Refine
Year of publication
- 2021 (32) (remove)
Document Type
- Preprint (32) (remove)
Language
- English (32)
Has Fulltext
- yes (32)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (32)
Keywords
- 26 LncRNA (1)
- Acinetobacter baumannii (1)
- Browsertool (1)
- Cannabis (1)
- Data Analysis (1)
- Degradation (1)
- EEG (1)
- Fendrr (1)
- MRI (1)
- Proteomics (1)
Institute
- Medizin (32) (remove)
Substantia nigra dopamine (SN DA) neurons are progressively lost in Parkinson disease (PD). While the molecular and cellular mechanisms of their differential vulnerability and degeneration have been extensively studied, we still know very little about potential functional adaptations of those SN DA neurons that – at least for some time – manage to survive during earlier stages of PD. We utilized a partial lesion 6-OHDA mouse model to characterize initial electrophysiological impairments and chronic adaptations of surviving identified SN DA neurons, both in vivo and in vitro. Early after lesion (3 weeks), we detected a selective loss of in vivo burst firing in surviving SN DA neurons, which was accompanied by in vitro pacemaker instability. In contrast, late after lesion (>2 months), in vivo firing properties of surviving SN DA neurons had recovered in the presence of 2-fold accelerated pacemaking in vitro. Finally, we show that this chronic cell-autonomous adaptation in surviving SN DA neurons was mediated by Kv4.3 channel downregulation. Our study demonstrates substantial homeostatic plasticity of surviving SN DA neurons after a single-hit non-progressive lesion, which might contribute to the phenotype of initially surviving SN DA neurons in PD.
SAMHD1 is discussed as a tumour suppressor protein, but its potential role in cancer has only been investigated in very few cancer types. Here, we performed a systematic analysis of the TCGA (adult cancer) and TARGET (paediatric cancer) databases, the results of which did not suggest that SAMHD1 should be regarded as a bona fide tumour suppressor. SAMHD1 mutations that interfere with SAMHD1 function were not associated with poor outcome, which would be expected for a tumour suppressor. High SAMHD1 tumour levels were associated with increased survival in some cancer entities and reduced survival in others. Moreover, the data suggested differences in the role of SAMHD1 between males and females and between different races. Often, there was no significant relationship between SAMHD1 levels and cancer outcome. Taken together, our results indicate that SAMHD1 may exert pro- or anti-tumourigenic effects and that SAMHD1 is involved in the oncogenic process in a minority of cancer cases. These findings seem to be in disaccord with a perception and narrative forming in the field suggesting that SAMHD1 is a tumour suppressor. A systematic literature review confirmed that most of the available scientific articles focus on a potential role of SAMHD1 as a tumour suppressor. The reasons for this remain unclear but may include confirmation bias and publication bias. Our findings emphasise that hypotheses, perceptions, and assumptions need to be continuously challenged by using all available data and evidence.
The coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 is the cause of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Most SARS-CoV-2 infections are mild or even asymptomatic. However, a small fraction of infected individuals develops severe, life-threatening disease, which is caused by an uncontrolled immune response resulting in hyperinflammation. Antiviral interventions are only effective prior to the onset of hyperinflammation. Hence, biomarkers are needed for the early identification and treatment of high-risk patients. Here, we show in a range of model systems and data from post mortem samples that SARS-CoV-2 infection results in increased levels of CD47, which is known to mediate immune escape in cancer and virus-infected cells. Systematic literature searches also indicated that known risk factors such as older age and diabetes are associated with increased CD47 levels. High CD47 levels contribute to vascular disease, vasoconstriction, and hypertension, conditions which may predispose SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals to COVID-19-related complications such as pulmonary hypertension, lung fibrosis, myocardial injury, stroke, and acute kidney injury. Hence, CD47 is a candidate biomarker for severe COVID-19. Further research will have to show whether CD47 is a reliable diagnostic marker for the early identification of COVID-19 patients requiring antiviral therapy.
Adaptive threshold estimation procedures sample close to a subject’s perceptual threshold by dynamically adapting the stimulation based on the subject’s performance. Yet, perceptual thresholds not only depend on the observers’ sensory capabilities but also on any bias in terms of their expectations and response preferences, thus distorting the precision of the threshold estimates. Using the framework of signal detection theory (SDT), independent estimates of both, an observer’s sensitivity and internal processing bias can be delineated from threshold estimates. While this approach is commonly available for estimation procedures engaging the method of constant stimuli (MCS), correction procedures for adaptive methods (AM) are only scarcely applied. In this article, we introduce a new AM that takes individual biases into account, and that allows for a bias-corrected assessment of subjects’ sensitivity. This novel AM is validated with simulations and compared to a typical MCS-procedure, for which the implementation of bias correction has been previously demonstrated.
Comparing AM and MCS demonstrates the viability of the presented AM. Besides its feasibility, the results of the simulation reveal both, advantages, and limitations of the proposed AM. The procedure has considerable practical implications, in particular for the design of shaping procedures in sensory training experiments, in which task difficulty has to be constantly adapted to an observer’s performance, to improve training efficiency.
Recently, a 15-valent (PCV15) and a 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV20) have been licensed by the US Food and Drug Administration and are under evaluation by the European Medicines Agency. PCV15 contains all serotypes of the 13-valent conjugate vaccine (PCV13) plus serotype 22F and 33F and PCV20 includes PCV13 serotypes plus serotypes 8, 10A, 11A, 12F, 15B, 22F, 33F. We investigated pneumococcal serotype distribution, secular trends and proportion of pneumonia caused by serotypes included in PCV13, PCV15, PCV20, and the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV23) among adult patients with all-cause community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) between 2013 and 2019. We applied logistic mixed regression modelling to assess annual trends. Urine samples from adult patients with CAP treated in the community or hospital in Germany and included in the CAPNETZ study, a prospective multi-centre cohort study, were analysed by two serotype-specific multiplex urinary antigen detection assays (UAD1/UAD2) at Pfizer’s Vaccines Research and Development Laboratory. UAD1 detects serotypes in PCV13, UAD2 detects additional serotypes in PCV20 plus serotypes 2, 9N, 17F and 20. Out of 1,831 patients screened, urine samples with a valid UAD test result were available for 1,343 patients (73.3%). Among those patients, 829 patients (61.7%) were male, 792 patients (59.0%) were aged ≥60 years, 1038 patients (77.3%) had at least one comorbidity and 1,204 patients (89.7%) were treated in the hospital. The overall proportion of vaccine-type pneumonia among all-cause CAP for PCV13, PCV15, PCV20 and PPV23 was 7.7% (n=103), 9.1% (n=122), 12.3% (n=165) and 13.3% (n=178). Over the entire observation period, we did not observe evidence for significant annual trends in pneumococcal vaccine serotype coverage against pneumonia in adults (PCV13: OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.83-1.05; PCV15: OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.84-1.03; PCV20: OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.86-1.04; PPV23: OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.90-1.08). In conclusion, our data show that i) the infant vaccination program of PCV13, which started in Germany 2010 did not result in a relevant and sustained decrease of PCV13 serotypes in pneumonia in adults and ii) that the gap in the coverage between PCV20 and PPV23 was small and did not increase over the entire observation time.
Background Stigma is one of the most significant constraints on people living with depression. There is a lack of validated scales in Portugal to measure depression stigma; therefore, validation of the Depression Stigma Scale (DSS) is an essential step to the depression stigma research in Portugal.
Methods We developed the adaptation process with the ITC Guidelines for Translation and Adapting Tests taken into consideration. We collected the sample as part of the OSPI program – Optimizing suicide prevention programs and their implementation in Europe, specifically within the application in Portugal, and included 1693 participants. Floor-ceiling effects and response ranges were analyzed, and we calculated Cronbach alphas, conducted a Principal Component Analysis and Confirmatory Analysis. Validity evidence was tested with two well-documented hypotheses, using data on gender and depression symptoms.
Results The sample was well comparable with the general Portuguese population, indicating its representativeness. We identified a three-factor structure in each subscale (personal and perceived stigma): weak-not-sick, discrimination, and dangerous/unpredictable. The Cronbach’s alphas were satisfactory, and validity was confirmed.
Conclusions This study established the validity and demonstrated good psychometric properties of the DSS in the Portuguese population. The validation of the DSS can be beneficial in exploring stigma predictors and evaluating the effectiveness of stigma reduction interventions.
Background: School attendance during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is intensely debated. Modelling studies suggest that school closures contribute to community transmission reduction. However, data among school-attending students and staff are scarce. In November 2020, we examined SARS-CoV-2 infections and seroreactivity in 24 randomly selected school classes and connected households in Berlin, Germany.
Methods: Students and school staff were examined, oro-nasopharyngeal swabs and blood samples collected, and SARS-CoV-2 infection and IgG antibodies detected by RT-PCR and ELISA. Household members performed self-swabs. Individual and institutional infection prevention and control measures were assessed. Classes with SARS-CoV-2 infection and connected household members were re-tested after one week.
Findings: 1119 participants were examined, including 177 primary and 175 secondary school students, 142 staff, and 625 household members. Participants reported mainly cold symptoms (19·4%). SARS-CoV-2 infection occurred in eight of 24 classes affecting each 1-2 individuals. Infection prevalence was 2·7% (95%CI; 1·2-5·0%; 9/338), 1·4% (0·2-5·1%; 2/140), and 2·3% (1·3-3·8%; 14/611) among students, staff and household members, respectively, including quarantined persons. Six of nine infected students were asymptomatic. Prevalence increased with inconsistent facemask use in school, way to school on foot, and case-contacts outside school. IgG antibodies were detected in 2·0% (0·8-4·1%; 7/347), 1·4% (0·2-5·0%; 2/141) and 1·4% (0·6-2·7%; 8/576), respectively. For three of nine households with infection(s) detected at cross-sectional assessment, origin in school seemed possible. After one week, no school-related, secondary infections appeared in affected classes; the attack rate in connected households was 1·1%.
Interpretation: These data suggest that school attendance under preventive measures is feasible, provided their rigorous implementation. In balancing threats and benefits of open versus closed schools during the pandemic, parents and society need to consider possible spill-overs into their households. Deeper insight is needed into the infection risks due to being a schoolchild as compared to attending school.
Recently, a 15-valent (PCV15) and a 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV20) have been licensed by the US Food and Drug Administration and are under evaluation by the European Medicines Agency. PCV15 contains all serotypes of the 13-valent conjugate vaccine (PCV13) plus serotype 22F and 33F and PCV20 includes PCV13 serotypes plus serotypes 8, 10A, 11A, 12F, 15B, 22F, 33F. We investigated pneumococcal serotype distribution, secular trends and proportion of pneumonia caused by serotypes included in PCV13, PCV15, PCV20, and the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV23) among adult patients with all-cause community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) between 2013 and 2019. We applied logistic mixed regression modelling to assess annual trends. Urine samples from adult patients with CAP treated in the community or hospital in Germany and included in the CAPNETZ study, a prospective multi-centre cohort study, were analysed by two serotype-specific multiplex urinary antigen detection assays (UAD1/UAD2) at Pfizer’s Vaccines Research and Development Laboratory. UAD1 detects serotypes in PCV13, UAD2 detects additional serotypes in PCV20 plus serotypes 2, 9N, 17F and 20. Out of 1,831 patients screened, urine samples with a valid UAD test result were available for 1,343 patients (73.3%). Among those patients, 829 patients (61.7%) were male, 792 patients (59.0%) were aged ≥60 years, 1038 patients (77.3%) had at least one comorbidity and 1,204 patients (89.7%) were treated in the hospital. The overall proportion of vaccine-type pneumonia among all-cause CAP for PCV13, PCV15, PCV20 and PPV23 was 7.7% (n=103), 9.1% (n=122), 12.3% (n=165) and 13.3% (n=178). Over the entire observation period, we did not observe evidence for significant annual trends in pneumococcal vaccine serotype coverage against pneumonia in adults (PCV13: OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.83-1.05; PCV15: OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.84-1.03; PCV20: OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.86-1.04; PPV23: OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.90-1.08). In conclusion, our data show i) no decline of PCV13 serotypes in all-cause CAP between 2013-2019 mainly due to a persistently high proportion of serotype 3 suggesting no meaningful effect of childhood PCV13 vaccination on PCV13 coverage in pneumonia in adults during this time period and ii) that the gap in the coverage between PCV20 and PPV23 was small and did not increase over the entire observation time.
Reduced neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant by vaccine sera and monoclonal antibodies
(2021)
Due to numerous mutations in the spike protein, the SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern Omicron (B.1.1.529) raises serious concerns since it may significantly limit the antibody-mediated neutralization and increase the risk of reinfections. While a rapid increase in the number of cases is being reported worldwide, until now there has been uncertainty about the efficacy of vaccinations and monoclonal antibodies. Our in vitro findings using authentic SARS-CoV-2 variants indicate that in contrast to the currently circulating Delta variant, the neutralization efficacy of vaccine-elicited sera against Omicron was severely reduced highlighting T-cell mediated immunity as essential barrier to prevent severe COVID-19. Since SARS-CoV-2 Omicron was resistant to casirivimab and imdevimab, genotyping of SARS-CoV-2 may be needed before initiating mAb treatment. Variant-specific vaccines and mAb agents may be required to treat COVID-19 due to Omicron and other emerging variants of concern.
Reduced neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant by vaccine sera and monoclonal antibodies
(2021)
Due to numerous mutations in the spike protein, the SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern Omicron (B.1.1.529) raises serious concerns since it may significantly limit the antibody-mediated neutralization and increase the risk of reinfections. While a rapid increase in the number of cases is being reported worldwide, until now there has been uncertainty about the efficacy of vaccinations and monoclonal antibodies. Our in vitro findings using authentic SARS-CoV-2 variants indicate that in contrast to the currently circulating Delta variant, the neutralization efficacy of vaccine-elicited sera against Omicron was severely reduced highlighting T-cell mediated immunity as essential barrier to prevent severe COVID-19. Since SARS-CoV-2 Omicron was resistant to casirivimab and imdevimab, genotyping of SARS-CoV-2 may be needed before initiating mAb treatment. Variant-specific vaccines and mAb agents may be required to treat COVID-19 due to Omicron and other emerging variants of concern.