Refine
Year of publication
- 2011 (152) (remove)
Document Type
- Part of a Book (152) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (152) (remove)
Keywords
- Literatur (24)
- Rezeption (21)
- Dante Alighieri (20)
- Productive reception (18)
- Psychoanalyse (18)
- Freud, Sigmund (17)
- Das Unheimliche (16)
- Überleben (15)
- Divina Commedia (9)
- Topographie <Kulturwissenschaft> (9)
Institute
- Medizin (4)
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache (IDS) Mannheim (3)
- Extern (2)
- Kulturwissenschaften (2)
- Biochemie und Chemie (1)
- Erziehungswissenschaften (1)
- Exzellenzcluster Makromolekulare Komplexe (1)
- Gesellschaftswissenschaften (1)
- Rechtswissenschaft (1)
- Sonderforschungsbereiche / Forschungskollegs (1)
- Zentrum für Biomolekulare Magnetische Resonanz (BMRZ) (1)
Although Dante’s influence on modernism has been widely explored and examined from different points of view, the aspects of Virginia Woolf's relationship with the Florentine author have not yet been extensively considered. Woolf's use of Dante is certainly less evident and ponderous than that of authors such as T.S. Eliot and James Joyce; nonetheless, this connection should not be disregarded, since Woolf's reading of Dante and her meditations on his work are inextricably fused with her creative process. As Teresa Prudente shows in this essay, Woolf's appreciation of Dante is closely connected to major features of her narrative experimentation, ranging from her conception of the structure and design of the literary work to her reflections concerning the meaning and function of literary language.
There are many tools available that are used to evaluate a radiotherapy treatment plan, such as isodose distribution charts, dose volume histograms (DVH), maximum, minimum and mean doses of the dose distributions as well as DVH point dose constraints. All the already mentioned evaluation tools are dosimetric only without taking into account the radiobiological characteristics of tumors or OARs. It has been demonstrated that although competing treatment plans might have similar mean, maximum or minimum doses they may have significantly different clinical outcomes (Mavroidis et al. 2001). For performing a more complete treatment plan evaluation and comparison the complication-free tumor control probability (P+) and the biologically effective uniform dose (D ) have been proposed (Källman et al. 1992a, Mavroidis et al. 2000). The D concept denotes that any two dose distributions within a target or OAR are equivalent if they produce the same probability for tumor control or normal tissue complication, respectively (Mavroidis et al. 2001)...