Center for Financial Studies (CFS)
Refine
Year of publication
- 2023 (91) (remove)
Document Type
- Working Paper (91)
Has Fulltext
- yes (91)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (91) (remove)
Keywords
- Monetary Policy (4)
- DSGE (3)
- ESG (3)
- Machine Learning (3)
- Numerical accuracy (3)
- Solution methods (3)
- Sustainable Finance (3)
- climate change (3)
- household finance (3)
- social preferences (3)
- Active investors (2)
- Climate change (2)
- Delegated portfolio management (2)
- ECB (2)
- Environmental policy (2)
- Green bonds (2)
- Greenium (2)
- Machine learning (2)
- Optimal policy (2)
- Quantitative Easing (2)
- Speculation (2)
- Sustainable Investments (2)
- Transfer Learning (2)
- Transition risk (2)
- consumption (2)
- crises (2)
- financial intermediation (2)
- regulation (2)
- risk premium (2)
- uncertainty (2)
- "Event Study" (1)
- Accounting research (1)
- Agency costs (1)
- AnaCredit (1)
- Asset Pricing (1)
- Auctions (1)
- Backward error (1)
- Bank Acquisition (1)
- Bank Credit (1)
- Bank Resolution (1)
- Bank affiliation (1)
- Banking Supervision (1)
- Banks (1)
- Bayesian inference (1)
- Bayesian time-varying parameter estimation (1)
- Biodiversity (1)
- Blockchain (1)
- Business Cycles (1)
- CBDC (1)
- COVID-19 Pandemic (1)
- Car Loans (1)
- Cash (1)
- Causal inferences (1)
- Central Bank (1)
- Central Bank Communication (1)
- Central Bank Losses (1)
- Central Banks (1)
- Climate Change (1)
- Closed-end funds (1)
- Clustering (1)
- Co-residence (1)
- Commodities (1)
- Competition (1)
- Concentration (1)
- Condition number (1)
- Consumption (1)
- Container Trade (1)
- Corporate Governance (1)
- Corporate Name Change (1)
- Corporate Quantitative Easing (1)
- Corporate Social Responsibility (1)
- Corporate financing (1)
- DSGE models (1)
- Database linking (1)
- Depreciation (1)
- Determinacy (1)
- Digital (1)
- Digital art (1)
- Disclosure (1)
- Disclosure Framework (1)
- Disposition Effect (1)
- Distraction (1)
- Dividend Policy (1)
- ESG lending (1)
- ESG loans (1)
- ETFs (1)
- EZB (1)
- Economic research (1)
- Empirical Asset Pricing (1)
- Empirical methods (1)
- Employee commitment (1)
- Employee rights (1)
- Endogeneity (1)
- Energy Performance Certificate (1)
- Energy efficiency (1)
- Entity matching (1)
- Entity resolution (1)
- Equity Premium (1)
- Ethereum (1)
- Euro (1)
- European Monetary Union (1)
- Eurosystem (1)
- Exchange rate volatility (1)
- Exchange traded funds (1)
- Experimental Finance (1)
- Family dynamics (1)
- Fear of job loss (1)
- Financial Advice (1)
- Financial Regulation and Banking (1)
- Financial Stability (1)
- Financial openness (1)
- Finanzsystem (1)
- Firm-bank relationship (1)
- Forward error (1)
- Frequency Domain (1)
- Fund Flows (1)
- Fundamental Value (1)
- Geldpolitik (1)
- Germany (1)
- Green Bonds (1)
- Greenwashing (1)
- Group Think (1)
- Grüne Transformation (1)
- Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (1)
- Hazard estimation (1)
- Hedge funds (1)
- Higher Moments of Return (1)
- Homeownership (1)
- Household Finance (1)
- Hypothekarkredite (1)
- Industry Classification (1)
- Inflation (1)
- Inflation Beliefs (1)
- Information Treatment (1)
- Institution formation (1)
- Institutional Investors’ Ownership (1)
- International relationships (1)
- Investment Styles (1)
- Künstliche Intelligenz (KI) (1)
- Leitungsentscheidungen (1)
- Lender of Last Resort (1)
- Life Events (1)
- Life course transitions (1)
- Limited partnerships (1)
- Liquiditätseffekte der Zinspolitik (1)
- Low-emission vehicles (1)
- Market Efficiency (1)
- Market Power (1)
- Market microstructure (1)
- Marketplace lending (1)
- Mensch und Maschine (1)
- Mental models (1)
- Meritocracy (1)
- Minimum Reserves (1)
- Model uncertainty (1)
- Monetary policy rules (1)
- Monetary policy strategy (1)
- Money Market (1)
- Money Market Funds (1)
- Multilayer networks (1)
- Mutual Funds (1)
- Mutual funds (1)
- Narrative Identification (1)
- Natural Language Processing (1)
- Natural experiments (1)
- Net-zero transition (1)
- Neural Network (1)
- Neural Networks (1)
- New Keynesian Models (1)
- Non-fungible tokens (NFTs) (1)
- Original sin (1)
- Output Gap (1)
- Overlapping generations (1)
- Potential Output (1)
- Preference survey module (1)
- Production (1)
- Productivity (1)
- QE (1)
- RCT (1)
- Real-Time Data (1)
- Realization Utility (1)
- Record resolution (1)
- Redemptions (1)
- Regulation (1)
- Regulations (1)
- Regulierung (1)
- Repo Specialness (1)
- Reporting Standards (1)
- Research design (1)
- Retail Investor (1)
- Revisions (1)
- Risk Premium (1)
- Russian Economy (1)
- SFDR (1)
- Sanctions (1)
- Securitization (1)
- Selling Behavior (1)
- Shareholder Letters (1)
- Shareholder wealth (1)
- Sign Restrictions (1)
- Similarity encoding (1)
- Sovereign debt (1)
- Sovereign wealth funds (1)
- Spatial autoregressive model (1)
- Stablecoins (1)
- Sticky Information (1)
- Stochastic volatility (1)
- Strategic investors (1)
- Supply Chain (1)
- Sustainability-Linked Bonds (1)
- Sustainability-Linked Loans (1)
- Sustainabilty (1)
- Sustainable Investing (1)
- Takeover speculation (1)
- Taxonomie (1)
- Taylor Rule (1)
- Term Structure of Interest Rates (1)
- Textual Analysis (1)
- Time-varying networks (1)
- Transition Financing (1)
- Tree-based models (1)
- Triple Difference Estimator (1)
- Twitter (1)
- Uncertainty (1)
- Utilization (1)
- Wirecard (1)
- Wohnungsfinanzierung (1)
- Word Embedding (1)
- Yield spread (1)
- annual general meeting (1)
- annuity (1)
- asset pricing (1)
- attitudes towards inequality (1)
- balance of payments (1)
- bank default (1)
- banking regulation (1)
- banknotes (1)
- big data (1)
- borrowing (1)
- borrowing constraints (1)
- business cycle (1)
- capital markets (1)
- capital requirements (1)
- caps (1)
- career concerns (1)
- cash flow effects of interest rate policy (1)
- central bank (1)
- cognitive load (1)
- competition (1)
- competitive equilibrium (1)
- conspicuous consumption (1)
- consumption-based models (1)
- continuation vote (1)
- cooperation (1)
- corporate finance (1)
- corporate savings (1)
- counterfactual thinking (1)
- credit default swap (1)
- credit risk (1)
- cross-section of stock return (1)
- currency competition (1)
- current account (1)
- dark trading (1)
- delayed claiming (1)
- digital money (1)
- discount (1)
- divestments (1)
- downside risk (1)
- economic rationality (1)
- emissions trading system (ETS) (1)
- externalities (1)
- fairness (1)
- financial innovation (1)
- financial market stability (1)
- financial markets (1)
- financial regulation (1)
- foreign portfolio investment (1)
- forward guidance (1)
- free banking (1)
- frequency domain (1)
- front loading Effekte (1)
- front loading effects (1)
- funding risk (1)
- furlough (1)
- geopolitical risk (1)
- global preference survey (1)
- goal orientation (1)
- group identity (1)
- group size (1)
- habit (1)
- high consumption volatility (1)
- housing investments (1)
- inference (1)
- information asymmetry (1)
- information demand (1)
- information processing (1)
- investor protection (1)
- large language models (1)
- lifecycle saving (1)
- limited arbitrage (1)
- liquidity requirements (1)
- long-run risk (1)
- longevity (1)
- machine learning (1)
- mergers and acquisitions (1)
- mini-flash crash (1)
- model comparison (1)
- model uncertainty (1)
- monetary policy (1)
- monetary policy rules (1)
- money (1)
- mortgage loans (1)
- net-zero arbitrage (1)
- net-zero plans and targets (1)
- online experiments (1)
- options (1)
- performance (1)
- personality traits (1)
- policy evaluation (1)
- policy rules (1)
- political polarization (1)
- private equity (1)
- private markets (1)
- private money (1)
- public markets (1)
- quantitative easing (1)
- rating (1)
- recursive utility (1)
- redistribution (1)
- regulatory arbitrage (1)
- replication (1)
- repurchases (1)
- responsibility (1)
- retained earnings (1)
- retirement plan (1)
- return expectations (1)
- saving (1)
- securities regulation (1)
- shareholder engagement (1)
- signaling (1)
- skill (1)
- social (1)
- social dilemma (1)
- socially responsible consumers (1)
- solution methods (1)
- speed bump (1)
- stabilization (1)
- sustainability KPIs (1)
- sustainable finance (1)
- taxes (1)
- term premia (1)
- textual analysis (1)
- transition risk (1)
- unconventional monetary policy (1)
- utility dividends (1)
- utility functions (1)
- validation (1)
- valuation (1)
- war (1)
- z-Transform (1)
There is much discussion today about a possible digital euro (PDE). Is this attention exaggerated? Are “central bank digital currencies” (CBDCs) “a solution in search of a problem”, as some have argued? This article summarizes the main facts about the PDE and concludes that, if the decision on adoption had to be taken today, the arguments against would outweigh those in favor. However, there may be future circumstances in which having a CBDC ready for use can indeed be useful. Therefore, preparing is a good thing, even if the odds of its usefulness in normal conditions are slim.
Unconventional green
(2023)
We analyze the effects of the PEPP (Pandemic Emergency Purchase Programme), the temporary quantitative easing implemented by the ECB immediately after the burst of the Covid-19 pandemic. We show that the differences in aim, size and flexibility with respect to the traditional Corporate Sector Purchase Programme (CSPP) were able to significantly involve, in addition to the directly targeted bonds, also the green bond segment. Via a standard difference- in-differences model we estimate that the yield on green bonds declined by more than 20 basis points after the PEPP. In order to take into account also the differences attributable to the eligibility to the programme, we employ a triple difference estimator. Bonds that at the same time were green and eligible benefitted of an additional premium of 39 basis points.
Digital platforms have become an important part of the digital economy by facilitating transactions between large numbers of users and by fostering innovation on collaborative platforms. In combination with technical platform services, some platform operators have managed to create powerful ecosystems that create network externalities and benefit from economies of scale and economies of scope. It is striking that, due to the specific economic drivers of the digital infrastructure, platform-based or platform-related services are dominated by a select number of global players. Most of the global platform operators are headquartered in the US, including Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta and Microsoft, also known as the “Big 5”. Some are located in Asia (e.g. Alibaba, Tencent). In Europe there are only a limited number of platform operators with a small market share.
Much research has been conducted on the emergence and characteristics of platforms, network externalities and platform competition. However, there has been very little research on whether or not one can idķentify common features that might explain the success of Big Tech. The following article focuses on an analysis of the Big 5 based on their strategies and development paths. The comparison reveals certain commonalities, from which several conclusions can be drawn regarding the success factors of the Big 5. These insights could be helpful for business decision-makers when shaping digital strategies. But also policy makers, especially in Europe, could benefit from these lessons learned to improve the European technology ecosystem.
I have assessed changes in the monetary policy stance in the euro area since its inception by applying a Bayesian time-varying parameter framework in conjunction with the Hamiltonian Monte Carlo algorithm. I find that the estimated policy response has varied considerably over time. Most of the results suggest that the response weakened after the onset of the financial crisis and while quantitative measures were still in place, although there are also indications that the weakening of the response to the expected inflation gap may have been less pronounced. I also find that the policy response has become more forceful over the course of the recent sharp rise in inflation. Furthermore, it is essential to model the stochastic volatility relating to deviations from the policy rule as it materially influences the results.
This paper presents and compares Bernoulli iterative approaches for solving linear DSGE models. The methods are compared using nearly 100 different models from the Macroeconomic Model Data Base (MMB) and different parameterizations of the monetary policy rule in the medium-scale New Keynesian model of Smets and Wouters (2007) iteratively. I find that Bernoulli methods compare favorably in solving DSGE models to the QZ, providing similar accuracy as measured by the forward error of the solution at a comparable computation burden. The method can guarantee convergence to a particular, e.g., unique stable, solution and can be combined with other iterative methods, such as the Newton method, lending themselves especially to refining solutions.
Fabo, Janˇcokov ́a, Kempf, and P ́astor (2021) show that papers written by central bank researchers find quantitative easing (QE) to be more effective than papers written by academics. Weale and Wieladek (2022) show that a subset of these results lose statistical significance when OLS regressions are replaced by regressions that downweight outliers. We examine those outliers and find no reason to downweight them. Most of them represent estimates from influential central bank papers published in respectable academic journals. For example, among the five papers finding the largest peak effect of QE on output, all five are published in high-quality journals (Journal of Monetary Economics, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, and Applied Economics Letters), and their average number of citations is well over 200. Moreover, we show that these papers have supported policy communication by the world’s leading central banks and shaped the public perception of the effectiveness of QE. New evidence based on quantile regressions further supports the results in Fabo et al. (2021).
The SVB case is a wake-up call for Europe’s regulators as it demonstrates the destructive power of a bank-run: it undermines the role of loss absorbing capital, elbowing governments to bailout affected banks. Many types of bank management weaknesses, like excessive duration risk, may raise concerns of bank losses – but to serve as a run-trigger, there needs to be a large enough group of bank depositors that fails to be fully covered by a deposit insurance scheme. Latent run-risk is the root cause of inefficient liquidations, and we argue that a run on SVB assets could have been avoided altogether by a more thoughtful deposit insurance scheme, sharply distinguishing between loss absorbing capital (equity plus bail-in debt) and other liabilities which are deemed not to be bail-inable, namely demand deposits. These evidence-based insights have direct implications for Europe’s banking regulation, suggesting a minimum and a maximum for a banks’ loss absorption capacity.
Flows of funds run by banks or by firms that belong to the same financial group as a bank are less volatile and less sensitive to bad past performance. This enables bank-affiliated funds to better weather distress and to hold lower precautionary cash buffers in comparison with their unaffiliated peers. Banks provide liquidity support to distressed affiliated funds by buying shares of those funds that are experiencing large outflows. This, in turn, diminishes the severity of strategic complementarities in investors’ redemptions. Liquidity support and other benefits of bank affiliation are conditional on the financial health of the parent company. Distress in the banking system spills over to the mutual fund sector via ownership links. Our research high-lights substantial dependencies between the banking system and the asset management industry, and identifies an important channel via which financial stability risks depend on the organisational structure of the financial sector.
We contribute to the debate about the future of capital markets and corporate finance, which has ensued against the background of a significant boom in private markets and a corresponding decline in the number of firms and the amount of capital raised in public markets in the US and Europe.
Our research sheds light on the fluctuating significance of public and private markets for corporate finance over time, and challenges the conventional view of a linear progression from one market to the other. We argue instead that a more complex pattern of interaction between public and private markets emerges, after taking a long-term perspective and examining historical developments more closely.
We claim that there is a dynamic divide between these markets, and identify certain factors that determine the degree to which investors, capital, and companies gravitate more towards one market than the other. However, in response to the status quo, other factors will gain momentum and favor the respective other market, leading to a new (unstable) equilibrium. Hence, we observe the oscillating domains of public and private markets over time. While these oscillations imply ‘competition’ between these markets, we unravel the complementarities between them, which also militate against a secular trend towards one market. Finally, we examine the role of regulation in this dynamic divide as well as some policy implications arising from our findings.
Art-related non-fungible tokens (NFTs) took the digital art space by storm in 2021, generating massive amounts of volume and attracting a large number of users to a previously obscure part of blockchain technology. Still, very little is known about the attributes that influence the price of these digital assets. This paper attempts to evaluate the level of speculation associated with art NFTs, comprehend the characteristics that confer value on them and design a profitable trading strategy based on our findings. We analyze 860,067 art NFTs that have been deployed on the Ethereum blockchain and have been involved in 317,950 sales using machine learning methods to forecast the probability of sale, the trade frequency and the average price. We find that NFTs are highly speculative assets and that their price and recurrence of sale are heavily determined by the floor and the last sale prices, independent of any fundamental value.