Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
Volltext vorhanden
- ja (33)
Gehört zur Bibliographie
- nein (33) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- DMEK (5)
- Amblyopia (3)
- Dose response (3)
- Eccentric fixation (3)
- Efficiency (3)
- Occlusion treatment (3)
- Fuchs endothelial dystrophy (2)
- Scheimpflug imaging (2)
- Visual quality (2)
- corneal edema (2)
Institut
- Medizin (33) (entfernen)
Purpose: To investigate short-term (3 months follow-up) changes in visual quality following Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy (FED). Methods: In this prospective institutional case series, 51 patients that underwent DMEK for FED were included. Assessment included the Quality of Vision (QoV) questionnaire preoperatively, at 1 month, and 3 months after surgery. Secondary outcome measures were anterior segment parameters acquired by Scheimpflug imaging, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and endothelial cell density (ECD). Results: Glare, hazy vision, blurred vision, and daily fluctuation in vision were the symptoms mostly reported preoperatively. All symptoms demonstrated a significant reduction of item scores for severity, frequency, and bothersome in the course after DMEK (P < 0.01). Glare and fluctuation in vision remained to some extent during the follow-up period (median score = 1). Preoperatively, corneal densitometry correlated moderately to weakly with severity of hazy vision (rs = 0.39; P = 0.03) and frequency (rs = 0.26; P = 0.02) as well as severity (rs = 0.27; P = 0.03) of blurry vision. CDVA and central corneal thickness (CCT) did not correlate with visual complains. Conclusions: Following DMEK for FED, patient-reported visual symptoms assessed by the QoV questionnaire represent a useful tool providing valuable information on the impact of DMEK on visual quality that cannot be directly estimated by morphological parameters and visual acuity only.
Purpose: To investigate short-term (3 months follow-up) changes in visual quality following Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy (FED). Methods: In this prospective institutional case series, 51 patients that underwent DMEK for FED were included. Assessment included the Quality of Vision (QoV) questionnaire preoperatively, at 1 month, and 3 months after surgery. Secondary outcome measures were anterior segment parameters acquired by Scheimpflug imaging, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and endothelial cell density (ECD). Results: Glare, hazy vision, blurred vision, and daily fluctuation in vision were the symptoms mostly reported preoperatively. All symptoms demonstrated a significant reduction of item scores for severity, frequency, and bothersome in the course after DMEK (P < 0.01). Glare and fluctuation in vision remained to some extent during the follow-up period (median score = 1). Preoperatively, corneal densitometry correlated moderately to weakly with severity of hazy vision (rs = 0.39; P = 0.03) and frequency (rs = 0.26; P = 0.02) as well as severity (rs = 0.27; P = 0.03) of blurry vision. CDVA and central corneal thickness (CCT) did not correlate with visual complains. Conclusions: Following DMEK for FED, patient-reported visual symptoms assessed by the QoV questionnaire represent a useful tool providing valuable information on the impact of DMEK on visual quality that cannot be directly estimated by morphological parameters and visual acuity only.
Purpose: To analyze refractive and topographic changes secondary to Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in pseudophakic eyes with Fuchs’ endothelial dystrophy (FED). Methods: Eighty-seven pseudophakic eyes of 74 patients who underwent subsequent DMEK surgery for corneal endothelial decompensation and associated visual impairment were included. Median post-operative follow-up time was 12 months (range: 3–26 months). Main outcome measures were pre- and post-operative manifest refraction, anterior and posterior corneal astigmatism, simulated keratometry (CASimK) and Q value obtained by Scheimpflug imaging. Secondary outcome measures included corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), central corneal densitometry, central corneal thickness, corneal volume (CV), anterior chamber volume (ACV) and anterior chamber depth (ACD). Results: After DMEK surgery, mean pre-operative spherical equivalent (± SD) changed from + 0.04 ± 1.73 D to + 0.37 ± 1.30 D post-operatively (p = 0.06). CDVA, proportion of emmetropic eyes, ACV and ACD increased significantly during follow-up. There was also a significant decrease in posterior corneal astigmatism, central corneal densitometry, central corneal thickness and corneal volume over time (p = 0.001). Only anterior corneal astigmatism and simulated keratometry (CASimK) remained fairly stable after DMEK. Conclusion: Despite tendencies toward a hyperopic shift, changes in SE were not significant and refraction remained overall stable in pseudophakic patients undergoing DMEK for FED. Analysis of corneal parameters by Scheimpflug imaging mainly revealed changes in posterior corneal astigmatism pointing out the relevance of posterior corneal profile changes during edema resolution after DMEK.
Purpose: To evaluate the potential impact of rebubbling on the anterior segment parameters and refractive outcomes in patients with graft detachment following uneventful DMEK for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy (FED).
Methods: Retrospective institutional cohort study of comparing 34 eyes of 31 patients with rebubbling for graft detachment following Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) to 33 eyes of 28 patients with uneventful DMEK. Main outcome parameters were various corneal parameters obtained by Scheimpflug imaging, refractive outcome, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and endothelial cell density (ECD).
Results: Anterior and posterior corneal astigmatism, corneal densitometry, central corneal thickness, and anterior chamber depth and volume showed no significant differences. Preoperative distribution of astigmatism axis orientations showed a high proportion of anterior corneal with-the-rule astigmatism (71%) in eyes requiring rebubbling. Mean postoperative cylinder in the rebubbling group (1.21 ± 0.85 D) was significantly higher compared to the controls (p = 0.04), while differences in spherical equivalent (SE) were insignificant (p = 0.24). Postoperative CDVA was 0.11 ± 0.11 in the control group compared to 0.21 ± 0.17 in the rebubbling group (p = 0.03). Eyes with subsequent rebubbling demonstrated a significantly higher endothelial cell loss (56% versus 37%) (p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Apart from higher cylinder values, refractive outcome and corneal parameters assessed by Scheimpflug imaging were comparable in eyes with rebubbling and controls. However, a reduced visual acuity and an increased endothelial cell loss should be taken into consideration prior to rebubbling especially in eyes with circumscribed graft detachment.
Purpose: To evaluate if repeat Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is appropriate to achieve functional improvements in patients with corneal decompensation from secondary graft failure after primary DMEK.
Methods: This is a retrospective monocentric cohort study including 13 eyes of 13 patients with repeat DMEK for corneal decompensation following primary DMEK. Eyes with primary DMEK only and comparable preoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) served as control. Main outcome parameter was CDVA. Secondary outcome measures were central corneal thickness (CCT), endothelial cell density, and rebubbling rate (RR).
Results: The average time interval (±SD) between primary and secondary DMEK was 12.5±6 months. Preoperative CDVA (logMAR) was 1.97±0.90 in the repeat DMEK group and 1.38±0.92 in the primary DMEK group. At 6 months, both groups showed significant improvement in visual acuity (repeat DMEK group, 0.49±0.35, P<0.01 and primary DMEK group, 0.40±0.36, P<0.01). CDVA did not differ significantly between both groups at all time points examined (1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively). Mean CCT values at 3 and 6 months postoperatively did not differ significantly between the two groups (P>0.05). The RR was
23% (n=3) in both groups.
Conclusion: Repeat DMEK is a useful therapeutic approach in the setting of corneal decompensation following primary DMEK. Functional results of repeat DMEK, visual acuity in particular, are comparable to patients with single DMEK only.
Purpose: To investigate the efficacy and safety of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for corneal decompensation following primary Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK).
Methods: This was a retrospective case series of 15 patients that underwent DMEK surgery for corneal decompensation after failed DSAEK. Main outcome parameter was corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) after DMEK and DSAEK. Secondary outcome measures included central corneal thickness (CCT), endothelial cell density (ECD), rebubbling rate, and primary graft failure after DMEK. Explanted DSAEK grafts were evaluated by light microscopy.
Results: The mean (±SD) time period between DSAEK and DMEK surgery was 15±8 months (range, 6–31 months). Preoperative CDVA was 1.72±0.62 (logMAR). After DMEK, CDVA improved significantly to 0.78±0.48 at 1 month and to 0.23±0.24 after 12 months (P=0.022). Visual acuity data after DMEK were significantly better compared to preoperative values. The average CCT after DMEK decreased significantly from 869±210 µm (preoperative) to 505±45 µm (1 month postoperative) (P<0.001) and remained stable over 12 months. The ECD decreased from 2,589±209/mm2 (preoperative) to 1,691±589/mm2 (12 months postoperative). Rebubbling DMEK was required in three patients (=20%).
Conclusion: DMEK represents a feasible and safe procedure in achieving better functional results compared to DSAEK. Visual acuity and optical quality can be effectively reestablished after unsuccessful primary DSAEK surgery even in patients with long-standing corneal decompensation. Further investigations are required to validate the preliminary clinical findings.
Hintergrund: Die Unterschidung von Augen mit frühem Keratokonus (KC) von normalen Augen bereitet nach wie vor Schwierigkeiten. Die vorliegende Untersuchung vergleicht konventionelle keratometrie-basierte mit wellenfront-basierten Maßzahlen hinsichtlich ihrer Eignung, normale Augen von Augen mit sehr frühem Keratokonus zu unterscheiden.
Methoden: Es wurden 17 Augen von 17 Patienten mit frühem KC eingeschlossen. Bei diesen 17 Augen handelt es sich um klinisch unauffällige Partneraugen des stärker betroffenen Auges. 123 Normalaugen von 69 Patienten dienten als Negativkontrolle. Von den axialen Kurvaturdaten wurden folgende Maßzahlen berechnet: zentrale Keratometrie (cK), Astigmatismus (AST), inferior-superiore Brechwertdifferenz (I-S), Verkippung der radialen Achsen (SRAX), KISA% index (eine Maßzahl, die auf cK, AST, I-S und SRAX basiert) und corneale Zernike-Koeffizienten (1.–7. Ordnung, Pupillendurchmesser: 6 mm). Aus Zernike-Koeffizienten wurden Diskriminanzfunktionen konstruiert. Receiver-Operatiing-Charakteristik (ROC)-Kurven wurden erstellt, um die diagnostische Trennschärfe dieser Werte zur Unterscheidung von klinisch unauffälligen Partneraugen von Augen mit frühem Keratokonus und normalen Kontrollen zu evaluieren.
Ergebnisse: Der I-S-Wert (Korrektheit 92,1%, kritischer Wert 0,59 D) und die vertikale Coma (C3-1; 96,7%, –0,2 µm) waren die beiden Einzelwerte mit höchster Trennschärfe. Mit den ursprünglich publizierten kritischen Werten lag der Rabinowitz-McDonnell test (cK und I-S) bei 83,3% (Sensitivität 0%, Spezifität 100%) und der KISA% bei 70,8% (81,3%, 60,3%). In Verbindung mit Diskriminanzanalyse errichten Zernike-Koeffizienten eine Korrektheit von 96,7% (100%, 93,4%).
Schlussfolgerungen: Auf cornealen Zernike-Koeffizienten basierende Maßzahlen erreichte die höchste Trennschärfe bei der Unterscheidung von Augen mit subklinischem KC von Normalaugen. Dennoch konnten konventionelle KC-indices eine ähnlich hohe Trenschärfe wie die Zernike-Methode erreichen, wenn die kritischen Werte entsprechend angepasst werden.
Hintergrund: Im Rahmen der Erforschung von Mechanismen der Presbyopie-Entstehung hat das Interesse an Methoden zur Linsendensitometrie wieder zugenommen. Für spezielle Fragestellungen sind flexible Untersuchungsmethoden notwendig.
Methoden: Basierend auf Aufnahmen mit der Scheimpflug-Kamera Pentacam HR (Oculus, Wetzlar) wurde ein MATLAB-Programm (V7.0, The MathWorks) erstellt, um größere Datenmengen automatisiert auszuwerten. Die Erkennung der Pupillenmitte als Referenzpunkt erfolgt mittels eines Randerkennungsalgorithmus. Als Kennzahlen dienen klassische Parameter der beschreibenden Statistik (Mittel, Minimum, Maximum, Standardabweichung und Variationskoeffizient) für einen definierten rechteckigen Bereich und für die zentrale vertikale Achse.
Ergebnisse: In einer Präliminarserie von 18 Augen war eine automatisierte Messung mit korrekter Pupillenerkennung in 80% der Fälle möglich. Verglichen mit der hersteller-eigenen Software (Pentacam 6.03r11) besitzt das eigene Programm eine erweiterte Spannweite der Messwerte. Die Messwerte können automatisch nach Excel (Microsoft) exportiert werden. Ein modularer Aufbau ermöglicht eine flexible Erweiterung für weitere Fragestellungen (z.B. Quantifizierung von Kern- und Rindentrübungen).
Schlussfolgerungen: Mittels eines selbst programmierten MATLAB-basierten Programmes kann eine automatisierte Messung und Analyse von linsndensitometrischen Parametern durchgeführt werden.
Introduction: For management of complicated retinal detachments, a pars plana vitrectomy with temporary silicone oil (SO) fill is the method of choice. According to literature, the retinal redetachment rate varies between <10% and >70% with around 36% in our own group (retrospective data analysis, n = 119 eyes).
Methods: The main goal was to reduce the retinal redetachment rate. Standard operating procedures (SOPs) and evaluation protocols (EVALPs) were developed to prospectively analyse risk factors. Lab analysis of SO was performed, and the role of surgical experience was evaluated and investigated with Eyesi®.
Results: We achieved a significant reduction of the retinal redetachment rate (to 6.80%, n = 101, p = 0.002). After surgery with SO injection, neither further membrane peeling (in 16.5%) nor retinal laser coagulation (in 100%) during revision surgery had a significant effect on the reattachment rate (p = 0.167, p = 0.23), while extensive additional laser coagulation reduced visual acuity (p = 0.01). A 3-port approach had to be set up to complete SO removal. A difference in success rate depending on surgical experience was confirmed, and the performance in Eyesi correlated with that in the patients' eye.
Conclusions: A SOP- and EVALP-based management and new strategies to secure the surgical performance seem to be essential for successful surgery.