Refine
Document Type
- Article (21)
- Working Paper (1)
Language
- English (22)
Has Fulltext
- yes (22)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (22)
Keywords
- Branching fraction (5)
- Lepton colliders (3)
- BESIII (2)
- Charmed mesons (2)
- Electroweak interaction (2)
- Hadronic decays (2)
- Leptonic, semileptonic & radiative decays (2)
- Particle decays (2)
- Quarkonium (2)
- e +-e − Experiments (2)
Institute
- Physik (18)
- Medizin (2)
- Biodiversität und Klima Forschungszentrum (BiK-F) (1)
- Center for Financial Studies (CFS) (1)
- Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies (FIAS) (1)
- Geowissenschaften (1)
- House of Finance (HoF) (1)
- Informatik (1)
- Senckenbergische Naturforschende Gesellschaft (1)
- Sonderforschungsbereiche / Forschungskollegs (1)
Oxidized phospholipids (oxPAPC) induce endothelial dysfunction and atherosclerosis. Here we show that oxPAPC induce a gene network regulating serine-glycine metabolism with the mitochondrial methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase/cyclohydrolase (MTHFD2) as a causal regulator using integrative network modeling and Bayesian network analysis in human aortic endothelial cells. The cluster is activated in human plaque material and by atherogenic lipoproteins isolated from plasma of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within the MTHFD2-controlled cluster associate with CAD. The MTHFD2-controlled cluster redirects metabolism to glycine synthesis to replenish purine nucleotides. Since endothelial cells secrete purines in response to oxPAPC, the MTHFD2-controlled response maintains endothelial ATP. Accordingly, MTHFD2-dependent glycine synthesis is a prerequisite for angiogenesis. Thus, we propose that endothelial cells undergo MTHFD2-mediated reprogramming toward serine-glycine and mitochondrial one-carbon metabolism to compensate for the loss of ATP in response to oxPAPC during atherosclerosis.
Non-standard errors
(2021)
In statistics, samples are drawn from a population in a data-generating process (DGP). Standard errors measure the uncertainty in sample estimates of population parameters. In science, evidence is generated to test hypotheses in an evidence-generating process (EGP). We claim that EGP variation across researchers adds uncertainty: non-standard errors. To study them, we let 164 teams test six hypotheses on the same sample. We find that non-standard errors are sizeable, on par with standard errors. Their size (i) co-varies only weakly with team merits, reproducibility, or peer rating, (ii) declines significantly after peer-feedback, and (iii) is underestimated by participants.