Refine
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (4) (remove)
Language
- English (4)
Has Fulltext
- yes (4) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (4)
Institute
- Medizin (4)
Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, decreased volumes of acute stroke admissions were reported. We aimed to examine whether subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) volumes demonstrated similar declines in our department. Furthermore, the impact of pandemic on disease progression should be analyzed.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective study in neurosurgical department of university hospital Frankfurt including patients with the diagnosis of aneurysmal SAH during the first year of COVID-pandemic. One year cumulative volume for SAH hospitalization procedures were compared to the one-year period before (03/2020–02/2021 versus 03/2019–02/2020) and the last 5 pre-COVID-pandemic years (2015-2020). All relevant patient characteristics concerning family history, disease history, clinical condition at admission, active/past COVID-infection, treatment management, complications and outcome were analyzed.
Results: There was a decline in SAH hospitalizations, with 84 admissions in the year immediately before and 56 admissions during the pandemic, without reaching a significance. No significant difference in analyzed patient characteristics including clinical condition at onset, treatment, complications and outcome, between 56 SAH patients admitted during COVID pandemic and treated patients in the last 5 years in pre-COVID period were found. Using a multivariable analysis, we detected young age (p<0.05;OR4,2) and no existence of early hydrocephalus (p<0.05;OR0,13) as important factors for a favorable outcome (mRS≤0-2) after aSAH during the COVID-pandemic. A past COVID-infection was detected in young patients suffering from aSAH (Age< 50years, p<0.05;OR10,5) with increased rate of cerebral vasospasm after SAH onset (p<0.05;OR26). Nevertheless, past COVID-infection did not reach a significance as a high risk factor for unfavorable outcome.
Conclusion: There was a relative decrease in the volume of SAH during the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite of extremely different conditions of hospitalization, there was no impairing significant effect on treatment and outcome of admitted SAH patients. A past COVID-infection seemed not to be a relevant limiting factor concerning favorable outcome.
Background: Transfusion of red blood cells (RBC) in patients undergoing major elective cranial surgery is associated with increased morbidity, mortality and prolonged hospital length of stay (LOS). This retrospective single center study aims to identify the impact of RBC transfusions on skull-base and non-skull-base meningioma patients including the identification of risk factors for RBC transfusion.
Methods: From October 2009 - October 2016 we retrospectively analyzed 423 primary meningioma patients undergoing surgery for primary meningioma resection our department.
Results: Of these 423 patients, 68 (16.1%) received RBC transfusion and 355 (83.9%) did not receive RBC units. Preoperative anaemia rate was significantly higher in transfused patients (17.7%) compared to patients without RBC transfusion (6.2%; p = 0.0015). In transfused patients, postoperative complications as well as hospital LOS was significantly higher (p < 00001) compared to non-transfused patients. After multivariate analyses, risk factors for RBC transfusion were preoperative American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status score (p = 0.0247), tumor size (p = 0.0006), surgical time (p = 0.0018) and intraoperative blood loss (p < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier curves revealed significant influence on overall survival by preoperative anaemia, RBC transfusion, smoking, cardiovascular disease, preoperative KPS ≤ 60% and age (elderly ≥ 75 years).
Conclusion: We concluded that blood loss due to large tumors or localization near large vessels are the main triggers for RBC transfusion in meningioma patients paired with a potential preselection that masks the effect of preoperative anaemia in multivariate analysis. Further studies evaluating the impact of preoperative anaemia management for reduction of RBC transfusion are needed to improve clinical outcomes of meningioma patients.
Background: Epileptic seizures are common clinical features in patients with acute subdural hematoma (aSDH); however, diagnostic feasibility and therapeutic monitoring remain limited. Surface electroencephalography (EEG) is the major diagnostic tool for the detection of seizures but it might be not sensitive enough to detect all subclinical or nonconvulsive seizures or status epilepticus. Therefore, we have planned a clinical trial to evaluate a novel treatment modality by perioperatively implanting subdural EEG electrodes to diagnose seizures; we will then treat the seizures under therapeutic monitoring and analyze the clinical benefit.
Methods: In a prospective nonrandomized trial, we aim to include 110 patients with aSDH. Only patients undergoing surgical removal of aSDH will be included; one arm will be treated according to the guidelines of the Brain Trauma Foundation, while the other arm will additionally receive a subdural grid electrode. The study's primary outcome is the comparison of incidence of seizures and time-to-seizure between the interventional and control arms. Invasive therapeutic monitoring will guide treatment with antiseizure drugs (ASDs). The secondary outcome will be the functional outcome for both groups as assessed via the Glasgow Outcome Scale and modified Rankin Scale both at discharge and during 6 months of follow-up. The tertiary outcome will be the evaluation of chronic epilepsy within 2-4 years of follow-up.
Discussion: The implantation of a subdural EEG grid electrode in patients with aSDH is expected to be effective in diagnosing seizures in a timely manner, facilitating treatment with ASDs and monitoring of treatment success. Moreover, the occurrence of epileptiform discharges prior to the manifestation of seizure patterns could be evaluated in order to identify high-risk patients who might benefit from prophylactic treatment with ASDs.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier no. NCT04211233.
Oral e-Poster Presentations - Booth 1: Vascular 3, September 27, 2023, 10:00 AM - 10:40 AM
Background: Despite current clinical guidelines recommending suboccipital decompressive craniectomy (SDC) in patients with space-occupying cerebellar infarction when neurological deterioration occurs, the precise definition of such deterioration remains unclear. The current study aimed at characterizing whether clinical outcomes can be predicted by the GCS score immediately prior to SDC, and whether higher GCS scores are associated with better clinical outcomes. We aimed to characterize whether clinical outcomes can be predicted by the GCS score immediately prior to SDC, and if higher GCS scores are associated with better clinical outcomes.
Methods: In a single-center, retrospective analysis of 51 patients treated with SDC for space-occupying cerebellar infarction clinical and imaging data were evaluated at the timepoints of symptom onset, hospital admission and preoperatively. Clinical outcome was measured by mRS at the last available follow-up. Preoperative GCS scores were stratified into three groups (GCS 3-8, 9-11 and 12-15). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed using clinical and radiological parameters as predictors of clinical outcome.
Results: In Cox-regression analysis using mRS of 1-2 as a positive clinical outcome we found a significant increase in the proportional hazard ratio (HR) of 6.581 [CI 1.839-36.414]; p=0.031 for GCS scores of 12-15 prior to SDC. Clinical outcomes (mRS 3-6) were associated with infarct volume above 6.0 cm3 (HR 2.473 [CI 1.209-5.057]; p=0.013), tonsillar herniation (HR: 0.279 [CI 0.083-0.933]; p=0.038), brainstem compression (HR 0.304 [CI 0.123-0.749]; p=0.010) and a preoperative GCS score of 3-8 (HR 2.386 [CI 1.160-4.906]; p=0.018).
Conclusions: SDC should be considered in patients with infarct volumes above 6.0 cm3 with GCS scores higher than previously described in the literature, as these patients may show better long-term outcome than those in which surgery is delayed until a GCS score of 11 or lower.