Refine
Document Type
- Article (2)
Language
- English (2) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (2)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (2)
Keywords
- Antioxidants (2) (remove)
Institute
- Biowissenschaften (1)
- Medizin (1)
Cancer is the leading cause of death worldwide after cardiovascular diseases. This has been the case for the last few decades despite there being an increase in the number of cancer treatments. One reason for the apparent lack of drug effectiveness might be, at least in part, due to unspecificity for tumors; which often leads to substantial side effects. One way to improve the treatment of cancer is to increase the specificity of the treatment in accordance with the concept of individualized medicine. This will help to prevent further progression of an existing cancer or even to reduce the tumor burden. Alternatively it would be much more attractive and efficient to prevent the development of cancer in the first place. Therefore, it is important to understand the risk factors and the mechanisms of carcinogenesis in detail. One such risk factor, often associated with tumorigenesis and tumor progression, is an increased abundance of reactive oxygen species (ROS) arising from an imbalance of ROS-producing and -eliminating components. A surplus of ROS can induce oxidative damage of macromolecules including proteins, lipids and DNA. In contrast, ROS are essential for an adequate signal transduction and are known to regulate crucial cellular processes like cellular quiescence, differentiation and even apoptosis. Therefore, regulated ROS-formation at physiological levels can inhibit tumor formation and progression. With this review we provide an overview on the current knowledge of redox control in cancer development and progression.
Glycolate oxidase that was partially purified from pea leaves was inactivated in vitro by blue light in the presence of FMN. Inactivation was greatly retarded in the absence of O2. Under aerobic conditions H2O2 was formed. The presence of catalase, GSH or dithiothreitol protected glycolate oxidase against photoinactivation. Less efficient protection was provided by ascorbate, histidine, tryptophan or EDTA. The presence of superoxide dismutase or of hydroxyl radical scavengers had no, or only minor, effects. Glutathione suppressed H2O2 accumulation and was oxidized in the presence of glycolate oxidase in blue light. Glycolate oxidase was also inactivated in the presence of a superoxide-generating system or by H2O2 in darkness. In intact leaves photoinactivation of glycolate oxidase was not observed. However, when catalase was inactivated by the application of 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole or depleted by prolonged exposure to cycloheximide a strong photoinactivation of glycolate oxidase was also seen in leaves. In vivo blue and red light were similarly effective. Furthermore, glycolate oxidase was photoinactivated in leaves when the endogenous GSH was depleted by the application of buthionine sulfoximine. Both catalase and antioxidants, in particular GSH, appear to be essential for the protection of glycolate oxidase in the peroxisomes in vivo.