Refine
Document Type
- Article (9)
Has Fulltext
- yes (9)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (9)
Keywords
- Koelerio-Corynephoretea (9) (remove)
We present a report on the second annual symposium of the Dry Grassland Working Group, which took place 26.-28.08.05 in Münster and was entitled ‘Observation scales in dry grasslands’ The Dry Grassland Working Group is a discussion forum for all who are dealing with dry grasslands in central Europe. It organises annual symposia on various topics and aims to prepare the volumes on dry grasslands and closely related vegetation classes within the the ‘Synopsis of the plant communities of Germany’ The Synopsis will be based on a TURBOVEG database. As its structure and reference lists are now almost fixed, we will probably be able to start with data input at the beginning of 2006.
We report on the activities of the European Dry Grassland Group (EDGG) during the last year, namely the 8th European Dry Grassland Meeting in Uman', Ukraine in June 2011, the 3rd EDGG Research Expedition in Bulgaria in August 2011, the 4th EDGG Research Expedition in Sicily in April 2012, as well as the completed and forthcoming EDGG-coordinated special features in international journals. Then we provide a brief bibliometrical analysis of the Dry Grassland Special Features in Tuexenia since 2005. The 32 contributions of the years 2005–2011 constituted approx. 17% of the overall content of Tuexenia in this period. Including this 7th Dry Grassland Special Feature, sixty-one authors from 12 countries have contributed to these Special Features, guest-edited by yearly changing teams from a total of 16 guest editors. In the years with statistically reliable data, contributions in the Dry Grassland Special Features have been cited approximately four times as much as regular Tuexenia contributions. It is likely that this fact together with the internationality of the Special Features has contributed to the final inclusion of the journal in the Web of Science in 2011. Finally, we introduce the four research articles of this 7th Dry Grassland Special Feature. Two of them are focusing on vegetation change and restoration issues of cryptogam-rich sand dunes in the Netherlands and calcareous grasslands in Bavaria (Germany), respectively. The others, dealing with siliceous grasslands in Hesse (central Germany) and the results of EDGG Research Expedition 2009 to Transylvania (Romania), focus on syntaxonomy.
We give a report of the fourth annual symposium of the Dry Grassland Working Group, which was organized in conjunction with the second workshop ‘Floristics and geobotany - Contributions to applied questions’, from 6 to 8 Sept. 2007 in Freising-Weihenstephan. The symposium was entitled ‘Restoration and spontaneous establishment of dry and semi-dry grasslands at traditional and urban-industrial sites’. Additionally, the aims of the Dry Grassland Working Group are shortly outlined and the next symposia of both groups are announced.
We present the data of the 2nd research expedition of the European Dry Grassland Group (EDGG), which was conducted in 2010 in Central Podolia, Ukraine. The aim was to collect plot data to compare Ukrainian dry grasslands with those of other parts of Europe in terms of syntaxonomy and biodiversity. We sampled 21 nested-plot series (0.0001–100 m2) and 184 normal plots (10 m2) covering the full variety of dry grassland types occurring in the study region. For all plots, we recorded species composi-tion of terrestrial vascular plants, bryophytes and lichens, while for the 226 10-m2 plots we estimated and measured percentage cover of all species, structural, topographic, soil and landuse parameters. The 10-m² plots were used for phytosociological classification based on iteratively refined TWINSPAN classification as well as for DCA ordination. Differences between the derived vegetation types with respect to environmental conditions and species richness were assessed with ANOVAs. We assigned our plots to nine association-level units but refrained from placing them into formal associations with two exceptions. In the study area, dry grasslands of the Festuco-Brometea were far more common than those of the Koelerio-Corynephoretea. Among the Festuco-Brometea, xeric Festucetalia valesiacae grasslands were more frequent and represented by the Festucion valesiacae (2 associations, including the Allio taurici-Dichanthietum ischaemi ass. nova) and the Stipion lessingianae (1) compared to the Brachypodietalia pinnati with the Agrostio vinealis-Avenulion schellianae (3). The Koelerio-Corynephoretea were represented by three associations, each from a different order and alliance: basiphilous outcrops (Alysso alyssoidis-Sedetalia: Alysso alyssoidis-Sedion?), acidophilous outcrops (Sedo-Scleranthetalia: Veronico dillenii-Sedion albi?) and mesoxeric sandy grasslands (Trifolio arvensis-Festucetalia ovinae: Agrostion vinealis). We discuss the issue of the mesoxeric order Galietalia veri placed within the Molinio-Arrhenatheretea by Ukrainian authors and conclude that the content of that order would probably be better placed in the mesoxeric orders of the Koelerio-Corynephoretea and Festuco-Brometea. Other syntaxonomic questions could not be solved with our geographically limited dataset and await a supraregional analysis, e.g. whether the Ukrainian outcrop communities should be assigned to the same alliances as known from Central Europe or rather represent new vicariant units. The analysis of the biodiversity patterns showed that at a grain size of 10 m2, Podolian Koelerio-Corynephoretea communities were overall richer than Festuco-Brometea communities (46.4 vs. 40.6 species). This difference was due to the Koelerio-Corynephoretea containing twice as many bryophytes and nine times more lichens, while vascular plant species richness did not differ significantly between classes. The orders within the classes showed no real differences in species richness. The richness patterns observed in Podolia were almost the opposite of those usually found in dry grasslands, where Brachypodietalia pinnati are richer than Festucetalia valesiacae, and these richer than stands of the Koelerio-Corynpehoretea – and we do not have a good explanation for these idiosyncrasies. In conclusion, Podolian dry grasslands behave quite unexpectedly regarding biodiversity, and their syntaxonomy is still poorly understood. These knowledge gaps can only be addressed with supranational analyses based on comprehensive datasets.
Dry grasslands of NW Bulgarian mountains : first insights into diversity, ecology and syntaxonomy
(2013)
We present the data of the 3rd research expedition of the European Dry Grasslands Group (EDGG), which was conducted in 2011 in two contrasting areas in NW Bulgarian mountains. The aim was to collect plot data for comparing Bulgarian dry grasslands with those of other parts of Europe in terms of syntaxonomy and biodiversity. We sampled 15 nested-plot series (0.0001–100 m²) and 68 normal plots (10 m²) covering the full variety of dry grassland types occurring in the Vratsa area (Balkan Mts.) and the Koprivshtitsa area (Sredna Gora Mt.). In the plots all vascular plants, terricolous non-vascular plants and a set of soil and other environmental parameters were determined. By applying modified TWIN-SPAN, we distinguished 10 floristically well characterised vegetation types at the association level. After comparison with the regional and European literature, we propose to place them within three classes and five orders: Festuco-Brometea with the orders Stipo pulcherrimae-Festucetalia pallentis (xerophilous dry grasslands of base-rich rocks; alliance Saturejion montanae), Brachypodietalia pinnati (meso-xeric, basiphilous grasslands; alliances Cirsio-Brachypodion pinnati and Chyrsopogono grylli-Danthonion calycinae), Calluno-Ulicetea with the order Nardetalia stricae (lowland to montane Nar-dus swards; alliance Violion caninae), and Koelerio-Corynephoretea with the orders Sedo-Scleranthetalia (open communities of skeleton-rich, acidic soils; alliance unclear) and Trifolio arvensis-Festucetalia ovinae (closed, meso-xeric, acidophilous grasslands; alliance Armerio rumelicae-Potentillion). The Violion caninae with the association Festuco rubrae-Genistelletum sagittalis is reported from Bulgaria for the first time, while the two occurring Koelerio-Corynephoretea communities are described as new associations (Cetrario aculeatae-Plantaginetum radicatae, Plantagini radicatae-Agrostietum capillaris). According to DCA the main floristic gradient was largely determined by soil conditions, differentiating the Festuco-Brometea communities on soils with high pH and high humus content from the Koelerio-Corynephoretea communities on acidic, humus-poor soils, while the Calluno-Ulicetea stands are the connecting link. At 10 m2 Festuco-Brometea and Calluno-Ulicetea stands were richer in species across all investigated taxa and in vascular plants than Koelerio-Corynephoretea stands; the latter were richest in lichen species, while bryophyte richness did not differ significantly among syntaxa. Among the Bulgarian classes, the species-area relationships tended to be steepest in the Festuco-Brometea (i.e. highest beta diversity), but both alpha and beta diversity clearly fell behind the Festuco-Brometea communities in the Transylvanian Plateau, Romania, located less than 500 km north of the study region. Overall, our study contributes to a more adequate placement of the Bulgarian dry grasslands in the European syntaxonomic system and provides valuable data for large-scale analyses of biodiversity patterns.
Die Arbeitsgruppe Trockenrasen wurde 2004 mit dem Ziel gegründet, mittelfristig die Bände der Trockenrasen und nahe stehender Vegetationstypen innerhalb der „Synopsis der Pflanzengesellschaften Deutschlands“ zu verfassen. Dazu soll zunächst eine umfassende TURBOVEG-Datenbank mit Vegetationsaufnahmen der Klassen Koelerio-Corynephoretea, Festuco-Brometea, Violetea calaminariae, Elyno-Seslerietea und Trifolio-Geranietea sanguinei aus Deutschland erstellt werden. Anschließend ist die ergebnisoffene syntaxonomische Neubearbeitung dieser Gesellschaftsgruppe nach einer einheitlichen Methodik geplant. Personen, die an der Arbeitsgruppe mitwirken oder ihr Daten zur Verfügung stellen wollen, sind herzlich willkommen. Außerdem veranstaltet die Arbeitsgruppe eine jährliche Tagung zu wechselnden Themen. Die erste im September 2004 in Lüneburg stand unter dem Motto „Trockenrasen als Biodiversitätshotspots“. Fünf der damaligen Beiträge werden in diesem Band publiziert.
We first report from the 5th Dry Grassland Meeting held from 28th to 30st of August 2008 in Kiel, Germany. Then we take stock of the achievements of the German Arbeitsgruppe Trockenrasen and the international Working Group on Dry Grasslands in the Nordic and Baltic Region towards establishment of vegetation databases of dry grasslands in these study regions. At the conference, the European Dry Grassland Group (EDGG) was founded as an international platform of dry grassland researchers and conservationists. As networking tools it provides a homepage on the internet, publishes a quarterly electronical bulletin, and will organise the future European Dry Grassland Meetings. In the last part of this contribution, we give a short introduction to the five articles of this Special Feature. Four of them make a major contribution to supra-national classification of Koelerio-Corynephoretea and Festuco- Brometea communities, respectively, by providing syntaxonomic overviews based on comprehensive data from eastern European countries for which only few data have been available until now. The other major focus of the Feature papers is on degradation and restoration of various types of dry grasslands.
We first report from the 7th European Dry Grassland Meeting held 27 May to 1 June 2010 in Smolenice, Slovakia, devoted to the main topic "Succession, restoration and management of dry grasslands". Apart from the scientific programme and the excursions, we also summarise the outcomes of the General Assembly of the EDGG and present the Smolenice Grassland Declaration. Then we take stock of the dynamic development of the European Dry Grassland Group (EDGG), report on its activities during the past year, and announce its future plans. Finally, we give a short introduction to the four articles of this Special Feature, which deal with biodiversity patterns, vegetation classification, and dynamics of dry grassland habitats. One presents a detailed phytosociological study of the xeric and mesic grasslands of the Slovak part of the Biele Karpaty Mts. The second provides a new numeric approach to the assignment of relevés to syntaxa and exemplifies this in a case study for the delimitation of the classes Festuco-Brometea against Trifolio-Geranietea sanguinei in Austria. The third article investigates the septennial impact of mouflon grazing and weather on dry grassland plant communities in dry grassland patches of the Czech Republic. The fourth article deals with long-term abandonment of grasslands in Central Slovakia and shows the importance of vegetation structure, ecological stability, and low-disturbance regime for specific ant assemblages.
Trockenrasen (v. a. Klassen Koelerio-Corynephoretea und Festuco-Brometea) gehören zu den auf kleinen Flächen artenreichsten Pflanzengesellschaften überhaupt und stellen ideale Modellsysteme für die Analyse von Phytodiversitätsmustern und deren Ursachen dar. Ich gebe einen Überblick der in verschiedenen Trockenrasentypen Europas auftretenden Durchschnitts- und Maximalwerte der Artenzahlen von Gefäßpflanzen, Moosen und Flechten auf unterschiedlichen Flächengrößen zwischen 1 mm2 und 100 m2. Gesellschaften der Festuco-Brometea sind generell artenreicher als jene der Koelerio-Corynephoretea. Die bislang höchsten publizierten Artendichten stammen jedoch aus dem Gypsophilo fastigiatae-Globularietum vulgaris, einer basiphilen Felsgrusflur der schwedischen Insel Öland (Ordnung Alysso alyssoidis-Sedetalia, Koelerio-Corynephoretea). Sie betragen auf 4 m2 durchschnittlich 53,6 und maximal 80 Arten. Die geringsten Artendichten unter den Trockenrasen weisen das Caricetum arenariae und das Corniculario-Corynephoretum (beide Ordnung Corynephoretalia canescentis, Koelerio-Corynephoretea) mit durchschnittlich weniger als 10 Arten auf 4 m2 auf. Die Artenzahl-Areal-Beziehung von Trockenrasen lässt sich über den ganzen betrachteten Dimensionsbereich exzellent durch eine Potenzfunktion S = c • A z beschreiben. Dabei unterscheiden sich die z-Werte verschiedener Trockenrasentypen nur geringfügig und betragen im Mittel 0,21. Das führt dazu, dass die Reihung verschiedener Trockenrasengesellschaften hinsichtlich ihrer Artenzahl auf unterschiedlichen Skalenebenen nahezu unverändert bleibt, und eröffnet die Möglichkeit, Artenzahlen auf andere Flächengrößen zu extrapolieren.
Es folgt eine Erörterung der wichtigsten Faktoren, welche die Verteilung der Phytodiversität in Trockenrasen beeinflussen. Die größte Bedeutung hat hier die Bodenreaktion. Im Allgemeinen wurden stark steigende Artendichten mit zunehmendem pH-Wert, teilweise auch ein erneuter leichter Abfall oberhalb des Neutralpunktes gefunden. Eine Abnahme der Artendichte mit zunehmender Höhenlage im Gebirge konnte zumindest in zwei Fällen auch für Probeflächen gleicher Größe nachgewiesen werden. Abschließend diskutiere ich die Gründe für den überdurchschnittlichen Artenreichtum von Trockenrasen, weise auf Forschungsdefizite hin und unterbreite Empfehlungen für die Konzeption und Durchführung künftiger Studien der Biodiversitätsforschung wie auch der pflanzensoziologischen Datenerhebung allgemein. Als vordringliche Qualitätskriterien erachte ich die Arbeit mit standardisierten Probeflächengrößen und die sorgfältige Berücksichtigung von Moosen und Flechten.