700 Künste; Bildende und angewandte Kunst
Refine
Document Type
- Article (3)
- Doctoral Thesis (2)
- Contribution to a Periodical (1)
- Review (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (7)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (7)
Keywords
- Ai Weiwei (1)
- Bloggen (1)
- Blogs (1)
- China (1)
- Dissidenz (1)
- Doris Salcedo (1)
- Forensic Architecture (1)
- Mika Rottenberg (1)
- Recht (1)
- Rechtssicherheit (1)
Institute
- Gesellschaftswissenschaften (7) (remove)
The aim of this paper is to examine how Adorno's aesthetic and musicological thinking was received in Czech and Slovak musicology in the decades between the 60s and the 80s. The focus is on the Czech and Slovak translation of some of Adorno’s musicological treatises and lectures – especially those concerning his views on the Second Vienna School and the musical poetics of its immediate successors – which were published in former Czechoslovakia. The study offers an interesting perspective on Adorno’s relatively unknown lecture Form der neuen Musik (1965) and its related, although not identical, Czech version Formové princípy súčasnej hudby [Formal Principles of Contemporary Music] (1966) as well as on his discussion with some Slovak composers and musicologists published as Dnes je možné iba radikálne kritické myslenie [Today, Only Radical Critical Thinking is Possible] (1967). The study also considers other scientific texts by Adorno in relation to the above-mentioned translations of his works. The analysis, reflection, and interpretation of Adorno’s works in former Czechoslovakia, as well as their contemporary reception, turn out to be sporadic in the examined period. The purpose of this research is to revive awareness of their significance and to give a new impulse to their reassessment within the current musicological and philosophical reflection.
Day-to-day art criticism and art theory are qualitatively distinct. Whereas the best art criticism entails a closeness to its objects which is attuned to particularity, art theory inherently makes generalized claims, whether these claims are extrapolated from the process of art criticism or not. However, this article argues that these dynamics are effectively reversed if we consider the disparity between the criticism of so-called political art and attempts over the last century to elaborate theory which accounts for the political in art qua art. Art theory has located the political force of art precisely in the way that its particularity opposes or resists the status quo. Art criticism, on the other hand, tends to treat artwork as a text to be interpreted whose particularity may as well dissolve when translated into discourse. Drawing from the work of Theodor W. Adorno, this article argues that political art theory calls for art criticism more attuned to experience if it is to elucidate art’s critical valence.
In Paris, metropolis of xix century, Benjamin traces the new paradigm of modernity: the modern theatrical dimension corresponds to the artistic innovations and to the reproduction of aesthetical requests. Entfremdung and Neutralisierung are the main characters of the Ästhetisierung and they are one with the distraction as principle of reception and the conformism as principle of valuation. This is the context of the aura’s decline. The Adorno’s critical essay on the radio (1963) analyses the transformation of works of art in cultural gifts and, in particular, the loss of autonomy of the musical work of art in the radio listening. The Adorno’s remarks recognize the historical character of aura and a new possibility that it can re-emerge in a new historical dimension of the music.
Die vorliegende Arbeit untersuchte die Chancen und Restriktivitäten einer künstlerischen Ausbildung. Welche Möglichkeiten stehen einer künstlerischen Ausbildung zur Verfügung und welchen Grenzen steht sie unüberwindlich gegenüber? Diese waren konstitutionstheoretisch zu entfalten und wissenschaftspraktisch anhand von mir erhobenem Datenmaterial (vornehmlich Interviews mit Studenten und Professoren von Kunsthochschulen in Deutschland) zu belegen bzw. zu verdichten...
Wenn die Rede auf China kommt, dann fällt meist sehr schnell ein Name: Ai Weiwei, der bekannteste Gegenwartskünstler des „Reichs der Mitte“. Aber wer ist dieser Mann? Zwei Bücher und ein Film zeichnen ein umfassendes Bild eines beeindruckenden Mannes – unsere „Medien des Monats“ statt eines einzelnen „Buchs des Monats“.