Universitätspublikationen
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (44)
- Conference Proceeding (9)
Language
- English (53)
Has Fulltext
- yes (53)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (53)
Keywords
- Hemorrhage (4)
- meningioma (3)
- Death rates (2)
- Lesions (2)
- Multivariate analysis (2)
- Neurology (2)
- Prognosis (2)
- Pulmonary embolism (2)
- Quality of life (2)
- Subarachnoid hemorrhage (2)
Institute
Background: The surgical treatment of giant olfactory groove meningiomas (OGMs) with marked perilesional brain oedema is still a surgical challenge. After tumour resection, increase of brain oedema may occur causing dramatic neurological deterioration and even death of the patient. The objective of this paper is to describe surgical features of a two-step staged resection of these tumours performed to counter increase of postoperative brain oedema.
Methods: This two-step staged resection procedure was carried out in a consecutive series of 19 patients harbouring giant OGMs. As first step, a bifrontal craniectomy was performed followed by a right-sided interhemispherical approach. About 80% of the tumour mass was resected leaving behind a shell-shaped tumour remnant. In the second step, carried out after the patients’ recovery from the first surgery and decline of oedema, the remaining part of the tumour was removed completely followed by duro- and cranioplasty.
Results: Ten patients recovered quickly from first surgery and the second operation was performed after a mean of 12.4 days. In eight patients, the second operation was carried out later between day 25 and 68 due to surgery-related complications, development of a trigeminal zoster, or to a persisting frontal brain oedema. Mean follow-up was 49.3 months and all but one patient had a good outcome regardless of surgery-related complications.
Conclusions: Our results suggest that a two-step staged resection of giant OGMs minimizes the increase of postoperative brain oedema as far as possible and translates into lower morbidity and mortality.
Introduction: Dysphagia is a common and severe symptom of traumatic brain injury (TBI) affecting up to 78% of patients. It is associated with pneumonia, increased morbidity, and mortality. Although subdural hematoma (SDH) accounts for over 50% of TBI, the occurrence of dysphagia in this subtype has not been investigated yet.
Methods: All patients with SDH admitted to the author's institution between the years 2007 and 2020 were included in the study. Patients with SDH and clinical suspicion for dysphagia received a clinical swallowing assessment by a speech and language pathologist (SLP). Furthermore, the severity of dysphagia was rated according to swallowing disorder scale. Functional outcome was evaluated by the Glasgow outcome scale (GOS).
Results: Out of 545 patients with SDH, 71 patients had dysphagia (13%). The prevalence of dysphagia was significantly lower in the surgical arm compared to the conservative arm (11.8 vs. 21.8%; OR 0.23; p = 0.02). Independent predictors for dysphagia were GCS < 13 at admission (OR 4.17; p < 0.001), cardiovascular disease (OR 2.29; p = 0.002), and pneumonia (OR 2.88; p = 0.002), whereas the operation was a protective factor (OR 0.2; p < 0.001). In a subgroup analysis, right-sided SDH was an additional predictor for dysphagia (OR 2.7; p < 0.001). Overall, patients with dysphagia improved significantly under the SLP treatment from the initial diagnosis to hospital discharge (p < 0.01). However, a subgroup of patients with the most severe grade of dysphagia showed no significant improvement. Patients with dysphagia had significantly worse outcomes (GOS 1–3) compared to those without dysphagia (48.8 vs. 26.4%; p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Dysphagia is a frequent symptom in SDH, and the early identification of dysphagia is crucial regarding the initiation of treatment and functional outcome. Surgery is effective in preventing dysphagia and should be considered in high-risked patients.
Short- and long-term effects of rehabilitation after perimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage
(2021)
n about 25% of patients with spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), a bleeding source cannot be identified during radiological diagnostics. Generally, the outcome of perimesencephalic or prepontine (PM) SAH is known to be significantly better than after non-PM SAH. Data about long-term follow-up concerning physical and mental health are scarce, so this study is reports on long-term results. We measured the influence of PM SAH on a quality-of-life modified Rankin (mRs) scale after six months. For long-term follow-up, a SF-36 questionnaire was used. Questionnaires were sent out between 18 and 168 months after ictus. In 37 patients, a long-term follow-up was available (up to 14 years after SAH). Data detected with the SF-36 questionnaire are compared to reference applicability to the standard population. In total, 37 patients were included for further analysis and divided in 2 subgroups; 13 patients (35%) received subsequent rehabilitation after clinical stay and 24 (65%) did not. In the short-term outcome, a significant improvement from discharge until follow-up was identified in patients with subsequent rehabilitation, but not in the matched pair group without rehabilitation. When PM SAH was compared to the standard population, a reduction in quality of life was identified in physical items (role limitations because of physical health problems, physical functioning) as well as in psychological items (role limitations because of emotional problems). Subsequent rehabilitation on PM SAH patients probably leads to an increase in independence and better mRs. While better mRs was shown at discharge in patients without subsequent rehabilitation, the mRs of rehabilitants was nearly identical after rehabilitation. Patients with good mRs also reached high levels of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) without rehabilitation. Thus, subsequent rehabilitation needs to be encouraged on an individual basis. Indication criteria for subsequent rehabilitation should be defined in further studies to improve patient treatment and efficiency in health care.
Background: With refinements in diagnosis and therapy of gliomas, the importance of survival time as the sole outcome parameter has decreased, and patient-centered outcome parameters have gained interest. Pursuing a profession is an indispensable component of human happiness. The aim of this study was to analyze the professional outcomes besides their neuro-oncological and functional evaluation after surgery for gliomas in eloquent areas.
Methods: We assessed neuro-oncological and functional outcomes of patients with gliomas WHO grades II and III undergoing surgery between 2012 and 2018. All patients underwent routine follow-up and adjuvant treatment. Treatment and survival parameters were collected prospectively. Repercussions of the disease on the patients’ professional status, socio-economic situation, and neurocognitive function were evaluated retrospectively with questionnaires.
Results: We analyzed data of 58 patients with gliomas (WHO II: 9; III: 49). Median patient age was 35.8 years (range 21–63 years). Awake surgery techniques were applied in 32 patients (55.2%). Gross total and subtotal tumor resections were achieved in 33 (56.9%) and 17 (29.3%) patients, respectively, whereas in 8 patients (13.8%) resection had to remain partial. Most patients (n = 46; 79.3%) received adjuvant treatment. Median follow up was 43.8 months (range 11–82 months). After treatment 41 patients (70.7%) were able to resume a working life. Median time until returning to work was 8.0 months (range 0.2–22.0 months). To be younger than 40 at the time of the surgery was associated with a higher probability to return to work (p < .001). Multivariable regression analysis showed that patient age < 40 years as well as occupational group and self-reported fatigue were factors independently associated with the ability to return to work.
Conclusion: The ability to resume professional activities following brain tumor surgery is an important patient-oriented outcome parameter. We found that the majority of patients with gliomas were able to return to work following surgical and adjuvant treatment. Preservation of neurological function is of utmost relevance for individual patients´ quality of life.
Background: Transfusion of red blood cells (RBC) in patients undergoing major elective cranial surgery is associated with increased morbidity, mortality and prolonged hospital length of stay (LOS). This retrospective single center study aims to identify the impact of RBC transfusions on skull-base and non-skull-base meningioma patients including the identification of risk factors for RBC transfusion.
Methods: From October 2009 - October 2016 we retrospectively analyzed 423 primary meningioma patients undergoing surgery for primary meningioma resection our department.
Results: Of these 423 patients, 68 (16.1%) received RBC transfusion and 355 (83.9%) did not receive RBC units. Preoperative anaemia rate was significantly higher in transfused patients (17.7%) compared to patients without RBC transfusion (6.2%; p = 0.0015). In transfused patients, postoperative complications as well as hospital LOS was significantly higher (p < 00001) compared to non-transfused patients. After multivariate analyses, risk factors for RBC transfusion were preoperative American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status score (p = 0.0247), tumor size (p = 0.0006), surgical time (p = 0.0018) and intraoperative blood loss (p < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier curves revealed significant influence on overall survival by preoperative anaemia, RBC transfusion, smoking, cardiovascular disease, preoperative KPS ≤ 60% and age (elderly ≥ 75 years).
Conclusion: We concluded that blood loss due to large tumors or localization near large vessels are the main triggers for RBC transfusion in meningioma patients paired with a potential preselection that masks the effect of preoperative anaemia in multivariate analysis. Further studies evaluating the impact of preoperative anaemia management for reduction of RBC transfusion are needed to improve clinical outcomes of meningioma patients.
Background: Dexamethasone (Dex) is the most common corticosteroid to treat edema in glioblastoma (GBM) patients. Recent studies identified the addition of Dex to radiation therapy (RT) to be associated with poor survival. Independently, Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) provides a novel anti-cancer modality for patients with primary and recurrent GBM. Whether Dex influences the efficacy of TTFields, however, remains elusive.
Methods: Human GBM cell lines MZ54 and U251 were treated with RT or TTFields in combination with Dex and the effects on cell counts and cell death were determined via flow cytometry. We further performed a retrospective analysis of GBM patients with TTFields treatment +/- concomitant Dex and analysed its impact on progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS).
Results: The addition of Dex significantly reduced the efficacy of RT in U251 and MZ54 cells. TTFields (200 kHz/250 kHz) induced massive cell death in both cell lines. Concomitant treatment of TTFields and Dex did not reduce the overall efficacy of TTFields. Further, in our retrospective clinical analysis, we found that the addition of Dex to TTFields therapy did not influence PFS nor OS.
Conclusion: Our translational investigation indicates that the efficacy of TTFields therapy in patients with GBM and primary GBM cell lines is not affected by the addition of Dex.
Highlights
• Consider tissue expanders for challenging DBS cases in PD patients with hardware erosion.
• Placement of tissue expander is essential in planning the reconstruction.
• MRI-compatibility of the tissue expander is paramount for shortening the total duration of anesthesia.
• Role of routine skin biopsies to identify PD patients at additional risk for developing scalp defects should be investigated.
Background: Epileptic seizures are common clinical features in patients with acute subdural hematoma (aSDH); however, diagnostic feasibility and therapeutic monitoring remain limited. Surface electroencephalography (EEG) is the major diagnostic tool for the detection of seizures but it might be not sensitive enough to detect all subclinical or nonconvulsive seizures or status epilepticus. Therefore, we have planned a clinical trial to evaluate a novel treatment modality by perioperatively implanting subdural EEG electrodes to diagnose seizures; we will then treat the seizures under therapeutic monitoring and analyze the clinical benefit.
Methods: In a prospective nonrandomized trial, we aim to include 110 patients with aSDH. Only patients undergoing surgical removal of aSDH will be included; one arm will be treated according to the guidelines of the Brain Trauma Foundation, while the other arm will additionally receive a subdural grid electrode. The study's primary outcome is the comparison of incidence of seizures and time-to-seizure between the interventional and control arms. Invasive therapeutic monitoring will guide treatment with antiseizure drugs (ASDs). The secondary outcome will be the functional outcome for both groups as assessed via the Glasgow Outcome Scale and modified Rankin Scale both at discharge and during 6 months of follow-up. The tertiary outcome will be the evaluation of chronic epilepsy within 2-4 years of follow-up.
Discussion: The implantation of a subdural EEG grid electrode in patients with aSDH is expected to be effective in diagnosing seizures in a timely manner, facilitating treatment with ASDs and monitoring of treatment success. Moreover, the occurrence of epileptiform discharges prior to the manifestation of seizure patterns could be evaluated in order to identify high-risk patients who might benefit from prophylactic treatment with ASDs.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier no. NCT04211233.
Propranolol as a potentially novel treatment of arteriovenous malformations: from bench to bedside
(2022)
Background: Propranolol is a non-selective blocker of the β-adrenergic receptor and has been used for treatment of proliferative infantile hemangiomas. The vasoconstrictive and antiangiogenic effects of propranolol led us to explore its potential application for the treatment of AVMs.
Methods: AVM tissue was cultured after surgical resection in the presence of 100μM propranolol or solvent DMSO. After incubation for 72 hours, tissue was harvested for testing. The expression levels of SDF1α, CXCR4, VEGF and HIF-1 was measured by rt-PCR. Furthermore, data of patients in 2 vascular centres harboring AVM was retrospectively interrogated for a time period of 20 years. The database included information about hemorrhage, AVM size and antihypertensive medication. Descriptive analyses were performed, focusing on the risk of hemorrhage, size of the lesion at presentation and clinical follow-up in patients on β-blocker medication versus those who were not.
Results: Among 483 patients, 73 (15%) were under β-blocker-treatment. 48% AVMs presented with hemorrhage at diagnosis. Patients under β-blocker-treatment had a lower risk of hemorrhage at the time of diagnosis in a univariate analysis (p<0,0001;OR13). Patients under β-blocker-treatment showed a significant higher chance for a lower Spetzler-Martin-grade ≤III (p<0,0001;OR6,5) and a lower risk for the presence of an associated aneurysm (p<0,0001;OR3,6).
Multivariate analysis including Spetzler-Martin-Grading, young age ≤50, presence of associated aneurysm and β-blocker-treatment showed reduced risk for hemorrhage under β-blocker-treatment (p<0,01,OR0,2).
The expression of CXCR4 was suppressed by propranolol most likely through the HIF-1-pathways. The gene-expression of vasculogenesis factors was decreased in with propranolol incubated AVMs.
Conclusion: β-Blocker medication seems to be associated with a decreased risk of AVM-related hemorrhage and AVM-size at presentation or during follow-up. Propranolol inhibits SDF1α-induced vasculogenesis by suppressing the expression of CXCR4 most likely through the HIF-1-pathways. Therefore, SDF1α/CXCR4 axis plays an important role in the vasculogenesis and migration of inflammatory cells in AVM lesions.
Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, decreased volumes of acute stroke admissions were reported. We aimed to examine whether subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) volumes demonstrated similar declines in our department. Furthermore, the impact of pandemic on disease progression should be analyzed.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective study in neurosurgical department of university hospital Frankfurt including patients with the diagnosis of aneurysmal SAH during the first year of COVID-pandemic. One year cumulative volume for SAH hospitalization procedures were compared to the one-year period before (03/2020–02/2021 versus 03/2019–02/2020) and the last 5 pre-COVID-pandemic years (2015-2020). All relevant patient characteristics concerning family history, disease history, clinical condition at admission, active/past COVID-infection, treatment management, complications and outcome were analyzed.
Results: There was a decline in SAH hospitalizations, with 84 admissions in the year immediately before and 56 admissions during the pandemic, without reaching a significance. No significant difference in analyzed patient characteristics including clinical condition at onset, treatment, complications and outcome, between 56 SAH patients admitted during COVID pandemic and treated patients in the last 5 years in pre-COVID period were found. Using a multivariable analysis, we detected young age (p<0.05;OR4,2) and no existence of early hydrocephalus (p<0.05;OR0,13) as important factors for a favorable outcome (mRS≤0-2) after aSAH during the COVID-pandemic. A past COVID-infection was detected in young patients suffering from aSAH (Age< 50years, p<0.05;OR10,5) with increased rate of cerebral vasospasm after SAH onset (p<0.05;OR26). Nevertheless, past COVID-infection did not reach a significance as a high risk factor for unfavorable outcome.
Conclusion: There was a relative decrease in the volume of SAH during the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite of extremely different conditions of hospitalization, there was no impairing significant effect on treatment and outcome of admitted SAH patients. A past COVID-infection seemed not to be a relevant limiting factor concerning favorable outcome.