Refine
Year of publication
- 2005 (603) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (215)
- Working Paper (79)
- Conference Proceeding (72)
- Doctoral Thesis (58)
- Part of a Book (51)
- Part of Periodical (43)
- Preprint (43)
- Report (22)
- Book (11)
- Review (3)
Language
- English (603) (remove)
Keywords
- Artikulation (13)
- Phonetik (13)
- Artikulatorische Phonetik (12)
- Englisch (11)
- Artikulator (8)
- Deutsch (7)
- Europäische Union (7)
- Geldpolitik (7)
- Bedeutungswandel (6)
- Computerlinguistik (6)
Institute
- Physik (72)
- Center for Financial Studies (CFS) (43)
- Wirtschaftswissenschaften (39)
- Biochemie und Chemie (32)
- Medizin (24)
- Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies (FIAS) (20)
- Geowissenschaften (17)
- E-Finance Lab e.V. (16)
- Extern (15)
- Universitätsbibliothek (15)
In his paper, "The Canonization of German-language Digital Literature," Florian Hartling discusses "Net Literature," a relatively young phenomenon, that has its roots in experimental visual and concrete poetry and hypertext. With the use of new media technology, this new genre of literature has acquired much interest and is now considered to be one of the most important influences in contemporary art. Not only does Net Literature connect sound, video, and animation with interactivity and allows new forms of artistic expression, it also impacts significantly on the traditional functions of the literary system. Hartling suggests that, in relation to Net Literature, the notion of the "death of the author" gives birth to the "writing reader." Hartling presents the results of his study where he applies the concept of "canon" to German-language Net Literature and where he attempts to find out whether, in this new form of literature, a "canon" has already been formed. Based on Karl Erik Rosengren's framework of "mention technique," a sample of Germanlanguage reviews of Net Literature was analyzed. The study intends to test the applicability of Rosengren's method to the analysis of Net Literature, that is, whether it is valid to use a method that was originally developed for the empirical study of the traditional literary canon for the study of an emergent Net Literature.
Focus expressions in Yom
(2005)
This paper discusses constructions like “We’ll have two beers and a coffee.” that are typically used for beverage orders in restaurant contexts. We compare the behaviour of nouns in these constructions in three Germanic languages, English, Icelandic, and German, and take a closer look at the correlation of the morpho-syntactic and semantic-conceptual changes involved here. We show that even within such a closely related linguistic sample, one finds three different grammatical options for the expression of the same conceptual transition. Our findings suggest an analysis of coercion as a genuinely semantic phenomenon, a phenomenon that is located on a level of semantic representations that serves as an interface between the conceptual and the grammatical system and takes into account inter- and intralinguistic variations.
Accusations are a very frequent type of speech act both in everyday life and in formal controversies, and answering accusations is a sophisticated type of linguistic practice well worth analysing from a pragmatic point of view. In my paper I shall first describe some basic properties of accusations and characteristic types of reactions to accusations, i. e. denying the alleged fact, making excuses, and giving justifications. I then go on to describe some fundamental functions of accusations in controversies. Using the basic patterns of accusations and reactions to accusations as an object of comparison, I then analyse some relevant exchanges from historical controversies (l6th to 18th century), among them famous polemical interactions like the Hobbes-Bramhall controversy, but also less well-known debates from the fields of medicine and theology. The present paper is both a contribution to the theory of controversy and to the pragmatic history of controversies. Keywords: historical pragmatics, theory of controversy, ad hominem moves, dynamics of controversy