Refine
Document Type
- Article (1)
- Conference Proceeding (1)
Language
- English (2) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (2)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (2)
Keywords
- DBS (1)
- VIM (1)
- brain shift (1)
- essential tremor (1)
- ventralis intermedius nucleus (1)
Institute
- Medizin (2) (remove)
Background: Essential Tremor (ET) is a progressive neurological disorder characterized by postural and kinetic tremor most commonly affecting the hands and arms. Medically intractable ET can be treated by deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventral intermediate nucleus of thalamus (VIM). We investigated whether the location of the effective contact (most tremor suppression with at least side effects) in VIM-DBS for ET changes over time, indicating a distinct mechanism of loss of efficacy that goes beyond progression of tremor severity, or a mere reduction of DBS efficacy.
Methods: We performed programming sessions in 10 patients who underwent bilateral vim-DBS surgery between 2009 and 2017 at our department. In addition to the intraoperative (T1) and first clinical programming session (T2) a third programming session (T3) was performed to assess the effect- and side effect threshold (minimum voltage at which a tremor suppression or side effects occurred). Additionally, we compared the choice of the effective contact between T1 and T2 which might be affected by a surgical induced “brain shift.”
Discussion: Over a time span of about 4 years VIM-DBS in ET showed continuous efficacy in tremor suppression during stim-ON compared to stim-OFF. Compared to immediate postoperative programming sessions in ET-patients with DBS, long-term evaluationshowednorelevantchangeinthechoiceofcontactwithrespecttosideeffects andefficacy.InthemajorityofthecasestheactivecontactatT2didnotcorrespondtothe most effective intraoperative stimulation site T1, which might be explained by a brain-shift due to cerebral spinal fluid loss after neurosurgical procedure.
Oral e-Poster Presentations - Booth 1: Vascular 3, September 27, 2023, 10:00 AM - 10:40 AM
Background: Despite current clinical guidelines recommending suboccipital decompressive craniectomy (SDC) in patients with space-occupying cerebellar infarction when neurological deterioration occurs, the precise definition of such deterioration remains unclear. The current study aimed at characterizing whether clinical outcomes can be predicted by the GCS score immediately prior to SDC, and whether higher GCS scores are associated with better clinical outcomes. We aimed to characterize whether clinical outcomes can be predicted by the GCS score immediately prior to SDC, and if higher GCS scores are associated with better clinical outcomes.
Methods: In a single-center, retrospective analysis of 51 patients treated with SDC for space-occupying cerebellar infarction clinical and imaging data were evaluated at the timepoints of symptom onset, hospital admission and preoperatively. Clinical outcome was measured by mRS at the last available follow-up. Preoperative GCS scores were stratified into three groups (GCS 3-8, 9-11 and 12-15). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed using clinical and radiological parameters as predictors of clinical outcome.
Results: In Cox-regression analysis using mRS of 1-2 as a positive clinical outcome we found a significant increase in the proportional hazard ratio (HR) of 6.581 [CI 1.839-36.414]; p=0.031 for GCS scores of 12-15 prior to SDC. Clinical outcomes (mRS 3-6) were associated with infarct volume above 6.0 cm3 (HR 2.473 [CI 1.209-5.057]; p=0.013), tonsillar herniation (HR: 0.279 [CI 0.083-0.933]; p=0.038), brainstem compression (HR 0.304 [CI 0.123-0.749]; p=0.010) and a preoperative GCS score of 3-8 (HR 2.386 [CI 1.160-4.906]; p=0.018).
Conclusions: SDC should be considered in patients with infarct volumes above 6.0 cm3 with GCS scores higher than previously described in the literature, as these patients may show better long-term outcome than those in which surgery is delayed until a GCS score of 11 or lower.