Refine
Year of publication
- 2019 (104) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (72)
- Contribution to a Periodical (11)
- Review (9)
- Conference Proceeding (3)
- Book (2)
- Preprint (2)
- Bachelor Thesis (1)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
- Master's Thesis (1)
- Part of Periodical (1)
Language
Has Fulltext
- yes (104)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (104)
Keywords
- Critical Theory (6)
- Frankfurt School (6)
- Adorno (4)
- Escola de Frankfurt (4)
- Estudios organizacionales (4)
- critical theory (4)
- representation (4)
- Escuela de Frankfurt (3)
- Estudos organizacionais (3)
- Herbert Marcuse (3)
- Indústria cultural (3)
- Teoria Crítica (3)
- democracy (3)
- education (3)
- responsibility (3)
- Axel Honneth (2)
- Catherine Lu (2)
- Communication (2)
- Comunicación (2)
- Comunicação (2)
- Constitución del sujeto (2)
- Constituição do sujeito (2)
- Constitution of the subject (2)
- Dialogue (2)
- Diálogo (2)
- Europe (2)
- European Union (2)
- Habermas (2)
- Intersubjectivity (2)
- Intersubjetividad (2)
- Intersubjetividade (2)
- Jürgen Habermas (2)
- Martin Heidegger (2)
- Organizational Studies (2)
- Organizational studies (2)
- Saward (2)
- Teoria crítica (2)
- Teoría crítica (2)
- authoritarian populism (2)
- barbarie (2)
- barbarism (2)
- critique (2)
- culture (2)
- deliberative democracy (2)
- direct democracy (2)
- equality (2)
- feminist epistemology (2)
- fenomenología (2)
- freedom (2)
- marxismo (2)
- migration (2)
- populism (2)
- post-truth (2)
- recognition (2)
- representative claim (2)
- representative claims (2)
- spirit (2)
- structural injustice (2)
- subjectivity (2)
- teoría crítica (2)
- upbringing (2)
- виховання (2)
- освіта (2)
- 2016 US Presidential Election (1)
- ABD (1)
- Aesthetic Objectivity (1)
- Aesthetic Subjectivity (1)
- Ambivalenz (1)
- Anthropology (1)
- Antropologia (1)
- Auschwitz (1)
- Ação Comunicativa (1)
- Beschneidung <Frau> (1)
- Bewegungen (1)
- Bielik-Robson (1)
- Biodiversity (1)
- Blanchot (1)
- Brazil (1)
- Brexit (1)
- Bundesverfassungsgericht (1)
- Car (1)
- Carl Schmitt (1)
- Carro (1)
- Ciencia (1)
- Ciência (1)
- Communicative Action (1)
- Consumo (1)
- Consumption (1)
- Contemporary subjectivities (1)
- Cour constitutionnelle fédérale (1)
- Critical Theor (1)
- Cultural industry (1)
- Culture industry (1)
- Democracia transnacional (1)
- Demographic change (1)
- Dialéctica Negativa (1)
- Diskursanalyse (1)
- Doku Mittelstufe (1)
- Donald Trump (1)
- Driver (1)
- Drives (1)
- EU migration (1)
- Edmund Husserl (1)
- Educación (1)
- Educação (1)
- Education (1)
- Education and Emancipation (1)
- Educational inequalities (1)
- Educational transitions (1)
- Educação e Emancipação (1)
- Emotionale Ambivalenz (1)
- Emotionssoziologie (1)
- Entscheidung (1)
- Ereignis (1)
- Erfahrung (1)
- Estudos organizacionais; (1)
- Ethics (1)
- Europa-mercado (1)
- Europemarket (1)
- Ética (1)
- Filosofia (1)
- Filosofía (1)
- Forschung (1)
- Frankfurt Okulu (1)
- Frankfurt am Main (1)
- Franz Rosenzweig (1)
- Genitalverstümmelung (1)
- Germany (1)
- Grundrechte (1)
- Habermas’ discursive theory of law (1)
- Hamlet (1)
- Heidegger (1)
- Heimat (1)
- History (1)
- História (1)
- Human population dynamics (1)
- Idiosincrasia (1)
- Idiossincrasia (1)
- Idiosyncrasy (1)
- Industria cultural (1)
- Intergenerational effects (1)
- Internet use (1)
- Intimchirurgie (1)
- Investigación (1)
- Iris Marion Young (1)
- Justice (1)
- Justicia (1)
- Justiça (1)
- Karl Marx (1)
- Kommunalpolitik (1)
- Konstitutionalisierung (1)
- Kosmetische Chirurgie (1)
- Lessing (1)
- Liberalisierung (1)
- Liberdade (1)
- Libertad (1)
- Liberty (1)
- Linda Radzik (1)
- Luftfahrt (1)
- Marcuse (1)
- Marranism (1)
- Marxism (1)
- Medizin (1)
- Meinungsfreiheit (1)
- Melancholy (1)
- Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (1)
- Mimese (1)
- Mimesis (1)
- Music (1)
- Múscia radiofônica (1)
- Música (1)
- Nature (1)
- Natureza (1)
- Negative Dialectics (1)
- Normative reconstruction (1)
- Opposition (1)
- Painting (1)
- Parental unemployment (1)
- Partei (1)
- Parteien (1)
- Parteiensystem (1)
- Paul Valéry (1)
- Pavel Florenskij (1)
- Pesquisa (1)
- Philosophy (1)
- Pintura (1)
- Populismus (1)
- Praxis (1)
- Propensity score matching (1)
- Proust (1)
- Prática (1)
- Práxis (1)
- Pseudomorfose (1)
- Pseudomorphosis (1)
- Psicologia Social (1)
- Publicidade (1)
- Publicity (1)
- Pulsões (1)
- Recognition (1)
- Reconhecimento (1)
- Reconocimiento (1)
- Reconstrucción normativa (1)
- Reconstrução normativa (1)
- Regulación (1)
- Regulação (1)
- Regulation (1)
- Research (1)
- Schönheit (1)
- Schönheitschirurgie (1)
- Science (1)
- Semblance and Truth (1)
- Shakespeare (1)
- Social Psychology (1)
- Solipsism (1)
- Splitterpartei (1)
- Stadtverordnetenversammlung (1)
- Subjetividades contemporâneas (1)
- Systematic review (1)
- Teoria (1)
- Teoría (1)
- Teoría Crítica (1)
- Th. Adorno (1)
- Theodor Adorno (1)
- Theodore W. Adorno (1)
- Theory (1)
- Transnational Democracy (1)
- Trauerspiel (End Of) (1)
- USA (1)
- University (1)
- União Europeia (1)
- Utopia (1)
- Utopie (1)
- Valery (1)
- Vulva (1)
- Walter Benjamin (1)
- Zwiespalt (1)
- adoption (1)
- aesthetic experience (1)
- aesthetic theory (1)
- agitator (1)
- ajitatör (1)
- atonement (1)
- authoritarian character (1)
- being (1)
- belonging (1)
- biografia (1)
- biografía (1)
- biography (1)
- bruno latour (1)
- caesura (1)
- campaigns (1)
- categories of reason (1)
- categorías de la razón (1)
- citation (1)
- climate change (1)
- collectivization (1)
- colonialism (1)
- comparative analysis (1)
- conformism (1)
- consciousness (1)
- constitutionnalisation (1)
- constructivist turn (1)
- content analysis (1)
- correspondencia inédita (1)
- correspondència inèdita (1)
- critique of reason (1)
- cultura (1)
- cultural capital (1)
- decisiones reproductivas (1)
- decisões reprodutivas (1)
- decolonization (1)
- deliberative system (1)
- deliberative systems (1)
- democratic innovations (1)
- democratic system (1)
- democratic theory (1)
- dialectics (1)
- dialéctica (1)
- digital divide (1)
- digital inequality (1)
- direct democratic instruments (1)
- domination (1)
- dominiación (1)
- droits fondamentaux (1)
- educational pathologies (1)
- emancipación (1)
- emancipation (1)
- equity (1)
- espíritu (1)
- ethics (1)
- ethics of resistance (1)
- experience (1)
- experiência estética (1)
- factual reality (1)
- false prophets (1)
- fenomenologia (1)
- genetic tests (1)
- global justice (1)
- guilt (1)
- historic injustice (1)
- history (1)
- humanities (1)
- ideology (1)
- indigenous peoples (1)
- individualization (1)
- individuum (1)
- interdisciplinary critical theory (1)
- interpretation (1)
- justice (1)
- labour (1)
- latour (1)
- legitimacy (1)
- legitimidad (1)
- legitimidade (1)
- liability model (1)
- libertad (1)
- liberté d’expression (1)
- literature (1)
- marxisme (1)
- metafísica (1)
- metaphysics (1)
- misrepresentation (1)
- movements (1)
- multiple correspondence analysis (1)
- musealisation (1)
- musealização (1)
- myth (1)
- negative dialectics (1)
- otoritaryen popülizm (1)
- out-of-work benefits (1)
- parliamentary debate (1)
- participatory governance (1)
- parties (1)
- party competition (1)
- party families (1)
- patient and public involvement (1)
- phenomenology (1)
- philosophy (1)
- post-factual (1)
- post-home (1)
- postmemoryv (1)
- project (1)
- provas genéticas (1)
- pruebas genéticas (1)
- realidad fáctica (1)
- reality (1)
- reception (1)
- reciprocity (1)
- reconciliation (1)
- reconocimiento (1)
- reified consciousness (1)
- relational alienation (1)
- reparations (1)
- reproductive decisions (1)
- research (1)
- sahte peygamberler (1)
- scientific discipline (1)
- scientific ideal (1)
- scientific thinking (1)
- self-realization (1)
- settler colonialism (1)
- shame (1)
- social freedom (1)
- social justice (1)
- social media (1)
- social movements (1)
- social rights (1)
- social sciences (1)
- social-connection (1)
- socialización (1)
- socialization (1)
- society (1)
- sociology (1)
- strategy (1)
- structural alienation (1)
- student (1)
- subject (1)
- subjetividad (1)
- systems theory (1)
- taxonomy (1)
- teoria crítica (1)
- teoria discursiva do direito de Habermas (1)
- teoría discursiva del derecho de Habermas (1)
- the nonidentical (1)
- total (1)
- trabajo (1)
- typology (1)
- unpublished correspondence (1)
- utopía (1)
- welfare rights (1)
- welfare state (1)
- women’s quota (1)
- wrongful birth (1)
- Ética (1)
- ética (1)
- ética de la resistencia (1)
- Аушвіц (1)
- аctuality (1)
- авторитарний характер (1)
- адоптація (1)
- актуальность (1)
- актуальність (1)
- буття (1)
- бытие (1)
- гуманитарная наука (1)
- действительность (1)
- досвід (1)
- дух (1)
- дійсність (1)
- интерпретация (1)
- история (1)
- конформізм (1)
- культура (1)
- научная дисциплина (1)
- научное мышление (1)
- научный идеал (1)
- образование (1)
- овеществленное сознание (1)
- повноліття (1)
- провина (1)
- проект (1)
- свобода (1)
- свідомість (1)
- сенс (1)
- смысл (1)
- студент (1)
- субьект (1)
- суб’єкт (1)
- суспільство (1)
- тлумачення (1)
- тотальность (1)
- тотальність (1)
- университет (1)
- философия (1)
- філософія (1)
- ідеологія (1)
- індивідуація (1)
- індивідуум (1)
- історія (1)
- 教育病理學 (1)
- 社會自由 (1)
- 自我實現 (1)
- 認肯 (1)
Institute
- Gesellschaftswissenschaften (104) (remove)
L’arrêt Lüth – 50 ans après
(2019)
Même 50 ans plus tard, l’arrêt Lüth, rendu par la Cour constitutionnelle fédérale le 15 janvier 1958, n’a rien perdu de son actualité. Il confère durablement à la liberté d’expression un rang primordial pour le débat public démocratique et marque le point de départ du développement d’une dogmatique des droits fondamentaux spécifiquement allemande, à l’origine d’un renforcement des compétences et de la puissance particulières de la Cour constitutionnelle fédérale. Les raisons qui expliquent l’approche particulière de résolution de conflits entre droits suivie dans l’arrêt Lüth ne laissent pas présager un abandon de cette jurisprudence, abandon qui ne serait d’ailleurs ni souhaitable ni réaliste.
Within the last decades, western democracies have experienced a rise of inequality, with the gap between lower and upper class citizens steadily increasing and a widespread sentiment of growing inequalities also in the political sphere. Against this background, and in the context of the current “crisis of democracy”, democratic innovations such as direct democratic instruments are discussed as a very popular means to bring citizens back in. However, research on direct democracy has produced rather inconsistent results with regard to the question of which effects referenda and initiatives have on equality. Studies in this field are often limited to single countries and certain aspects of equality. Moreover, most existing studies look at the mere availability of direct democratic instruments instead of actual bills that are put to a vote. This paper aims to take a first step to fill these gaps by giving an explorative overview of the outputs of direct democratic bills on multiple equality dimensions, analyzing all national referenda and initiatives in European democracies between 1990 and 2015. How many pro- and contra-equality bills have been put to a vote, how many of those succeeded at the ballot, and are there differences between country groups? Our findings show that a majority of direct democratic bills was not related to equality at all. Regarding the successful bills, we detect some regional differences along with the general tendency that there are more pro- than contra-equality bills. Our paper sheds new light on the question if direct democracy can serve as an appropriate means to complement representative democracy and to shape democratic institutions in the future. The potential of direct democracy in fostering or impeding equality should be an important criterion for the assessment of claims to extend decision-making by citizens.
In Justice and Reconciliation in World Politics Catherine Lu endorses the idea that those who contribute to the reproduction of structural injustice have responsibilities to address that injustice (Lu, 2017). However, in the book, Lu does not explore the grounds and justification for recognising such a responsibility. In order to address this deficit, this paper proposes that those likely to contribute to the reproduction of structural injustice, in the future, have precautionary duties, in the present, that require them to take action aimed at preventing their future contribution. It is proposed that these ‘collectivization duties’ (Collins, 2013) require them to act responsively with a view to forming a collective that can end the structural injustice in question. This account recommends a collective-action solution alongside recognising that each socially connected agent is obliged to act. However, it does not entail that amorphous groups bear responsibilities and is appropriate in its attribution of blame, thus avoiding both Nussbaum’s (2011) critique of perpetually forward-looking accounts and the ‘agency objection’ (Wringe, 2010).
This article analyzes and criticizes the temporal orientation of Catherine Lu’s theory of colonial redress in Justice and Reconciliation in World Politics. Lu argues that colonial historic injustice can, with few exceptions, justify special reparative measures only if these past injustices still contribute to structural injustice in contemporary social relations. Focusing on Indigenous peoples, I argue that the structural injustice approach can and should incorporate further backward looking elements. First, I examine how Lu’s account has backward-looking elements not present in other structural injustice accounts. Second, I suggest how the structural injustice approach could include additional backward-looking features. I presuppose here, with Lu, that all agents connected to an unjust social structure have a forwardlooking political responsibility to reform this structure, regardless of their relation (or lack thereof) to victims or perpetrators of historic injustice. However, I suggest that agents with connections to historic injustice can occupy a social position that makes them differently situated than other agents within that same structure, leading to differences in how these agents should discharge their forward-looking responsibility and differentiated liability for failure to do so. Third, I argue that Lu obscures the importance of rectifying material dispossession. Reparations, pace Lu, can be justified beyond a minimum threshold of disadvantage. Theorists of settler colonialism and Indigenous scholars show how the dispossession of Indigenous land can be seen as a structure that has not yet ended. I conclude by arguing that rectification can be a precondition for genuine reconciliation.
Structural alienation: Lu's structural approach to reconciliation from within a relational framework
(2019)
In Justice and Reconciliation in World Politics Catherine Lu argues that structural reconciliation, rather than interactional reconciliation, ought to be the primary normative goal for political reconciliation efforts. I suggest that we might have good reason to want to retain relational approaches – such as that of Linda Radzik – as the primary focus of reconciliatory efforts, but that Lu’s approach is invaluable for identifying the parties who ought to bear responsibility for those efforts in cases of structural injustice. First, I outline Lu’s analysis of reconciliation, where she argues for the normative priority of structural approaches within the global political sphere, and propose that it will be useful to identify whether or not a relational account could instead identify underlying structural injustices. Second, I examine one particular relational account of reconciliation (based on Radzik’s account of atonement) and argue that this type of account brings to light underlying structural injustices of the kind Lu is concerned with. Finally, I identify an issue for relational accounts in identifying relevant responsible parties for reconciliation before returning to Lu’s structural account to address this gap.
This paper discusses two possible difficulties with Catherine Lu’s powerful analysis of the moral response to our shared history of colonial evil; both of these difficulties stem from the rightful place of shame in that moral response. The first difficulty focuses on efficacy: existing states may be better motivated by shame at the past than by a shared duty to bring about a just future. The second focuses on equity: it is, at the very least, possible that shame over past misdeeds ought to be brought into the conversation about present duties, in a manner more robust than Lu’s analysis allows.
This paper addresses the phenomenon of climate-induced displacement. I argue that there is scope for an account of asylum as compensation owed to those displaced by the impacts of climate change which needs only to appeal to minimal normative commitments about the requirements of global justice. I demonstrate the possibility of such an approach through an examination of the work of David Miller. Miller is taken as an exemplar of a broadly ‘international libertarian’ approach to global justice, and his work is a useful vehicle for this project because he has an established view about both responsibility for climate change and about the state’s right to exclude would-be immigrants. In the course of the argument, I set out the relevant aspects of Miller’s views, reconstruct an account of responsibility for the harms faced by climate migrants which is consistent with Miller’s views, and demonstrate why such an account yields an obligation to provide asylum as a form of compensation to ‘climate migrants.’