Refine
Year of publication
- 2010 (1) (remove)
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Language
- English (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (1)
Institute
- Medizin (1)
Purpose of the Study: The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the role of radiofrequency (RF) and microwave (MW) ablation in the treatment of pulmonary neoplasms. Materials and Methods: From March 2004 to January 2009, 164 patients (92 males, 72 females; mean age 59.7 years, SD: 10.2) underwent computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous RFA of pulmonary malignancies. RFA was performed on 248 lung lesions (20 primary lesions and 228 metastatic lesions) in 248 sessions (one lesion per session). Tumors were pathologically proven and were classified as primary lung neoplasms in 20 patients (non-small cell lung cancer) and as metastatic lung neoplasms in 144 patients. RFA was performed using: a) CelonProSurge bipolar internally cooled applicator b) RITA®StarburstTMXL. From December 2007 to October 2009, 80 patients (30 males, 50 females; mean age 59.7 years, range: 48-68, SD: 6.4) underwent computed tomography (CT) guided percutaneous MW ablation of pulmonary metastases from variable histopathological primaries. MW was performed on 130 lung lesions in 130 sessions (one lesion per session) using Valleylab TM system. Results: The overall success rate of RFA was 67.7% (168/248 lesions), with overall failure rate either due to tumor residue or recurrence on follow up in 32.3% (80/248) with mean time to tumor progress was 5.6 months SD: 2.99 (Range:1-18 months). Complete successful ablation was achieved in patients treated by MWA in 73.1% (95/130 lesions), with failure rate either due to tumor residue or recurrence on follow up in 26.9% (35/130) with mean time to tumor progress 6 months SD: 2.83 (Range:1-12months). Correlation of the histopathological type of the lesion and the end result of ablation therapy revealed insignificant correlation in both RFA and MWA (p > 0.1). The preablation tumor size was one of the most significant factors that determined the end result of ablation. In RFA successful tumor ablation was significant statistically for lesions with maximal axial diameter up to 2.5 cm (110/140) in comparison to lesions of more than 2.5 cm in maximal axial diameter (58/108) (Fisher’s exact test: p < 0.0001). While in MW ablated lesions successful tumor ablation was significant statistically for lesions with maximal axial diameter up to 3 cm (90/110) in comparison to lesions of more than 3 cm in maximal axial diameter (5/20) (Fisher’s exact test: p < 0.001). The location of the lesion was another important factor that determined the end result of ablation. In both RFA and MWA successful ablation was significantly more correlated to peripheral lesions (RFA: 120/160, 80% / MWA: 80/100, 80%) than centrally located lesions (RFA: 48/88, 50%; MWA: 15/30, 50%) (Fisher’s Exact Test: p > 0.001). For successfully RFA ablated cases mean preablation tumor volumes 1.9 cc SD: 0.9 (range: 0.3 - 4.25 cc) while for failed cases the mean tumor volume was 3.7 SD: 2.4 (range: 0.8 – 6.8cc). For successfully MW ablated cases the mean preablation tumor volume: 2.4 cc SD: 2.2 (range: 0.25-8.2 cc) while for failed cases the mean tumor volume was 3.5 SD: 2.6 (range: 0.3 – 7.1 cc). In RFA the survival rates at 12, 24 and 36 months were 90%, 78% and 68% respectively while in MWA treated patients the survival rate within 12 months follow up period was 96% while at 20 month the survival rate was 77%. Complications associated with the ablation therapy were: a) procedure related mortality: 0.4% (1/248) in RFA due to massive pulmonary hemorrhage versus 0% (0/130) in MWA, b) pneumothorax: 11.3% (28/240) in RFA versus 8.5% (11/130) in MWA, c) pulmonary Hemorrhage: 17.7% (44 of 248 sessions) of which one patient had massive uncontrolled bleeding and immediate death versus 6.2% (8/130) in MWA, d) pleural effusion: 3.2 % (8 of 248 sessions) in RFA versus 3.8 % (6/130) in MWA, e) hemoptysis: 4% (10/248) in RFA versus 4.6% (6/130) in MWA ranging from mild tinged sputum to frank bleeding, f) infection: 0.4% (1/248) in RFA, versus 0% in MWA, and g) post ablation pain: 10% (25/248) in RFA versus 9.2% (12/130) in MWA. Pain was generally adequately controlled by analgesics. Conclusion: Radiofrequency and microwave ablation are effective minimally invasive tools and may be safely applied for management of lung malignancy. The success of ablation therapy is significantly correlated to the preablation tumor size, volume and tumor location.