Refine
Document Type
- Article (4) (remove)
Language
- English (4)
Has Fulltext
- yes (4)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (4)
Keywords
Institute
- Biochemie und Chemie (4) (remove)
The full-length translation-regulating add adenine riboswitch (Asw) from Vibrio vulnificus has a more complex conformational space than its isolated aptamer domain. In addition to the predicted apo (apoA) and holo conformation that feature the conserved three-way junctional purine riboswitch aptamer, it adopts a second apo (apoB) conformation with a fundamentally different secondary structure. Here, we characterized the ligand-dependent conformational dynamics of the full-length add Asw by NMR and by single-molecule FRET (smFRET) spectroscopy. Both methods revealed an adenine-induced secondary structure switch from the apoB-form to the apoA-form that involves no tertiary structural interactions between aptamer and expression platform. This strongly suggests that the add Asw triggers translation by capturing the apoA-form secondary structure in the holo state. Intriguingly, NMR indicated a homogenous, docked aptamer kissing loop fold for apoA and holo, while smFRET showed persistent aptamer kissing loop docking dynamics between comparably stable, undocked and docked substates of the apoA and the holo conformation. Unraveling the folding of large junctional riboswitches thus requires the integration of complementary solution structural techniques such as NMR and smFRET.
NMR spectroscopy is a potent method for the structural and biophysical characterization of RNAs. The application of NMR spectroscopy is restricted in RNA size and most often requires isotope‐labeled or even selectively labeled RNAs. Additionally, new NMR pulse sequences, such as the heteronuclear‐detected NMR experiments, are introduced. We herein provide detailed protocols for the preparation of isotope‐labeled RNA for NMR spectroscopy via in vitro transcription. This protocol covers all steps, from the preparation of DNA template to the transcription of milligram RNA quantities. Moreover, we present a protocol for a chemo‐enzymatic approach to introduce a single modified nucleotide at any position of any RNA. Regarding NMR methodology, we share protocols for the implementation of a suite of heteronuclear‐detected NMR experiments including 13C‐detected experiments for ribose assignment and amino groups, the CN‐spin filter heteronuclear single quantum coherence (HSQC) for imino groups and the 15N‐detected band‐selective excitation short transient transverse‐relaxation‐optimized spectroscopy (BEST‐TROSY) experiment.
Basic Protocol 1: Preparation of isotope‐labeled RNA samples with in vitro transcription using T7 RNAP, DEAE chromatography, and RP‐HPLC purification
Alternate Protocol 1: Purification of isotope‐labeled RNA from in vitro transcription with preparative PAGE
Alternate Protocol 2: Purification of isotope‐labeled RNA samples from in vitro transcription via centrifugal concentration
Support Protocol 1: Preparation of DNA template from plasmid
Support Protocol 2: Preparation of PCR DNA as template
Support Protocol 3: Preparation of T7 RNA Polymerase (T7 RNAP)
Support Protocol 4: Preparation of yeast inorganic pyrophosphatase (YIPP)
Basic Protocol 2: Preparation of site‐specific labeled RNAs using a chemo‐enzymatic synthesis
Support Protocol 5: Synthesis of modified nucleoside 3′,5′‐bisphosphates
Support Protocol 6: Preparation of T4 RNA Ligase 2
Support Protocol 7: Setup of NMR spectrometer for heteronuclear‐detected NMR experiments
Support Protocol 8: IPAP and DIPAP for homonuclear decoupling
Basic Protocol 3: 13C‐detected 3D (H)CC‐TOCSY, (H)CPC, and (H)CPC‐CCH‐TOCSY experiments for ribose assignment
Basic Protocol 4: 13C‐detected 2D CN‐spin filter HSQC experiment
Basic Protocol 5: 13C‐detected C(N)H‐HDQC experiment for the detection of amino groups
Support Protocol 9: 13C‐detected CN‐HSQC experiment for amino groups
Basic Protocol 6: 13C‐detected “amino”‐NOESY experiment
Basic Protocol 7: 15N‐detected BEST‐TROSY experiment
RNA-protein complexes (RNPs) are essential components in a variety of cellular processes, and oftentimes exhibit complex structures and show mechanisms that are highly dynamic in conformation and structure. However, biochemical and structural biology approaches are mostly not able to fully elucidate the structurally and especially conformationally dynamic and heterogeneous nature of these RNPs, to which end single molecule Förster resonance energy transfer (smFRET) spectroscopy can be harnessed to fill this gap. Here we summarize the advantages of strategic smFRET studies to investigate RNP dynamics, complemented by structural and biochemical data. Focusing on recent smFRET studies of three essential biological systems, we demonstrate that investigation of RNPs on a single molecule level can answer important functional questions that remained elusive with structural or biochemical approaches alone: The complex structural rearrangements throughout the splicing cycle, unwinding dynamics of the G-quadruplex (G4) helicase RHAU, and aspects in telomere maintenance regulation and synthesis.
Genetic code expansion facilitates position‐selective labeling of rna for biophysical studies
(2019)
Nature relies on reading and synthesizing the genetic code with high fidelity. Nucleic acid building blocks that are orthogonal to the canonical A‐T and G‐C base‐pairs are therefore uniquely suitable to facilitate position‐specific labeling of nucleic acids. Here, we employ the orthogonal kappa‐xanthosine‐base‐pair for in vitro transcription of labeled RNA. We devised an improved synthetic route to obtain the phosphoramidite of the deoxy‐version of the kappa nucleoside in solid phase synthesis. From this DNA template, we demonstrate the reliable incorporation of xanthosine during in vitro transcription. Using NMR spectroscopy, we show that xanthosine introduces only minor structural changes in an RNA helix. We furthermore synthesized a clickable 7‐deaza‐xanthosine, which allows to site‐specifically modify transcribed RNA molecules with fluorophores or other labels.