soviet period when existing debates on metabolism took on new urgency as tools for praxis on every scale, from the body of the individual worker to humanity's future collective management of planetary material and energy flows.
In search for an ecological concept defining a "whole complex of organisms inhabiting a given region" with more methodological value than 'complex organism' or 'biome' and 'biotic community', the British phytocenologist Arthur Tansley introduced the term 'ecosystem' in 1935. [...] Independently of each other, other scientists from different countries also recognized the interconnectedness of all phenomena on the Earth's surface, resulting in the parallel coining of various notions. The Russian Botanist Vladmir Sukachev (1880–1967) introduced the term 'biogeotsenoz' ('biogeocoenosis' or 'biogeocoenose'), which was broadly used in the Soviet Union and throughout Eastern Europe. It was introduced into Russian in two stages: Following the forestologist Georgii Morozov (1867–1920), who systematically implemented Karl Möbius's term 'biocoenosis', Sukachev first suggested the term 'geotsenoz' ('geocoenosis') in 1942. It was meant to link the earth's surface with its inhabitants and abiotic environmental factors in a dynamic unit. However, in 1944, he changed geocoenosis into biogeocoenosis (BGC), implementing an integral connection with Vladimir Vernadsky's (1863–1945) concepts of the biosphere and the biogeochemical cycles. According to Sukachev, BGC came close to Tansley's notion of the ecosystem which also brings together a biocoenosis with its habitat (the ecotope). However, both terms were not used synonymously: as a more general term, ecosystem was not precise enough to classify the unit of nature itself, whereas the BGC, in accordance with Vernadsky's concept of 'living matter', did not include all abiogenic abiotic factors of the ecosystem. Also, the notions of 'facies' and 'landshaft', which were used by physical geographers, were discussed as similar conceptualization.
Vladimir Vernadsky's concept of living matter is central to his biogeochemistry, the science he founded. For several reasons, his original understanding of living matter is one of the most complex notions in the history of the life sciences. First, biogeochemistry is by definition an interdisciplinary enterprise that embraces biology, including evolutionary theory, geology, and chemistry, and combines them into a unique research program. Second, if understood in the original sense as used by Vernadsky, living matter is a concept built into idiosyncratic metaphysics constructed around the so-called principle of life's eternity. Third, the concept of living matter reflects the specificity of Vernadsky's sophisticated philosophy of science as he insisted that 'scientific thought' is a planetary phenomenon as well as a geological force. In our contribution, we will introduce Vernadsky's concept of living matter in its historical context. Accordingly, we will also give some chronology of Vernadsky's work related to the growth of his biosphere concept highlighting the 'Ukrainian' period as it is in this period that he intensively elaborated on the notion of living matter. This will be followed by his theory of living matter as it was formulated in his major works of the later period. We are going to locate the notion of living matter within Vernadsky's theoretical system and demonstrate that he regarded his theory of the living as an evolutionary theory complementary to that of Charles Darwin from the very beginning. Additionally, we will briefly present Vladimir Beklemishev's concept of 'geomerida' which he developed at approximately the same time as Vernadsky was elaborating on his 'living matter' to highlight the specificity of the latter's methodology.
The Soviet Union is remembered as a lab for socioeconomic changes on larges scales and environmental catastrophes: the Chernobyl disaster, the Aral Sea tragedy, and ecocide. However, little is known about the groundbreaking concepts and theories of Russian and early Soviet science which laid the foundation for systemic ecological thinking, environmental consciousness for nature conservation, and corresponding initiatives of the revolutionary years after 1917. The isolation of Eastern Europe that came as a result of Stalinism and the Cold War led to Soviet science developing its own scientific approaches and terminology during the 20th century. This does not only include ideological constructions and practices such as the pseudo-scientific Lysenkoism which outlawed genetics and led to disastrous effects on agriculture, the people, and the scientific community. Soviet science has also managed to continue and unfold the new concepts and interdisciplinary dynamics of the ecological turn on the threshold of the 20th century, a development which, at that time, was only sporadically noted in the West. In the context of its thematic focus on Eastern European ecological terminology, this issue discusses a selection of these concepts.
Editorial
(2023)
Das Forum Interdisziplinäre Begriffsgeschichte hat in seiner zwölfjährigen Geschichte immer wieder Begriffe an der Schnittstelle von Biologie sowie Gesellschaft und Kultur, insbesondere aber solche des ökologischen Diskurses thematisiert. [...] Das vorliegende, von der Slawistin Tatjana Petzer (Universität Graz) als Gastherausgeberin gestaltete Schwerpunktthema "Ecology in Eastern European Terminology" lässt sich als Fortsetzung dieser Thematiken verstehen. Die Beiträge verdeutlichen, wie Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftler osteuropäischer Länder und der Sowjetunion, die oftmals zunächst im engen Kontakt mit westeuropäischen Wissenschaftsentwicklungen standen, aufgrund der späteren, vor allem im Kalten Krieg forcierten Abkoppelung eigenständige Terminologien und Konzepte entwickelten, deren Zusammenhang mit westlichen Ideen dadurch verdeckt waren, und doch mitunter auch wieder auf sie zurückwirkten. Viele der behandelten interdisziplinären Begriffe (Biogeochemie, Biogeozönose, Metabolismus, Regulation oder Geocryologie) thematisieren den heute so intensiv diskutierten Zusammenhang zwischen Ökologie und Geologie.
