Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (41)
- Conference Proceeding (6)
- Preprint (3)
- Review (2)
- Report (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (53)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (53)
Keywords
- Herb induced liver injury (5)
- Herbal hepatotoxicity (3)
- Causality assessment (2)
- Corona (2)
- Drug hepatotoxicity (2)
- Drug induced liver injury (2)
- Epileptischer Anfall (2)
- Pandemic (2)
- Pandemie (2)
- Pelargonium sidoides (2)
Institute
Seit dem Sommersemester 2006 führt der Fachbereich Medizin der J. W. Goethe – Universität kontinuierlich eine Analyse über den Zusammenhang der Oberstufen- und Abiturprüfungsnoten mit den Studiumserfolgen bei den Frankfurter Medizinstudierenden durch. Den Rahmen hierfür bildet das Projekt Studierendenauswahl zur Identifizierung und Validierung geeigneter Prädiktoren des Studienerfolgs zur universitären Auswahl (60 Prozent der Studiumsplätze in den ZVS-Fächern unterliegen der direkten Vergabekompetenz der Hochschulen). Wir präsentieren in dieser Kommunikation die Ergebnisse einer retrospektiven Datenerhebung bei den Studierenden im klinischen Studienabschnitt, welche Kurse zur Erlangung der Hochschulreife ausgewählt wurden (n=700). Hintergrund für dieses Vorgehen ist die Vermutung, dass zwischen der Kurswahl und dem Studienerfolg ein unmittelbarer Zusammenhang besteht. Die Studienleistungen wurden auf der Basis von fachbereichseigenen Prüfungen (vorklinische und klinische Leistungsnachweise) durch die Ergebnisse in den Staatsexamina identifiziert. Des Weiteren sollte geklärt werden, wie viele Leistungskurskombinationen – bedingt durch die Vorgaben des deutschen Oberstufensystems – vorliegen. Erste Auswertungen geben zu erkennen, dass die Korrelation zwischen den erreichten Punkten der individuellen Schulfächer (Mathematik, Biologie, Chemie, Deutsch und Englisch) und den Ergebnissen im 1.Abschnitt der ärztlichen Prüfung deutlich fachabhängig sind. Das Gleiche gilt für die Leistungskurswahl: Die große Anzahl verschiedener Leistungskurskombinationen (bei 700 Studierenden über 80) zeigt ausgesprochen variable Korrelationen mit den Leistungen im 1. Abschnitt der Ärztlichen Prüfung. Dabei ist die Leistungskurskombination Mathematik + Englisch nach unserer gegenwärtigen Analyse der beste Prädiktor für Erfolg im Medizinstudium. Diese Ergebnisse könnten in naher Zukunft als Basis des universitären Auswahlverfahrens für Medizinstudierende dienen.
Background: Physical activity is an important part of life, and hence exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) can reduce the quality of life. A standardized test is needed to diagnose EIB. The American Thoracic Society (ATS) guidelines recommend an exercise challenge in combination with dry air. We investigated the feasibility of a new, ATS guidelines conform exercise challenge in a cold chamber (ECC) to detect EIB. The aim of this study was to investigate the surrogate marker reaction to methacholine, ECC and exercise challenge in ambient temperature for the prediction of a positive reaction and to re-evaluate the reproducibility of the response to an ECC.
Methods: Seventy-eight subjects aged 6 to 40 years with suspected EIB were recruited for the study. The subjects performed one methacholine challenge, two ECCs, and one exercise challenge at an ambient temperature. To define the sensitivity and specificity of the predictor, a receiver-operating characteristic curve was plotted. The repeatability was evaluated using the method described by Bland and Altman (95% Limits of agreement).
Results: The following cut-off values showed the best combination of sensitivity and specificity: the provocation dose causing a 20% decrease in the forced expiratory volume in 1 s (PD20FEV1) of methacholine: 1.36 mg (AUC 0.69, p < 0.05), the maximal decrease in FEV1 during the ECC: 8.5% (AUC 0.78, p < 0.001) and exercise challenges at ambient temperatures: FEV1 5.2% (AUC 0.64, p = 0.13). The median decline in FEV1 was 14.5% (0.0–64.2) during the first ECC and 10.7% (0.0–52.5) during the second ECC. In the comparison of both ECCs, the Spearman rank correlation of the FEV1 decrease was r = 0.58 (p < 0.001). The 95% limits of agreement (95% LOAs) for the FEV1 decrease were − 17.7 to 26.4%.
Conclusions: The surrogate markers PD20FEV1 of methacholine and maximal decrease in FEV1 during ECC can predict a positive reaction in another ECC, whereas the maximal FEV1 decrease in an exercise challenge at an ambient temperature was not predictive. Compared with previous studies, we can achieve a similar reproducibility with an ECC.
Clinical trial registration: NCT02026492 (retrospectively registered 03/Jan/2014).
Background: Both standard and low-dose allergen provocations are an established tool in asthma research to improve our understanding of the pathophysiological mechanism of allergic asthma. However, clinical symptoms are less likely to be induced. Therefore, we designed a protocol for repetitive high-dose bronchial allergen challenges to generate clinical symptoms and airway inflammation.
Methods: A total of 27 patients aged 18 to 40 years with positive skin-prick tests and mild asthma underwent repetitive high-dose allergen challenges with household dust mites for four consecutive days. Pulmonary function and exhaled NO were measured at every visit. Induced sputum was analysed before and after the allergen challenges for cell counts, ECP, IL-5, INF-γ, IL-8, and the transcription factor Foxp3.
Results: We found a significant decrease in pulmonary function, an increased use of salbutamol and the development of a late asthmatic response and bronchial hyperresponsiveness, as well as a significant induction of eNO, eosinophils, and Th-2 cytokines. Repeated provocation was feasible in the majority of patients. Two subjects had severe adverse events requiring prednisolone to cope with nocturnal asthma symptoms.
Conclusions: Repeated high-dose bronchial allergen challenges resulted in severe asthma symptoms and marked Th-2-mediated allergic airway inflammation. The high-dose challenge model is suitable only in an attenuated form in diseased volunteers for proof-of-concept studies and in clinical settings to reduce the risk of severe asthma exacerbations.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.govNCT00677209
Die Evaluation der studentischen Lehre - Basis für eine leistungsorientierte Mittelvergabe (LOM)?
(2008)
Die Evaluation der medizinischen Ausbildung wird am Fachbereich Medizin der J.W. Goethe – Universität Frankfurt seit 1998 systematisch durchgeführt. Damit ist diese Implementierung deutlich vor den bindenden Bestimmungen der Ärztlichen Approbationsordnung (in Kraft getreten am 01.10.2003) installiert worden. Die Evaluation der studentischen Lehre beinhaltet die Evaluierung sämtlicher Pflichtveranstaltungen (Kurse, Seminare, Praktika) durch einen standardisierten Fragebogen, der am Ende der Lehrpflichtveranstaltung (in jedem Semester) ausgeteilt und nach dem Ausfüllen durch die Studierenden wieder eingesammelt wird.
In dieser Kommunikation belegen wir anhand ausgewählter Beispiele (vom Wintersemester 2003/2004 bis zum Wintersemester 2005/2006), dass die anderen Orts oft vorgetragenen negativen studentischen Bewertungen der vorklinischen Fächer an der J.W. Goethe – Universität nicht zutreffen (Bsp.:Kursus Anatomie I, Makroskopischer Teil, WS 2005/2006: M=1,8, SD=0,86). Die Bewertung der didaktischen Qualität („Lehrstoff wurde gut verständlich präsentiert“) ist bei den meisten vorklinischen Pflichtveranstaltungen zufriedenstellend (Bsp.: Kursus Anatomie I, Makroskopischer Teil, WS 2005/2006: M=2,06, SD=0,94). Aus diesen Ergebnissen schließen wir auf eine positive Rückwirkung des curricularen und didaktischen Umbaus des Medizinstudiums an der Goethe – Universität.
Die Veröffentlichung der Ergebnisse der studentischen Evaluation („Zusammenfassende Beurteilung“) muss dem Umstand Rechnung tragen, dass praxisferne Fächer vielen Studierenden nur schwer zu vermitteln sind. Deswegen wird auf ein Ranking verzichtet. Nach diesen Ergebnissen wird ein Teil der Mittel leistungsorientiert vergeben (im jährlichen Zyklus). Diese leistungsorientierte Mittelvergabe (LOM) (davon 45 Prozent nach der studentischen Evaluation) beträgt 4 Prozent des jeweiligen Grundetats für Forschung und Lehre (Landeszuführung). Eine positive Lehrevaluation kann für eine Klinik/ein Institut einen wesentlich größeren Betrag bedeuten. Das Verfahren ist am Fachbereich akzeptiert.
Aims: Inadequate treatment is one of the factors interfering with a successful social and working life. Among students, it can impair their health and learning progress. In the field of medicine the problem of inadequate treatment seems widespread. This study examines wether inadequate treatment in internships differs between medicine and other academic disciplines.
Method: Using a questionnaire, the frequency, forms and severity of inadequate treatment among students were compared between the disciplines of medicine, civil engineering and teaching.
Results: 69,3% of medical students reported inadequate treatment during their internships, about twice as many as students of other disciplines. The ratios of verbal, non-verbal and organisational inadequate treatment were similar between the different academic disciplines. However, medical students executed tasks without receiving sufficient safety precautions or training significantly more often (sevenfold) than students of other disciplines. In total however, the experienced incidents of inadequate treatment were seen as similarly severe across the different academic fields.
Conclusion: Inadequate treatment of students during internships is a larger problem in medicine than in civil engineering or teaching, particularly concerning the performance of unsafe tasks. With regard to the health of students and patients, inadequate treatment in the medical education should be tackled. Previous studies suggest that this goal can be achieved only through longtime extensive measures on the level of students, lecturers, faculty and teaching hospitals.
Causality assessment of suspected drug induced liver injury (DILI) and herb induced liver injury (HILI) is hampered by the lack of a standardized approach to be used by attending physicians and at various subsequent evaluating levels. The aim of this review was to analyze the suitability of the liver specific Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) scale as a standard tool for causality assessment in DILI and HILI cases. PubMed database was searched for the following terms: drug induced liver injury; herb induced liver injury; DILI causality assessment; and HILI causality assessment. The strength of the CIOMS lies in its potential as a standardized scale for DILI and HILI causality assessment. Other advantages include its liver specificity and its validation for hepatotoxicity with excellent sensitivity, specificity and predictive validity, based on cases with a positive reexposure test. This scale allows prospective collection of all relevant data required for a valid causality assessment. It does not require expert knowledge in hepatotoxicity and its results may subsequently be refined. Weaknesses of the CIOMS scale include the limited exclusion of alternative causes and qualitatively graded risk factors. In conclusion, CIOMS appears to be suitable as a standard scale for attending physicians, regulatory agencies, expert panels and other scientists to provide a standardized, reproducible causality assessment in suspected DILI and HILI cases, applicable primarily at all assessing levels involved.
Traditional chinese medicine and herbal hepatotoxicity: a tabular compilation of reported cases
(2015)
Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) with its focus on herbal use became popular worldwide. Treatment was perceived as safe, with neglect of rare adverse reactions including liver injury. To compile worldwide cases of liver injury by herbal TCM, we undertook a selective literature search in the PubMed database and searched for the items Traditional Chinese Medicine, TCM, Traditional Asian Medicine, and Traditional Oriental Medicine, also combined with the terms herbal hepatotoxicity or herb induced liver injury. The search focused primarily on English-language case reports, case series, and clinical reviews. We identified reported hepatotoxicity cases in 77 relevant publications with 57 different herbs and herbal mixtures of TCM, which were further analyzed for causality by the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) scale, positive reexposure test results, or both. Causality was established for 28/57 different herbs or herbal mixtures, Bai Xian Pi, Bo He, Ci Wu Jia, Chuan Lian Zi, Da Huang, Gan Cao, Ge Gen, Ho Shou Wu, Huang Qin, Hwang Geun Cho, Ji Gu Cao, Ji Xue Cao, Jin Bu Huan, Jue Ming Zi, Jiguja, Kudzu, Ling Yang Qing Fei Keli, Lu Cha, Rhen Shen, Ma Huang, Shou Wu Pian, Shan Chi, Shen Min, Syo Saiko To, Xiao Chai Hu Tang, Yin Chen Hao, Zexie, and Zhen Chu Cao. In conclusion, this compilation of liver injury cases establishes causality for 28/57 different TCM herbs and herbal mixtures, aiding diagnosis for physicians who care for patients with liver disease possibly related to herbal TCM.
Cannabinoid drugs are registered for postoperative nausea and emesis, Tourette syndrome and tumor-related anorexia, but are also used for spasticity and pain relief, among other conditions. Clinical studies for spasmolysis have been equivocal and even conclusions from meta-analyses were not consistent. This may be due to uncertainty in diagnostic criteria as well as a lack of direct spasmolytic activity (direct causality). In this review we used the Hill criteria to investigate whether a temporal association is causal or spurious. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed to identify all clinical trials of cannabinoids for spasticity. Studies were evaluated for dose dependency and time association; all studies together were analyzed for reproducibility, coherence, analogy and mechanistic consistency. A Funnel plot was done for all studies to identify selection or publication bias. Results: Twenty-seven studies were included in this meta-analysis. The spasmolytic activity (effect strength) was weak, with a nonsignificant small effect in most studies and a large effect only in a few studies (“enriched” studies, low patient numbers). No dose dependency was seen and plotting effect size vs. daily dose resulted in a slope of 0.004. Most studies titrated the cannabinoid to the optimum dose, e.g., 20 mg/d THC. The effect decreased with longer treatment duration (3–4 months). The spasmolytic effect is consistent for different European countries but not always within a country, nor is the effect specific for an etiology (multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury, others). For other criteria like plausibility, coherence or analogous effects, no data exist to support or refute them. In most studies, adverse effects were frequently reported indicating a therapeutic effect only at high doses with relevant side effects. Conclusions: Current data do not support a specific spasmolytic effect; a general decrease in CNS activity analogous to benzodiazepines appears more likely. Whether individual patients or specific subgroups benefit from cannabinoids is unclear. Further studies should compare cannabinoids with other, nonspecific spasmolytic drugs like benzodiazepines.
Die Erfassung von subjektiven Theorien von bildungsfernen Personen gestaltet sich schwierig, wenn die Personen nicht in der Lage sind, ihre Theorien formal zu abstrahieren. In dieser Publikation wird ein Verfahren beschrieben, mit welchen Schritten dennoch subjektive Theorien zur aufgestellten Forschungsfrage extrahiert werden können. Das Verfahren basiert auf einer systematischen Auswertung von transkribierten Interviews.