Refine
Year of publication
- 2009 (16) (remove)
Document Type
- Working Paper (16) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (16)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (16) (remove)
Keywords
- Deutschland (4)
- Fiscal Stimulus (3)
- Fiskalpolitik (3)
- Contagion (2)
- Crowding-out (2)
- Fiscal Multiplier (2)
- Government Spending (2)
- Keynessche Theorie (2)
- Macroeconomic Modelling (2)
- New Keynesian Model (2)
Institute
- Wirtschaftswissenschaften (16) (remove)
Stocks are exposed to the risk of sudden downward jumps. Additionally, a crash in one stock (or index) can increase the risk of crashes in other stocks (or indices). Our paper explicitly takes this contagion risk into account and studies its impact on the portfolio decision of a CRRA investor both in complete and in incomplete market settings. We find that the investor significantly adjusts his portfolio when contagion is more likely to occur. Capturing the time dimension of contagion, i.e. the time span between jumps in two stocks or stock indices, is thus of first-order importance when analyzing portfolio decisions. Investors ignoring contagion completely or accounting for contagion while ignoring its time dimension suffer large and economically significant utility losses. These losses are larger in complete than in incomplete markets, and the investor might be better off if he does not trade derivatives. Furthermore, we emphasize that the risk of contagion has a crucial impact on investors' security demands, since it reduces their ability to diversify their portfolios.
The recent financial crisis has led to a major debate about fair-value accounting. Many critics have argued that fair-value accounting, often also called mark-to-market accounting, has significantly contributed to the financial crisis or, at least, exacerbated its severity. In this paper, we assess these arguments and examine the role of fair-value accounting in the financial crisis using descriptive data and empirical evidence. Based on our analysis, it is unlikely that fair-value accounting added to the severity of the current financial crisis in a major way. While there may have been downward spirals or asset-fire sales in certain markets, we find little evidence that these effects are the result of fair-value accounting. We also find little support for claims that fair-value accounting leads to excessive write-downs of banks’ assets. If anything, empirical evidence to date points in the opposite direction, that is, towards overvaluation of bank assets.
The global financial crisis has lead to a renewed interest in discretionary fiscal stimulus. Advocates of discretionary measures emphasize that government spending can stimulate additional private spending — the so-called Keynesian multiplier effect. Thus, we investigate whether the discretionary spending announced by Euro area governments for 2009 and 2010 is likely to boost euro area GDP by more than one for one. Because of modeling uncertainty, it is essential that such policy evaluations be robust to alternative modeling assumptions and different parameterizations. Therefore, we use five different empirical macroeconomic models with Keynesian features such as price and wage rigidities to evaluate the impact of fiscal stimulus. Four of them suggest that the planned increase in government spending will reduce private spending for consumption and investment purposes significantly. If announced government expenditures are implemented with delay the initial effect on euro area GDP, when stimulus is most needed, may even be negative. Traditional Keynesian multiplier effects only arise in a model that ignores the forward-looking behavioral response of consumers and firms. Using a multi-country model, we find that spillovers between euro area countries are negligible or even negative, because direct demand effects are offset by the indirect effect of euro appreciation.
Recent evaluations of the fiscal stimulus packages recently enacted in the United States and Europe such as Cogan, Cwik, Taylor and Wieland (2009) and Cwik and Wieland (2009) suggest that the GDP effects will be modest due to crowding-out of private consumption and investment. Corsetti, Meier and Mueller (2009a,b) argue that spending shocks are typically followed by consolidations with substantive spending cuts, which enhance the short-run stimulus effect. This note investigates the implications of this argument for the estimated impact of recent stimulus packages and the case for discretionary fiscal policy.
This paper investigates the impact of IT standardization on bank performance based on a panel of 457 German savings banks over the period from 1996 to 2006. We measure IT standardization as the fraction of IT expenses for centralized services over banks' total IT expenses. Bank efficiency, in turn, is measured by traditional accounting performance indicators as well as by cost and profit efficiencies that are estimated by a stochastic frontier approach. Our results suggest that IT standardization is conducive to cost efficiency. The relation is positive and robust for small and medium-sized banks but vanishes for very large banks. Furthermore, our study confirms the often cited computer paradox by showing that total IT expenditures negatively impact cost efficiency and have no influence on bank profits. To the best of our knowledge, this paper is first to empirically explore whether IT standardization enhances efficiency by employing genuine data of banks' IT expenditures. JEL Classification: C23, G21 Keywords: IT standardization, cost and profit efficiency, savings banks
The objective of this paper is to test the hypothesis that in particular financially constrained firms lease a higher share of their assets to mitigate problems of asymmetric information. The assumptions are tested under a GMM framework which simultaneously controls for endogeneity problems and firms’ fixed effects. We find that the share of total annual lease expenses attributable to either finance or operating leases is considerably higher for financially strained as well as for small and fast-growing firms – those likely to face higher agency-cost premiums on marginal financing. Furthermore, our results confirm the substitution of leasing and debt financing for lessee firms. However, we find no evidence that firms use leasing as an instrument to reduce their tax burdens. Keywords: Leasing; financial constraints; capital structure; asymmetric information.
In this paper we investigate the comparative properties of empirically-estimated monetary models of the U.S. economy. We make use of a new data base of models designed for such investigations. We focus on three representative models: the Christiano, Eichenbaum, Evans (2005) model, the Smets and Wouters (2007) model, and the Taylor (1993a) model. Although the three models differ in terms of structure, estimation method, sample period, and data vintage, we find surprisingly similar economic impacts of unanticipated changes in the federal funds rate. However, the optimal monetary policy responses to other sources of economic fluctuations are widely different in the different models. We show that simple optimal policy rules that respond to the growth rate of output and smooth the interest rate are not robust. In contrast, policy rules with no interest rate smoothing and no response to the growth rate, as distinct from the level, of output are more robust. Robustness can be improved further by optimizing rules with respect to the average loss across the three models.
Renewed interest in fiscal policy has increased the use of quantitative models to evaluate policy. Because of modeling uncertainty, it is essential that policy evaluations be robust to alternative assumptions. We find that models currently being used in practice to evaluate fiscal policy stimulus proposals are not robust. Government spending multipliers in an alternative empirically-estimated and widely-cited new Keynesian model are much smaller than in these old Keynesian models; the estimated stimulus is extremely small with GDP and employment effects only one-sixth as large.
This paper analyzes the risk properties of typical asset-backed securities (ABS), like CDOs or MBS, relying on a model with both macroeconomic and idiosyncratic components. The examined properties include expected loss, loss given default, and macro factor dependencies. Using a two-dimensional loss decomposition as a new metric, the risk properties of individual ABS tranches can directly be compared to those of corporate bonds, within and across rating classes. By applying Monte Carlo Simulation, we find that the risk properties of ABS differ significantly and systematically from those of straight bonds with the same rating. In particular, loss given default, the sensitivities to macroeconomic risk, and model risk differ greatly between instruments. Our findings have implications for understanding the credit crisis and for policy making. On an economic level, our analysis suggests a new explanation for the observed rating inflation in structured finance markets during the pre-crisis period 2004-2007. On a policy level, our findings call for a termination of the 'one-size-fits-all' approach to the rating methodology for fixed income instruments, requiring an own rating methodology for structured finance instruments. JEL Classification: G21, G28 Keywords: credit risk, risk transfer, systematic risk
Im vorliegenden Papier werden drei Ansätze zur Reform des Familienleistungsausgleichs (FLA) mit jeweils zwei Varianten dargestellt und hinsichtlich ihrer fiskalischen Effekte und Wirkungen in verschiedenen Segmenten der Einkommensverteilung systematisch verglichen. – Mit dem weitestgehenden Konzept, der Kindergrundsicherung, wird ein Existenz sicherndes und zu versteuerndes Kindergeld in Höhe von monatlich 502 Euro bzw. 454 Euro pro Kind vorgeschlagen. Die bisherigen kindbedingten Freibeträge und mehrere Sozialleis-tungen könnten entfallen bzw. reduziert werden. – Daneben werden Kindergelderhöhungen auf einheitlich 238 Euro bzw. 328 Euro pro Kind und Monat, die allen Kindern – auch denen im SGB II-Leistungsbezug – zugute kommen sollen, untersucht. Das Kindergeld wäre wie bisher nicht zu versteuern, die bisherigen kindbedingten Freibeträge würden aber entfallen. – Schließlich wird der Vorschlag einer deutlichen Erhöhung des Kinderzuschlags bei reduzierter Mindesteinkommensgrenze und Wegfall der Höchsteinkommensgrenze erörtert. Zudem ist bei diesem Ansatz ein nochmals erhöhter Kinderzuschlag bei Alleinerziehenden – analog zum Mehrbedarfszuschlag nach dem SGFB II – (erste Variante) oder eine Herabsetzung der Transferentzugsrate auf Nichterwerbseinkommen von 100% auf 70% (zweite Variante) vorgesehen. Die zu erwartenden fiskalischen Belastungen der einfachen Kindergelderhöhung (ohne Be-steuerung) können ohne Weiteres hochgerechnet werden (16 bzw. 35 Mrd. Euro p. a.), die der anderen Reformmodelle sind aber ohne mikroanalytische Fundierung unter Berücksichtigung der Einkommensverteilung kaum abschätzbar. Zwar lassen sich auch die Bruttokosten der Kindergrundsicherung auf einfachem Wege ermitteln (Multiplikation der Kindergeld-Kinder mit der Betragshöhe), die Aggregate der davon abzusetzenden zahlreichen Einsparungen bei anderen Sozialleistungen und insbesondere der Steuermehreinnahmen sind allerdings nicht offensichtlich. Eine erste Überschlagsrechnung hat ergeben, dass die Nettokosten der ersten „großzügigen“ Variante der Kindergrundsicherung (502 Euro) denen der Kindergelderhöhung auf das sächliche Existenzminimum (322 Euro) ohne Besteuerung ungefähr gleich sind (in der Größenordnung von 35 Mrd. Euro). Eine genauere Quantifizierung kann aber nur auf der Ba-sis repräsentativer Mikrodaten und eines Simulationsmodells erfolgen, da insbesondere der Besteuerungseffekt der Kindergrundsicherung von der faktischen Einkommensverteilung abhängt. Auch eine Kostenschätzung für die Kinderzuschlagsreform bedarf mikroanalytischer Verfahren; ungeachtet dessen würde diese auf einen begrenzten Einkommensbereich gerichte-te Reform aber eindeutig die geringsten Kosten verursachen. Für einen systematischen Vergleich der Verteilungswirkungen der Reformvorschläge werden in der vorliegenden Arbeit Modellrechnungen für zwei ausgewählte Haushaltstypen präsen-tiert. Dabei wird deutlich, dass mit dem vergleichsweise begrenzten Konzept der Ausweitung des Kinderzuschlags die Situation von Familien in prekären Einkommensverhältnissen bis zu Familien der unteren Mittelschicht deutlich verbessert werden könnte. Inwieweit dieser Effekt eintreten würde, hängt allerdings auch vom Inanspruchnahmeverhalten ab; bisher ist die Nicht-Inanspruchnahme von Kinderzuschlag und Wohngeld weit verbreitet. Zudem würde sich die Situation der ärmsten Familien, die auf SGB II-Leistungen angewiesen sind, nicht verbessern, und am oberen Rand würden die Entlastungseffekte des FLA als Folge der kind-bedingten Freibeträge weiterhin mit dem elterlichen Einkommen zunehmen. Demgegenüber würden sich bei den Varianten der Kindergelderhöhung (ohne Besteuerung) die deutlichen Verbesserungen gegenüber dem Status quo gleichmäßig über das Einkommensspektrum vom Niedriglohnsegment – bei unverändert problematischen Effekten des Kinderzuschlags (Ein-kommensbruchstelle bei Höchsteinkommensgrenze) – bis in obere Schichten verteilen und erst am oberen Rand mit steigendem Einkommen sinken (infolge des Wegfalls der bisherigen kindbedingten Freibeträge). Die Förderungen durch die Kindergrundsicherung schließlich würden am stärksten im unteren und unteren Mittelbereich ausfallen und – im Gegensatz zu anderen Konzepten – insbesondere verdeckte Armut systembedingt, also quasi „automatisch“, weitgehend abbauen. Im oberen Mittelbereich und hauptsächlich in höheren Schichten würden die Transfers dagegen mit zunehmendem Einkommen kontinuierlich abnehmen. Insgesamt würde dies zu einem vergleichsweise stetig steigenden Verlauf des verfügbaren Familieneinkommens führen; die wegen der hohen Transferentzugsraten des Kinderzuschlags – gegebenenfalls in Kombination mit Wohngeld – häufigen Befürchtungen negativer Arbeitsanreize im unteren Einkommensbereich wären gegenstandslos. Inwieweit die hier diskutierten Reformkonzepte zu einem Abbau von Kinder- und Familien-armut und zu weniger Ungleichheit der personellen Einkommensverteilung führen können, lässt sich allein auf der Basis von Modellrechnungen allerdings nicht absehen. Dazu bedarf es detaillierter Analysen auf der Basis von repräsentativen Mikrodaten, die die faktische Ein-kommensverteilung abbilden und Simulationsrechnungen zur Quantifizierung der Effekte der Reformvarianten – unter Einbeziehung der Finanzierung der jeweiligen Nettokosten – ermöglichen. Daran wird im Projekt „Vom Kindergeld zu einer Grundsicherung für Kinder“ auf Basis der Daten des Sozio-ökonomischen Panels (SOEP) 2007 gearbeitet; die Repräsentativität des Datensatzes hinsichtlich des Nachweises von Einkommens-, insbesondere Transferar-ten wurde bereits geprüft – mit gutem Ergebnis.
This paper relates recursive utility in continuous time to its discrete-time origins and provides a rigorous and intuitive alternative to a heuristic approach presented in [Duffie, Epstein 1992], who formally define recursive utility in continuous time via backward stochastic differential equations (stochastic differential utility). Furthermore, we show that the notion of Gâteaux differentiability of certainty equivalents used in their paper has to be replaced by a different concept. Our approach allows us to address the important issue of normalization of aggregators in non-Brownian settings. We show that normalization is always feasible if the certainty equivalent of the aggregator is of expected utility type. Conversely, we prove that in general L´evy frameworks this is essentially also necessary, i.e. aggregators that are not of expected utility type cannot be normalized in general. Besides, for these settings we clarify the relationship of our approach to stochastic differential utility and, finally, establish dynamic programming results. JEL Classifications: D81, D91, C61
The utility-maximizing consumption and investment strategy of an individual investor receiving an unspanned labor income stream seems impossible to find in closed form and very dificult to find using numerical solution techniques. We suggest an easy procedure for finding a specific, simple, and admissible consumption and investment strategy, which is near-optimal in the sense that the wealthequivalent loss compared to the unknown optimal strategy is very small. We first explain and implement the strategy in a simple setting with constant interest rates, a single risky asset, and an exogenously given income stream, but we also show that the success of the strategy is robust to changes in parameter values, to the introduction of stochastic interest rates, and to endogenous labor supply decisions.
We provide explicit solutions to life-cycle utility maximization problems simultaneously involving dynamic decisions on investments in stocks and bonds, consumption of perishable goods, and the rental and the ownership of residential real estate. House prices, stock prices, interest rates, and the labor income of the decision-maker follow correlated stochastic processes. The preferences of the individual are of the Epstein-Zin recursive structure and depend on consumption of both perishable goods and housing services. The explicit consumption and investment strategies are simple and intuitive and are thoroughly discussed and illustrated in the paper. For a calibrated version of the model we find, among other things, that the fairly high correlation between labor income and house prices imply much larger life-cycle variations in the desired exposure to house price risks than in the exposure to the stock and bond markets. We demonstrate that the derived closed-form strategies are still very useful if the housing positions are only reset infrequently and if the investor is restricted from borrowing against future income. Our results suggest that markets for REITs or other financial contracts facilitating the hedging of house price risks will lead to non-negligible but moderate improvements of welfare.
In this paper, we analyze economies of scale for German mutual fund complexes. Using 2002-2005 data of 41 investment management companies, we specify a hedonic translog cost function. Applying a fixed effects regression on a one-way error component model there is clear evidence of significant overall economies of scale. On the level of individual mutual fund complexes we find significant economies of scale for all of the companies in our sample. With regard to cost efficiency, we find that the average mutual fund complexes in all size quartiles deviate considerably from the best practice cost frontier. JEL Classification: G2, L25 Keywords: mutual fund complex, investment management company, cost efficiency, economies of scale, hedonic translog cost function, fixed effects regression, one-way error component model
Gauging risk with higher moments : handrails in measuring and optimising conditional value at risk
(2009)
The aim of the paper is to study empirically the influence of higher moments of the return distribution on conditional value at risk (CVaR). To be more exact, we attempt to reveal the extent to which the risk given by CVaR can be estimated when relying on the mean, standard deviation, skewness and kurtosis. Furthermore, it is intended to study how this relationship can be utilised in portfolio optimisation. First, based on a database of 600 individual equity returns from 22 emerging world markets, factor models incorporating the first four moments of the return distribution have been constructed at different confidence levels for CVaR, and the contribution of the identified factors in explaining CVaR was determined. Following this the influence of higher moments was examined in portfolio context, i.e. asset allocation decisions were simulated by creating emerging market portfolios from the viewpoint of US investors. This can be regarded as a normal decisionmaking process of a hedge fund focusing on investments into emerging markets. In our analysis we compared and contrasted two approaches with which one can overcome the shortcomings of the variance as a risk measure. First of all, we solved in the presence of conflicting higher moment preferences a multi-objective portfolio optimisation problem for different sets of preferences. In addition, portfolio optimisation was performed in the mean-CVaR framework characterised by using CVaR as a measure of risk. As a part of the analysis, the pair-wise comparison of the different higher moment metrics of the meanvariance and the mean-CVaR efficient portfolios were also made. Throughout the work special attention was given to implied preferences to the different higher moments in optimising CVaR. We also examined the extent to which model risk, namely the risk of wrongly assuming normally-distributed returns can deteriorate our optimal portfolio choice. JEL Classification: G11, G15, C61
Der vorliegende Beitrag untersucht, ob der Mehrheitsaktionär einer Gesellschaft im Vorfeld eines Zwangsausschlusses von Minderheitsaktionären (sog. Squeeze-Out) versucht, die Kapitalmarkterwartungen negativ zu beeinflussen. Ein solches "manipulatives" Verhalten wird häufig in der juristischen wie betriebswirtschaftlichen Literatur unterstellt, da der Aktienkurs fü die Abfindungshöhe die Wertuntergrenze bildet. Unsere empirische Untersuchung der Bilanz- und Pressemitteilungspolitik von Squeeze-Out-Unternehmen im Vorfeld der Ankündigung einer solchen Maßnahme am deutschen Kapitalmarkt zeigt, dass in diesem Zeitraum tatsächlich ein signifikanter Anstieg (Rückgang) der im Ton pessimistischen (optimistischen) Pressemitteilungen feststellbar ist. Allerdings zeigt sich weiter, dass die Aktien der Squeeze-Out-Kandidaten bereits im Vorfeld und am Tag der Ankündigung so hohe positive Überrenditen erzielen, dass der von uns quantifizierte kumulierte Effekt der Informationspolitik auf die Börsenbewertung einen insgesamt nur sehr geringen Einfluss ausübt und von anderen Faktoren (z.B. Abfindungsspekulationen) dominiert wird. JEL: M41, M40, G14, K22