Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Working Paper (25) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (25)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (25)
Keywords
- Risikokapital (8)
- Venture Capital (8)
- Corporate Governance (5)
- Deutschland (5)
- Underpricing (4)
- Going Public (3)
- Initial Public Offerings (2)
- Long-Run Performance (2)
- Neuer Markt (2)
- Vertrag (2)
Broad, long-term financial and economic datasets are a scarce resource, in particular in the European context. In this paper, we present an approach for an extensible, i.e. adaptable to future changes in technologies and sources, data model that may constitute a basis for digitized and structured long- term, historical datasets. The data model covers specific peculiarities of historical financial and economic data and is flexible enough to reach out for data of different types (quantitative as well as qualitative) from different historical sources, hence achieving extensibility. Furthermore, based on historical German company and stock market data, we discuss a relational implementation of this approach.
Sondierungsstudie im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für Bildung und Forschung: Die jüngste Finanzkrise und die darauf folgende Staatsschuldenkrise hat sowohl wirtschaftlich als auch gesellschaftlich tiefgreifende Spuren hinterlassen. Dabei wurden auch sehr deutliche Lücken in der Forschung offenbar. Ziel dieser Studie ist es, aufbauend auf dem aktuellen Forschungsstand weiteren Forschungsbedarf in den wesentlich mit Finanzkrisen verbundenen Bereichen aufzuzeigen. Es werden fünf Forschungsbereiche mit jeweiligen Unterthemen vorgeschlagen. Diese fünf Forschungsbereiche gehen unmittelbar aus der Struktur und den Mechanismen der Finanz- und Staatsschuldenkrise hervor. Dabei wird besonderes Augenmerk auf die wirtschafts- und regulierungspolitische Relevanz der Themen sowie dem Umstand getragen, dass die Beantwortung vieler der Fragen interdisziplinäre Zusammenarbeit erfordert.
Finanzkrisen sind inherent mit dem Bankenmodell verbunden. Aufgrund von Verbindungen der Banken untereinander können Probleme einzelner Institute auf andere Institute übertragen werden. Diese systemischen Risiken können das gesamte Finanzsystem destabilisieren. Das Finanzsystem nimmt durch die Kreditvergabe und Bereitstellung von Transaktionssystemen eine herausragende Stellung in einer Volkswirtschaft ein, wodurch stabilisierende Eingriffe der Politik notwendig werden können. Eingriffe zur Wiederherstellung von Stabilität können sehr kostspielig sein und, wie aktuell eindrucksvoll belegt, die stabilisierenden Staaten selbst destabilisieren. Die alternativen Eingriffe vorab betreffen neben der Geldpolitik vor allem regulatorische Eingriffe. Im besonderen sind die Corporate Governance von Finanzinstituten und die Informationsbereitstellung bzw. Transparenz innerhalb des Finanzsektors von Bedeutung. In den vergangen Jahren wuchs vor dem Hintergrund von Regulierung zudem ein paralleles Schattenbankensystems heran, das in seiner Bedeutung dem traditionellen Bankensystem nur unwesentlich nachsteht.
Zwar sind die groben Zusammenhänge und Auswirkungen in den einzelnen Bereichen bekannt, jedoch ist für ein tiefgreifendes Verständnis als Grundlage zur Vermeidung bzw. Eindämmung zukünftiger Krisen sowie zur Folgenabschätzung von Regulierung weitere Forschung unabdingbar.
This paper aims to analyze the impact of different types of venture capitalists on the performance of their portfolio firms around and after the IPO. We thereby investigate the hypothesis that different governance structures, objectives and track record of different types of VCs have a significant impact on their respective IPOs. We explore this hypothesis by using a data set embracing all IPOs which occurred on Germany's Neuer Markt. Our main finding is that significant differences among the different VCs exist. Firms backed by independent VCs perform significantly better two years after the IPO compared to all other IPOs and their share prices fluctuate less than those of their counterparts in this period of time. Obviously, independent VCs, which concentrated mainly on growth stocks (low book-to-market ratio) and large firms (high market value), were able to add value by leading to less post-IPO idiosyncratic risk and more return (after controlling for all other effects). On the contrary, firms backed by public VCs (being small and having a high book-to-market ratio) showed relative underperformance. Klassifikation: G10, G14, G24 . 29th January 2004 .
This paper sets out to analyze the influence of different types of venture capitalists on the performance of their portfolio firms around and after IPO. We investigate the hypothesis that different governance structures, objectives, and track records of different types of VCs have a significant impact on their respective IPOs. We explore this hypothesis using a data set embracing all IPOs that have occurred on Germany's Neuer Markt. Our main finding is that significant differences among the different VCs exist. Firms backed by independent VCs perform significantly better two years after IPO as compared to all other IPOs, and their share prices fluctuate less than those of their counterparts in this period of time. On the contrary, firms backed by public VCs show relative underperformance. The fact that this could occur implies that market participants did not correctly assess the role played by different types of VCs.
We analyze the impact of decreases in available lending resources on quantitative and qualita- tive dimensions of firms’ patenting activities. We thereby make use of the European Banking Authority?s capital exercise to carve out the causal effect of bank lending on firm innovation. In order to do so we combine various datasets to derive information on firms’ financials, their patenting behaviors, as well as their relationships with their lenders. Building on this self- generated dataset, we provide support for the “less finance, less innovation” view. At the same time, we show that lower available financial resources for firms lead to improvement in the qualitative dimensions of their patents. Hence, we carve out a “less finance, less but better innovation” pattern.
Private equity fund managers are typically required to invest their own money alongside the fund. We examine how this coinvestment affects the acquisition strategy of leveraged buyout funds. In a simple model, where the investment and capital structure decisions are made simultaneously, we show that a higher coinvestment induces managers to chose less risky firms and use more leverage. We test these predictions in a unique sample of private equity investments in Norway, where the fund manager's taxable wealth is publicly available. Consistent with the model, portfolio company risk decreases and leverage ratios increase with the coinvestment fraction of the manager's wealth. Moreover, funds requiring a relatively high coinvestment tend to spread its capital over a larger number of portfolio firms, consistent with a more conservative investment policy.
This paper investigates the potential implications of say on pay on management remuneration in Germany. We try to shed light on some key aspects by presenting quantitative data that allows us to gauge the pertinent effects of the German natural experiment that originates with the 2009 amendments to the Stock Corporation Act of 1965. In order to do this, we deploy a hand-collected data set for Germany's major firms (i.e. DAX 30), for the years 2006-2012. Rather than focusing exclusively on CEO remuneration we collected data for all members of the management board for the whole period under investigation. We observe that the compensation packages of management board members of Germany's DAX30-firms are quite closely linked to key performance measures. In addition, we find that salaries increase with the size of the company and that ownership concentration has no significant effect on compensation. Also, our findings suggest that the two-tier system seems to matter a lot when it comes to compensation. However, it would be misleading to state that we see no significant impact of the introduction of the German say on pay-regime. Our findings suggest that supervisory boards anticipate shareholder-behavior.
We analyze the desinvestment decision of venture capitalists in the course of an IPO of their portfolio firms. The capital market learns of the project quality only in the period following the IPO. Venture capitalists with high-quality firms face a trade-off between immediately selling their stake in the venture at a price below the true value and having to wait until the true value is revealed. We show that the dilemma may be resolved via a reputation-acquiring mechanism in a repeated game set-up. Thereby, we can explain, e.g., the advent of "hot-issue market behavior" involving early disinvestments and a high degree of price uncertainty. Furthermore, we provide a new rationale for underpricing. Young venture capitalists may use underpricing as a device for credibly committing themselves to acquiring reputation.
This paper aims to analyze the effects of financial constraints and the financial crisis on the financing and investment policies of newly founded firms. Thereby, the analysis adds important new insights on a crucial segment of the economy. We make use of a large and comprehensive data set of French firms founded in the years 2004-2006, i.e. well before the financial crisis. Our panel data analysis shows that the global financial crisis imposed a shock (mostly demand-driven) on the financing as well as on the investments of these firms. Moreover, we find that financially constrained firms use less external debt financing and invest smaller amounts. They also rely on less trade credit. With regard to bank financing, newly founded firms which are more financially constrained accumulate less bank debt and repay initial bank debt slower than their non-financially constraint counterparts. Finally, we find that financially constrained firms are affected to a smaller degree by the financial crisis than their less financially constrained counterparts.