Open Access

We consider matching, rewriting, critical pairs and the Knuth-Bendix confluence test on rewrite rules in a nominal setting extended by atom-variables. Computing critical pairs is done using nominal unification, and rewriting using nominal matching. We utilise atom-variables to formulate rewrite rules, which is an improvement over previous approaches, using usual nominal unification, nominal matching and nominal equivalence of expressions coupled with a freshness constraint. We determine the complexity of several problems in a quantified freshness logic. In particular we show that nominal matching is Πp2-complete. We prove that the adapted Knuth-Bendix confluence test is applicable to a nominal rewrite system with atom-variabes and thus, that there is a decidable test whether confluence of the ground instance of the abstract rewrite system holds. We apply the nominal Knuth Bendix confluence criterion to the theory of monads, and compute a convergent nominal rewrite system modulo alpha-equivalence.

The focus of this paper are space-improvements of programs, which are transformations that do not worsen the space requirement during evaluations. A realistic theoretical treatment must take garbage collection method into account. We investigate space improvements under the assumption of an optimal garbage collector. Such a garbage collector is not implementable, but there is an advantage: The investigations are independent of potential changes in an implementable garbage collector and our results show that the evaluation and other similar transformations are space-improvements.

Correctness of program transformations and translations in concurrent programming is the focus of our research. In this case study the relation of the synchronous pi-calculus and a core language of Concurrent Haskell (CH) with asynchronous communication is investigated. We show that CH embraces the synchronous pi-calculus. The formal foundations are contextual semantics in both languages, where may- as well as should-convergence are observed. We succeed in defining and proving smart properties of a particular translation mapping the synchronous pi-calculus into CH. This implies that pi-processes are error-free if and only if their translation is an error-free CH-program Our result shows that the chosen semantics is not only powerful, but can also be applied in concrete and technically complex situations. The developed translation uses private names. We also automatically check potentially correct translations that use global names instead of private names. As a complexity parameter we use the number of MVars introduced by the transformation, where MVars are synchronized 1-place buffers. The automated refutation of incorrect translations leads to a classification of potentially correct translations, and to the conjecture that one global MVar is insufficient.

We investigate translations from the synchronous pi-calculus into a core language of Concurrent Haskell (CH). Synchronous messagepassing of the pi-calculus is encoded as sending messages and adding synchronization using Concurrent Haskell’s mutable shared-memory locations (MVars). Our correctness criterion for translations is invariance of may- and should-convergence. This embraces that all executions of a process are error-free if and only if this also holds for the translated program. We exhibit a particular correct translation that uses a fresh, private MVar per communication interaction and that is in addition adequate, and which is also fully abstract on closed expressions. A metaresult is that CH has the expressive power and the concurrency capabilities of the synchronous pi-calculus. We also automatically check variants of translations of synchronous communication into an asynchronous calculus where only an a priori fixed number of MVars per channel (and not per communication interaction!) is available. We obtain non-correctness results for classes of small translations, and exemplary argue for the correctness (and adequacy) for two translations with a higher number of MVars. We introduce a classification of the potentially correct translations.

Automated deduction in higher-order program calculi, where properties of transformation rules are demanded, or confluence or other equational properties are requested, can often be done by syntactically computing overlaps (critical pairs) of reduction rules and transformation rules. Since higher-order calculi have alpha-equivalence as fundamental equivalence, the reasoning procedure must deal with it. We define ASD1-unification problems, which are higher-order equational unification problems employing variables for atoms, expressions and contexts, with additional distinct-variable constraints, and which have to be solved w.r.t. alpha-equivalence. Our proposal is to extend nominal unification to solve these unification problems. We succeeded in constructing the nominal unification algorithm NomUnifyASC. We show that NomUnifyASC is sound and complete for these problem class, and outputs a set of unifiers with constraints in nondeterministic polynomial time if the final constraints are satisfiable. We also show that solvability of the output constraints can be decided in NEXPTIME, and for a fixed number of context-variables in NP time. For terms without context-variables and atom-variables, NomUnifyASC runs in polynomial time, is unitary, and extends the classical problem by permitting distinct-variable constraints. 1998 ACM Subject Classification F.4.1 Mathematical Logic