Refine
Year of publication
- 2013 (8) (remove)
Document Type
- Working Paper (8) (remove)
Language
- English (8) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (8)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (8) (remove)
Keywords
- Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) (2)
- European Banking Authority (EBA) (2)
- European Central Bank (ECB) (2)
- Gerichte (2)
- Konfliktlösung (2)
- banking union (2)
- conflict resolution (2)
- courts (2)
- political economy of bureaucracy (2)
- prudential supervision (2)
- regulatory capture (2)
- Akkadian language (1)
- Akkadische Sprache (1)
- Alter Orient (1)
- Amtsgerichte (1)
- Ancient Near Eastern International Law (1)
- Ancient Near Eastern law (1)
- Ancient near east (1)
- Ausschüsse für Politik und Recht (1)
- Boards für Stadt-Entwicklung (1)
- Büros für Wirtschafts-und Handelsbeziehungen (1)
- Büros für Wohnungsbau (1)
- China (1)
- Chinese studies (1)
- Colonialism (1)
- Copyright (1)
- Debatten (1)
- Dorfkomitees (1)
- Eide (1)
- Gerichtsverfahren (1)
- German Capital Markets Model Case Act (KapMuG) (1)
- Gesellschaft (1)
- Gesetzgebung (1)
- Globalization (1)
- Handelsrechtsprechung (1)
- Hanse (1)
- Informality of negotiation (1)
- Informalität der Verhandlungen (1)
- Intellectual Property (1)
- Kaufleute (1)
- Legal Transplants (1)
- Parteistaat (1)
- Petitionen (1)
- Policy debates (1)
- Politics and Law Committees (1)
- Privilegien (1)
- Rechtsstreitigkeiten (1)
- Rechtsverbindlichkeit (1)
- Sanktionen (1)
- Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM) (1)
- Sinologie (1)
- Stabilität (1)
- Verfahren (1)
- Verfahrensregeln (1)
- Vergütung (1)
- Vermittlung (1)
- Verträge (1)
- alternative dispute resolution (ADR) (1)
- alternative oispute resolution (ADR) (1)
- altorientalisches Recht (1)
- altorientalistisches internationales Recht (1)
- city development boards (1)
- collective litigation (1)
- collective redress (1)
- compensation (1)
- court cases (1)
- district courts (1)
- economic and trade bureaus (1)
- fragmented authoritarianism (1)
- fragmentierter Autoritarismus (1)
- housing construction bureaus (1)
- investor protection (1)
- judicial offices (1)
- legally binding force (1)
- legislation (1)
- litigation (1)
- local Public Security Bureaus (1)
- local government (1)
- lokale Regierungen (1)
- lokale Ämter für Öffentliche Sicherheit (1)
- mediation (1)
- merchants (1)
- model case procedure (1)
- oaths (1)
- party-state (1)
- petitioning cases (1)
- privileges (1)
- procedural rules (1)
- procedure (1)
- sanctions (1)
- society (1)
- stability (1)
- trade jurisdiction (1)
- treaties (1)
- village committees (1)
- weiwen (1)
Institute
- Rechtswissenschaft (8) (remove)
Stability maintenance at the grassroots: China’s weiwen apparatus as a form of conflict resolution
(2013)
This working paper explores the history and potential of “stability maintenance” (weiwen) as a form of conflict resolution in China. Its emphasis on conflict resolution is novel. Previous examinations of the weiwen apparatus have concentrated on its political function, namely to manage resistance within society and maintain the authority of the party-state. This avenue of investigation has proved fruitful as a means of characterising the political motivation and the higher-level strategies involved in stability maintenance. Nonetheless, there remain significant conceptual and empirical gaps relating to how stability maintenance offices and processes actually function, particularly out of larger cities and at local levels. The research described in this paper aims to consider the effectiveness of stability maintenance as a part of the “market” for conflict resolution in local China, and to test the hypothesis that conflict resolution as facilitated by weiwen is the most pragmatic and effective means of actually resolving conflicts in the current Chinese political context, notwithstanding the closeness of the stability maintenance discourse to state authority and its relative distance from rule of law-based methods of dispute resolution...
The paper focuses on the problems of a juridical classification and evaluation of Ancient Near Eastern treaties with regard to the question if there existed an Ancient Near Eastern International Law or not. Alternatively treaties and their content are looked at uncommitted as mechanisms of conflict and dispute resolution. Main aspects are preliminary and prophylactic conflict resolution in treaties and the procedural context and efficiency of treaties.
The German Capital Markets Model Case Act (KapMuG) and its amendment of 2012 highlight some fundamentals of collective redress in civil law countries at the example of model case procedures in the field of investor protection. That is why a survey of the ongoing activities of the European Union in the area of collective redress and of its repercussions on the member state level forms a suitable basis for the following analysis of the 2012 amendment of the KapMuG. It clearly brings into focus a shift from sector-specific regulation with an emphasis on the cross-border aspect of protecting consumers towards a “coherent approach” strengthening the enforcement of EU law. As a result, regulatory policy and collective redress are two sides of the same coin today. With respect to the KapMuG such a development brings about some tension between its aim to aggregate small individual claims as efficiently as possible and the dominant role of individual procedural rights in German civil procedure. This conflict can be illustrated by some specific rules of the KapMuG: its scope of application, the three-tier procedure of a model case procedure, the newly introduced notification of claims and the new opt-out settlement under the amended §§ 17-19.
Between the 12th and 16th centuries the Hanseatic merchants obtained extremely important privileges from the rulers of the countries with whom they traded. These secured their commercial and legal status and the autonomy of their staples in Flanders, England, Norway, Denmark and Russia. Within these privileges no other subject receives so extensive a treatment as court procedure. Here, the single most important concern of the Hanseatic merchants was their position in front of alien courts. The article analyses the great attention given to court procedure in the twenty main Hanseatic privileges: What did the merchants require? Which procedural rules were necessary to encourage them to submit their disputes to alien public court instead of taking the matter into their own hands and turning to extra-judicial methods to resolve matters, e.g. cancellation of business relations, boycotts or even trade wars? This analysis suggests that the two most important concerns reflected in the procedural rules were to avoid delay to the next trading trip and to ensure a rational law of proof. The former was addressed by pressing for short-term scheduling and swift judgment and by the dispensation from appearing before the court in person. The latter included avoidance of duels and other ordeals and the attempt to obtain parity by appointing half of the jurors from Hanseatic cities.
Although intellectual property law is a distinctively Western, modern, and relatively young body of law, it has spread all over the world, now encompassing all but a very few outsiders such as Afghanistan, Somalia, and Vanuatu. This article presents three legal transfers that contributed to this development: first, from real property in land and movables to intellectual property in the late 18th century in Western Europe; second, from Western Europe, in particular from the United Kingdom and France to the rest of the world during the colonial era in the 19th and early 20th century; third, from the protection of new knowledge to the protection of traditional knowledge, held by indigenous communities in developing countries, on 5 August 1963. This story illuminates how legal transfers in a broad sense – including, but not limited to legal transplants - drive the evolution of law.
The article makes two points regarding the fundamental rights dimensions of intellectual property (IP). First, it explains why the prevailing approach to balancing the fundamental right to intellectual property with conflicting fundamental freedoms as if they were of equal rank is conceptually flawed and should be replaced by a justification paradigm. Second, it highlights the pre-eminent role of the legislature and the much more limited role of the judiciary in developing IP law. The arguments are based on an analysis of the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and last but not least the German Constitutional Court, the Bundesverfassungsgericht, regarding the respective inter-/supra-/national fundamental-rights regimes.
This paper analyzes the evolving architecture for the prudential supervision of banks in the euro area. It is primarily concerned with the likely effectiveness of the SSM as a regime that intends to bolster financial stability in the steady state.
By using insights from the political economy of bureaucracy it finds that the SSM is overly focused on sharp tools to discipline captured national supervisors and thus under-incentives their top-level personnel to voluntarily contribute to rigid supervision. The success of the SSM in this regard will hinge on establishing a common supervisory culture that provides positive incentives for national supervisors. In this regard, the internal decision making structure of the ECB in supervisory matters provides some integrative elements. Yet, the complex procedures also impede swift decision making and do not solve the problem adequately. Ultimately, a careful design and animation of the ECB-defined supervisory framework and the development of inter-agency career opportunities will be critical.
The ECB will become a de facto standard setter that competes with the EBA. A likely standoff in the EBA’s Board of Supervisors will lead to a growing gap in regulatory integration between SSM-participants and other EU Member States.
Joining the SSM as a non-euro area Member State is unattractive because the cur-rent legal framework grants no voting rights in the ECB’s ultimate decision making body. It also does not supply a credible commitment opportunity for Member States who seek to bond to high quality supervision.
This paper analyzes the evolving architecture for the prudential supervision of banks in the euro area. It is primarily concerned with the likely effectiveness of the SSM as a regime that intends to bolster financial stability in the steady state. By using insights from the political economy of bureaucracy it finds that the SSM is overly focused on sharp tools to discipline captured national supervisors and thus underincentives their top-level personnel to voluntarily contribute to rigid supervision. The success of the SSM in this regard will hinge on establishing a common supervisory culture that provides positive incentives for national supervisors. In this regard, the internal decision making structure of the ECB in supervisory matters provides some integrative elements. Yet, the complex procedures also impede swift decision making and do not solve the problem adequately. Ultimately, a careful design and animation of the ECB-defined supervisory framework and the development of inter-agency career opportunities will be critical.
The ECB will become a de facto standard setter that competes with the EBA. A likely standoff in the EBA’s Board of Supervisors will lead to a growing gap in regulatory integration between SSM-participants and other EU Member States.
Joining the SSM as a non-euro area Member State is unattractive because the current legal framework grants no voting rights in the ECB’s ultimate decision making body. It also does not supply a credible commitment opportunity for Member States who seek to bond to high quality supervision.