Refine
Document Type
- Article (4) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (4) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (4)
Keywords
- pragmatics (4) (remove)
Institute
- Philosophie (1)
The aim of this paper is to show how Grimmelshausen uses forms of addressing and which factors are important for the choice of address in the novel Simplicissimus. The research of indirect speaking in novel texts of the baroque is a desiderate in science. The result is: Often pragmatic motives of situation figure rather the choice of address then conventions of social classes. The balance between power semantic and solidary semantic as well as human affects and emotions regulate how literary characters are addressing other characters. The reason for that is that most authors refer to novel texts with members of the society’s elite. Contrary it can be argued that Grimmelshausen uses many different levels of society. Therefore, we can suppose, that our investigation makes the understanding of how politeness is working round. It is based on knowledge of a dynamic language.
El siguiente trabajo se propone como objetivo la reconstrucción de la estructura interna que constituye a las acciones con sentido (o intencionales) de los hombres tal como puede ser hecha desde la pragmática trascendental del lenguaje de Karl-Otto Apel. Resaltando (I) el papel decisivo que juega el lenguaje y el discurso en la constitución como tal de las acciones intencionales, se procede a la explicitación de una estructura interna de pretensiones de validez similar a la que es posible encontrar en el discurso explícito, tal como lo hicieron los planteos clásicos de Karl-Otto Apel. Luego de la discusión de algunas críticas que pueden hacerse a esta reconstrucción (II), se arriban finalmente a algunas conclusiones referidas a los presupuestos de las acciones no lingüísticas (III).
Rad se bavi analizom svojstava, funkcija i markera konverzacijkih implikatura u SMS diskursu. U prvome dijelu članka utvrđuju se temeljni mehanizmi prijenosa implicitnih intencionalno enodiranih sadržaja u diskurs te se određuju obilježja jezične strukture i govorne produkcije tipična za dopisivanje putem SMS poruka. Diskurs SMS dopisivanja smatra se plodnim područjem za proučavanje implikatura zbog bogatstva implicitnim sadržajima (uvjetovanoga sažetošću SMS forme); posrednosti komunikacije koja iziskuje jezično ili znakovno markiranje implikatura te specifičnih načina prijenosa i signaliziranja implicitnih sadržaja. U drugome dijelu rada predstavljaju se paralingvistički i jezični markeri konverzacijskih implikatura koji su se temeljem analize korpusa SMS dopisivanja pokazali najzastupljenijima u upotrebi. Cilj je rada ukazati na specifičnosti SMS diskursa kada su u pitanju sredstva i mehanizmi enkodiranja, signaliziranja te uspješnoga dekodiranja implicitnih sadržaja.
In this paper I seek to account for the productive word-formation process resulting in the current proliferation of un-nouns, the semi-legitimate offspring of Humpty Dumpty´s un-birthday present (1871) and 7-Up´s commercial incarnation as The Un-Cola (1968), a construction that can be linked to the more well-established categories of un-adjectives and un-verbs, whose formation constraints we will also examine. Drawing on a large corpus of novel un-nouns I have assembled in collaboration with Beth Levin presented in the Appendices to this paper, I will invoke Rosch´s prototype semantics and Aristotle´s notion of PRIVATIVE opposites, defined in terms of a marked exception to a general class property, to generalize across the different categories of un-words. It will be argued that a given un-noun refers either to an element just outside a given category with whose members it shares a salient function (e.g. un-cola) or to a peripheral member of a given category (an unhotel is a hotel but not a good exemplar of the class-not a HOTEL hotel).