Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (44)
- Contribution to a Periodical (1)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (46)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (46)
Keywords
- HIV (4)
- COVID-19 (3)
- Opportunistic infections (2)
- SARS-CoV-2 (2)
- AA-amylodosis (1)
- Acute coronary syndrome (1)
- Antibody avidity (1)
- Antigens (1)
- Antiretroviral therapy (1)
- Assay variation (1)
Institute
- Medizin (46) (remove)
Background: Using data from the COHERE collaboration, we investigated whether primary prophylaxis for pneumocystis pneumonia (PcP) might be withheld in all patients on antiretroviral therapy (ART) with suppressed plasma human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) RNA (≤400 copies/mL), irrespective of CD4 count.
Methods: We implemented an established causal inference approach whereby observational data are used to emulate a randomized trial. Patients taking PcP prophylaxis were eligible for the emulated trial if their CD4 count was ≤200 cells/µL in line with existing recommendations. We compared the following 2 strategies for stopping prophylaxis: (1) when CD4 count was >200 cells/µL for >3 months or (2) when the patient was virologically suppressed (2 consecutive HIV RNA ≤400 copies/mL). Patients were artificially censored if they did not comply with these stopping rules. We estimated the risk of primary PcP in patients on ART, using the hazard ratio (HR) to compare the stopping strategies by fitting a pooled logistic model, including inverse probability weights to adjust for the selection bias introduced by the artificial censoring.
Results: A total of 4813 patients (10 324 person-years) complied with eligibility conditions for the emulated trial. With primary PcP diagnosis as an endpoint, the adjusted HR (aHR) indicated a slightly lower, but not statistically significant, different risk for the strategy based on viral suppression alone compared with the existing guidelines (aHR, .8; 95% confidence interval, .6–1.1; P = .2).
Conclusions: This study suggests that primary PcP prophylaxis might be safely withheld in confirmed virologically suppressed patients on ART, regardless of their CD4 count.
Replacement therapy in severe hemophilia A leads to factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors in 30% of patients. Factor VIII gene (F8) mutation type, a family history of inhibitors, ethnicity and intensity of treatment are established risk factors, and were included in two published prediction tools based on regression models. Recently investigated immune regulatory genes could also play a part in immunogenicity. Our objective is to identify bio-clinical and genetic markers for FVIII inhibitor development, taking into account potential genetic high order interactions. The study population consisted of 593 and 79 patients with hemophilia A from centers in Bonn and Frankfurt respectively. Data was collected in the European ABIRISK tranSMART database. A subset of 125 severely affected patients from Bonn with reliable information on first treatment was selected as eligible for risk stratification using a hybrid tree-based regression model (GPLTR). In the eligible subset, 58 (46%) patients developed FVIII inhibitors. Among them, 49 (84%) were “high risk” F8 mutation type. 19 (33%) had a family history of inhibitors. The GPLTR model, taking into account F8 mutation risk, family history of inhibitors and product type, distinguishes two groups of patients: a high-risk group for immunogenicity, including patients with positive HLA-DRB1*15 and genotype G/A and A/A for IL-10 rs1800896, and a low-risk group of patients with negative HLA-DRB1*15 / HLA-DQB1*02 and T/T or G/T for CD86 rs2681401. We show associations between genetic factors and the occurrence of FVIII inhibitor development in severe hemophilia A patients taking into account for high-order interactions using a generalized partially linear tree-based approach.
Poster presentation: Purpose of the study To compare the virological, immunological and clinical response to three boosted double protease inhibitor (PI) regimens of saquinavir and ritonavir in combination with lopinavir (LOPSAQ), atazanavir (ATSAQ) or fosamprenavir (FOSAQ) without reverse transcriptase inhibitors (RTI) in HIV-positive patients with limited RTI treatment options. ...
Biomarkers and bacterial pneumonia risk in patients with treated HIV infection: a case-control study
(2013)
Background: Despite advances in HIV treatment, bacterial pneumonia continues to cause considerable morbidity and mortality in patients with HIV infection. Studies of biomarker associations with bacterial pneumonia risk in treated HIV-infected patients do not currently exist.
Methods: We performed a nested, matched, case-control study among participants randomized to continuous combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) in the Strategies for Management of Antiretroviral Therapy trial. Patients who developed bacterial pneumonia (cases) and patients without bacterial pneumonia (controls) were matched 1:1 on clinical center, smoking status, age, and baseline cART use. Baseline levels of Club Cell Secretory Protein 16 (CC16), Surfactant Protein D (SP-D), C-reactive protein (hsCRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and d-dimer were compared between cases and controls.
Results: Cases (n = 72) and controls (n = 72) were 25.7% female, 51.4% black, 65.3% current smokers, 9.7% diabetic, 36.1% co-infected with Hepatitis B/C, and 75.0% were on cART at baseline. Median (IQR) age was 45 (41, 51) years with CD4+ count of 553 (436, 690) cells/mm3. Baseline CC16 and SP-D were similar between cases and controls, but hsCRP was significantly higher in cases than controls (2.94 µg/mL in cases vs. 1.93 µg/mL in controls; p = 0.02). IL-6 and d-dimer levels were also higher in cases compared to controls, though differences were not statistically significant (p-value 0.06 and 0.10, respectively).
Conclusions: In patients with cART-treated HIV infection, higher levels of systemic inflammatory markers were associated with increased bacterial pneumonia risk, while two pulmonary-specific inflammatory biomarkers, CC16 and SP-D, were not associated with bacterial pneumonia risk.
The use of cardiac troponins (cTn) is the gold standard for diagnosing myocardial infarction. Independent of myocardial infarction (MI), however, sex, age and kidney function affect cTn levels. Here we developed a method to adjust cTnI levels for age, sex, and renal function, maintaining a unified cut-off value such as the 99th percentile. A total of 4587 individuals enrolled in a prospective longitudinal study were used to develop a model for adjustment of cTn. cTnI levels correlated with age and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in males/females with rage = 0.436/0.518 and with reGFR = −0.142/−0.207. For adjustment, these variables served as covariates in a linear regression model with cTnI as dependent variable. This adjustment model was then applied to a real-world cohort of 1789 patients with suspected acute MI (AMI) (N = 407). Adjusting cTnI showed no relevant loss of diagnostic information, as evidenced by comparable areas under the receiver operator characteristic curves, to identify AMI in males and females for adjusted and unadjusted cTnI. In specific patients groups such as in elderly females, adjusting cTnI improved specificity for AMI compared with unadjusted cTnI. Specificity was also improved in patients with renal dysfunction by using the adjusted cTnI values. Thus, the adjustments improved the diagnostic ability of cTnI to identify AMI in elderly patients and in patients with renal dysfunction. Interpretation of cTnI values in complex emergency cases is facilitated by our method, which maintains a single diagnostic cut-off value in all patients.
Protein turnover and quality control by the proteasome is of paramount importance for cell homeostasis. Dysfunction of the proteasome is associated with aging processes and human diseases such as neurodegeneration, cardiomyopathy, and cancer. The regulation, i.e. activation and inhibition of this fundamentally important protein degradation system, is still widely unexplored. We demonstrate here that the evolutionarily highly conserved type II triple-A ATPase VCP and the proteasome inhibitor PSMF1/PI31 interact directly, and antagonistically regulate proteasomal activity. Our data provide novel insights into the regulation of proteasomal activity.
Aims: We investigated N471D WASH complex subunit strumpellin (Washc5) knock-in and Washc5 knock-out mice as models for hereditary spastic paraplegia type 8 (SPG8). Methods: We generated heterozygous and homozygous N471D Washc5 knock-in mice and subjected them to a comprehensive clinical, morphological and laboratory parameter screen, and gait analyses. Brain tissue was used for proteomic analysis. Furthermore, we generated heterozygous Washc5 knock-out mice. WASH complex subunit strumpellin expression was determined by qPCR and immunoblotting. Results: Homozygous N471D Washc5 knock-in mice showed mild dilated cardiomyopathy, decreased acoustic startle reactivity, thinner eye lenses, increased alkaline phosphatase and potassium levels and increased white blood cell counts. Gait analyses revealed multiple aberrations indicative of locomotor instability. Similarly, the clinical chemistry, haematology and gait parameters of heterozygous mice also deviated from the values expected for healthy animals, albeit to a lesser extent. Proteomic analysis of brain tissue depicted consistent upregulation of BPTF and downregulation of KLHL11 in heterozygous and homozygous knock-in mice. WASHC5-related protein interaction partners and complexes showed no change in abundancies. Heterozygous Washc5 knock-out mice showing normal WASHC5 levels could not be bred to homozygosity. Conclusions: While biallelic ablation of Washc5 was prenatally lethal, expression of N471D mutated WASHC5 led to several mild clinical and laboratory parameter abnormalities, but not to a typical SPG8 phenotype. The consistent upregulation of BPTF and downregulation of KLHL11 suggest mechanistic links between the expression of N471D mutated WASHC5 and the roles of both proteins in neurodegeneration and protein quality control, respectively.
Das Ziel dieser Arbeit ist eine Darstellung der Etablierung des Films im Bereich der Medizin auf Universitätsebene am Beispiel von Prof. Karl Kleist, Leiter der Psychiatrie in Frankfurt am Main von 1920 bis 1950. Als Primärquellen wurden Akten, Briefe und Filme der Frankfurter Psychiatrie aus der damaligen Zeit gesichtet und ausgewertet. Zusammen mit den Sekundärquellen über Kleist und der Darstellung der politischen Rahmenbedingungen in diesem Zeitraum bildet dies die Grundlage der hier vorliegenden Arbeit. Kleist wurde am 31.Januar 1879 in Mühlhausen im Elsass geboren. Nach dem Medizinstudium in Straßburg, Heidelberg, Berlin und München begann er seine Arbeit 1903 als Assistenzarzt in Halle. Hier lernte er Carl Wernicke kennen, der ihn in seinem weiteren wissenschaftlichen Denken und Vorgehen stark prägte. Es entstand eine neue wissenschaftliche Schule, später bekannt als Wernicke- Kleist- Leonhard- Schule. Nach seiner fünfjährigen Assistenzarztzeit in Halle arbeitete er vorübergehend an Edingers Neurologischem Institut in Frankfurt am Main und im hirnpathologischanatomischen Laboratorium Alzheimers in München innerhalb der Klinik von Emil Kraepelin. Danach wechselte er als Oberarzt an die Nervenklinik in Erlangen, wo er bis 1914 arbeitete. Während des ersten Weltkrieges wurde er in einem Kriegslazarett eingesetzt. Dort sammelte er viele Erfahrungen mit Hirnverletzten. 1916 wurde er Direktor der Psychiatrie in Rostock. 1920 folgte er einem Ruf nach Frankfurt am Main. Kleist wurde Leiter der Städtischen und Universitätsklinik für Gemüts- und Nervenkranke in Frankfurt am Main. Auch nach seiner Emeritierung 1950 war er dort weiter wissenschaftlich tätig. Während der Zeit in Frankfurt am Main förderte er den Film als Lehr- und Forschungsmittel. Zu Beginn wurde er von privaten Stiftungen gefördert, später baute er einen Kontakt zum Medizinisch-Kinematographischen Universitätsinstitut in Berlin auf. Dieses arbeitete eng mit dem Verlag Wissenschaftlicher Filme zusammen. Mit Hilfe dieses Verlages stellte er viele Filme her; als Gegenleistung bekam der Verlag unter anderem die Negative seiner Aufnahmen. Nach dem Konkurs des Verlages kaufte die Deutsche Gesellschaft für wissenschaftliche Filme einen Großteil der Konkursmasse und damit auch Kleists Filme auf. Aufgrund der wirtschaftlichen Verhältnisse konnte das Unternehmen jedoch nicht florieren. Kleist wollte seine aufgenommenen Filme aber wissenschaftlich nutzbar machen und ein umfassendes Archiv von psychiatrischen und neurologischen Filmen erstellen. Kaufen konnte er das Material aufgrund mangelnder finanzieller Möglichkeiten nicht. Er schaffte es allerdings, seine Filme bei der Deutschen Gesellschaft für wissenschaftliche Filme zu vereinen und sie teilweise wissenschaftlich zu nutzen. Bald darauf wurden diese Bestände jedoch von der neu gegründeten Reichsstelle für den Unterrichtsfilm übernommen. Einerseits entsprach diese Zentralisierung Kleists Vorstellungen in Bezug auf eine bessere Übersicht und Nutzung der Filme seines Fachgebietes, andererseits stellte er aber ein fragwürdiges wissenschaftliches Interesse der Reichsstelle für den Unterrichtsfilm fest. Nach dem Krieg erlangte er über viele Umwege den Großteil seiner Filme zurück. Darunter befand sich der in dieser Arbeit exemplarisch analysierte Katatoniefilm. Die Fertigstellung der Filme benötigte damals oft Jahre. Wissenschaftliche Filme mit einer Länge von 15-20 Minuten mit mehreren Sequenzen benötigten bis zur Fertigstellung teilweise über zehn Jahre. Die Gründe hierfür waren vielschichtig. Abgesehen von den technischen Problemen waren Aufnahmen aufwändig und teuer. In die Planung mussten sehr viele Ressourcen investiert werden. Patienten mit seltenen Krankheiten waren für Aufnahmen nicht immer verfügbar und die wirtschaftlichen und politischen Gegebenheiten wie Wirtschaftsdepression und Krieg verminderten die Realisationschancen. Trotz dieser widrigen Umstände schaffte es Kleist eine beachtliche Anzahl an Filmen herzustellen und das Filmwesen zu fördern. Prof. Karl Kleist war ein Gründer des psychiatrischen und neurologischen Films. Er hatte das große Ganze im Blick und strebte stets danach seine Ideale auch im Detail zu verwirklichen.
Introduction: The German PID-NET registry was founded in 2009, serving as the first national registry of patients with primary immunodeficiencies (PID) in Germany. It is part of the European Society for Immunodeficiencies (ESID) registry. The primary purpose of the registry is to gather data on the epidemiology, diagnostic delay, diagnosis, and treatment of PIDs.
Methods: Clinical and laboratory data was collected from 2,453 patients from 36 German PID centres in an online registry. Data was analysed with the software Stata® and Excel.
Results: The minimum prevalence of PID in Germany is 2.72 per 100,000 inhabitants. Among patients aged 1–25, there was a clear predominance of males. The median age of living patients ranged between 7 and 40 years, depending on the respective PID. Predominantly antibody disorders were the most prevalent group with 57% of all 2,453 PID patients (including 728 CVID patients). A gene defect was identified in 36% of patients. Familial cases were observed in 21% of patients. The age of onset for presenting symptoms ranged from birth to late adulthood (range 0–88 years). Presenting symptoms comprised infections (74%) and immune dysregulation (22%). Ninety-three patients were diagnosed without prior clinical symptoms. Regarding the general and clinical diagnostic delay, no PID had undergone a slight decrease within the last decade. However, both, SCID and hyper IgE- syndrome showed a substantial improvement in shortening the time between onset of symptoms and genetic diagnosis. Regarding treatment, 49% of all patients received immunoglobulin G (IgG) substitution (70%—subcutaneous; 29%—intravenous; 1%—unknown). Three-hundred patients underwent at least one hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Five patients had gene therapy.
Conclusion: The German PID-NET registry is a precious tool for physicians, researchers, the pharmaceutical industry, politicians, and ultimately the patients, for whom the outcomes will eventually lead to a more timely diagnosis and better treatment.
Objectives: Rising prevalence of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) is a major health problem in patients with liver cirrhosis. The impact of MDRO colonization in liver transplantation (LT) candidates and recipients on mortality has not been determined in detail.
Methods: Patients consecutively evaluated and listed for LT in a tertiary German liver transplant center from 2008 to 2018 underwent screening for MDRO colonization including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria (MDRGN), and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). MDRO colonization and infection status were obtained at LT evaluation, planned and unplanned hospitalization, three months upon graft allocation, or at last follow-up on the waiting list.
Results: In total, 351 patients were listed for LT, of whom 164 (47%) underwent LT after a median of 249 (range 0–1662) days. Incidence of MDRO colonization increased during waiting time for LT, and MRDO colonization was associated with increased mortality on the waiting list (HR = 2.57, p<0.0001. One patients was colonized with a carbapenem-resistant strain at listing, 9 patients acquired carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria (CRGN) on the waiting list, and 4 more after LT. In total, 10 of these 14 patients died.
Conclusions: Colonization with MDRO is associated with increased mortality on the waiting list, but not in short-term follow-up after LT. Moreover, colonization with CRGN seems associated with high mortality in liver transplant candidates and recipients.