Refine
Document Type
- Article (14)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (15)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (15)
Keywords
- Low back pain (2)
- Motor control (2)
- Sports and exercise medicine (2)
- arteriogenesis (2)
- blood flow restriction (2)
- peripheral artery disease (2)
- ACL (1)
- ACL rupture (1)
- Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (1)
- Body limbs (1)
Institute
- Sportwissenschaften (15) (remove)
Background: Although anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear-prevention programs may be effective in the (secondary) prevention of a subsequent ACL injury, little is known, yet, on their effectiveness and feasibility. This study assesses the effects and implementation capacity of a secondary preventive motor-control training (the Stop-X program) after ACL reconstruction.
Methods and design: A multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled, prospective, superiority, two-arm design is adopted. Subsequent patients (18–35 years) with primary arthroscopic unilateral ACL reconstruction with autologous hamstring graft are enrolled. Postoperative guideline rehabilitation plus Classic follow-up treatment and guideline rehabilitation plus the Stop-X intervention will be compared. The onset of the Stop-X program as part of the postoperative follow-up treatment is individualized and function based. The participants must be released for the training components. The endpoint is the unrestricted return to sport (RTS) decision. Before (where applicable) reconstruction and after the clearance for the intervention (aimed at 4–8 months post surgery) until the unrestricted RTS decision (but at least until 12 months post surgery), all outcomes will be assessed once a month. Each participant is consequently measured at least five times to a maximum of 12 times. Twelve, 18 and 24 months after the surgery, follow-up-measurements and recurrence monitoring will follow. The primary outcome assessement (normalized knee-separation distance at the Drop Jump Screening Test (DJST)) is followed by the functional secondary outcomes assessements. The latter consist of quality assessments during simple (combined) balance side, balance front and single-leg hops for distance. All hop/jump tests are self-administered and filmed from the frontal view (3-m distance). All videos are transferred using safe big content transfer and subsequently (and blinded) expertly video-rated. Secondary outcomes are questionnaires on patient-reported knee function, kinesiophobia, RTS after ACL injury and training/therapy volume (frequency – intensity – type and time). All questionnaires are completed online using the participants’ pseudonym only.
Group allocation is executed randomly. The training intervention (Stop-X arm) consists of self-administered home-based exercises. The exercises are step-wise graduated and follow wound healing and functional restoration criteria. The training frequency for both arms is scheduled to be three times per week, each time for a 30 min duration. The program follows current (secondary) prevention guidelines.
Repeated measurements gain-score analyses using analyses of (co-)variance are performed for all outcomes.
Trial registration: German Clinical Trials Register, identification number DRKS00015313. Registered on 1 October 2018.
Patienten mit chronisch-unspezifischen Nackenschmerzen weisen Studien zufolge ein gegenüber symptomfreien Personen pathologisch verändertes Bewegungsverhalten der Halswirbelsäule auf. Aktuelle Untersuchungen bestätigen dabei eine im Vergleich zu gesunden, symptomfreien Probanden verminderte Beweglichkeit der Zervikalregion. Mit dem Fokus auf sensomotorische Funktionen deuten Studien zudem ein erhöhtes Maß an nicht-intendierter Bewegungsvariabilität sowie ein vermindertes Maß an Nebenbewegungen in andere Ebenen bei der Durchführung zweidimensionaler Bewegungsabfolgen an. Demgegenüber verändert sich bei symptomfreien Personen das zervikale Bewegungs-verhalten im Altersverlauf. Aktuelle Untersuchungen indizieren dabei eine im Alter erhöhte Bewegungsvariabilität. Zusätzlich indizieren Studien ein mit zunehmendem Alter geringer werdendes maximales Bewegungsausmaß der Halswirbelsäule. Publizierte Normwerte drücken diese altersabhängigen Veränderungen jedoch nur grob kategorisierend für größere Altersspannen aus. Daten zu möglichen Zuordnungsmöglichkeiten von Patienten und gesunden Personen anhand trennscharfer Schwellenwerten zum Bewegungsausmaß und zur Bewegungskonsistenz fehlen gänzlich.Vor diesem Hintergrund war das Ziel der Studie die Entwicklung und Validierung klassifikatorischer Modelle zur Diskriminierung von symptomatischem und asympto-matischem zervikalem Bewegungsverhalten. Symptomfreie Probanden (120) wurden konsekutiv der Modellentwicklung (n = 100, 18 – 75 Jahre, 36 f) bzw. der Modellvalidierung zugeteilt (n = 20, 23 – 75 Jahre, 15 f). Zusätzlich wurden zur Modellvalidierung ebenfalls 20 Patienten mit chronisch-unspezifischen Nackenschmerzen eingeschlossen (22 – 71 Jahre, 15 f). Alle Probanden absolvierten initial eine Bewegungsanalyse zur Erhebung des Bewegungsverhaltens der Halswirbelsäule. Diese beinhaltet ein Set zu fünf repetitiven zervikalen Flexions-/Extensions-Bewegungszyklen. Die kinematischen Variablen wurden dabei ultraschalltopometrisch erfasst. Diese standardisierte Erhebung erfolgte in stabiler aufrechter Positionierung und selbstgewählter Geschwindigkeit unter Verwendung eines nichtinvasiven 3D-Bewegungsanalysesystems. Die kinematischen Charakteristika, bestehend aus maximalem Bewegungsausmaß in der Sagittalebene (ROM), den Variationskoeffizienten (CV) sowie den mittleren Nebenbewegungen in Frontal- und Transversalebene (NEB) wurden final aus den Rohdaten berechnet. Im Anschluss erfolgte die Modellentwicklung auf Basis von Cut-Offs. Dies geschah mittels der Erstellung von voraussetzungskonformen linearen Regressionsmodellen. Unabhängige Variable war dabei das Alter, die abhängige Variable stellte das jeweilige kinematische Charakteristikum dar. Die Cut-Offs beschrieben jeweils die Prognose-Konfidenzintervalle der Regressionsgeraden (90% Prognose-Konfidenzintervall für individuelle Werte (ind) und 95% Prognose-Konfidenzintervall für Mittelwerte (MW)). Die Werte der kinematischen Analyse jedes Probanden, der in die Modellvalidierung der entwickelten Cut-Offs eingeschlossen wurde, wurden anschließend mittels dieser Cut-Offs klassifiziert als ‘asymptomatisch’ oder ‘symptomatisch’. Auf der Basis dieser Zuteilung wurden die Cut-Offs stringent mittels Vierfeldertafeln auf ihre Trennschärfe in der Diskriminierung von chronisch-unspezifischen Nackenschmerzpatienten und symptomfreien Personen überprüft. Alle entwickelten Modelle wiesen einen gerichteten linearen Zusammenhang zwischen Alter und dem jeweiligen kinematischen Charakteristikum auf. Auf Basis der internen Validierung beinhaltet das 95%-Konfidenzintervall der Steigung der Regressionsgeraden in dem vorliegenden Modell den Nullwert nicht und schließt zudem bei allen drei Modellen die bei der Erstellung des Modells gefundene Steigung ein. Bei der Modellvalidierung ergab die Bewertung der Vierfeldertafeln überzufällige Unterschiede zwischen erwarteter und beobachteter Häufigkeitsverteilung der mittels Prognose-Konfidenzintervalle für Mittelwerte für ROM (ROMMW; Chi2= 6.8; p< .01) und CV (CVMW; Chi2= 6.42; p< .05) klassierten kinematischen Größen, nicht jedoch für die vier anderen Klassifikatoren (p> .05). Im Anschluss ergab die Analyse der Trennschärfe der Modelle mit überzufälliger Merkmalsverteilung eine Sensitivität von 60 % für ROMMW und von 75 % für CVMW. Die Spezifität betrug 85 % für ROMMW und 65 % für CVMW. Die Resultate demonstrieren einerseits einen linearen Zusammenhang von Alter und verschiedener kinematischer Charakteristika sowie eine überzufällige Merkmalsverteilung für die Modelle ROMMW und CVMW mit ausreichender Spezifität und Sensitivität und – daraus hervorgehend – eine ausreichende Trennschärfe der klassifikatoren in der Differenzierung von symptomatischen und asymptomatischen Bewegungsmustern. Die Resultate sind einerseits im Einklang mit anderen – kategorisierenden – Studienresultaten und ergänzen andererseits – durch die Erstellung und Bewertung trennscharfer Klassifikatoren – den aktuellen Forschungsstand konsekutiv. Die Trennschärfe-Indizes bewegen sich dabei in vergleichbarer Größenordnung wie andere (subjektive) Klassifikatoren (z.B. Schmerzstärke) zur Einordnung von Nackenschmerzpatienten. Insbesondere in der individuellen Beurteilung, aber auch für mögliche prospektive Vergleiche sind valide Ein ordnungskriterien von Belangen und bieten gegenüber einfachen kategorisierenden Gruppenwerten genauere und verlässlichere Klassierungen. Zukünftige Forschungsaktivitäten sollten sich insbesondere mit der Übertragbarkeit vorliegender Cut-Offs auf interventionsinduzierte individuelle Veränderungen auseinandersetzen.
Background: Self-myofascial release (SMR) aims to mimic the effects of manual therapy and tackle dysfunctions of the skeletal muscle and connective tissue. It has been shown to induce improvements in flexibility, but the underlying mechanisms are still poorly understood. In addition to neuronal mechanisms, improved flexibility may be driven by acute morphological adaptations, such as a reduction in passive tissue stiffness or improved movement between fascial layers. The aim of the intended study is to evaluate the acute effects of SMR on the passive tissue stiffness of the anterior thigh muscles and the sliding properties of the associated fasciae.
Methods: In a crossover study de sign, 16 participants will receive all of the following interventions in a permutated random order: (1) one session of 2 × 60 s of SMR at the anterior thigh, (2) one session of 2 × 60 s of passive static stretching of the anterior thigh and (3) no intervention. Passive tissue stiffness, connective tissue sliding, angle of first stretch sensation, as well as maximal active and passive knee flexion angle, will be evaluated before and directly after each intervention.
Discussion: The results of the intended study will allow a better understanding of, and provide further evidence on, the local effects of SMR techniques and the underlying mechanisms for flexibility improvements.
Introduction Current: evidence suggests that the loss of mechanoreceptors after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears might be compensated by increased cortical motor planning. This occupation of cerebral resources may limit the potential to quickly adapt movements to unforeseen external stimuli in the athletic environment. To date, studies investigating such neural alterations during movement focused on simple, anticipated tasks with low ecological validity. This trial, therefore, aims to investigate the cortical and biomechanical processes associated with more sport-related and injury-related movements in ACL-reconstructed individuals.
Methods and analysis: ACL-reconstructed participants and uninjured controls will perform repetitive countermovement jumps with single leg landings. Two different conditions are to be completed: anticipated (n=35) versus unanticipated (n=35) successful landings. Under the anticipated condition, participants receive the visual information depicting the requested landing leg prior to the jump. In the unanticipated condition, this information will be provided only about 400 msec prior to landing. Neural correlates of motor planning will be measured using electroencephalography. In detail, movement-related cortical potentials, frequency spectral power and functional connectivity will be assessed. Biomechanical landing quality will be captured via a capacitive force plate. Calculated parameters encompass time to stabilisation, vertical peak ground reaction force, and centre of pressure path length. Potential systematic differences between ACL-reconstructed individuals and controls will be identified in dependence of jumping condition (anticipated/ unanticipated, injured/uninjured leg and controls) by using interference statistics. Potential associations between the cortical and biomechanical measures will be calculated by means of correlation analysis. In case of statistical significance (α<0.05.) further confounders (cofactors) will be considered.
Ethics and dissemination: The independent Ethics Committee of the University of Frankfurt (Faculty of Psychology and Sports Sciences) approved the study. Publications in peer-reviewed journals are planned. The findings will be presented at scientific conferences.
Trial status: At the time of submission of this manuscript, recruitment is ongoing.
Trial registration number: NCT03336060; Pre-results.
Background: We aimed to investigate the potential effects of a 4-week motor–cognitive dual-task training on cognitive and motor function as well as exercise motivation in young, healthy, and active adults.
Methods: A total of 26 participants (age 25 ± 2 years; 10 women) were randomly allocated to either the intervention group or a control group. The intervention group performed a motor–cognitive training (3×/week), while the participants of the control group received no intervention. Before and after the intervention period of 4 weeks, all participants underwent cognitive (d2-test, Trail Making Test) and motor (lower-body choice reaction test and time to stabilization test) assessments. Following each of the 12 workouts, self-reported assessments (rating of perceived exertion, enjoyment and pleasant anticipation of the next training session) were done. Analyses of covariances and 95% confidence intervals plotting for between group and time effects were performed.
Results: Data from 24 participants were analysed. No pre- to post-intervention improvement nor a between-group difference regarding motor outcomes (choice-reaction: F = 0.5; time to stabilization test: F = 0.7; p > 0.05) occurred. No significant training-induced changes were found in the cognitive tests (D2: F = 0.02; Trail Making Test A: F = 0.24; Trail Making Test B: F = 0.002; p > 0.05). Both enjoyment and anticipation of the next workout were rated as high.
Discussion: The neuro-motor training appears to have no significant effects on motor and cognitive function in healthy, young and physically active adults. This might be explained in part by the participants’ very high motor and cognitive abilities, the comparably low training intensity or the programme duration. The high degree of exercise enjoyment, however, may qualify the training as a facilitator to initiate and maintain regular physical activity. The moderate to vigorous intensity levels further point towards potential health-enhancing cardiorespiratory effects.
Background: Individuals afflicted with nonspecific chronic low back pain (CLBP) exhibit altered fundamental movement patterns. However, there is a lack of validated analysis tools. The present study aimed to elucidate the measurement properties of a functional movement analysis (FMA) in patients with CLBP.
Methods: In this validation (cross-sectional) study, patients with CLPB completed the FMA. The FMA consists of 11 standardised motor tasks mimicking activities of daily living. Four investigators (two experts and two novices) evaluated each item using an ordinal scale (0–5 points, one live and three video ratings). Interrater reliability was computed for the total score (maximum 55 points) using intra class correlation and for the individual items using Cohen’s weighted Kappa and free-marginal Kappa. Validity was estimated by calculating Spearman’s Rho correlations to compare the results of the movement analysis and the participants’ self-reported disability, and fear of movement.
Results: Twenty-one participants (12 females, 9 males; 42.7 ± 14.3 years) were included. The reliability analysis for the sum score yielded ICC values between .92 and.94 (p < .05). The classification of individual scores are categorised "slight" to "almost perfect" agreement (.10–.91). No significant associations between disability or fear of movement with the overall score were found (p > .05). The study population showed comparably low pain levels, low scores of kinesiophobia and disability.
Conclusion: The functional movement analysis displays excellent reliability for both, live and video rating. Due to the low levels of disability and pain in the present sample, further research is necessary to conclusively judge validity.
Background: Physical activity and sleep quality are both major factors for improving one's health. Knowledge on the interactions of sleep quality and the amount of physical activity may be helpful for implementing multimodal health interventions in older adults. Methods: This preliminary cross-sectional study is based on 64 participants [82.1 ± 6.4 years (MD ± SD); 22 male: 42 female]. The amount of physical activity was assessed by means of an accelerometer (MyWellness Key). Self-reported sleep parameters were obtained using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. The Barthel Index was used for physical disability rating. Bivariate correlations (Spearman's Rho) were used to explore relationships between the amount of physical activity and sleep quality. To analyse differences between categorial subgroups univariate ANOVAs were applied; in cases of significance, these were followed by Tukey-HSD post-hoc analyses. Results: No linear association between physical activity and sleep quality was found (r = 0.119; p > 0.05). In subgroup analyses (n = 41, Barthel Index ≥90 pts, free of pre-existing conditions), physical activity levels differed significantly between groups of different sleep duration (≥7 h; ≥6 to <7 h; ≥5 to <6 h; <5h; p = 0.037). Conclusion: There is no general association between higher activity levels and better sleep quality in the investigated cohort. However, a sleep duration of ≥5 to <6 h, corresponding to 7.6 h bed rest time, was associated with a higher level of physical activity.
Study design: Systematic review. Background and objectives: Preoperative neuromuscular function is predictive for knee function and return to sports (RTS) after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). The aim of this review was to examine the potential benefits of prehabilitation on pre-/postoperative objective, self-reported and RTS-specific outcomes. Methods: A systematic search was conducted within three databases. From the 1.071 studies screened, two randomized control trials (RCTs), two control trials (CTs) and two cohort studies (CS) met the inclusion criteria. Methodological quality rating adopted the PEDro- (RCT, CT) or Newcastle-Ottawa-Scale (CS). Results and conclusions: Methodological quality of the included studies was moderate (PEDro score: 6.5 ± 1.7; range 4 to 9). Two studies reported higher increases of the maximal quadriceps torque from baseline to pre-reconstruction: one study in the limb symmetry index (LSI), and one in both legs of the prehabilitation group compared to the controls. At 12-weeks post-reconstruction, one study (from two) indicated that the prehabilitation group had a lesser post-operative decline in the single-leg-hop for distance LSI (clinically meaningful). Similar findings were found in terms of quadriceps strength LSI (one study). At both pre-reconstruction (three studies) and two-year post-surgery (two studies), the prehabilitation groups reached significantly higher self-reported knee function (clinically meaningful) than the controls. RTS tended to be faster (one study). At two years post-surgery, RTS rates (one study) were higher in the prehabilitation groups. The results provide evidence for the relevance of prehabilitation prior to ACL-reconstruction to improve neuromuscular and self-reported knee function as well as RTS. More high quality confirmatory RCTs are warranted.
A large body of evidence suggests that the 11+ warm-up programme is effective in preventing football-related musculoskeletal injuries. However, despite considerable efforts to promote and disseminate the programme, it is unclear as to whether team head coaches are familiar with the 11+ and how they rate its feasibility. The present study aimed to gather information on awareness and usage among German amateur level football coaches. A questionnaire was administered to 7893 individuals who were in charge of youth and adult non-professional teams. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyse the obtained data. A total of 1223 coaches (16%) returned the questionnaire. There was no risk of a non-response bias (p>.05). At the time of the survey, nearly half of the participants (42.6%) knew the 11+. Among the coaches who were familiar with the programme, three of four reported applying it regularly (at least once per week). Holding a license (φ = .28, p < .0001), high competitive level (Cramer-V = .13, p = .007), and coaching a youth team (φ = .1, p = .001) were associated with usage of 11+. Feasibility and suitability of the 11+ were rated similarly by aware and unaware coaches. Although a substantial share of German amateur level coaches is familiar with the 11+, more than half of the surveyed participants did not know the programme. As the non-usage does not appear to stem from a lack of rated feasibility and suitability, existing communication strategies might need to be revised.
Background: Arising from the relevance of sensorimotor training in the therapy of nonspecific low back pain patients and from the value of individualized therapy, the present trial aims to test the feasibility and efficacy of individualized sensorimotor training interventions in patients suffering from nonspecific low back pain.
Methods and study design: A multicentre, single-blind two-armed randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effects of a 12-week (3 weeks supervised centre-based and 9 weeks home-based) individualized sensorimotor exercise program is performed. The control group stays inactive during this period. Outcomes are pain, and pain-associated function as well as motor function in adults with nonspecific low back pain. Each participant is scheduled to five measurement dates: baseline (M1), following centre-based training (M2), following home-based training (M3) and at two follow-up time points 6 months (M4) and 12 months (M5) after M1. All investigations and the assessment of the primary and secondary outcomes are performed in a standardized order: questionnaires – clinical examination – biomechanics (motor function). Subsequent statistical procedures are executed after the examination of underlying assumptions for parametric or rather non-parametric testing.
Discussion: The results and practical relevance of the study will be of clinical and practical relevance not only for researchers and policy makers but also for the general population suffering from nonspecific low back pain.