Refine
Document Type
- Article (2)
- Book (1)
- Part of a Book (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (4)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (4) (remove)
Keywords
- accessibility (4) (remove)
Institute
Der Sammelband "Digitale Barrierefreiheit in der Bildung weiter denken: Innovative Impulse aus Praxis, Technik und Didaktik", der von #DigiBar, dem "Netzwerk digitale Barrierefreiheit an hessischen Hochschulen", herausgegeben wird, geht der Frage nach, welchen Status Quo, welche Herausforderungen sowie praktischen und theoretischen Lösungsansätze das Thema digitale Barrierefreiheit in der Bildung aufzeigt. Die Beiträge des vorliegenden Sammelbandes tragen diesem Forschungsdesiderat Rechnung. Die von "studiumdigitale" (Goethe-Universität Frankfurt) in Kooperation mit BliZ, dem Zentrum für blinde und sehbehinderte Studierende (THM - Technischen Hochschule Mittelhessen) herausgegebene Veröffentlichung richtet sich an Lehrende, Hochschulangehörige, Entscheidungsträger*innen, Webadmins, Tutor*innen, soziale Träger*innen und Interessierte. Die Beiträge beleuchten das Titelthema in all seinen Facetten: Von Modellprojekten über Fallstudien und technische Lösungsszenarien bis hin zur Vermittlung praktischer Informationen und zu Szenarien der Barrierefreiheit im multimedialen Raum sind hier Grundlagenforschung, Best-Practice-Beispiele und technische Lösungen in einem Band vereint. Selbstverständlich ist die digitale Veröffentlichung in barrierefreier Form, um ein Vorbild für weitere derartige Veröffentlichungen zu sein. Helfen auch Sie mit, Barrieren in der Bildungswelt abzubauen und Teilhabe zu ermöglichen.
A list of abbreviations regarding literature, collections and persons as used by early authors (1758–1779) of scarabaeoid beetles (Insecta: Coleoptera) is given together with modern referrals to the Literature Cited. Notes regarding referential errors are included. Hyperlinks to all mentioned and freely online available publications are provided.
ZooBank registration. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8508A5D0-CA65-4BBB-9FD4-8D14AC261F72
Imposters are grammatically third-person expressions used to refer to the firstperson speaker or second-person addressee (e.g. ‘the present authors’ when used to refer to the first-person writer, ‘Mommy’ or ‘Daddy’ when used by parents for self-reference in child-directed speech). Current analyses of imposters differ in whether they derive the unusual referential properties of imposters using syntactic means or attribute them to semantic and pragmatics. We aim to shed light on these competing approaches by means of a psycholinguistic experiment focusing on first-person imposters that investigates the kinds of pronouns (first-person vs. third-person) used to refer to imposter antecedents. Our results show that manipulating the prominence of the first-person speaker does not significantly boost the acceptability of first-person pronouns in imposter-referring contexts. However, our results suggest that a purely syntactic approach may not be sufficient either, as psycholinguistic processing factors also appear to be relevant.
This paper compares the production of different types of direct objects by Portuguese–German and Polish–German bilingual school-aged children in their heritage languages (HLs), Polish and European Portuguese (EP). Given that the two target languages display identical options of object realization, our main research question is whether the two HLs develop in a similar way in bilingual children. More precisely, we aim at investigating whether bilingual children acquiring Polish and EP are sensitive to accessibility and animacy when realizing a direct object in their HL. The results of a production experiment show that this is indeed the case and that the two groups of bilinguals do not differ from each other, although they may overgeneralize null objects or full noun phrases to some extent. We conclude that the bilingual acquisition of object realization is guided by the relevant properties in the target languages and is not influenced by the contact language, German.