Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (3)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (3) (remove)
Keywords
- Islam (3) (remove)
Institute
- Extern (3) (remove)
DEDICACES GRATITUDES INTRODUCTION- - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -7 Formulation, délimitation et choix du sujet- - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 9 Hypothèse de recherche- - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -11 Cadre méthodologique- - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 13 PREMIERE PARTIE : INSCRIPTION DU DON DANS L’OEUVRE D’AMINATA SOW FALL CHAPITRE I : TYPOLOGIE DES DONS- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 17 I.1.Le don des biens et services I.2.Le don de soi et de temps CHAPITRE II : ACTEURS DU DON- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 19 II.1.Le donateur II.2.Le donataire II.3.L’intermédiaire CHAPITRE III : AUTOUR DU DON- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -21 III.1.Le don comme forme d’échange III.2.Le don comme facteur d’intérêt DEUXIEME PARTIE : DON ET SOCIETE CHAPITRE IV : MOTIVATIONS DU DON- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -25 IV.1.La religion et l’indigence IV.2.La culture africaine CHAPITRE V : AVANTAGES DU DON- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 27 V.1.Le don comme acte humanitaire V.2.Le don comme vecteur du lien social CHAPITRE VI : DESAGREMENTS DU DON- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -29 VI.1.L’émergence des classes VI.2.La dette morale CONCLUSION- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 31 BIBLIOGRAPHIE- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 32 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CRELAF (Cercle de Reflexion des Etudiants en Littératures Africaines), Département de Littératures Africaines, Université Omar Bongo, Gabon
Pope Benedict XVI’s Regensburg lecture has been exposed by some learned voices of 'the Muslim world' as alluding, by the means of one particular quotation, to age-old stereotypes about Islam being an essentially violent creed in which moderation through reason has no legitimate place, and of representing Muhammadas an evil and inhuman man who preached that Islam should be spread by the sword. While none of these presumably 'Muslim' voices deny that the Pope has the right to express his opinions, even when they are plainly wrong in the face of historic facts that show how Islam and Christianity were spread (or were made to spread) across the world, he is criticised for a host of omissions in terms of intellectual honesty and factual accuracy. These omissions, it is argued here, cast an unfortunate light on the compatibility of scientific and religious rationality much advocated by the Pope in his 12 September 2006 lecture. This flagrant 'performative contradiction' (Habermas) leaves room for speculation about the true aim of the speech. Is Benedict XVI's appeal to theology as a legitimate academic discipline a credible attempt to explicate Roman Catholicism's rightful place in a modern world governed by liberal democracy and ethical-political pluralism, or is it a reflection of a move to restore the age-old, intolerant, anti-scientific, and anti-democratic legacy of the pre-Vatican II Catholic Church?