Refine
Year of publication
- 2022 (19) (remove)
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (19) (remove)
Language
- English (19)
Has Fulltext
- yes (19)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (19) (remove)
Institute
- Medizin (19) (remove)
Background: The most frequent therapy of hydrocephalus is the implantation of ventriculoperitoneal shunts for diverting cerebrospinal fluid from the ventricles into the peritoneum. We compared two adjustable valves, the proGAV and proGAV 2.0, for complications which resulted in revision operations.
Methods: Four hundred patients who underwent primary shunt implantation between 2014 and 2020 were analyzed for overall revision rate, one-year revision rate, revision free survival and overall survival observing patient age group, gender, etiology of hydrocephalus, implantation site, prior diversion of cerebrospinal fluid and cause of revision.
Results: All data were available of all 400 patients (female/male 208/192). Overall, 99 patients underwent revision surgery after primary implantation. ProGAV valve was implanted in 283 patients, proGAV 2.0 in 117 patients. There was no significant difference between the two shunt valves concerning revision rate (p=0.8069), one-year revision rate (p=0.9077), revision free survival (p=0.6921) and overall survival (p=0.3232). Furthermore, regarding one-year revision rate, we observed no significant difference between the two shunt valves in pediatric patients (40.7% vs 27.6%; p=0.2247). Revision operation had to be performed more frequently in pediatric patients (46.6% vs 24.8%; p=0.0093) with a significant higher number of total revisions with proGAV than proGAV 2.0 (55.9% vs. 27.6%; p=0.0110) most likely due to longer follow up in the proGAV -group.
Conclusion: According to the target variables we analyzed, aside from lifetime revision rate in pediatric patients there is no significant difference between the two shunt valves. From our subjective point of view, implantation of the newer proGAV 2.0 valve is preferable due to higher adjustment comfort for both patients and physicians.
Background: A growing interest exists in using polymeric nanoparticles (NPs) especially functionalized with surface-active substances as carriers across the blood brain barrier (BBB) for potentially effective drugs in traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, the organ distribution of intravenous administrated biodegradable and non-biodegradable NPs coated with different surfactants, how much of the administrated dose reach the brain parenchyma in areas with intact and opened BBB after trauma, as well as whether they elicit an inflammatory response is still to be clarified.
Methods: The organ distribution, brain penetration and eventual inflammatory activation of polysorbate-80 (Tw80) and sodium-lauryl-sulfate (SDS) coated poly l-lactide (PLLA) and perfluorodecyl acrylate (PFDL) nanoparticles were evaluated after intravenous administration in rats prior and after undergoing controlled cortical impact (CCI).
Results: A significant highest NP uptake at 4 and 24 hs was observed in the liver and spleen, followed by the brain and kidney, with minimal concentrations in the lungs and heart for all NPs. After CCI, a significant increase of NP uptake at 4 hs and 24 hs was observed within the traumatized hemisphere, especially in the perilesional area, although NPs were still found in areas away from CCI and the contralateral hemisphere in similar concentrations as in non-CCI subject. NPs were localized in neurons, glial and endovascular cells. Immunohistochemical staining against GFAP, Iba1, TNFα and IL1β demonstrated no glial activation or neuroinflamatory changes.
Conclusions: Tw80 and SDS coated biodegradable (PLLA) and non-biodegradrable (PFDL) NPs reach the brain parenchyma in both areas of traumatized and undamaged brain with disrupted and intact BBB, even though a high amount of them are retained in the liver and the spleen. No inflammatory reaction is elicited by these NPs within 24 hs after application. These preliminary promising results postulate the effectiveness and safety of these NPs as drug-carriers for the treatment of TBI.
Propranolol as a potentially novel treatment of arteriovenous malformations: from bench to bedside
(2022)
Background: Propranolol is a non-selective blocker of the β-adrenergic receptor and has been used for treatment of proliferative infantile hemangiomas. The vasoconstrictive and antiangiogenic effects of propranolol led us to explore its potential application for the treatment of AVMs.
Methods: AVM tissue was cultured after surgical resection in the presence of 100μM propranolol or solvent DMSO. After incubation for 72 hours, tissue was harvested for testing. The expression levels of SDF1α, CXCR4, VEGF and HIF-1 was measured by rt-PCR. Furthermore, data of patients in 2 vascular centres harboring AVM was retrospectively interrogated for a time period of 20 years. The database included information about hemorrhage, AVM size and antihypertensive medication. Descriptive analyses were performed, focusing on the risk of hemorrhage, size of the lesion at presentation and clinical follow-up in patients on β-blocker medication versus those who were not.
Results: Among 483 patients, 73 (15%) were under β-blocker-treatment. 48% AVMs presented with hemorrhage at diagnosis. Patients under β-blocker-treatment had a lower risk of hemorrhage at the time of diagnosis in a univariate analysis (p<0,0001;OR13). Patients under β-blocker-treatment showed a significant higher chance for a lower Spetzler-Martin-grade ≤III (p<0,0001;OR6,5) and a lower risk for the presence of an associated aneurysm (p<0,0001;OR3,6).
Multivariate analysis including Spetzler-Martin-Grading, young age ≤50, presence of associated aneurysm and β-blocker-treatment showed reduced risk for hemorrhage under β-blocker-treatment (p<0,01,OR0,2).
The expression of CXCR4 was suppressed by propranolol most likely through the HIF-1-pathways. The gene-expression of vasculogenesis factors was decreased in with propranolol incubated AVMs.
Conclusion: β-Blocker medication seems to be associated with a decreased risk of AVM-related hemorrhage and AVM-size at presentation or during follow-up. Propranolol inhibits SDF1α-induced vasculogenesis by suppressing the expression of CXCR4 most likely through the HIF-1-pathways. Therefore, SDF1α/CXCR4 axis plays an important role in the vasculogenesis and migration of inflammatory cells in AVM lesions.
Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, decreased volumes of acute stroke admissions were reported. We aimed to examine whether subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) volumes demonstrated similar declines in our department. Furthermore, the impact of pandemic on disease progression should be analyzed.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective study in neurosurgical department of university hospital Frankfurt including patients with the diagnosis of aneurysmal SAH during the first year of COVID-pandemic. One year cumulative volume for SAH hospitalization procedures were compared to the one-year period before (03/2020–02/2021 versus 03/2019–02/2020) and the last 5 pre-COVID-pandemic years (2015-2020). All relevant patient characteristics concerning family history, disease history, clinical condition at admission, active/past COVID-infection, treatment management, complications and outcome were analyzed.
Results: There was a decline in SAH hospitalizations, with 84 admissions in the year immediately before and 56 admissions during the pandemic, without reaching a significance. No significant difference in analyzed patient characteristics including clinical condition at onset, treatment, complications and outcome, between 56 SAH patients admitted during COVID pandemic and treated patients in the last 5 years in pre-COVID period were found. Using a multivariable analysis, we detected young age (p<0.05;OR4,2) and no existence of early hydrocephalus (p<0.05;OR0,13) as important factors for a favorable outcome (mRS≤0-2) after aSAH during the COVID-pandemic. A past COVID-infection was detected in young patients suffering from aSAH (Age< 50years, p<0.05;OR10,5) with increased rate of cerebral vasospasm after SAH onset (p<0.05;OR26). Nevertheless, past COVID-infection did not reach a significance as a high risk factor for unfavorable outcome.
Conclusion: There was a relative decrease in the volume of SAH during the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite of extremely different conditions of hospitalization, there was no impairing significant effect on treatment and outcome of admitted SAH patients. A past COVID-infection seemed not to be a relevant limiting factor concerning favorable outcome.