Refine
Document Type
- Working Paper (7)
Has Fulltext
- yes (7) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (7)
Keywords
- Aktienmarkt (7) (remove)
Institute
- Wirtschaftswissenschaften (7) (remove)
Die mit unterschiedlichen Organisationsformen des Wertpapierhandels einhergehende Liquidität und ihre Messung ist eine der zentralen Fragen im Zusammenhang mit der Gestaltung von Wertpapiermärkten. Zunächst wird die Eignung verschiedener in der Literatur vorgeschlagener Liquiditätsmaße diskutiert. Anhand einer Serie von Marktexperimenten wird dann die Liquidität der grundsätzlichen Ausgestaltungsformen des Wertpapierhandels - Gesamtkursermittlung, kontinuierliche Auktion und Market-Maker-System - miteinander verglichen.
Sowohl das Handelsvolumen als auch das von ROLL (1984) vorgeschlagene Maß sind offenbar für den Vergleich der Liquidität unterschiedlich organisierter Wertpapiermärkte nicht geeignet. Eine aufgrund theoretischer Überlegungen prognostizierte Überschätzung der Transaktionskosten bei der Gesamtkursermittlung kann empirisch bestätigt werden.
Die explizite Geld-Brief-Spanne ist dagegen grundsätzlich ein geeignetes Liquiditätsmaß. Mit den Daten der experimentellen Märkte läßt sich auch für die Gesamtkursermittlung eine solche Spanne ermitteln. Sie erweist sich als niedriger als die Spanne in der kontinuierlichen Auktion und dem Market-Maker-Markt. Jedoch ist auch die Geld-Brief-Spanne mit Vorsicht zu interpretieren. Es wird gezeigt, daß unter bestimmten Umständen systematische Verzerrungen existieren können. In den hier untersuchten experimentellen Märkten ließen sich diese identifizieren. Bei Untersuchungen anhand von Felddaten ist dies jedoch nicht ohne weiteres möglich, so daß hier die Gefahr von Verzerrungen durchaus real ist.
Traditional tests of the CAPM following the Fama / MacBeth (1973) procedure are tests of the joint hypotheses that there is a relationship between beta and realized return and that the market risk premium is positive. The conditional test procedure developed by Pettengill / Sundaram / Mathur (1995) allows to independently test the hypothesis of a relation between beta and realized returns. Monte Carlo simulations show that the conditional test reliably identifies this relation. In an empirical examination for the German stock market we find a significant relation between beta and return. Previous studies failed to identify this relationship probably because the average market risk premium in the sample period was close to zero. Our results provide a justification for the use of betas estimated from historical return data by portfolio managers.
We propose a new approach to measuring the effect of unobservable private information or beliefs on volatility. Using high-frequency intraday data, we estimate the volatility effect of a well identified shock on the volatility of the stock returns of large European banks as a function of the quality of available public information about the banks. We hypothesise that, as the publicly available information becomes stale, volatility effects and its persistence should increase, as the private information (beliefs) of investors becomes more important. We find strong support for this idea in the data. We argue that the results have implications for debate surrounding the opacity of banks and the transparency requirements that may be imposed on banks under Pillar III of the New Basel Accord.
This paper investigates whether the stock market reacts to unsolicited ratings for a sample of S&P rated firms from January 1996 to December 2005. We first analyze the stock market reaction associated with the assignment of an initial unsolicited rating. We find evidence that this reaction is negative and particularly accentuated for Japanese firms. A comparison between S&P’s initial unsolicited ratings with previously published ratings of two Japanese rating agencies for a Japanese subsample shows that ratings assigned by S&P are systematically worse. Further, we find that the stock market does not react to the transition from an unsolicited to a solicited rating. Comparison of the upgrades in the sample with a matched-sample of upgrades of solicited ratings reveals that the price reactions are no different. In addition, abnormal returns are worse for firms whose rating remained unchanged after the solicitation compared to those for upgraded firms. Finally, we find that Japanese firms are less likely to receive an upgrade. Our findings suggest that unsolicited ratings are biased downwards, that the capital market therefore expects upgrades of formerly unsolicited ratings and punishes firms whose ratings remain unchanged. All these effects seem to be more pronounced for Japanese firms.
We present an empirical study focusing on the estimation of a fundamental multi-factor model for a universe of European stocks. Following the approach of the BARRA model, we have adopted a cross-sectional methodology. The proportion of explained variance ranges from 7.3% to 66.3% in the weekly regressions with a mean of 32.9%. For the individual factors we give the percentage of the weeks when they yielded statistically significant influence on stock returns. The best explanatory power – apart from the dominant country factors – was found among the statistical constructs „success“ and „variability in markets“.
In this paper we study the benefits derived from international diversification of stock portfolios from German and Hungarian point of view. In contrast to the German capital market, which is one of the largest in the world, the Hungarian Stock Exchange is an emerging market. The Hungarian stock market is highly volatile, high returns are often accompanied by extremely large risk. Therefore, there is a good potential for Hungarian investors to realize substantial benefits in terms of risk reduction by creating multi-currency portfolios. The paper gives evidence on the above me ntioned benefits for both countries by examining the performance of several ex ante portfolio strategies. In order to control the currency risk, different types of hedging approaches are implemented.
This paper examines intraday stock price effects and trading activity caused by ad hoc disclosures in Germany. The evidence suggests that the observed stock prices react within 90 minutes after the ad hoc disclosures. Trading volumes take even longer to adjust. We find no evidence for abnormal price reactions or abnormal trading volume before announcements. The bigger the company that announces an ad hoc disclosure, the less severe is the abnormal price effect following the announcement. The number of analysts is negatively correlated to the trading volume effect before the ad hoc disclosure. The higher the trading volume on the last trading day before the announcement, the greater is the price effect after the ad hoc disclosures and the greater the trading volume effect. Keywords: ad hoc disclosure rules, intraday stock price adjustments, market efficiency.