Refine
Year of publication
- 2010 (3) (remove)
Document Type
- Part of a Book (2)
- Magister's Thesis (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (3)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (3) (remove)
Keywords
- Kirchengeschichte (3) (remove)
Indonesia is a multicultural and multireligious nation whose heterogeneity is codified in the state doctrine, the Pancasila. Yet the relations between the various social, ethnic, and religious groups have been problematic down to the present day, and national unity has remained fragile. In several respects, Christians have a precarious role in the struggle for shaping the nation. They are a small minority (about 9% of the population) in a country predominantly inhabited by Muslims; in the past they were interconnected in manifold ways with the Dutch colonial government; they exert great influence in economy and the military, and constitute the majority of the population in some parts of the so-called Outer Islands (such as Flores, Sumba, and Timor), which are characterized by an attitude fraught with ambivalence towards the state apparatus perceived as ‘Javanese’ and ‘Muslim’. In the aftermath of the former president Suharto’s resignation and in the course of the ensuing political changes – in particular the independence of East Timor – Christians were repeatedly discredited for allegedly posing a threat to Indonesian unity, and have been involved both as victims and perpetrators in violent regional clashes with Muslims that claimed thousands of lives. Since the beginning of the new millennium the violent conflicts have lessened, yet the pressure exerted on Christians by Islamic fundamentalists still continues undiminished in the Muslim-majority regions. The future of the Christians in Indonesia remains uncertain, and pluralist society is still on trial. For this reason the situation of Christians in Indonesia is an important issue that goes far beyond research on a minority, touching on general issues relating to the formation of the nation-state.
From the very outset of European expansion, scholars have been preoccupied with the impact of proselytization and colonization on non-European societies. Anthropologists such as Margaret Mead and Bronislaw Malinowski, who witnessed these processes at the beginning of the twentieth century while at the same time benefitting from the colonial structure, were convinced that the autochthonous societies could not possibly withstand the onslaught of the dominant European cultures, and thus were doomed to vanish in the near future. The fear of losing their object of research, which had just recently been discovered, hung above the heads of the scholars like a sword of Damocles ever since the establishment of anthropology as a discipline. They felt hurried to document what seemed to be crumbling away. Behind these fears there was the notion that the indigenous cultures were comparatively static entities that had existed untouched by any external influences for many centuries, or even millennia, and were unable to change. This idea was shared by proponents of other disciplines; in religious studies, for example, up to the late 1980s the view prevailed that the contact between the great world religions and the belief systems of small, autochthonous societies doomed the latter to extinction. However, more recent studies have shown that this assumption, according to which indigenous peoples have not undergone any changes in the course of history, is untenable. It became apparent that groups supposedly living in isolation have extensive contact networks, and that migration, trade, and conquest are not privileges of modern times. Myths and oral traditions bore witness of journeys to faraway regions, new settlements founded in unknown territories, or the arrival of victorious foreigners who introduced new ways and customs and laid claim to a place of their own within society.
Die lutherische Reformation war nicht nur eine Reformation von Glauben und Leben, sondern auch eine solche von Tod und Sterben. Mit den Predigten Luthers bei den Begräbnisfeierlichkeiten für die sächsischen Kurfürsten Friedrich den Weisen (1525) und Johann den Beständigen (1532), der Predigt bei Luthers eigenem Begräbnis (1546) und den jeweils begleitenden biographischen orationes Philipp Melanchthons formte sich eine neue Gattung der Totenmemoria aus, die von den Wittenberger Theologiestudenten an ihre späteren Wirkungsorte getragen wurde. Sie selbst waren es dann, in ihrer Funktion als Prediger, die das neue Medium der Leichenpredigt zu ihrer eigenen Verortung in der frühneuzeitlichen Gesellschaft nutzten, indem sie die Gruppe der evangelischen Geistlichen, in der Gestalt des jeweils Verstorbenen, als nachahmenswertes Vorbild christlicher Tugend priesen und ihre Rolle für den gesellschaftlichen Zusammenhalt herausstellten. Das so gezeichnete Bild bringt nicht nur das Amtsverständnis zum Ausdruck, sondern wirft auch Licht auf die jeweiligen Zeitumstände, den Bildungsweg der Verstorbenen, ihre Berufung als Prediger, Heiratsstrategien, Kinder und deren Entwicklung, Zuständigkeitsverteilungen im Amt, gesundheitliche und andere Beschwerden, ihren seelsorgerlichen Einsatz, ihre konfessionelle Ausrichtung und schließlich das ritualisierte Sterben. Somit sind gedruckte Leichenpredigten eine vielseitig auswertbare Quelle zur frühneuzeitlichen Alltagskultur, insbesondere hinsichtlich der Bevölkerungsgruppe, die uns sowohl als deren Autoren, wie als Verstorbene gegenübertritt. Die lutherische Reichsstadt Frankfurt am Main, deren Geistliche sich zur gemeinsamen Beratung in einem „Predigerministerium“ zusammenfanden, bietet hier ein besonders lohnendes Untersuchungsfeld. Die gute Überlieferungslage, die Bedeutung Frankfurts im Alten Reich, wie auch das, gerade am Beginn der Reformationsepoche, spannungsreiche Miteinander von Rat und Predigern ermöglichen es, an ausgewählten Beispielen die Etablierung, das Selbstverständnis und die wechselnden theologischen Herausforderungen der mit der Reformation entstandenen neuen Sozialgruppe der evangelischen Geistlichkeit im Wandel dreier Jahrhunderte zu verfolgen.