Refine
Year of publication
- 2007 (58) (remove)
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (58) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (58) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (58)
Keywords
- Germanistik (2)
- Kongress (2)
- Nungisch (2)
- Tibetobirmanische Sprachen (2)
- Universitätsbibliothek Johann Christian Senckenberg (2)
- Ablauforganisation (1)
- Afrikanistik (1)
- Bachmann, Ingeborg (1)
- Berlin <West> / Junge Presse (1)
- Bibliothek (1)
Institute
Hintergrund: Am Fachbereich Medizin der Universität Frankfurt werden jedes Jahr zwischen 15 und 20 neue Projekte zur Verbesserung der Lehre durch den Studienausschuss gefördert. Portfolios zur Skizzierung der Projekte werden von den Zentren und Instituten eingereicht. Diese Projekte haben u.a. die Neustrukturierung von Kursen und Praktika, die Implementierung und Evaluation von Prüfungen (z. B. objective structured clinical evaluation), die Förderung der didaktischen Aus- und Weiterbildung von Dozenten und Tutoren oder die curriculare Einbindung von elektronischen Medien in die Lehre zum Inhalt.
Um diese Projekte untereinander zu koordinieren, wurde im Juni 2006 das Frankfurter Ideenforum für Lehre und Unterricht – kurz FILU – geschaffen.
Ziele des Frankfurter Ideenforums für Lehre und Unterricht
1. Das Forum FILU bietet eine Informationsplattform für die Projektleiter der Lehrverbesserungsprojekte.
2. Das Forum übernimmt die Funktion eines Kondensators für thematisches und informationelles Vernetzungspotential der Projekte untereinander.
3. Übersteigt der Arbeits- und Koordinationsbedarf die Möglichkeiten des Forums, initiiert das FILU neue interdisziplinäre Arbeitsgruppen.
4. Der "Journal Club" innerhalb der Treffen des FILU läßt alle Teilnehmer an der aktuellen Studienlage in Ausbildungsforschung teilhaben.
5. Das Forum FILU engagiert sich dafür, die Aktivitäten zur Lehre innerhalb des Fachbereiches Medizin und darüber hinaus bekannt zu machen.
Methode: Koordination und Organisation des Forums übernimmt eine ärztliche wissenschaftliche Mitarbeiterin. Die Treffen finden in 4-Wochenrhythmen à 2 Stunden statt. Pflichtmitglieder sind die Initiatoren und Leiter der Lehrverbesserungsprojekte; weitere interessierte Akteure des Fachbereiches nehmen ebenfalls teil.
Pro Termin werden maximal zwei Lehrverbesserungsprojekte vorgestellt und diskutiert. In einem Journal Club wird eine aktuelle und für den Fachbereich relevante Studie aus den einschlägigen Journalen der Ausbildungsforschung und Medizindidaktik vorgestellt. Nach jedem Treffen erfolgt eine freiwillige Befragung der Mitglieder hinsichtlich Zielvorstellungen, Veranstaltungsankündigungen und Vortragswünschen. Halbjährig erfolgt ein Bericht an den Studienausschuss. [Ein Organigramm stellt bildhaft die Strukturen dar.]
Ergebnisse: Insgesamt haben bisher bei 9 Terminen 202 Personen teilgenommen. Aus der Befragung der Mitglieder initiierten sich ein interdisziplinäres Promotions- und Studienkolleg für Ausbildungsforschung und ein Lehrverbesserungsprojekt zur zentrumsübergreifenden Koordination von Simulationspatienten in OSCE.
Innerhalb des Forums entstand die Planung zur Präsentation der Lehre-Aktivitäten auf einer Veranstaltung der Frankfurter Medizinischen Gesellschaft. Der Fachbereich verfügt durch Anregung aus dem Gremium inzwischen über ein eigenes Online-Portal, einen virtuellen "Treffpunkt Lehre".
[Teilnehmerzahlen, Herkunftszentren der Teilnehmer, Themen der LV-Projekte über die letzten zwei Jahre]
Schlussfolgerung: Das "Frankfurter Ideenforum für Lehre und Unterricht", FILU, bietet seit seiner Implementierung eine lebendige Austausch- und Kommunikationsplattform für die Leiter der Lehrverbesserungsprojekte am Fachbereich. Über das Forum wird eine gemeinsame Nutzung der vorhandenen Ressourcen in der Lehre möglich. Die interdisziplinäre Zusammenarbeit der Akteure wird maßgeblich gefördert und bietet die Möglichkeit, sinnvolle thematische und personelle Synergien zu finden.
University 2.0
(2007)
The major challenge facing universities in the next decade is to reinvent themselves as information organizations. Universities are, at their core, organizations that cultivate knowledge, seeking both to create new knowledge and to preserve and convey existing knowledge, but they are remarkably inefficient and therefore ineffective in the way that they leverage their own information resources to advance that core activity. This talk will explore ways that the university could learn from what is now widely called "Web 2.0" -- a term that is meant to identify a shift in emphasis from the computer as platform to the network as platform, from hardware to data, from the wisdom of the expert to the wisdom of crowds, and from fixity to remixability.
In several academic fields (most notably: physics, mathematics, economics, astronomy, and computer science), most current research papers are freely accessible on the Internet in both pre- and post-publication formats. For these disciplines, open-access dissemination of publications and data has created a robust and useful information environment that is highly valued by researchers. While the acceptance of open-access dissemination has been disruptive to traditional scholarly publishing, the status and economic value of the elite journals has remained largely intact. Indeed, publication in the most prestigious journals (e.g., Science, Nature, Cell, BMJ, etc.) may have more influence than ever in determining the advancement of academic careers. Traditional publishing and open access will continue to coexist uncomfortably for years to come, but the next wave of digital publishing systems (empowered social networking applications) will establish open access repositories as indispensable infrastructure for the sciences and social sciences.
Information Supply in the era of mass digitization Drawing on his experience at the Bodleian Library and now at the British Library, Ronald Milne will share his first-hand impressions of 'boutique' and mass digitization programmes, such as those being undertaken by Google and Microsoft, and their effect on information supply. Collections define libraries. What does this mean in the 21st Century? Will all libraries become equal as the digital revolution progresses? What might the digitization and indexing of millions of works mean for university researchers and the intellectually curious more generally? What are the benefits and what are the strategic issues that we are bound to consider?
Trends for distributed, open, and increasingly collaborative models of information delivery challenge the library's classic roles. In addition, trends within the research community for more interdisciplinary and collaborative scholarship create an opportunity for more enabling information infrastructure. In an age of Amazon, Google, and "social" tools, how should the library respond? My presentation will focus on strategies for bringing the library's "assets" into the flow of researchers' work. How can the library integrate its resources into the scholar's workflow? What are the emerging challenges of this integration?
Information supply is the genuine task of academic institutions as well as of publishers. Publishers profit from copyright provisions which give them exclusive rights in their products. The same copyright provisions are often the limiting factor when academic institutions try to improve their service to the academic community. This is the case in particular when it comes to digital access to information. In a so-called "Second Basket", the German copyright act has just been revised, introducing explicit legal exemptions for document deliveries and on the spot consultation of works contained in public libraries' collections. At the same time, unresolved issues remain with respect to existing legal exemptions as well as the new ones. What will the legal parameters look like for academic institutions once the "Second basket" has been put into force? How can libraries work with these provisions in practice?
In the year 2000 the Deutsche Initiative für Netzwerkinformation (DINI) / German Coalition of Network Information was founded: 10 theses "Changes in information infrastructure – challenges to universities and their information and communications facilities" is the DINI’s founding charter (s. http://www.dini.de).
Thesis 4 states: "The universities need to establish information management structures to integrate departments. University managements, departments and central institutions ought to prepare a university development plan for the areas of information, communication and multimedia." ...
Universities of the 21st century heavily depend on an efficient IT infrastructure for teaching, research and administration. E-Learning environments, blended learning and all sorts of multimedia and cooperative environments are important requirements for teaching at universities and for further education. Many of the organizational structures such as continuous examinations, interdisciplinary studies, ECTS system and many more require efficient examination administration systems as well as room and personnel management. Research is based on Internet inquiries, eScience, eLibrary and other IT supported media. Research results must be documented and archived in a digital way and results must be distributed and marketed through the Internet. The efficient administration of all kinds of resources of the university must be planned using management support systems. Decisions of university heads must be prepared from well documented statistics and analysis software. In the past, many of the applications named above for teaching, research and administration have been performed by separate software applications and run in distributed environments of universities. Powerful server structures and networking features as well as new software technology like service-oriented architectures make it necessary to recentralize the IT services of the university after a long period of decentralization. Based on metadirectories and unified access procedures, all of the software components must be integrated into a seamless IT infrastructure. To guarantee consistency, data must not be stored in a redundant way. Project IntegraTUM of Technische Universität München started in 2003 and is an umbrella project to define such a seamless IT infrastructure for a university with 22.000 students and approximately 10.000 staff. The talk describes the project, which besides the definition of new technology is based on a fundamental process analysis of the university and many changes in the organizational structure.
Working closely with teaching and research staff is critical to the success of libraries and information services. Indeed, the degree of integration with a University's academic work is one of the factors that distinguish a successful service from a poor one. This paper will consider the relationship between information services and how universities operate. Using the challenges facing institutions as a starting point - including the move towards a single European higher education market - the impact of information provision on institutional strategies will be explored. Information resources underpin all learning, teaching and research activities and the presentation will consider the professional practice which ensures that libraries and computing services are fully exploited. The focus on the experience of students is leading some institutions to integrate information services with a wide range of other activities and the paper will consider the opportunities and challenges which this brings, including the need to build working relationships with a broader range of professional groups.