Working paper series / Institute for Monetary and Financial Stability
http://www.imfs-frankfurt.de/de/forschung/imfs-working-papers.html
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Working Paper (10)
Language
- English (10)
Has Fulltext
- yes (10)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (10)
Keywords
- ECB (3)
- Federal Reserve (3)
- central bank independence (3)
- discretion (3)
- monetary policy (2)
- policy rules (2)
- quantitative easing (2)
- Bank of Japan (1)
- Central Bank of Cyprus (1)
- Cyprus (1)
- ELA (1)
- Global financial crisis (1)
- Monetary policy strategy (1)
- balance sheet risk (1)
- central bank accountability (1)
- central bank governance (1)
- central bank mandates (1)
- cliff effect (1)
- collateral (1)
- complexity (1)
- crisis (1)
- default premium (1)
- euro area (1)
- financial crisis (1)
- financial stability (1)
- fiscal dominance (1)
- forward guidance (1)
- government finance (1)
- inflation target (1)
- lender of last resort (1)
- liftoff (1)
- liquidity premium (1)
- loss sharing (1)
- model uncertainty (1)
- monetary financing (1)
- monetary policy real-time output gap (1)
- monetary policy strategy (1)
- multiple equilibria (1)
- policy normalization (1)
- populism (1)
- price stability (1)
- real-time data (1)
- robust simple rules (1)
- rules (1)
- rules vs discretion (1)
- simple rules (1)
- sovereign debt (1)
- yields (1)
- zero lower bound (1)
200
Despite a number of helpful changes, including the adoption of an inflation target, the Fed’s monetary policy strategy proved insufficiently resilient in recent years. While the Fed eased policy appropriately during the pandemic, it fell behind the curve during the post-pandemic recovery. During 2021, the Fed kept easing policy while the inflation outlook was deteriorating and the economy was growing considerably faster than the economy’s natural growth rate—the sum of the Fed’s 2% inflation goal and the growth rate of potential output.
The resilience of the Fed’s monetary policy strategy could be enhanced, and such errors be avoided with guidance from a simple natural growth targeting rule that prescribes that the federal funds rate during each quarter be raised (cut) when projected nominal income growth exceeds (falls short) of the economy’s natural growth rate. An illustration with real-time data and forecasts since the early 1990s shows that Fed policy has not persistently deviated from this simple rule with the notable exception of the period coinciding with the Fed’s post-pandemic policy error.