Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Working Paper (15)
- Article (13)
- Review (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (29)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (29)
Keywords
- Mobilität (6)
- Personenmobilität (5)
- Fahrradverleihsysteme (4)
- Region Rhein-Main (4)
- Verkehr (4)
- Fahrradmitnahme (3)
- Mobilität in Deutschland (3)
- ÖPNV (3)
- Bike and Ride / Fahrrad-Abstellanlagen (2)
- Darmstadt (2)
Institute
- Geographie (29) (remove)
Mobilität ist eine Grundvoraussetzung, um am gesellschaftlichen Leben teilhaben zu können. Ist der Möglichkeitsraum potenzieller Ortsveränderungen eingeschränkt – beispielsweise durch räumliche, finanzielle oder körperliche Barrieren oder Ängste –, wird von Mobilitätsarmut gesprochen. Wie Mobilitätsarmut auf der Verwaltungsebene verhindert werden kann, zeigt dieser Policy Brief des Projektes Social2Mobility. Diese Handlungsempfehlungen basieren auf Erkenntnissen des Projektes Social2Mobility und adressieren insbesondere Verwaltungsmitarbeitende der Fachplanungen Verkehrs-, Raum- und Sozialplanung von der Kommunal- bis zur Landes- und Bundesebene. Ziel des Projektes Social2Mobility war es, die soziale Teilhabe armutsgefährdeter Personen durch eine Steigerung ihrer Mobilitätsoptionen zu stärken. Der Policy Brief erläutert die Problematik von Mobilitätsarmut, thematisiert deren Relevanz und zeigt verschiedene Facetten von Mobilitätsarmut auf. Er beinhaltet fünf verschiedene Handlungsfelder zur Verhinderung von Mobilitätsarmut. Der Policy Brief soll zu einer dezernats- und abteilungsübergreifenden Zusammenarbeit der Fachplanungen Sozial-, Raum- und Verkehrsplanung zur Lösung von Mobilitätsarmut anregen. Synergieeffekte und gegenseitige Potentiale bei einer Zusammenarbeit werden dabei herausgestellt. Hierzu gehören beispielsweise die Anwendung von Verkehrsnachfragemodellen in der Sozialplanung oder die Berücksichtigung vielfältiger unterschiedlicher Lebenslagen und der daraus hervorgehenden Mobilitätsbedarfe in der Verkehrsplanung.
Financial poverty, mobility and social participation are interrelated. This nexus makes old-age poverty a highly relevant issue in terms of transport-related social exclusion in an ageing society. To understand how financial poverty affects older people’s travel practices and how they cope with their limited financial resources, we conducted qualitative interviews with low-income older people (aged 60 and above) in Ronnenberg (Hanover region, Germany). Although all the respondents have comparably limited financial resources, using a practice theory perspective along the elements of materials, competences and meanings (Shove et al., 2012), we identified three different types of low-income older people by their travel practices: (i) active older people with multifaceted social interactions, (ii) neighbourhood-oriented older people with local interactions and (iii) home-centred older people with few social interactions. From our analysis, we conclude that financial poverty shapes each element of low-income older people’s travel practices and thereby increases the risk of transport-related social exclusion: (i) certain materials have to be financed, which is challenging or even impossible due to financial poverty; (ii) meanings of travel practices are strongly linked to other practices, thus, if (also for financial reasons) no or a limited range of destinations are mentioned, travel practices are restricted in their frequency and distance; and (iii) necessary competences to be mobile and engage in social activities despite low financial means seem to be differentially available or - more cautiously formulated – less often utilised by low-income older people, which may lead to them abandoning travel practices and related social activities.
Facing the challenges of motorised traffic, many cities around the globe started implementing measures to transform their urban transport systems. One of the major challenges for the success of adequate policies is not only their effectiveness but also whether they are accepted by city residents. With a quantitative case study in four neighbourhoods in Frankfurt am Main (N = 821), this article investigates the acceptability of three measures: (i) parking management, (ii) the conversion of car lanes into cycle lanes and (iii) the closure of an inner city arterial road to car traffic. The results show a surprisingly high acceptability for all measures if the benefits for local residents are tangible. Thus, successful policy packages may combine push measures with either pull measures, as suggested frequently in the literature, or with improvements for other land uses (e.g. re-using former car-parking spaces for non-transport purposes, such as greenery or seating areas). Furthermore, the perceived effectiveness, daily travel practices and intentions to reduce car use, the built environment and, to a lesser degree, socio-demographics explain differences in acceptability by population group.
Highlights:
• Evaluation of three cycle street designs by means of visualisation assessments.
• Shared space is evaluated as the safest and most attractive cycle street design.
• The conventional urban street design is perceived as the most clearly structured.
• Affinity towards walking and cycling favours a positive evaluation of shared space.
Abstract
Cycle streets have been implemented in many urban areas around the world in recent years to make cycling safer and more attractive. In these streets, cyclists have priority over motorised traffic. They are allowed to use the entire roadway and determine traffic speed. However, there have been no standardised design guidelines for cycle streets to date. Moreover, there is limited understanding of the individual perception of different cycle street designs. Yet, positive evaluations of safety and attractiveness are especially important for pleasant travel in public spaces. Therefore, this study examines the individual perceptions of three cycle street designs: conventional, flow and shared space. Visualisations of these designs were implemented in a written household survey conducted in the urban Rhine-Main metropolitan region in Germany (n = 701). Participants were asked to assess the different designs in terms of safety, clarity, attractiveness and fun. Furthermore, bivariate analyses and regression models were performed to investigate whether individual travel preferences and attitudes, regular mode use and socio-demographic characteristics affect assessments of the designs. The results show that the shared space design is rated as the safest, most attractive and most fun. The conventional cycle street is evaluated as the most clearly structured. Individual affinity towards cycling and walking favours a good evaluation of the shared space design, while a high car affinity and having a migrant background positively affect the assessment of the conventional design. In addition, younger participants and members of households without a car assess the flow design more favourably.
Highlights
• Typology of low-income families by their daily travel practices.
• The competence to finance, organise or borrow materials needed for travel enhance low-income families' mobility options.
• Low-income families' social networks can compensate transport disadvantages through direct and indirect financial support.
• Low-income families experience transport-related social exclusion.
Abstract
Being mobile is essential to participate in social life. However, as transport involves costs, this is a particular challenge for people on low incomes. Households with children are, especially, at an increased risk of poverty. To provide a deeper understanding of how financial poverty affects the daily travel practices of low-income families and how they cope with their limited financial resources, we conducted 16 qualitative problem-centred interviews with low-income families in Ronnenberg (Hanover Region, Germany). Although all the interviewees have to cope with limited financial resources, their daily travel practices differ. We identify four types of daily travel practices for these families: (1) car-centred, (2) car-reduced, (3) public transport oriented and (4) non-motorised. For a more detailed analysis on how poverty affects transport and participation, we use the practice theory perspective (Shove et al., 2012). Our analysis highlights that the car plays a significant role despite poverty for some families. However, other low-income families manage their daily life with public transport and non-motorised modes only. Our results show that low-income households with children have several strategies for organising and financing their daily travel practices. One strategy is direct and indirect support for travel from their social network. Furthermore, some families forgo leisure activities with entrance fees or higher travel costs.
Highlights
• Applies a biographically inspired practice-theoretical approach to understand everyday mobility from car-reduced neighborhoods.
• Investigates various ‘contexts’ and ‘practice bundles’ that shape car-(in)dependent mobility practices.
• Material, personal-temporal, and socio-cultural contexts of residents’ travel behavior in car-reduced neighborhoods stabilize and support car-independent mobility.
• The meanings (including emotions and feelings) of mobility practices determine their performance type.
• Calls for more car-reduced planning for the transition to low-carbon mobility.
Abstract
Lately, transport researchers and practitioners are showing renewed interest in car-reduced neighborhoods and their residents’ mobility to investigate possible factors influencing sustainable transport. With a biographically inspired practice-theoretical approach, this study considers the ‘context of travel behavior’ and, thus, focuses on mobility as a ‘practice’ in order to improve the understanding of everyday mobility as well as the potential and limitations of implementing car-reduced housing. Based on qualitative interviews with residents of two German car-reduced neighborhoods, we first identify different compositions of materials, competences, and meanings (including the feelings and emotions) of car-(in)dependent mobility practices. Second, we discover the personal, social, temporal, and socio-structural circumstances of the residents’ travel behavior alongside ‘practice bundles’ that interact with car-(in)dependent mobility. Finally, our findings indicate, on the one hand, that the car-centric material context outside car-reduced neighborhoods, the incorporation of private car driving with the practice of everyday life, and the affective satisfaction with car use and ownership negatively influence car independence. On the other hand, our results highlight that residential location and its materiality in the case of car-reduced housing developments, as well as the personal-temporal and socio-cultural contexts of their residents’ mobility practices stabilize and support car independence and low-carbon mobility.
Die Lincoln-Siedlung, eine ehemalige Housing Area der US-Army im Süden von Darmstadt, wird seit dem amerikanischen Truppenabzug im Jahr 2008 als autoreduziertes Wohnquartier entwickelt. Der Autobesitz der Bewohner*innen wird über eine zentrale Stellplatzvergabe mit einem Stellplatzschlüssel von 0,65 Parkplätzen pro Wohneinheit reglementiert. Gleichzeitig stehen zahlreiche Alternativen, wie eine verbesserte Fuß- und Radverkehrsinfrastruktur, eine eng getaktete ÖPNV-Verbindung in die Innenstadt, mehrere (teils vergünstigte) Carsharing- und Fahrradverleihangebote sowie eine Mobilitätsberatung zur Verfügung. Die vorliegende Studie stützt sich auf eine quantitative Haushaltsbefragung (N = 166), evaluiert die genannten Elemente alternativer Mobilität aus Bewohner*innensicht und untersucht die umzugsbedingten Veränderungen im Mobilitätsverhalten der Bewohner*innen. Diese befürworten die Maßnahmen grundsätzlich, bezweifeln jedoch teilweise deren Wirksamkeit, etwa hinsichtlich der Minderung von Verkehrsaufkommen und Schadstoffbelastung. Im Hinblick auf das Mobilitätsverhalten zeigen die Daten eine signifikante Verringerung von Besitz und Nutzung privater Pkw im Vergleich zum Zeitraum vor dem Umzug in die Lincoln-Siedlung. Die Nutzung von Carsharing-Angeboten sowie Bus und Bahn ist hingegen signifikant angewachsen. Diese Veränderungen sind hinsichtlich der überwiegend kurzen Wohndauer der befragten Personen sowie der andauernden Quartiersentwicklung bemerkenswert. Als künftige Maßnahmen konnten bessere Informationen über das Gesamtkonzept und die einzelnen Mobilitätsangebote sowie die Kommunikation von Visionen der fertiggestellten Siedlung identifiziert werden.
Highlights
- Cost-free ticket increases public transport use even when the share was high beforehand
- Free tickets are more effective than just a price reduction (zero-price effect)
- Low income, female and older employees benefit the most
- Not only travel behaviour but also attitudes change
- Cost-free public transport is one component in a set of travel demand management tools
Abstract
To increase its attractiveness for employees, to save costs regarding parking supply and to foster modal shift away from the car, employers can offer sharply cost-reduced public transport tickets. In the state of Hesse/Germany, public authorities have gone one step further by introducing a cost-free public transport ticket for all state employees. We argue that the step from sharply cost-reduced to cost-free is more than just a monetary difference. The aim of this study is to assess whether the ticket is actually affecting employees and what changed their travel behaviour. Therefore, we have analysed a two-wave survey conducted at Goethe University in Frankfurt: one from before and one from after the introduction of the new ticket. The results show a substantial increase in the use of public transport (pt) for commuting and other trip purposes. Car use and availability, however, did not decrease. In particular, those who had no cost-reduced jobticket beforehand switched to public transport after the introduction. Furthermore, we identified increasing public transport use for low-income employees (inclusion hypothesis) and several indicators pointing towards a more multimodal behaviour (multimodal hypothesis).
Mobilität ist eine wesentliche Voraussetzung für soziale Teilhabe. Jedoch ist Mobilität mit Kosten verbunden, sodass die soziale Teilhabe bei geringen finanziellen Mitteln gefährdet sein kann. Das Projekt Social2Mobility begegnet dieser Problematik, indem es das Ziel verfolgt, die soziale Teilhabe von Menschen, die von finanzieller Armut betroffen oder bedroht sind, durch Stärkung ihrer Mobilität zu steigern. Um dieses Ziel zu erreichen, soll im Rahmen des Projektes in der Region Hannover ein Reallabor eingerichtet werden. Das Arbeitspapier begleitet dessen Konzeption und geht der Frage nach, inwiefern in der Region Hannover ein Reallabor zum Thema mobilitätsbezogene soziale Exklusion eingerichtet werden kann. So werden in diesem Arbeitspapier die konzeptionellen Überlegungen zur räumlichen Verortung, zur Zielgruppenauswahl und zu möglichen Themen für das Reallabor dargestellt. Zudem werden die Spezifizierung auf die Zielgruppen Haushalte mit Kindern und ältere Menschen (ab 60 Jahren) sowie die Auswahl der Kommune Ronnenberg als Verortung für das Reallabor begründet.
Highlights
• Explanation of mobility design and its practical, aesthetic and emblematic effects on travel behaviour.
• Review of recent studies on mobility design elements and the promotion of non-motorised travel.
• Discussion of research gaps and methodological challenges of data collection and comparability.
Abstract
To promote non-motorised travel, many travel behaviour studies acknowledge the importance of the built environment to modal choice, for example with its density or mix of uses. From a mobility design theory perspective, however, objects and environments affect human perceptions, assessments and behaviour in at least three different ways: by their practical, aesthetic and emblematic functions. This review of existing evidence will argue that travel behaviour research has so far mainly focused on the practical function of the built environment. For that purpose, we systematically identified 56 relevant studies on the impacts of the built environment on non-motorised travel behaviour in the Web of Science database. The focus of research on the practical design function primary involves land use distribution, street network connectivity and the presence of walking and cycling facilities. Only a small number of papers address the aesthetic and emblematic functions. These show that the perceived attractiveness of an environment and evoked feelings of traffic safety increase the likelihood of walking and cycling. However, from a mobility design perspective, the results of the review indicate a gap regarding comprehensive research on the effects of the aesthetic and emblematic functions of the built environment. Further research involving these functions might contribute to a better understanding of how to promote non-motorised travel more effectively. Moreover, limitations related to survey techniques, regional distribution and the comparability of results were identified.